1
|
Giannicola G, Amura A, Prigent S, Zoccali C, Sessa P. Stress Shielding around Press-Fit Radial Head Arthroplasty: Proposal for a New Classification System Based on the Analysis of 97 Patients with a Mid-Term Follow-Up and a Review of the Literature. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:396. [PMID: 38338281 PMCID: PMC10855405 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Stress shielding (SS) around press-fit radial head arthroplasty (RHA) was recently reported as a cause of a new type of proximal radial neck resorption (PRNR). Very few studies have analyzed this phenomenon. No comprehensive classification is currently available. We thus decided to clinically and radiographically analyze 97 patients who underwent a press-fit RHA and who were followed up for a mean period of 72 months (range: 2-14 years). PRNR in the four quadrants of the radial neck was assessed. We designed a novel SS classification based on (1) the degree of resorption of the length of the radial neck and (2) the number of neck quadrants involved on the axial plane. The mean PRNR (mPRNR) was calculated as the mean resorption in the four quadrants. mPRNR was classified as mild (<3 mm), moderate (3 to 6 mm), and severe (>6 mm). Eighty-four percent of the patients presented PRNR. mPRNR was mild in 33% of the patients, moderate in 54%, and severe in 13%. In total, 6% of the patients with mild mPRNR displayed resorption in one quadrant, 18% displayed resorption in two quadrants, 4% displayed resorption in three quadrants, and 72% displayed resorption in four quadrants. All four quadrants were always involved in moderate or severe mPRNR, with no significant differences being detected between quadrants (p = 0.568). mPRNR has no apparent effect on the clinical results, complications, or RHA survival in the medium term. However, longer-term studies are needed to determine the effects of varying degrees of PRNR on implant failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Giannicola
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 3, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (S.P.); (C.Z.)
| | - Andrea Amura
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 3, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (S.P.); (C.Z.)
| | - Sebastien Prigent
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 3, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (S.P.); (C.Z.)
| | - Carmine Zoccali
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 3, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (S.P.); (C.Z.)
| | - Pasquale Sessa
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, A.O. San Camillo-Forlanini, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00100 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luenam S, Kosiyatrakul A, Charoenlap C, Puncreobutr C, Lohwongwatana B. Radial head replacement with the 3D-printed patient-specific titanium prosthesis: Preliminary results of a multi-centric prospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2024; 32:10225536241236806. [PMID: 38430070 DOI: 10.1177/10225536241236806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report preliminary clinical results and safety of 3D-printed patient-specific titanium radial head (RH) prosthesis in treatment of the irreparable RH fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS This multi-centric prospective study included 10 patients (6 men and four women, mean age 41 years (range, 25-64 years)). Three cases were classified as Mason type III and 7 cases as type IV. Patients were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiology imaging, and laboratory blood and urine testing were evaluated. RESULTS The prostheses were implanted utilizing cemented stems in 5 patients and cementless stems in 5 patients. Intraoperatively, well congruency of a prosthesis with capitellum and radial notch of ulna was observed in all cases. All patients had improvement of ROM, VAS score, DASH score, and MEPS during the postoperative follow-ups. At the final follow-up, mean elbow extension was 6.5° (range, 0°-30°), flexion 145° (range, 125°-150°), supination 79° (range, 70°-80°), and pronation 73.5° (range, 45°-80°). Mean VAS score was 0.3 (range, 0-3), DASH score was 12.35 (range, 1.7-23.3), and MEPS was 99.5 (range, 95-100). Postoperative radiographs demonstrated heterotopic ossification in 2 cases, periprosthetic radiolucency in 2 cases, and proximal radial neck resorption in 2 cases. No one had the evidence of capitellar erosion, implant failure, malpositioning, overstuffing, or symptomatic stem loosening. There was no significant alteration of laboratory results or adverse events related to the 3D-printed prosthesis implantation. CONCLUSION The preliminary results demonstrated that implantation of the 3D-printed patient-specific titanium RH prosthesis is safe and may be a potential treatment option for irreparable RH fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suriya Luenam
- Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Arkaphat Kosiyatrakul
- Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chris Charoenlap
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chedtha Puncreobutr
- Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Boonrat Lohwongwatana
- Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Antoni M, Bruyere A, Meyer N, Clavert P. Radial neck osteolysis after radial head replacement: Functional impact and risk factors. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2023; 109:103291. [PMID: 35470120 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Onset of radial neck osteolysis (RNO) has been reported after radial head replacement (RHR), but data are sparse regarding impact and risk factors. We therefore conducted a retrospective study, 1) to quantify RNO after RHR, 2) to assess clinical and radiological impact, and 3) to identify risk factors. HYPOTHESIS RNO prevalence is high, but functional impact is limited. MATERIAL AND METHOD A single-center retrospective study included all patients undergoing RHR for acute radial head fracture between 2008 and 2017: 53 patients, with a mean age of 53.8±15.7 years [range, 21-85 years]. At a minimum 2 years' follow-up, patients were assessed clinically on joint range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and radiologically on standard radiographs. Associations between RNO and various parameters were assessed. RESULTS At a mean 46.7±19.8 months' follow-up [range, 24-84 months], RNO was found in 54.7% of cases (29/53), with mean 4.0 ±2.8mm distal extension [range, 1.2-13.4mm], corresponding to 13.4±7.3% of stem height [range, 2.7-27.7%]. RNO at last follow-up was not significantly associated with reduced flexion-extension (121.9° versus 114.0°; p=0.11), pronation-supination (152.6° versus 138.3°; p=0.25) or MEPS (84.7 versus 84.8; p=0.97), or with higher rates of postoperative complications (11/29 (37.9%) versus 7/24 (29.2%); p=0.782) or surgical revision (11/29 (37.9%) versus 10/24 (41.7%); p=0.503). RNO was significantly associated with cementless fixation (19/29 (65.5%) versus 7/24 (29.2%); p=0.01), unipolar prosthesis (21/29 (72.4%) versus 7/24 (29.2%); p=0.002), high filling-ratio, whether proximal (88% versus 77%; p=0.002), middle (84% versus 75%; p=0.007) or distal (69% versus 59%; p=0.032), and shorter radial stem (33.2mm versus 46.3mm; p=0.011). No demographic parameters showed significant association with RNO at last follow-up. CONCLUSION RNO was frequent after RHR, but without clinical or radiological impact in the present series. The risk factors identified here argue for involvement of stress shielding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Antoni
- Service de Chirurgie du Membre Supérieur, Pôle de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie, Hôpital Hautepierre 2 - CHU Strasbourg, Avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Alexandra Bruyere
- Service de Chirurgie du Membre Supérieur, Pôle de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie, Hôpital Hautepierre 2 - CHU Strasbourg, Avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Meyer
- Pole de Santé Publique, Secteur Méthodologie et Biostatistiques, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Clavert
- Service de Chirurgie du Membre Supérieur, Pôle de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie, Hôpital Hautepierre 2 - CHU Strasbourg, Avenue Molière, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Corbaz J, Barimani B, Vauclair F. Early aseptic loosening of a press-fit radial head prosthesis - A case series of 6 patients. J Int Med Res 2023; 51:3000605221135881. [PMID: 37082909 PMCID: PMC10126620 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221135881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is the principal treatment option for comminuted radial head (RH) fractures. Here, we present six cases of failed RHA using a modular monopolar press-fit RHA that was subsequently withdrawn from the market because it was associated with a high incidence of loosening. METHODS We retrospectively collected data from six patients who had received Radial Head Prothesis SystemTM at our centre between July 2015 and June 2016. The average follow-up was 40 months. RESULTS Aseptic loosening of the stem affected five (83%) of the six RHA. Four of these were symptomatic and RHA removal was performed. For these patients, the pain subsided and their elbow range of motion (ROM) improved. CONCLUSION While the ideal design for an RHA is still debatable, RHA is an efficient treatment option that restores elbow stability and function after a comminuted RH fracture. Importantly, removal of the prosthesis is an effective remedy following RHA associated elbow pain and decreased ROM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Corbaz
