C-reactive protein as marker of post-operative analgesic quality after primary total knee arthroplasty

Perioperative association between c-reactive protein, pain catastrophizing and acute pain after total knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis of two randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty is associated with an inflammatory response and high levels of pain in a subset of patients. Pain catastrophizing has been associated with acute postoperative pain. The association between these variables has not been investigated in an optimised fast-track setup including preoperative glucocorticoids. The aim of this study was, first, to investigate the correlation between the increase in postoperative c-reactive protein (CRP) and acute postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty, and second, to investigate the correlation between the increase in CRP and preoperative pain catastrophizing.

METHODS

This study is a secondary analysis of data from 119 patients participating in two randomised controlled trials. Correlation analyses were performed for preoperative CRP and CRP increase at 24 and 48 h and pain during a well-defined mobilisation at 24 and 48 h after total knee arthroplasty. Additionally, correlation analyses were performed between CRP increase and pain catastrophizing using the pain catastrophizing scale.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between preoperative CRP or postoperative CRP increase and pain at both 24 and 48 h. Analyses were similar when separated into high and low pain catastrophizers. There was no correlation between preoperative CRP or postoperative CRP increase and pain catastrophizing.

CONCLUSION

There was no association between the postoperative CRP response and postoperative acute pain or pain catastrophizing in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a well-defined multimodal fast-track regime including preoperative glucocorticoids. These results suggest that acute pain after knee arthroplasty is not reflected by CRP when applying preoperative glucocorticoids.

Effectiveness and safety of auricular acupuncture on adjuvant analgesia in patients with total knee arthroplasty: a randomized sham-controlled trial

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of auricular acupuncture (AA) on postoperative analgesia, the degree of postoperative nausea, and the effect of inflammation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

This was a single-center, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. In total, 96 patients were randomly divided into an AA group with an indwelling intradermal needle (n = 48) and a sham auricular acupuncture (SAA) group with a non-penetrating placebo needle (n = 48). Intra-spinal anesthesia was adopted in both groups during surgery, and an epidural analgesic pump was implanted after surgery for 48 h. The primary outcome was the post-surgery visual analog score (VAS) of resting and movement states (at 6, 12 h and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days). The secondary outcomes included additional doses of analgesic injection during the treatment, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell (WBC) count on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day after the operation, nausea on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd day after the operation, the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) on the 2nd and 12th week after the operation, and adverse events.

Results

The VAS in the AA group at 6 h, 12 h, 2, 3, and 5 days after surgery were lower than those of the SAA group (p < 0.05). Among the secondary outcomes, the total dose of additional analgesic injection after surgery in the AA group was lower than that in the SAA group (p < 0.05). The serum CRP on the 1st day after operation in the AA group was lower than that in the SAA group (p < 0.05). The degree of nausea on 2nd day after surgery in the AA group was lower than that in the SAA group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in other outcomes (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In this study, AA was shown to be an effective and safe complementary and alternative therapy for pain relief after TKA, which was able to reduce the total postoperative dose of additional painkillers, decrease serum CRP 1 day after surgery, and improve the degree of postoperative nausea.

Clinical trial registration

www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100054403.

Subchondral and intra-articular injections of bone marrow concentrate are a safe and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multi-center pilot study

PURPOSE

Subchondral bone is becoming a treatment target for knee OA patients, with promising early findings on the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). The aim of this prospective, multi-centric pilot study was to evaluate safety as well as clinical and MRI outcomes of a combined approach of intra-articular and subchondral BMAC injections.

METHODS

Thirty patients (19 men, 11 women, 56.4 ± 8.1 years) with symptomatic knee OA were treated with a combination of an intra-articular and two subchondral BMAC injections (femoral condyle and tibial plateau). Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1-3-6-12 months of follow-up with the IKDC subjective, VAS, KOOS, and EQ-VAS scores. The MRI evaluation was performed with the WORMS score.

RESULTS

No major complications were reported and only two patients were considered treatment failures, requiring a new injective or surgical treatment. The IKDC subjective score improved significantly from 40.5 ± 12.5 to 59.9 ± 16.1 at 3 months, 59.1 ± 12.2 at 6 months, and 62.6 ± 19.4 at 12 months (p < 0.0005). A similar improvement was reported for VAS pain and all KOOS subscales at all follow-ups, while EQ-VAS did not show any significant improvement. The MRI analysis showed a significant bone marrow edema reduction (p = 0.003), while the remaining WORMS parameters did not show any significant changes.

CONCLUSION

The pilot evaluation of this combined BMAC injective treatment showed safety and positive outcome up to 12 months of follow-up in patients with symptomatic knee OA associated with subchondral bone alterations. These findings suggest that targeting both subchondral bone and joint environment can provide promising results, and that BMAC can be a valid option for this combined approach to treat knee OA.