The survival and prognosis analysis of synovial sarcoma subtypes: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based analysis

Incidental intra-abdominal synovial sarcoma

Intra-abdominal synovial sarcomas are a rare type of soft tissue sarcomas that arise in the soft tissues of the abdominal cavity. They account for less than 1% of all primary synovial sarcoma cases. We report a case of a male patient in his early 30s who presented to the hospital with abdominal pain of 2 weeks duration. On examination, a mass was felt in the left mid-abdomen. MRI revealed a 12.7 cm×8.2 cm×8.6 cm soft tissue mass on the mesentery of the jejunum. The patient underwent surgical resection of the tumour, and the final pathology was synovial sarcoma, pT2b, grade 3.

Synovial sarcoma in the prevertebral space can mimic malignant neurogenic neoplasm: Case report and literature review

Synovial sarcoma, a rare malignant neoplasm with a poor prognosis, accounts for approximately 5%-10% of all primary soft-tissue malignancies worldwide. Typically affecting adolescents and young adults, it primarily manifests near the joints of the lower extremities. This study aimed to demonstrate that this tumor can also affect the prevertebral space. A 32-year-old male patient presented at our outpatient clinic with a 2-month history of upper limb numbness and a 1-month complaint of palpable neck mass. Imaging studies revealed a bulky, lobulated, and heterogeneous mass exhibiting heterogeneous enhancement. Furthermore, the mass caused expansion of the neuroforamen in the neck, initially suggesting a diagnosis of malignant schwannoma. However, a histopathologic examination suggested synovial sarcoma. The article provided a comprehensive review of the clinical, pathological, and radiological features of this condition. Additionally, it explored current treatment options and prognoses by referencing relevant literature.

A rare case of perineal synovial sarcoma

Synovial sarcoma is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm that is frequently misdiagnosed due to its slow growth and small size. This tumor presents as a nonspecific heterogeneous mass on cross-sectional imaging. Biopsy and histopathological assessments are required to differentiate synovial sarcoma from other sarcoma subtypes and to define the tumor grade. This article presents the case of a 17-year-old male patient with perineal synovial sarcoma.

Multidisciplinary management of recurrent synovial sarcoma of the chest wall

Background

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is part of soft tissue sarcomas (STS). An incidence between 5% to 10% is estimated. The origin is mesenchymal mainly affecting the extremities. Being even rarer at the chest level and vertebral body, representing around 1%. Histologically, it consists of 3 variants: monophasic, biphasic, and poorly differentiated. Surgical resection is a priority when it comes to multidisciplinary management. The prognosis of patients with SS over the years has improved markedly.

Purpose

Understand and evaluate the multidisciplinary management of SS considering that the SS has a lowe prevalence and highly malignancy.

Study Design

We present a case of a 31-year-old male who has a history of monophasic synovial sarcoma diagnosed in 2019 and underwent surgery. Patient came back after two years without symptoms and posterior to a control MRI we observed a local recurrence of SS.

Methods

The literature was reviewed with a focus on best clinical and surgical strategy for recurrence of SS.

Results

The patient recovered well with return to his normal daily activities. The review of the literature shows us the importance of the multidisciplinary management for the optimal clinical and surgical approach of SS recurrence.

Conclusions

SS represents a unique variant of STS, with malignant and metastatic potential. Being a rare pathology, an adequate multidisciplinary management is essential when providing optimal care for the patient.

Is the Number of National Database Research Studies in Musculoskeletal Sarcoma Increasing, and Are These Studies Reliable?

BACKGROUND

Large national databases have become a common source of information on patterns of cancer care in the United States, particularly for low-incidence diseases such as sarcoma. Although aggregating information from many hospitals can achieve statistical power, this may come at a cost when complex variables must be abstracted from the medical record. There is a current lack of understanding of the frequency of use of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) over the last two decades in musculoskeletal sarcoma research and whether their use tends to produce papers with conflicting findings.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is the number of published studies using the SEER and NCDB databases in musculoskeletal sarcoma research increasing over time? (2) What are the author, journal, and content characteristics of these studies? (3) Do studies using the SEER and the NCDB databases for similar diagnoses and study questions report concordant or discordant key findings? (4) Are the administrative data reported by our institution to the SEER and the NCDB databases concordant with the data in our longitudinally maintained, physician-run orthopaedic oncology dataset?

