Evaluation of risk factors for stiffness after distal humerus plating

Risk factors for dysfunctional elbow stiffness following operative fixation of distal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Elbow stiffness is 1 of the most common complications after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures; however, there is relatively limited literature assessing which factors are associated with this problem. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors associated with dysfunctional elbow stiffness in distal humerus fractures after operative fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all distal humerus fractures that underwent operative fixation (AO/OTA 13A-C) at a single level 1 trauma center from November 2014 to October 2021. A minimum 6-month follow-up was required for inclusion or the outcome of interest. Dysfunctional elbow stiffness was defined as a flexion-extension arc of less than 100° at latest follow-up or any patient requiring surgical treatment for limited elbow range of motion.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients with distal humerus fractures were included in the study: 54 patients comprised the elbow stiffness group and 56 patients were in the control group. Average follow-up of 343 (59 to 2079) days. Multiple logistic regression showed that orthogonal plate configuration (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91-16.99, P = .002), and longer operative time (aOR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.11-3.10, P = .017) were independently associated with an increased odds of elbow stiffness. OTA/AO 13A type fractures were significantly associated with a decreased odds of stiffness (aOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.80, P = .026). Among 13C fractures, olecranon osteotomy (aOR: 5.48, 95% CI: 1.08-27.73, P = .040) was also associated with an increased odds of elbow stiffness. There were no significant differences in injury mechanism, Gustilo-Anderson classification, reduction quality, days to surgery from admission, type of fixation, as well as rates of ipsilateral upper extremity fracture, neurovascular injury, nonunion, or infection between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Dysfunctional elbow stiffness was observed in 49.1% of patients who underwent operative fixation of distal humerus fractures in the present study. Orthogonal plate configuration, olecranon osteotomy, and longer operative time were associated with increased odds of dysfunctional elbow stiffness; however, 13A type fractures were associated with decreased odds of stiffness. Patients with these injuries should be counseled on their risk of stiffness following surgery and modifiable risk factors like plate positioning and performing an olecranon osteotomy should be considered by surgeons.

Clinical comparison of double-plate fixation by the perpendicular plate method versus parallel plate method for distal humeral fracture: a multicenter (TRON group) study

INTRODUCTION

Double-plating methods are popular, with perpendicular and parallel plate methods being widely used surgical method for the rigid fixation of distal humeral fracture (DHF). However, which plate method is better for DHF remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes including the incidences of complications and reoperation between the two plate methods.

METHODS

We extracted 383 patients with DHF undergoing surgery between 2011 and 2020 from our multicenter database, which is named TRON. We divided the subjects into two groups: perpendicular plating group (Group A) and parallel plating group (Group B). To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, patients were matched for age, sex, olecranon osteotomy, AO type, and type of injury. We assessed the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at 3 and 6 months and the last follow-up month as the clinical outcome. We investigated the incidences of complications and reoperations in both groups.

RESULTS

After matching, each group comprised 50 patients. There was no significant difference between Group A versus Group B in MEPS score at each time point. The incidence of implant removal in Group B was higher than that in Group A (26.5% vs 50%, p = 0.023).

DISCUSSION

Although there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complications between the two groups, the incidence of implant removal was higher in Group B than in Group A. In the parallel plate technique, where the plates have to be placed in areas with thin subcutaneous soft tissue, the incidence of implant removal might be high due to the discomfort caused by the implant.

Comparison of olecranon osteotomy and paratricipital approach in distal humerus intra-articular fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical outcomes of the paratricipital approach (PT) and olecranon osteotomy (OO) for the treatment of distal humerus intra-articular fracture have been reported. However, there is no consensus regarding which approach is better in terms of functional outcomes and complications. This study aimed to compare the operation time, functional outcomes, and complications of OO and PT.

METHODS

The databases of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before June 1, 2021. We performed synthetic analysis of the operation time, functional outcomes, and incidence of complication after the conduct of OO group or PT group in patients with distal humerus intra-articular fractures.

