A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data.

METHODS

Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs.

RESULTS

One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

Clinical Impact of Pelvic Malrotation on Radiograph-Based Preoperative Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept and Prudent Prediction of Acceptable Rotation

Introduction

Pelvic rotation (PR) on preoperative radiograph templating can affect various critical measured acetabular angles and potentially outcomes of successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Optimising anatomical reconstruction of the joint is essential to achieve function, longevity and prevention of complications following surgery. There is limited literature that standardises the degree of acceptable PR on radiograph or its effects on the fitting of acetabular prostheses.

Objective

This study aimed to develop a proof-of-concept that quantifies how PR can affect various acetabular angles used in pre-operative THA templating and to formulate a practicable method of determining if the preoperative PR is acceptable.

Materials and methods

Computerised tomography (CT) models from three control and two THA patients were generated and manipulated in various degrees of PR. CT slices were thickened to simulate radiographs and acetabular angles measured.

Results

The acetabular anteversion distance (AAD) and lateral opening angle (LOA) demonstrated a linear and quadratic relationship with good correlation (R 2 = 0.923, R 2 = 0.710 respectively, p < 0.0001) in relation to PR. Change in area of prosthesis (AOP) demonstrated a good linear correlation (r 2 = 0.774 and r 2 = 0.875, p < 0.0001) with PR. Two novel measurements were used to estimate the degree of PR from a pelvic radiograph; the horizontal distance between pubic symphysis and middle of sacrococcygeal joint (PSSC) and the simplified pelvic rotation ratio (SPRR). A strong correlation between PSSC and SPRR with change in PR was observed (R 2 = 0.970, R 2 = 0.953, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preliminary result suggests that an SPRR > 2.0 correlates to PR > 20° with potential to have a clinical impact on preoperative measurements.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

Background

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

Methods

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms ‘Lewinnek,’ ‘safe zone,’ and ‘total hip arthroplasty.’ Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

Results

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

Conclusions

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device

INTRODUCTION

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) relying on registration of the anterior pelvic plane (APP) allows precise acetabular component placement. We determined the variability of cup placement in patients who underwent THA with and without the use of CAS that does not rely on the registration of APP.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients who underwent staged-bilateral THAs, one without CAS (control), and a subsequent one with CAS (study group), were included. Acetabular inclination and anteversion were measured on standardized post-operative radiographs. Variance in cup position and Lewinnek's zone proportionality were compared between the groups. Multiple regressions were performed to identify factors affecting variability in acetabular component placement.

RESULTS

The mean inclination for the control and study group was 42.7° (SD 4.5) and 42.5° (SD 2.9), respectively. The inclination variance was 20.5° and 8.2° respectively (p = < 0.001). Cup inclination was more consistent in the study than in the control group (deviation from the mean: 2.3° vs. 3.8°, p < 0.001). The mean anteversion for the control and the study group was 25.5° (SD 7.4) and 26.8° (SD 4.3), respectively. The anteversion variance was 54.2° and 18.2° respectively (p = <0.001). Consistency in cup anteversion was significantly improved with CAS (deviation from the mean: 3.4° vs. 5.8°; p = 0.002). Lewinnek's zone proportionality was not affected by the use of  CAS. In the linear regression analysis, CAS significantly increased consistency in cup inclination (p = 0.01). Patient's factors including BMI and laterality affected consistency of cup placement.

CONCLUSION

CAS without referencing the APP allows a more consistent orientation of the acetabular component when compared to freehand placement.

Total hip arthroplasty with a monoblock conical stem and subtrochanteric transverse shortening osteotomy in Crowe type IV dysplastic hips

PURPOSE

This series assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with femoral shortening osteotomy for the management of patients with Crowe type IV hip dysplasia.

METHODS

Only patients with Crowe type IV hip dysplasia who underwent primary THA combined with a subtrochanteric transverse osteotomy with an uncemented monoblock conical stem were included. The clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed before and immediately after surgery, and at last follow-up. The hip function was assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS).

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (102 hips) with a mean age of 53.9 (range, 20-83) were evaluated at an average follow-up of 11.3 years (range, 5-25). Stem revision occurred in two (1.9%) cases, with a survivorship of 95.9% (95%IC, 91.9-99.9%) at ten years. The average HHS increased from 44 (range, 15-78) pre-operatively to 90.3 (range, 62-100) at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Osteotomy site non-union and early dislocation were observed in 3.9 and 3.8%, respectively. No cases of nerve palsy were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

THA with a monoblock conical stem associated with subtrochanteric transverse osteotomy provides good long-term survival, clinical and radiographic results. It may be considered an effective management of patients with Crowe IV hip dysplasia.