METHODS

To answer our first three questions, PubMed was searched from 2001 through 2020 for all studies using the SEER or the NCDB databases to evaluate sarcoma. Studies were excluded from the review if they did not use these databases or studied anatomic locations other than the extremities, nonretroperitoneal pelvis, trunk, chest wall, or spine. To answer our first question, the number of SEER and NCDB studies were counted by year. The publication rate over the 20-year span was assessed with simple linear regression modeling. The difference in the mean number of studies between 5-year intervals (2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, 2016-2020) was also assessed with Student t-tests. To answer our second question, we recorded and summarized descriptive data regarding author, journal, and content for these studies. To answer our third question, we grouped all studies by diagnosis, and then identified studies that shared the same diagnosis and a similar major study question with at least one other study. We then categorized study questions (and their associated studies) as having concordant findings, discordant findings, or mixed findings. Proportions of studies with concordant, discordant, or mixed findings were compared. To answer our fourth question, a coding audit was performed assessing the concordance of nationally reported administrative data from our institution with data from our longitudinally maintained, physician-run orthopaedic oncology dataset in a series of patients during the past 3 years. Our orthopaedic oncology dataset is maintained on a weekly basis by the senior author who manually records data directly from the medical record and sarcoma tumor board consensus notes; this dataset served as the gold standard for data comparison. We compared date of birth, surgery date, margin status, tumor size, clinical stage, and adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

The number of musculoskeletal sarcoma studies using the SEER and the NCDB databases has steadily increased over time in a linear regression model (β = 2.51; p < 0.001). The mean number of studies per year more than tripled during 2016-2020 compared with 2011-2015 (39 versus 13 studies; mean difference 26 ± 11; p = 0.03). Of the 299 studies in total, 56% (168 of 299) have been published since 2018. Nineteen institutions published more than five studies, and the most studies from one institution was 13. Orthopaedic surgeons authored 35% (104 of 299) of studies, and medical oncology journals published 44% (130 of 299). Of the 94 studies (31% of total [94 of 299]) that shared a major study question with at least one other study, 35% (33 of 94) reported discordant key findings, 29% (27 of 94) reported mixed key findings, and 44% (41 of 94) reported concordant key findings. Both concordant and discordant groups included papers on prognostic factors, demographic factors, and treatment strategies. When we compared nationally reported administrative data from our institution with our orthopaedic oncology dataset, we found clinically important discrepancies in adjuvant treatment (19% [15 of 77]), tumor size (21% [16 of 77]), surgery date (23% [18 of 77]), surgical margins (38% [29 of 77]), and clinical stage (77% [59 of 77]).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate use of databases in musculoskeletal cancer research is essential to promote clear interpretation of findings, as almost two-thirds of studies we evaluated that asked similar study questions produced discordant or mixed key findings. Readers should be mindful of the differences in what each database seeks to convey because asking the same questions of different databases may result in different answers depending on what information each database captures. Likewise, differences in how studies determine which patients to include or exclude, how they handle missing data, and what they choose to emphasize may result in different messages getting drawn from large-database studies. Still, given the rarity and heterogeneity of sarcomas, these databases remain particularly useful in musculoskeletal cancer research for nationwide incidence estimations, risk factor/prognostic factor assessment, patient demographic and hospital-level variable assessment, patterns of care over time, and hypothesis generation for future prospective studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Prognostic factors of the synovial sarcoma of the extremities: imaging does matter

OBJECTIVES

Synovial sarcomas (SS) of the extremities are rare soft tissue sarcomas that are more common in young adults. We deciphered the imaging phenotype of SS with the aim to determine if imaging could provide an incremental value to currently known prognostic factors (PF)-age and histological grade-to predict long-term overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included consecutive pediatric and adult patients with synovial sarcomas of the extremities from December 2002 to August 2020. Inclusion criteria were (i) a follow-up greater than 5 years and (ii) available pre-therapeutic MRI. A subset analysis included MRI and CT-scan. Clinical, pathological, and imaging variables were collected in all patients. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the association of these variables with OS using univariate and multivariate Cox regressions.