RESULTS

Five studies were included representing a total of 243 patients who underwent surgery for distal humerus intra-articular fractures. A pooled analysis showed that there was a longer operation time in the OO group compared with the PT group (mean difference [MD] = 13.32, 95% CI: 3.78-22.87; P = .006). There was no significant difference between the functional outcomes of the OO and PT groups (elbow flexion: MD = 2.4, 95% CI: -0.82 to 5.79, P = .14; elbow extension: MD = 0.36, 95% CI: -2.20 to 2.92, P = .78; elbow arc of motion: MD = 0.40, 95% CI: -4.05 to 4.84, P = .86; Mayo Elbow Performance score: MD = -1.37, 95% CI: -4.73 to 1.98, P = .42). The incidence of infection was significantly higher in the OO group compared with that of the PT group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.82, 95% CI: 1.03-14.16, P = .04). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of the heterotopic ossification and ulnar neuropathy (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 0.51-6.71, P = .35 and OR = 2.74, 95% CI: 0.60-12.48, P = .19, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the choice of surgical approach does not influence outcomes, surgeons can base their choice of approach on the basis of their own experience and familiarity with the procedure and the need to visualize the entire articular surface in complex intra-articular fracture patterns.

Sequence of Fixing Fractures Involving all the Three Major Joints of the Upper Limb: A Case Report

A 29-year-old lady accidentally fell from the first floor at home, sustained multiple fractures all on the left side which were the proximal humerus fracture, inter-condylar distal humerus fracture, intra-articular distal end radius fracture, and acetabulum fracture. She was actively managed following Advance Trauma life Support (ATLS) protocol and once stabilised was operated in a stage-wise manner for all the fractures. This case report is about the unusual presentation of multiple fractures involving all the three ipsilateral major joints of the upper limb in an adult following a fall from a height and highlights the uniqueness of the fracture's presentation and effective surgical management for better outcomes and rehabilitation.

Analysis of Factors Affecting Return to Work After Surgical Treatment in Patients with AO Type C Distal Humerus Fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional results of distal humerus fractures which were treated by open reduction and fixation with pre-contoured angular stable plates in young patients, and investigate whether the patients could return to their pre-injury work and patients' financial conditions while they were not working.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 48 patients, ages between 18 and 55 years, working in a job and having AO/OTA type C distal humerus fracture were retrospectively evaluated. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to determine functional results. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated to determine the rate of union, degenerative changes, malunion and heterotopic ossification. Financial outcome form was constituted by the authors and the patients asked whether she/he could return to their pre-injury works after treatment finished and the financial status of the patients during the treatment and after the treatment.

RESULTS

The mean flexion-extension arc was 114° ± 12°(range 85°-135°) and the mean MEPS score was 85 ± 11(range 65-100). The average time to return to work was 6.5 ± 2.4 months (3-12 months). AO type C2 and C3 fractures and heterotopic ossification negatively affected the functional results and also adversely affected the patients' return to their pre-injury works. 38 (79%) patients returned to pre-injury work and 29 (76%) of them started to work at the same position before the fracture occured. Nine of 38 patients (24%) had to change their positions. Among the 48 patients, 10 patients (21%) could not return to the same work, 7 of them found light duty and 3 of them had not been to work.

CONCLUSION

Although the functional results of surgical treatment of intra-articular distal humerus fractures are good, at the end of the treatment, especially heavy workers may have difficulties in returning to their former works.

Correlation between modified trochleocapitellar index and post-traumatic elbow stiffness in type C2-3 distal humeral fractures among adults

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to propose the modified trochleocapitellar index (mTCI), assess its reliability, and evaluate its correlation with post-traumatic elbow stiffness in type C2-3 distal humeral fractures among adults.

METHODS

From January 2013 to June 2017, a total of 141 patients with type C2-3 distal humeral fractures were included. The mTCI was calculated as the ratio between the modified trochlear and capitellar angles relative to the humeral axis (mTCI-HA), lateral humeral line (mTCI-LHL), and medial humeral line (mTCI-MHL) from anteroposterior radiographs taken immediately after the operation. The patients were divided into group A (with elbow stiffness) and group B (without elbow stiffness) based on follow-up results. To determine risk factors for elbow stiffness, univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed on each radiographic parameter separately, together with other clinical variables. Interrater reliability was assessed for all measurements.

