Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

A systematic review of the use of shockwave therapy for knee osteoarthritis

Introduction

Previous studies assessed the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for knee osteoarthritis (OA) among different situations. Thus, results from a meta-analysis regarding this topic may not be reliable due to heterogeneity.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted on three internet databases, namely Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase, gathering pertinent papers from their establishment to March 2024. The search phrases were as follows: "shockwave" OR "shock wave" OR "extracorporeal shockwave" OR "Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy [MeSH Term]" AND "knee" AND ("osteoarthritis" OR "arthritis" OR "arthritic" OR "osteoarthritis [MeSH term]").

Results

Twenty-four articles (n = 888) were included, with the resulting conclusions demonstrating that ESWT was effective for knee OA compared with sham ESWT; however, ESWT was not effective for patients with severe knee OA. Patients receiving higher energy or higher shock number had significant improvement than those receiving lower energy or less shock number, respectively. Adding ESWT in isokinetic muscular strengthening exercises (IMSE) was more effective than IMSE alone. The efficacy of ESWT was better than other therapies, including intravenously applied prostacyclin and bisphosphonate, corticosteroid injection, kinesiotherapy, hyaluronic acid injection, platelet-rich plasma injection, and physiotherapy.

Conclusions

This review demonstrated that ESWT was effective for knee OA. Higher energy and more shock numbers could obtain better efficacy. ESWT could be used as a replacement for some other therapies.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of dose-response meta-analysis

Introduction

The aim of the research was to conduct a systematic review of dose-response meta-analysis, examining the correlation between the energy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and clinical outcomes for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of three online databases - PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library - to collect relevant articles from their inception to May 2023. We included the articles that investigated the efficacy of ESWT in treating knee OA and were designed using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The main outcomes were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for primary outcomes and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for secondary outcomes. We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to examine the correlation between the energy of ESWT and clinical outcomes.

Results

Our study included a total of 7 RCTs (comprising 450 subjects) that met the inclusion criteria. We found a negative linear relationship between the doses of ESWT and WOMAC scores at the 1-week (p = 0.0398) and 4-week (p = 0.001) follow-up periods, but not at the 12-week follow-up period (p = 0.202). Furthermore, at the 4-week (p = 0.0477) and 12-week (p < 0.001) follow-up periods, a negative linear connection was found between the ESWT dose and VAS scores, but not at the 1-week follow-up period (p = 0.2268).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate a dose-response connection between the energy of ESWT and clinical outcomes. This suggests that using higher energy levels of ESWT to treat knee OA could lead to greater improvement in clinical outcomes compared to using lower energy levels.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and the Handstand-Position Radiography for Proximal Humeral Epiphysiolysis in Elite Gymnasts: A Report of Two Cases

We report two cases of proximal humeral epiphysiolysis in elite gymnasts. Both patients presented with shoulder pain during weight-bearing movements. The patient in case 1, treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), exhibited rapid bone repair and pain relief, allowing an early return to competition. In the case 2 patient, humeral shortening was identified. Handstand-position radiography revealed compensatory scapular movements, negating the need for surgical intervention. These findings highlight ESWT's potential in promoting bone repair and the utility of handstand-position radiography in assessing humeral length. Both methods provide innovative treatment approaches for proximal humeral epiphysiolysis in gymnasts.

The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee osteoarthritis : an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

An umbrella review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) versus non-ESWT in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of science were searched up to September 2023. Literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction were performed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of outcome indicators was performed using Revman 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of eight meta-analysis were included in this umbrella review. All meta-analysis were graded against a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) and scored between 8 and 11. Compared to the sham group, the ESWT group showed better results in WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) [mean difference (MD)=-2.94, 95% CI: -5.52, -0.37, P=0.03, I²=60%], Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (MD=-2.0, 95% CI: -2.5, -1.5, P<0.01, I²=0%), range of motion (ROM) (MD=17.55, 95% CI: 13.49, 21.61, P<0.00001, I²=0%), and Lequesne index (MD=-2.85, 95% CI: -3.64, -2.07, P<0.00001, I²=48%).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our analysis, ESWT is now an effective therapy for improving pain and function in patients with KOA.

Rehabilitation interventions in osteoarthritis

The goals of the management of osteoarthritis (OA) are to relieve joint pain and stiffness, maintain or increase joint mobility and stability, improve activities and participation, and enhance quality of life. The first step in the management is to make a comprehensive holistic assessment to understand the impact of the disease on the individual. Then, an individualized management plan can be set via a shared-decision making process between the patient and the clinician taking into account all components of functioning affected by the disease. Rehabilitation interventions serve as the basis of OA management whereas pharmacological modalities are usually administered for additional symptom control. This study aimed to overview the rehabilitation interventions used for people with OA with an update of the recent evidence. First, core management approaches that include patient education, physical activity and exercises, and weight loss were addressed; then adjunctive treatments including biomechanical interventions (e.g. orthoses, assistive devices) and physical modalities were overviewed.

Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with meta-analysis and grade recommendations

Objective

To investigate extracorporeal shock wave therapy effect on knee osteoarthritis compared to a sham or kinesiotherapy by a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Data Sources

The search was performed in: Cochrane Library, PubMed, PEDro, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS, and Scielo.

Review methods

We performed the online search until October, 2022. The following terms were used (Osteoarthritis) AND (“knee joint”) AND (“Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy”). Eligibility criteria: (1) randomized clinical trials; (2) effects comparison of shockwave therapy to a sham or kinesiotherapy in individuals with knee osteoarthritis; (3) pain and physical function as outcome variables. Risk of bias assessed using the PEDro scale. PROSPERO registration (CRD42021235597).

Results

We identified 4217 studies, and 12 were included in the qualitative synthesis and the meta-analysis, totaling 403 individuals submitted to the intervention and 331 control individuals. Compared to sham, shockwave was favored in short-term for the function outcome (SMD = −1.93; 95%CI: [−2.77; −1.09]; I² = 83%; P < 0.01). For the pain outcome, the shockwave was favored in the short (MD = −2.05; 95%CI: [−2.59; −1.51]; I² = 84%; P < 0.01), medium (MD = −3.46; 95%CI: [−4.03; −2.89]; I² = 0%; P < 0.01) and long-term (MD = −2.01; 95%CI: [−3.36; −0.65]; I² = 98%; P < 0.01). The association with kinesiotherapy was favored in the short term for the function outcome (SMD = -1.88; 95%CI: [−2.98; −0.78]; I² = 94%; P < 0.01) and favored for the pain outcome in the short (MD = −1.44; 95%CI: [−1.81; −1.07]; I² = 37%; P = 0.14), medium (MD = −1,31; 95%CI: [−1.76; −0,85]; I² = 0%; P = 0.41), and long terms (MD = −1.63; 95%CI: [−1.73; −1.52]; I² = 0%; P = 0.43).

Conclusion

Shockwave therapy may improve functionality in patients with knee osteoarthritis in the short term and pain in all follow-up moments, compared with sham. When associated to kinesiotherapy, it may improve function in the short term and pain in all follow-up time points, although improvement in pain may not be clinically significant.

The Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital das Clínicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine comprehensive rehabilitation program for elderly people with knee osteoarthritis

Background

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability in the elderly population. Chronic disabling pain is associated with maladaptive neuroplastic changes in brain networks, commonly associated with central sensitization. The main clinical features of nociplastic pain conditions include combined peripheral and central sensitization, and it is crucial to recognize this type of pain, as it responds to different therapies than nociceptive and neuropathic pain.

Objective

To report the effect of the Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (IMREA) comprehensive rehabilitation program to reduce pain and to improve functioning in elderly people with knee OA, under the DEFINE cohort.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational cohort of 96 patients with knee OA, recruited from October 2018 to December 2019. All patients were evaluated by a trained multidisciplinary team using the Kellgren Lawrence classification, bilateral knee ultrasonography, the visual analog scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, rigidity and difficulty scores, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), 10-m and 6-min walking test (10 and 6 MWT), Berg Balance Scale, isokinetic dynamometry for knee extension and flexion strength, and pain pressure thresholds. The rehabilitation program included paraspinous lidocaine blocks, focal extracorporeal shockwaves combined with radial pressure waves and functional electrical stimulation according to individual needs. The baseline was compred with the treatment results with a paired t-test.

Results

The study sample is composed of 96 participants, mostly females (n = 81, 84.38%), with bilateral osteoarthritis (n = 91, 94.79%), and a mean age of 68.89 (SD 9.73) years. Functional improvement was observed in TUG (p = 0.019), 6-mwt (p = 0.033), right knee flexion strength (p &lt; 0.0001), WOMAC rigidity and difficulty domains (p &lt; 0.0001). Pain was reduced from baseline as measured by WOMAC pain domain (p &lt; 0.0001), VAS for both knees (p &lt; 0.0001), and SF-36 pain domain (p &lt; 0.0001). Pressure pain threshold was modified above the patella (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002 for right and left knees, respectively), at the patellar tendons (p = 0.015 and p = 0.010 for right and left patellar tendons, respectively), left S2 dermatome (p = 0.017), and L1-L2 (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The IMREA comprehensive rehabilitation program improved functioning and reduced disabling pain in elderly people with knee OA. We highlight the relevance and discuss the implementation of our intervention protocol. Although this is an open cohort study, it is important to note the significant improvement with this clinical protocol.