RESULTS

Out of 428 patients screened for eligibility, 98 patients (mean age: 37.1 ± 15.2 years) were included (MRI: n = 98/98, CT scan: n = 34/98; 35%). The median OS was 75.25 months (IQR = 55.50-109.12) and thirty-six patients (n = 36/98;37%) died during follow-up. The recurrence rate was 12.2% (n =12/98). SS lesions were mostly grade 2 (57/98; 58%). On MRI, SS had a mean long-axis diameter of 67.5 ± 38.3 mm. On CT scan, 44% (15/34) were calcified. Grade (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.71; 95%CI = 1.30-5.66; p = 0.008), size of the lesions evaluated on MRI (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01-1.03; p < 0.001), and calcifications on CT scan (HR = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.02-0.50; p = 0.005) were independent PF of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that imaging biomarkers can be used to predict long-term outcome in patients with SS. Strikingly, the presence of calcifications on CT scan is associated with favorable outcome and provides an incremental value over existing PF such as age, grade, and size.

KEY POINTS

• Beyond its diagnostic value, MRI is a pre-operative prognostic tool in synovial sarcomas of the extremities since the size of the lesion is an important prognostic factor. • Calcifications on CT scans are independently and significantly associated with prolonged overall survival.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in metastatic synovial sarcoma: a real-world study in the US oncology network

Aim: To examine and understand patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (mSS) treated in a US community setting. Materials & methods: Retrospective observational study in adults with mSS in The US Oncology Network (diagnosed January 2012-December 2018). Results: Of 202 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma (SS), 71 had mSS. Of 39 patients with mSS who received first-line (1L) systemic treatment, 25 and 16 continued to 2L and 3L+ treatment, respectively. With each subsequent treatment line, time-to-treatment-discontinuation (1L-3L: 3.9-2.7 months) and time-to-next-treatment (1L-3L: 9.3-4.6 months) decreased. At 1L, median overall survival was 24.5 months. Conclusion: This study highlights the ongoing need for effective therapies for mSS.

Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of patients with limb epithelioid sarcoma

Limb epithelioid sarcoma (LES) is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma, which is scarcely reported. Therefore, the current study was performed to analyze the clinicopathologic features and risk factors of survival among patients with LES. By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, data were obtained regarding patients who were diagnosed with LES for the period between 2010 and 2016. We first analyzed overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) by applying univariate Cox regression analysis. Then we performed multivariate analysis to confirm independent predictors of survival. In total, we identified 475 patients with LES for survival analysis, of which 291 were males (61.3%) and 184 females (38.7%). The mean and median age at diagnosis were 38 and 36 years, respectively. The 5-year OS and CSS rates among Patients with LES were 65.4% and 69.5%, respectively. Gender, age, tumor stage, tumor size, and treatment type were significant predictors of OS on both univariate and multivariate analyses (P < .05). As for CSS, multivariable analysis revealed that age <60 years, localized stage, and tumor size <5 cm were significantly associated with increased survival (P < .05). Predictors of improved survival for LES patients include gender, age, tumor stage, tumor size, and treatment type. Surgery only was recommended for treating LES patients. Future studies are warranted to determine effective treatment types for LES patients.

The Role of Surgery for Primary Pulmonary Synovial Sarcoma: A Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

The rarity of primary pulmonary synovial sarcoma (PPSS) and the lack of prospective clinical trials resulted in poorly understood treatment modality and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to better understand PPSS based on patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and survival data of PPSS patients who were diagnosed during 1989 through 2016 and retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were studied. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of PPSS patients.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients with PPSS were included (median age: 50 y). PPSS accounted for 4.5% (122/2741) of total primary synovial sarcoma. Most of the patients were diagnosed as poor or undifferentiated grade (52.0% and 34.0%). Cancer-directed surgery was performed for 74.4% of PPSS patients and 28.2% of patients received radiotherapy. The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates of PPSS patients were 75.4%, 50.8%, 41.8%, and 39.3%, respectively. Cancer-directed surgery was shown to improve the survival of PPSS patients with localized or regional stage (P < 0.05), yet surgical resection did not prolong the OS and DSS of patients with distant stage (P > 0.1). Postoperational radiotherapy was associated with shortened survival time (P < 0.05). PPSS patients who received lobectomy had statistically prolonged OS and DSS than those with pneumonectomy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PPSS is a rare and special subtype of synovial sarcoma. Treatment with lobectomy or sublobar resection alone may contribute to a superior prognosis compared with other managements.

Trends of lymph node sampling and metastasis in pediatric and young adult patients with clear cell, epithelioid, and synovial sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue (CCS), epithelioid sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma are rare tumors historically identified as high risk for lymph node metastasis. This study investigates incident nodal metastasis and associated survival in children and young adults with these subtypes.