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - B Barimani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - F Vauclair
- Bone and Motion Center - Hirslanden, 1006 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heifner JJ, Kolovich GP, Bolano LE, Sibley PA, Gonzalez GA, Mercer DM. Revision of Failed Radial Head Arthroplasty. Hand (N Y) 2023:15589447231151434. [PMID: 36752100 DOI: 10.1177/15589447231151434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be indicated in cases of prosthesis loosening and malposition. Inherent difficulties in revision surgery include poor bone stock and disrupted soft tissue envelope. Although cases of RHA used for revision of failed RHA are rare, there is reasonable expectation for increasing frequency of these cases due to the increasing incidence of primary RHA. Furthermore, there is an increasing demand for postoperative recovery of function; thus, surgeons may consider revising a failed RHA to a new RHA. We report on series of failed RHA which were revised to a new radial head prosthesis. METHODS A retrospective review was performed at multiple institutions for a single radial head prosthesis used for revision of a failed radial head prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS Across 11 patients at a mean follow-up of 45.1 months, the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 81.7; mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 24.4; and mean Visual Analog Scale for pain was 0.6. Radiographic analysis yielded no evidence of capitellar wear or stem loosening. CONCLUSION A radial head prosthesis can produce satisfactory results when used for revision of a failed prosthesis. Inherent difficulties in revision surgery include the potential for reduced bone stock and a disrupted soft tissue envelope. Elements of prosthesis design which may contribute to effectively managing revision surgery include a long stem with in-growth surface and prosthetic head alignment to the axis of forearm rotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Heifner
- St. George's University School of Medicine, Great River, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Paul A Sibley
- Lehigh Valley Orthopedic Institute, Allentown, PA, USA
| | | | - Deana M Mercer
- University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang G, Li S, Zhang H, Lu Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis on different stem fixation methods of radial head prostheses during long-term follow-up. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:1041531. [PMID: 36394008 PMCID: PMC9663814 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1041531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is typically performed for non-reconstructible radial head fractures with or without valgus stability. The fixation methods can be divided into cemented rigid fixation, such as screw fixation, and uncemented micromovement fixation, including smooth stem, press-fit, expanded device, in-growth stem, and grit-blasted stem fixations. Different fixation methods may impact long-term clinical outcomes and cause complications. This study aimed to compare the long-term follow-up outcomes of cemented and uncemented radial head prostheses. Methods: A computerized literature search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for studies on radial head prostheses, replacement, and arthroplasty published from inception to April 2022. The prostheses fixation method was divided into cemented and uncemented fixation groups. The outcomes of interest included the participant characteristics, prostheses types, clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and complication rates during long-term follow-up. Results: A total of 57 studies involving 2050 patients who underwent RHA were included in our analysis. Cemented fixation was used in 23 of these studies, uncemented fixation in 35 studies, and both cemented and uncemented fixations in one study. Both fixation groups showed significantly improved clinical outcomes after treatment. In particular, both the reoperation and complication rates were lower in the uncemented fixation group (12% and 22%, respectively) than that in the cemented fixation group (20% and 29%, respectively). Among the studies, uncemented monopolar fixation had the lowest reoperation rate (14%), while cemented monopolar fixation had the highest reoperation rate (36%). Regarding complication rates, uncemented bipolar fixation yielded the lowest rate (12%), while cemented bipolar fixation yielded the highest rate (34%). The range of motion and clinical outcome scores were good in both groups. Conclusion: Uncemented radial head prostheses had lower reoperation and complication rates than cemented prostheses. In particular, uncemented monopolar prostheses may yield the lowest reoperation rate, while uncemented bipolar prostheses may yield the lowest overall complication rate.