Safety and Efficacy of Injecting Mesenchymal Stem Cells Into a Human Knee Joint To Treat Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Intraarticular stem cell therapy has become increasingly used to treat knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with minimal high-quality evidence to support its use. This study aims to see how well intra-articular injections of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) worked and how safe they were for individuals with KOA. A total of 10 studies were extracted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PMC from 2017 to 2021 in the English language. An assessment of the risk of bias was applied via the Cochrane Collaborative Bias Risk Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality. Changes in pain and functional outcomes in patients with KOA were measured by a Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at baseline, and follow-up evaluation criteria. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated using the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) and cartilage volume changes. A total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three prospective retrospective clinical trials, and one retrospective clinical trial included 723 patients. They were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral KOA with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 1-4 KOA and followed up for six, 12, and 24 months. The experimental groups received multipotent MSCs, mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), adipose tissue progenitor stem cells (AD-MPCs), adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs), bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), bone marrow aspiration (BMA), bone marrow aspiration concentration (BMAC), or micro fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) while the controlled groups received normal saline (NS), hyaluronic acid (HA), placebo, or went through conservative management.

In conclusion, significant improvements were noticed in the MSCs groups via different outcome measuring tools like KOOS, VAS, WOMAC, and MRI. Furthermore, no significant adverse events (AEs) have been observed. Therefore, intra-articular injections of MSCs are effective and safe in relieving pain and improving motor function in individuals with KOA in the short term, contrary to earlier research findings.

Treatment Options for Patellofemoral Arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present a synthesis of recent literature regarding the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis RECENT FINDINGS: Risk factors of PFJ OA include patella malalignment or maltracking, injury to supportive structures including the MPFL, dysfunction of hamstring and quadriceps coordination, lower limb alignment, trochlear dysplasia, patellar trauma, or ACL surgery. Special physical exam maneuvers include patellar grind test, apprehension test, and lateral patellar tilt angle. Radiographs that should be obtained first-line include weight bearing bilateral AP, lateral, and Merchant views. CT and MRI are used to assess trochlear dysplasia, excessive patellar height, and TT-TG distance. Non-operative management options discussed include non-pharmacologic treatment (patient education, self-management, physical therapy, weight loss), ESWT, cold therapy, taping, bracing, and orthotics. Pharmacologic management options discussed include NSAIDs, acetaminophen, oral narcotics, and duloxetine. Injection therapies include glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid, PRP, and other regenerative therapies (BMAC, adipose, or mesenchymal stem cells). Other treatment options include radiofrequency ablation and botulinum toxin. The algorithm for the surgical treatment of PFJ OA can begin with arthroscopic assessment of the PF articular cartilage to address mechanical symptoms and to evaluate/treat lateral soft tissue with or without overhanging lateral osteophytes. If patients fail to have symptomatic improvement, a TTO can be considered in those patients less than 50 years of age or active patients >50 years old. In patients with severe PFJ OA, refractory to the above treatments, PFA should be considered. While early PFA design and technique were less than encouraging, more recent implant design and surgical technique have demonstrated robust results in the literature. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis is a challenging orthopedic problem to treat, in that it can often affect younger patients, with otherwise well-functioning knees. It is a unique entity compared to TF OA with distinct epidemiology, biomechanics and risk factors and treatment options.

Relative Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Alone or in Combination with Noninjective Treatments on Pain and Physical Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has been recommended for managing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The difference in therapeutic effects between radial shockwave characteristics (RaSW) and focused shockwave characteristics (FoSW) with different energy levels for KOA remains controversial. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to identify the effects relative to the different ESWT regime and combination treatments on pain and functional outcomes in individuals with KOA. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the efficacy of RaSW, FoSW, and combination treatments in patients with KOA were identified by searches of electronic databases. The included RCTs were analyzed through NMA and risk-of-bias assessment. We analyzed 69 RCTs with a total of 21 treatment arms in the NMA. Medium-energy FoSW plus physical therapy, medium-energy acupoint RaSW plus Chinese medicine, and high-energy FoSW alone were the most effective treatments for reducing pain [standard mean difference (SMD) = −4.51], restoring function (SMD = 4.97), and decreasing joint inflammation (SMD = −5.01). Population area and study quality influenced the treatment outcomes, particularly pain. Our findings indicate that medium-energy ESWT combined with physical therapy or Chinese medicine is beneficial for treating pain and increasing function in adults with KOA.

Numerical Modeling of Shockwave Treatment of Knee Joint

Arthritis is a degenerative disease that primarily affects the cartilage and meniscus of the knee joint. External acoustic stimulation is used to treat this disease. This article presents a numerical model of the knee joint aimed at the computer-aided study of the regenerative effects of shockwave treatment. The presented model was verified and validated. A numerical analysis of the conditions for the regeneration of the tissues of the knee joint under shockwave action was conducted. The results allow us to conclude that to obtain the conditions required for the regeneration of cartilage tissues and meniscus (compressive stresses above the threshold value of 0.15 MPa to start the process of chondrogenesis; distortional strains above the threshold value of 0.05% characterized by the beginning of the differentiation of the tissues in large volumes; fluid pressure corresponding to the optimal level of 68 kPa to transfer tissue cells in large volumes), the energy flux density of therapeutic shockwave loading should exceed 0.3 mJ/mm².

