Open reduction and fixation with a locking plate without bone grafting is a reasonable and safe option for treating proximal humerus nonunion

Aseptic humeral shaft nonunion

Aseptic humeral shaft nonunions are rare lesions, with less than 700 cases per year in France. This low frequency explains why they are difficult to manage. They can be hypertrophic or atrophic, with or without a defect. The diagnosis is made based on radiographs and/or CT scan images. Nonunion is suspected early on when a patient presents with abnormal motion at the fracture site 6 weeks after the initial injury event in the context of conservative treatment or has large residual displacement after initial treatment or an open fracture. The treatment for hypertrophic nonunion consists in applying stable, rigid fixation, most often using a large-fragment plate with 4.5 mm screws, combined with cancellous autograft. When combined with the osteoperiosteal decortication first described by Judet, it produces union in 98% of cases. Intramedullary (IM) nail fixation with an autograft is another possibility. In atrophic nonunions, resecting the ends and ensuring the soft tissues have good vitality will generally lead to fracture union. Nonunions with critical size defects (larger than 5 cm), which have a high risk of infection, are a treatment challenge that requires stable fixation and recourse to more complex treatments like the two-step induced membrane technique or vascularized fibular graft. In all cases, to avoid complex repeat revision, internal fixation with plate or IM nail must be combined with a bone graft in situ to maximize the chances of union.

Repair of proximal humerus fracture nonunions using a standardized treatment algorithm: a case series

BACKGROUND

Nonunion of fractures about the proximal humerus represents a rare and complex problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes following proximal humerus fracture (PHF) nonunion repair using a plate and screw construct with a direct comparison to those experienced following operative fixation of acute PHF using a plate and screw construct.

METHODS

Two separate patient cohorts were included in this study. The first consisted of 16 patients diagnosed with a non-united PHF who underwent operative nonunion repair treated with a standard algorithmic approach. The comparison group consisted of 173 patients who achieved union following initial open reduction and internal fixation of an acute PHF treated with a proximal humerus locking plate construct. All patients had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. Outcomes were assessed for both groups using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and postoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM). Statistical analyses were used to compare these outcome measures between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

The nonunion repair cohort consisted of eleven surgical neck nonunions and five nonunions of both the surgical neck and greater tuberosity. Ten patients had undergone surgical treatment for their original fracture, while six were initially treated non-operatively. All patients had Boileau type 3 sequelae of their proximal humerus fracture. Union was achieved in all patients at a mean of 5.4 months following nonunion repair. Complications included hardware failure requiring revision in two patients (12.5%) and avascular necrosis requiring conversion to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty following union in one patient (6.3%). The nonunion repair and acute fracture cohorts did not differ with respect to mean ASES scores, VAS pain scores, or active shoulder ROM at any postoperative time point.

CONCLUSION

Surgical repair of PHF nonunion is a viable treatment strategy that can lead to consistent bony healing with outcomes comparable to those of patients who achieve fracture union following initial surgical repair of an acute proximal humerus fracture. Surgeons should be cognizant of mechanical considerations that may lead to early failure.

Operative Management of Proximal Humerus Nonunions in Adults: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the literature on operative interventions for proximal humerus nonunions in adults. Second, to identify prognostic factors associated with outcomes for locked plate open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles from 1990 to 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies reporting outcomes of proximal humerus nonunions managed with ORIF, hemiarthroplasty (HA), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), or reverse TSA (RTSA) were included. Studies failing to stratify outcomes by treatment or fracture sequelae were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted data and appraised study quality using MINORS score.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive statistics were reported. Outcomes for ORIF and arthroplasty groups were not compared due to differing patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-seven articles were included, representing 508 patients (246 ORIF, 137 HA/TSA, and 125 RTSA). Patients managed by ORIF were younger with simpler fracture patterns than those managed by arthroplasty. Regarding ORIF, locked plates achieved highest union rates (97.0%), but clinical outcomes were comparable with all plate fixation constructs [forward flexion (FF): 123-144°; external rotation: 42-46°; Constant score: 75-84]. Complication and reoperation rates for ORIF were 26.0% and 14.6%, respectively. Furthermore, subgroup analysis of locked plate ORIF demonstrated shorter consolidation time with initial conservative fracture management (4.3 vs. 6.0 months) and autograft use (3.9 vs. 5.5 months). With arthroplasty, RTSA demonstrated greater forward flexion (109.4° vs. 97.2°) but less external rotation (16.5° vs. 36.8°) than HA/TSA. Complication and reoperation rates were 18.2% and 10.9% for HA/TSA and 21.6% and 14.4% for RTSA, respectively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications after operatively treated distal radius fractures

In the recent years, treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) has advanced considerably. Surgical fixation with palmar angular stable plate has gained popularity, due to a reported lower complication rate when compared to dorsal fixation. The type of trauma or injury, surgical procedure and impaired bone quality are all contributors to complications in DRF. The main aim of this review is to summarize the most common complications and possible therapeutic solutions. In addition, strategies for minimizing these complications will be discussed.