Collapse
|
7
|
Schnetzke M, Jung MK, Groetzner-Schmidt C, Tross AK, Porschke F, Grützner PA, Guehring T, Nolte PC. Long-term outcome and survival rate of monopolar radial head replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:e361-e369. [PMID: 33484832 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purposes of this study were (1) to report functional outcomes; (2) to assess complications, revisions, and survival rate; and (3) to assess differences in functional outcomes between removed and retained radial head arthroplasties (RHAs), early and delayed treatment, and type of RHA used at long-term follow-up after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible radial head fractures or their sequelae. METHODS Seventy-eight patients (mean age, 59.2 years) who were at least 6 years postoperatively after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible RHFs or their sequelae were included. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score; visual analog scale; postoperative satisfaction (1-6, 6 = highly unsatisfied); range of motion; complications; and revisions were assessed. Radiographic findings were reported. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Subgroups (RHA type, early vs. delayed surgery, RHA removed vs. retained) were compared. RESULTS At a median clinical follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 6.0-28.4 years), median MEPS was 80.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60.0-97.5), median QuickDASH was 22.0 (IQR: 4.6-42.6), median visual analog scale was 1 (IQR: 0-4), median postoperative satisfaction was 2 (IQR: 1-3), and median arc of extension/flexion was 110° (IQR: 80°-130°). Radiographic follow-up was available for 48 patients at a median of 7.0 years (range: 2.0-15.0 years). Heterotopic ossifications were seen in 14 (29.2%), moderate-to-severe capitellar osteopenia/abrasion in 3 (6.1%), moderate-to-severe ulnohumeral degeneration in 3 (6.1%), and periprosthetic radiolucencies in 17 (35.4%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (37.2%) had complications and 20 patients (25.6%) underwent RHA exchange or removal. Kaplan-Meier analysis with failure defined as RHA exchange or removal demonstrated survival of 75.1% (95% confidence interval: 63.7-83.3) at 18 years. The highest annual failure rate was observed in the first year in which the RHAs of 7 patients (9%) were exchanged or removed. No significant differences were detected between type of RHA in MEPS (Mathys: 82.5 [75.0-100] vs. Evolve: 80.0 [60.0-95.0]; P = .341) and QuickDASH (Mathys: 12.5 [0-34.4] vs. Evolve: 26.7 [6.9-46.2]; P = .112). Early surgery (≤3 weeks) yielded significantly superior MEPS (80.0 [70.0-100.0] vs. 52.5 [30.0-83.8]; P = .014) and QuickDASH (18.6 [1.5-32.6] vs. 46.2 [31.5-75.6]; P = .002) compared with delayed surgery (>3 weeks). Patients with retained RHAs had significantly better MEPS (80.0 [67.5-100] vs. 70.0 [32.5-82.5]; P = .016) and QuickDASH (18.1 [1.7-31.9] vs. 49.1 [22.1-73.8]; P = .007) compared with patients with removed RHAs. CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcomes for RHA are satisfactory; however, there is a high complication and revision rate, resulting in implant survival of 75.1% at 18 years with the highest annual failure rate observed in the first postoperative year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Schnetzke
- Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany; German Joint Centre, ATOS Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias K Jung
- Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany
| | - Corinna Groetzner-Schmidt
- Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany
| | - Anna-K Tross
- Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Porschke
- Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany
| | - Paul A Grützner
- Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany
| | - Thorsten Guehring
- Department for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Arcus Clinic Pforzheim, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Philip-Christian Nolte
- Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen on the Rhine, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mid-term clinical outcome comparison of long-stemmed monopolar osseointegrated and short-stemmed bipolar radial head prostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141:823-830. [PMID: 32720000 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03534-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comparative data to guide implant choice for radial head replacements are lacking. Here, we compared the clinical results achieved using two different types of radial head prostheses. METHODS Data from patients with comminuted radial head fractures (n = 66), who underwent radial head arthroplasty with either short-stemmed bipolar (n = 31, Group 1: rHead Small Bone Innovations/USA) or monopolar long-stemmed osseointegrated rigidly fixed (n = 35, Group 2: MoPyC Tornier/France) prostheses, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed-up for an average of 42 months (16-64 months). Range of elbow motion, elbow stability, grip strength, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain were measured, and functional outcome assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and the Broberg-Morrey Score. Complications were analyzed and revision surgeries recorded. RESULTS Most patients achieved good/excellent results for all assessed outcome variables, with no significant differences between the two implant groups; however, regardless of the prosthesis type, a mean extension deficit of 18.5° ± 1.7° remained at latest follow-up. Although complication and surgical revision rates were comparable (bipolar, 23%; monopolar, 18%), significantly more bipolar prostheses were explanted because of painful loosening (16% vs. 3%; p = 0.029). CONCLUSION Good to excellent mid-term results for radial head arthroplasty of comminuted radial head fractures can be achieved using both a bipolar and a monopolar radial head implant; however, the monopolar implant may be preferable, as it had a lower rate of painful loosening. Extension deficit occurs regularly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III Retrospective comparative treatment study.