RESULTS

Specific optimal ranges of value were identified for mTCI-HA (0.750-0.875), mTCI-LHL (0.640-1.060), and mTCI-MHL (0.740-0.900), beyond which the likelihood of elbow stiffness significantly increased (P < .001). By multivariate analysis, mTCI-HA (odds ratio [OR] 26.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.39-203.07, P = .002), mTCI-LHL (OR 5.37, 95% CI 2.17-13.28, P < .001), and mTCI-MHL (OR 5.95, 95% CI 1.91-18.56, P = .002) values beyond the optimal ranges were identified as the independent risk factors for elbow stiffness. The interrater reliability of mTCI-HA, mTCI-LHL, and mTCI-MHL was 0.986, 0.983, and 0.987, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The mTCI measurement method is reliable. Either too small or too large mTCI values were associated with post-traumatic elbow stiffness among adult patients with type C2-3 distal humeral fractures. The mTCI-HA showed a better predictive value than mTCI-LHL and mTCI-MHL.

Clinical outcome of AO/OTA type C fracture of the distal humerus using the expanded paratricipital approach and cadaveric comparison of the exposure of the paratricipital and expanded paratricipital approaches to the distal humerus

BACKGROUND

We investigated the overall clinical outcome of the expanded paratricipital approach in complex articular fractures of the distal humerus and the effect of lack of visualization in the surgical field. In addition, we performed a cadaveric study to investigate the expansion or limitation of articular access in the expanded paratricipital approach.

METHODS

Forty-one AO/OTA type 13C fracture cases treated using the expanded paratricipital approach at a single trauma center from 2013 to 2017 were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the overall clinical outcome and analyzed the effect of lack of visualization in the surgical field with the expanded paratricipital approach by comparing outcomes between 2 groups classified by the location of the main articular fracture (group 1, limited visualization; group 2, without limited visualization). The length of inaccessible and accessible articular segments were analyzed using 40 matched-pair elbows.

RESULTS

The average duration of follow-up was 15.1 months. All fractures (type C1 in 11 cases, type C2 in 21, and type C3 in 9) were radiologically healed at 3.2 months after surgery. No cases required additional surgery because of implant irritation. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 90.5. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 18.5. Among the 41 cases, the limited visualization group (group 1, n = 21) had a longer surgical time and higher percentage of nonanatomic reduction than group 2. Although the expanded paratricipital approach allowed more articular exposure than the conventional approach, there was still a 20mm inaccessible articular segment (30% of transepicondylar width) in cadaveric dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The expanded paratricipital approach can be used in type C1, type C2, and selective type C3 articular fractures of the distal humerus with favorable results. Relative to surgical times and achieving anatomic reduction, it is more successful in a fracture with a main articular fragment and with good visualization.

Elbow Fractures

The elbow joint consists of the humeroulnar, humeroradial, and proximal radioulnar joints. Elbow stability is maintained by a combination of static and dynamic constraints. Elbow fractures are challenging to treat because the articular surfaces must be restored perfectly and associated soft tissue injuries must be recognized and appropriately managed. Most elbow fractures are best treated operatively with restoration of normal bony anatomy and rigid internal fixation and repair and/or reconstruction of the collateral ligaments. Advanced imaging, improved understanding of the complex anatomy of the elbow joint, and improved fixation techniques have contributed to improved elbow fracture outcomes.

The stiff elbow: Current concepts

Elbow stiffness is defined as any loss of movement that is greater than 30° in extension and less than 120° in flexion. Causes of elbow stiffness can be classified as traumatic or atraumatic and as congenital or acquired. Any alteration affecting the stability elements of the elbow can lead to a reduction in the arc of movement. The classification is based on the specific structures involved (Kay’s classification), anatomical location (Morrey’s classification), or on the degree of severity of rigidity (Vidal’s classification). Diagnosis is the result of a combination of medical history, physical examination (evaluating both active and passive movements), and imaging. The loss of soft tissue elasticity could be the result of bleeding, edema, granulation tissue formation, and fibrosis. Preventive measures include immobilization in extension, use of post-surgical drain, elastic compression bandage and continuous passive motion. Conservative treatment is used when elbow stiffness has been present for less than six months and consists of the use of serial casts, static or dynamic splints, CPM, physical therapy, manipulations and functional re-education. If conservative treatment fails or is not indicated, surgery is performed. Extrinsic rigidity cases are usually managed with an open or arthroscopic release, while those that are due to intrinsic causes can be managed with arthroplasties. The elbow is a joint that is particularly prone to developing stiffness due to its anatomical and biomechanical complexity, therefore the treatment of this pathology represents a challenge for the physiotherapist and the surgeon alike.