Failure of lumbar disc surgery: management by fusion or arthroplasty?

A cross-sectional analysis of 284 complications for lumbar disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar disc replacement (LDR) is a motion sparing procedure for degenerative disc disease. When compared to lumbar fusion, this procedure may reduce complications, reoperations, operative time, and length of stay. However, the extent of overall complications related to LDR has not been well defined in the literature.

PURPOSE

Demonstrate the complication profile of popular LDR implants reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Nationwide database of reported complications related to LDR products from patients throughout the country.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Complications related to LDR.

METHODS

Data files from January 1, 2004 to April 1, 2021 were queried using the publicly accessible Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database and Alternative Summary Reporting program. Three LDR ("Charité," "Prodisc-L," and "Activ L") products were analyzed for complications. Data collected included the date the reports were received by the FDA, the type of complication, complication event description, and the source of the report. The complication event description was utilized to determine the completion of the investigation. Entries with insufficient information were excluded. Complications were further divided into two categories, device and non-device related.

RESULTS

A total of 431 complication entries were found between January 1, 2004, and April 1, 2021. After screening for duplicates and events with insufficient information there were 284 total complications. The total complications were then further divided into implant and non-implant related. The five most common overall complications were lumbar pain (49 entries, 17.25%), migration of implant (42 entries, 14.78%), polyethylene dislodged (37 entries, 13.0%), insertion of device problem (37 entries, 13.0%), device handling problem (12 entries, 4.22%). The most common implant related complication, along with the number of MAUDE entries for each implant was migration of implant for Charité (n=6); Migration of implant for ActivL (n=24); Polyethylene dislodged for ProdiscL (n=32). Of the 284 total complications analyzed, 86 (30.28%) of the entries were deemed "investigation completed." The majority of reports were submitted from the manufacturer and company representative (66.2%, 14.8 % respectively). There were no entries related to LDR within the Alternative Summary Reporting search.

CONCLUSIONS

This study outlined the complications of LDR implants from the MAUDE database which have not always been highlighted in previously published studies. The findings of this study provide insight into the potential targets for improvement in future LDR design and surgical techniques to reduce complications and ensure the safe utilization of these implants.

Segmental Lordosis Gain Is a Prognostic Radiological Factor of Good Functional Outcome After the Implantation of a Single-Level Prosthesis or a Hybrid Construct for Lumbar Disc Degeneration

OBJECTIVE

To identify radiological factors and functional outcomes associated with good results after implantation of a single lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct (anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lumbar disc prosthesis) in the setting of painful degenerative lumbar discopathy.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective 10-year study included 92 patients ˃18 years old with chronic low back pain evolving for at least 1 year. The patients had degenerative disc disease and had failed conservative treatment and underwent lumbar arthroplasty. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Functional evaluation was based on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numerical rating scale. Radiological analysis was based on lumbar x-rays and magnetic resonance imaging parameters. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to the reduction in ODI score (>15 points or <15 points), and statistical analysis was done in both groups to find predictive radiological factors for a satisfactory functional outcome.

RESULTS

Clinically, 60 patients (65.2%) had a satisfactory functional result and 32 patients (34.8%) had a poor outcome according to ODI score. Radiographically, gain in segmental lordosis was statistically associated with good functional outcomes (8.9° for ODI decrease >15 vs. 3.2° for ODI decrease <15).

CONCLUSIONS

This study determined that gain in segmental lordosis is associated with a satisfactory functional outcome after a single-level lumbar disc prosthesis or a hybrid construct. Our study demonstrates that segmental lordosis gain may represent a significative useful positive predictor factor of patient outcome.