Collapse
|
9
|
Montbarbon B, Letissier H, Dubrana F, Le Nen D, Di Francia R. The Radial Floating Cup radial head prosthesis to treat radial head fractures: functional and radiographic results after more than 12 years of mean follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141:813-821. [PMID: 32712821 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03559-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of patients presenting with a radial head fracture who were treated surgically with a Judet Radial Floating Cup 2 (RFC 2) radial head prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective, monocentric, observational, multi-operator, and continuous study performed between July 1997 and June 2009 on the treatment of radial head fracture using an RFC 2 radial head prosthesis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the functional status of the operated elbow, evaluated using the Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (Quick-DASH) score and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). The secondary endpoints were mobility and stability of the operated elbow, residual pain and grip strength, nature and rate of complications, as well as possible radiographic abnormalities during follow-up. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were treated with the RFC 2 for radial head fractures over the study period. Three (13.6%) were lost to follow-up, including one death. Of the remaining 19 patients, three RFCs had to be removed (15.8%). The final analysis involved 16 patients. The mean follow-up was 144 months (range 109-225 months; standard deviation [SD] = 49.9 months) or 12 years. The average Quick-DASH score was 23.01/100 (range 0-50; SD = 7.8) and three cases were rated as having "excellent" results according to the MEPI (18.7%), nine cases were rated as having "good" results in (56.2%), and four cases were rated as having "average" results (25%). The average mobility values were: 132° of flexion (range 120°-150°; SD = 11), 14.5° of extension deficit (range 0°-40°; SD = 5), 84.4° of pronation (range 20°-90°; SD = 8°), and 67.7° of supination (range 25°-85°; SD = 10). All patients had a stable elbow. The average grip strength on the affected side thus corresponded to 79% (range 44-100%; SD = 8.3%) of the grip strength on the healthy side. Four patients (25%) developed complications: three cases of algodystrophic syndrome (18.7%) and one case of early dislocation (6.2%). Radiographic evaluation revealed that there was a periprosthetic radio-lucencies in eight patients (50%), periarticular ossifications in 12 patients (75%), and lysis of the capitulum in two patients. There was no significant difference in MEPI ratings between patients with and without a periprosthetic radio-lucencies (P = 0.8018). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicated that using the RFC 2 prosthesis to surgically treat radial head fractures provides good long-term functional results, including satisfactory mobility and stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hoel Letissier
- Service de Traumatologie, CHRU Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
| | | | | | - Rémi Di Francia
- Service de Traumatologie, CHRU Cavale Blanche, Brest, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
RADIAL head arthroplasty: does ligaments repair influence outcomes? A minimum two years follow-up radiographic multi-center study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2021; 32:405-411. [PMID: 33895897 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02979-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The current indication for comminuted radial head fractures is radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The main purpose of this study was to investigate any statistical differences in terms of prosthesis revision or removal and radiographic degenerative changes by comparing patients who underwent RHA and ligaments repair to those who underwent only RHA implant at minimum two years follow-up. The secondary aim was to delineate a trend profile of RHA implants. METHODS All patients who underwent RHA surgery for traumatic pathology between January 2012 and December 2017 were eligible. Two researchers independently and retrospectively reviewed the patients' charts and collected the following data: type of prosthesis, associated surgical procedures and revision surgery. They also looked for any radiographic sign of prosthesis loosening, overstuffing, capitellar osteopenia, heterotopic ossification and degenerative changes. No clinical evaluation was performed. RESULTS In 6 years, 124 RHA were implanted (74 female, 50 male, mean age 56). The main diagnoses were: terrible triad, trans-olecranon fracture and isolated radial head fracture. It was found no significant statistical difference between the 2 groups; nevertheless, the cohort of patients that underwent ligaments repair had a lower revision rate in comparison with the other. Suture of the annular ligament seems to be critical. The overall revision rate was 10.5%. CONCLUSION This multi-center study found no evidence that ligaments repair, as an associated surgical procedure, improves RHA longevity, except for annular ligament. Nevertheless, it seems to prevent degenerative changes at midterm follow-up.