Comparison of Efficacy among Three Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques for Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was first introduced for treating knee osteoarthritis (OA) in 2010 and has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option. Three RFA techniques have been adopted for treating knee OA, including conventional, pulsed, and cooled RFA. However, the efficacy among different RFA techniques in the treatment of knee OA is still unclear. Three electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant articles, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of articles that investigated the use of RFA techniques in the treatment of knee OA was conducted to pool the effect size in pain before and after treatment. A total of 20 eligible articles (including 605 patients) were included for our meta-analysis. After treatment, the patients had significant improvements in pain for all three RFA techniques when compared with the baseline level for the 1, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups (p < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in the efficacy among the three RFA techniques for all follow-up visits (p > 0.05). The three RFA techniques demonstrated a significant improvement in pain for up to 6 months after treatment. Comparing the efficacy of the three RFA techniques in the treatment of knee OA, our results showed that no significant differences in pain relief among the three RFA techniques were observed at the 1-, 3-, 6, and 12-month follow-up visits.

[Current evidences in shockwave treatment. SETOC (Spanish Society of Shockwave Treatment) recommendations]

This SETOC consensus document shows the scientific evidence of the technology in shockwaves (SW) and radial pressure waves (RPW) in a variety of spasticity disorders, musculoskeletal, skin, urological diseases, etc. SW and RPW, without anesthesia, are an effective, safe, non-invasive, cost-effective treatment, which reduces the need for surgery, lower risk of complications, faster recovery and greater acceptability to patients than surgery. Consequently, SW and RPW should be the first therapeutic option in the aforementioned chronic pathologies, when conservative alternatives have failed. SETOC advises to follow the recommendations given in this article, including the ones given by SW scientific societies and best evidence for each technology as well.

Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Purpose of Review

Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (fESWT) is a physical treatment modality developed over the last 25 years for musculoskeletal indications. It has many indications in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) and is effective, time-efficient, and cost-efficient. This review focuses on basics and on clinical indications as well as on significant trends in fESWT.

Recent Findings

In PM&R, stimulation of healing processes in tendons, surrounding tissue, and bones via mechanotransduction seems to be a relevant biological effect. The International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST) describes different types of indications (such as approved standard indications—in accordance with most scientific evidence—like calcifying tendinopathy of the shoulder, plantar fasciitis lateral epicondylopathy of the elbow, greater trochanter pain syndrome, patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy and bone non-union, common empirically tested clinical uses, exceptional or expert indications, and experimental indications).

Summary

fESWT is a relevant treatment option in PM&R and regenerative medicine. In recent years, historical paradigms (for example, application in cancer patients) have changed and new indications (such as nerve regeneration, myofascial trapezius syndrome, low back pain, dermatosclerosis, and lymphedema) are supported. Future translational research should focus on establishing actual exceptional indications and experimental indications for clinical routine.

Efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects and safety of intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells on patients with knee osteoarthritis by a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were retrieved. An assessment of the risk of bias was done through the Cochrane Collaborative Bias Risk Tool, publication bias was assessed by plotting funnel plots and Egger tests. Pain and functional improvements in patients with knee osteoarthritis were determined by changes in VAS scores and WOMAC scores at baseline and follow-up endpoints. For the evaluation of MRI, the WORMS score and changes in cartilage volume were used. In addition, the number of adverse events in the intervention group and the control group were counted to explore the safety.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials involving 335 patients were included. In the pooled analysis, compared with the control groups, the VAS scores of MSC groups decreased significantly (MD,-19.24; 95% CI: -26.31 to -12.18, P < .00001. All of the WOMAC scores also improved significantly: the total scores (SMD, - 0.66; 95% CI: - 1.09 to -0.23, P = .003), pain scores (SMD, - 0.46; 95% CI: - 0.75 to -0.17, P = .002), stiffness scores (SMD, -0.32; 95% CI: -0.64 to 0.00 P = 0.05), and functional scores (SMD, -0.36; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.04, P = .03). Two studies with non-double-blind designs were the main source of heterogeneity. In terms of cartilage repair, there was no significant difference in the WORMS score, but there was a significant increase in cartilage volume in the MSC group (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.13, P = .002). The proportion of patients with adverse events in the MSCs treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group (OR, 3.20; 95% CI: 1.50 to 6.83, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells is effective and safety to relieve pain and improve motor function of patients with knee osteoarthritis in a short term which is different to conclusions of previous study.