PROCEDURE

Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2015), we created a retrospective cohort of 1303 patients (aged ≤25 years) who underwent local control therapy for CCS, epithelioid sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated overall survival (OS) by subtype. Stratifying on subtype, Cox regressions assessed OS by lymph node sampling status and nodal metastasis.

RESULTS

There were 103 (7.9%) patients with CCS, 221 (17.0%) with epithelioid sarcoma, and 979 (75.1%) with synovial sarcoma. Lymph node sampling was more frequent in patients with CCS (56.3%) and epithelioid sarcoma (52.5%) versus synovial sarcoma (20.5%, p < .001). Synovial sarcoma metastasized to lymph nodes less frequently than CCS or epithelioid sarcoma (2.1% vs. 14.6% and 14.9%, p < .001). Across all subtypes, lymph node metastasis was associated with inferior OS (HR 2.02, CI 1.38-2.95, p < .001). Lymph node sampling was associated with improved OS in CCS (HR 0.35, CI: 0.15-0.78, p = .010), inferior OS in synovial sarcoma (HR 1.60, CI: 1.13-2.25, p = .007), and no statistical association with OS in epithelioid sarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis is rare in children and young adults with synovial sarcoma. Lymph node sampling procedures were not consistently performed for patients with CCS or epithelioid sarcoma, but improved OS supports routine lymph node sampling in children and young adults with CCS.

Nomogram to Predict Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Synovial Sarcoma in the Extremities: A Population-Based Study

Background

Synovial sarcoma is a rare disease, and synovial sarcoma that first appears in the extremities accounts for more than 80% of cases. We established two nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of patients with synovial sarcoma.

Methods

A total of 227 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma in the extremities between 2010 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to explore independent prognostic factors and to create two separate nomograms for OS and CSS. The C-index, the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve were used to evaluate the column line graphs and analyze prognostic factors.

Results

Age, Stage M, and surgery were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. The ROC curve showed good discriminative power for the nomogram. Calibration curves and DCA curves showed that the nomogram had a satisfactory ability to predict OS and CSS. The KM curve showed that chemotherapy alone did not affect patient survival.

Conclusion

Age, Stage M, and surgery are variables that affect OS and CSS in patients with synovial sarcoma in the extremities. Two nomograms were established based on the above variables to provide patients with more accurate individual survival predictions and to help physicians make appropriate clinical decisions.

The Biology of Synovial Sarcoma: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

New molecular insights are being achieved in synovial sarcoma (SS) that can provide new potential diagnostic and prognostic markers as well as therapeutic targets. In particular, the advancement of research on epigenomics and gene regulation is promising. The concrete hypothesis that the pathogenesis of SS might mainly depend on the disruption of the balance of the complex interaction between epigenomic regulatory complexes and the consequences on gene expression opens interesting new perspectives. The standard of care for primary SS is wide surgical resection combined with radiation in selected cases. The role of chemotherapy is still under refinement and can be considered in patients at high risk of metastasis or in those with advanced disease. Cytotoxic chemotherapy (anthracyclines, ifosfamide, trabectedin, and pazopanib) is the treatment of choice, despite several possible side effects. Many possible drug-able targets have been identified. However, the impact of these strategies in improving SS outcome is still limited, thus making current and future research strongly needed to improve the survival of patients with SS.

Synovial Sarcoma: A Clinical Review

Synovial sarcomas (SS) represent a unique subset of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and account for 5–10% of all STS. Synovial sarcoma differs from other STS by the relatively young age at diagnosis and clinical presentation. Synovial sarcomas have unique genomic characteristics and are driven by a pathognomonic t(X;18) chromosomal translocation and subsequent formation of the SS18:SSX fusion oncogenes. Similar to other STS, diagnosis can be obtained from a combination of history, physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging, biopsy and subsequent pathology, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. Increasing size, age and tumor grade have been demonstrated to be negative predictive factors for both local disease recurrence and metastasis. Wide surgical excision remains the standard of care for definitive treatment with adjuvant radiation utilized for larger and deeper lesions. There remains controversy surrounding the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of SS and there appears to be survival benefit in certain populations. As the understanding of the molecular and immunologic characteristics of SS evolve, several potential systematic therapies have been proposed.