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lobo-Escolar L, Abellán-Miralles C, Escolà-Benet A. Outcomes of press-fit radial head arthroplasty following complex radial head fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102645. [PMID: 32768276 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Press-fit radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is increasingly popular in treating complex radial head fractures. This study assessed the outcome of RHA, including the outcome following re-operation, and explored potentially influencing factors. HYPOTHESIS Complex radial head fractures treated with press-fit radial head prosthesis would have a favourable outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data on all consecutive patients treated with anatomic press-fit RHA from February 2002 to February 2015 were analysed. Post-surgery clinical and X-rays assessments included a post-discharge evaluation of function. Standardised methods implemented include the assessment of range of motion (ROM), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and subjective satisfaction scales. RESULTS Forty-five patients were recruited and 71% were classified in Mason IV and 62.2% had the "terrible triad". Re-operation was performed in 26.7% and prosthesis removal in 15.6%. Mean follow-up was 140.8 months (95% CI 117.7-164) and prosthesis survival was 69.5% at 24 months. Mean MEPS before re-operations was 86.3±15.9. Pain and/or instability were the most common reasons for re-operation, and re-operations were significantly more frequent in patients having one or more "associated injuries" (p=0.05), but not the terrible triad; and in patients with radiological "loosening" signs (p<0.01). Subjective scores were relatively good in most patients, although the functionality perceived in the re-operation with implant removal group was rather low. DISCUSSION Several studies of complex radial head fractures treated with press-fit radial head prosthesis have also shown favourable results, but the patients in such studies generally had less severe lesions. Moreover, differently from previous reports, this study with a long follow-up has included a younger population with high functionality requirements. Pain and/or instability, as observed in several previous reports, were the most common reasons for re-operation, but contrary to the expectation, the terrible triad was not associated with unfavourable outcome. CONCLUSION Treatment of complex fractures with press-fit radial head prosthesis, including re-operation with implant removal yields satisfactory results. Most scores of functional and subjective outcome improved following the re-intervention and most patients returned to their usual occupation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; case series; treatment study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lobo-Escolar
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Asepeyo Sant Cugat, Sant Cugat, Barcelona, Spain; Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - César Abellán-Miralles
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Asepeyo Sant Cugat, Sant Cugat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Escolà-Benet
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery, Hospital Universitario General de Cataluña, Sant Cugat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laumonerie P, Raad M, Tibbo ME, Kerezoudis P, Bonnevialle N, Mansat P. Midterm outcomes of 146 EVOLVE Proline modular radial head prostheses: a systematic review. Shoulder Elbow 2021; 13:205-212. [PMID: 33897852 PMCID: PMC8039765 DOI: 10.1177/1758573219850111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The EVOLVE implant (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) is a modular loose-fitting radial head prosthesis. The primary objective was to synthesize all available literature investigating the midterm clinical outcomes of the EVOLVE implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic literature search in Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was performed querying for studies published in 2000-2017. Articles describing clinical and radiographical outcomes as well as reoperation were included. Outcomes of interest included range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand, radiographic outcome, and reason for reoperation. RESULTS A total of five articles consisting of 146 patients with EVOLVE implants were included. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range 22-84), and 43.8% were males (n = 64). Mean follow-up was 4.8 years (range 1-14). Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score were 87.6 (range 30-100) and 18.9 (range 0-82), respectively. Midterm clinical results were good or excellent (Mayo Elbow Performance Score > 74) in 94 patients. Reoperation was observed in 12 patients, with implant revision required in 2 patients. The primary reason for reoperation was persistent stiffness (n = 9). CONCLUSION Midterm outcomes of EVOLVE radial head prosthesis are satisfactory, and associated complication rates are low. Loose-fit implant method appears to be a reliable approach to avoid failure of radial head prosthesis by painful loosening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Laumonerie
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France,Pierre Laumonerie, Department of Orthopedic
Surgery, Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Place du Docteur
Baylac, Toulouse, 31059, France
| | - Maroun Raad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France
| | - Meagan E Tibbo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Bonnevialle
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Mansat
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
Institut Locomoteur, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moon JG, Shukla DR, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O'Driscoll SW. Stem Length and Neck Resection on Fixation Strength of Press-Fit Radial Head Prosthesis: An In Vitro Model. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44:1098.e1-1098.e8. [PMID: 31101434 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Various radial head prosthesis designs are currently in use. Few studies compare different prosthetic designs. We hypothesized that increasing a cementless implant stem's length would reduce stem-bone micromotion, with both short and long neck cuts. We also hypothesized that a minimum stem length might be required for the initial fixation strength of a press-fit implant. METHODS In 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows (8 pairs), the radial head and neck were cut either 10 or 21 mm below the top of the head. Modular cementless stems were inserted and sequentially lengthened in 5-mm increments. Micromotion under eccentric loading was tested after each incremental change. RESULTS Incremental lengthening of the prosthetic stem and the amount of neck resection (10-mm cut vs 21-mm cut) both had a significant effect on micromotion. After a 10-mm radial head-neck resection, we observed a significant decrease in micromotion with stem lengths of 25 mm or greater, whereas with 21 mm of neck resection there was no further reduction in micromotion with increased stem length. These differences can be explained, at least in part, by the concept of the cantilever quotient: the ratio of the head-neck length outside the bone to the total length of the implant. CONCLUSIONS The length of the stem affects the initial stability of press-fit radial head prostheses when the level of head and neck resection is at the minimum (ie, 10 mm) for currently available prosthetic designs. At this resection level, stems 25 mm or greater had significantly higher initial stability, but all stem lengths tested had mean micromotion values within the threshold for bone ingrowth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The length of a radial head prosthetic stem affects the initial stability of press-fit radial head prostheses when the level of head and neck resection is at the minimum (ie, 10 mm) for currently available prosthetic designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Gyu Moon
- Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dave R Shukla
- Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - James S Fitzsimmons
- Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kai-Nan An
- Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Complications after radial head arthroplasty: a comparison between short-stemmed bipolar and monopolar long-stemmed osteointegrative rigidly fixed prostheses. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2018; 43:1917-1925. [PMID: 30267243 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4173-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, only a few studies have compared radial head prostheses (RHP) and their different anchoring principles. The aim of this study was to characterize concomitant injuries, necessary adjuvant procedures, complications, and radiological findings after implantation of two different types of RHP. METHODS Sixty-six patients with radial head fractures were treated with MoPyC (Tornier/France, 50 mm stem, monopolar) or SBI rHead prostheses (Small Bone Innovations/USA, 22-mm stem, bipolar) and followed up over 42 months (16-64 months). Primary objective was the detection of different loosening and explantation rates. In addition to the revision rate and the reasons for revision, we also used radiological findings to assess the dynamics of lysis phenomena. RESULTS Thirty-five patients (mean age 48 years; 22-73 years) were treated with the MoPyC, and 31 patients (mean age 47 years, 19-69 years) with the rHead prosthesis. Of these, 98% had a Mason 3 or 4 type of radial head fracture, and 94% showed concomitant injuries, which were addressed in 89% of cases by adjuvant procedures. The surgical revision rate was 20% (rHead 23%; MoPyC 18%). Significantly more of the rHead prostheses had to be explanted compared to MoPyC prostheses because of painful loosening (16% vs. 3%; p = 0.029). Predictors of subsequent loosening were significant radiolucent lines in the RHP over the first six months and an increase in width by two and a half times within the first 50 days after implantation. CONCLUSION Complex radial head fractures are frequent and difficult to treat. The monopolar long-stemmed prosthesis showed significantly lower rates of painful loosening and explanation rates than the bipolar short-stemmed prosthesis.
Collapse
|
15
|
Laumonerie P, Tibbo ME, Reina N, Pham TT, Bonnevialle N, Mansat P. Radial head arthroplasty: a historical perspective. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2018; 43:1643-1651. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4082-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|