1
|
Selph TJ, Suleiman LI, Pagadala MS, Bergman R, Franklin PD, Edelstein AI. Agreement of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Appropriate Use Criteria With Treatment Recommendations From Arthroplasty Surgeons. Arthroplast Today 2024; 27:101386. [PMID: 38812476 PMCID: PMC11134556 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee (2016) and Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip (2017) are intended to provide treatment recommendations for osteoarthritis (OA). This study examined the agreement of AUC appropriateness classifications with arthroplasty surgeon recommendations for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods The cohort included 558 OA patients (397 knee, 161 hip) referred to a specialty arthroplasty clinic. Surgeons completed the online AAOS AUC patient profiles to generate appropriateness ratings. Surgeons' recommendations for treatment were recorded. We performed univariate and bivariate analyses to evaluate relationships between AUC appropriateness and surgeon recommendations. Results The knee OA AUC classified TKA as "appropriate" for 309 (77.8%) of the 397 knee OA patients. Surgeons recommended TKA for 123 (31.0%), resulting in 46.8% (n = 186) higher rate of "appropriate" classification by AUC than TKA recommendation by surgeons. Weighted Cohen's κ demonstrated slight agreement (κ = 0.06, 95% confidence interval: 0.04, 0.09) between AUC appropriateness and surgeon TKA recommendation. The hip OA AUC classified THA as "appropriate" for 98 (60.9%) of the 161 hip OA patients. Surgeons recommended THA for 76 (47.2%), resulting in 13.7% (n = 22) higher rate of "appropriate" classification by AUC than THA recommendation by surgeons. Weighted Cohen's κ demonstrated moderate agreement (κ = 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.57) between the AUC appropriateness classification and the surgeon's THA recommendation. Conclusions AAOS AUC guidelines indicated surgical appropriateness significantly more than arthroplasty surgeons. AUC agreed slightly with surgeons for TKA and moderately for THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Jacob Selph
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Linda I. Suleiman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Rachel Bergman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Patricia D. Franklin
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Adam I. Edelstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang B, Li M, Liu Y, Zhang B, Liu Z, Chen X, Huo J, Han Y. The diagnostic value of blood sample NGS in patients with early periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Int Wound J 2023; 20:961-970. [PMID: 36054590 PMCID: PMC10030938 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood samples from patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated by comparing it with drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The study was designed as a retrospective diagnostic test. Thirty-six infected patients were diagnosed with PJI according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and 57 volunteers were included in our study. NGS and bacterial culture were chosen to detect PJI after THA. Blood samples and drainage fluid were collected for NGS, and the drainage fluid, which was collected at the same time as the NGS drainage fluid sample, was used for bacterial culture. The primary outcomes of interest were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the infection group, 31 patients showed positive results by blood sample NGS, 33 patients showed positive results by drainage fluid NGS, and 17 patients showed positive bacterial culture results. In the control group, the results of 2 blood sample NGS, 16 drainage fluid NGS, and 3 bacterial cultures were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the blood sample were 0.86, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the drainage fluid samples were 0.92, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of bacterial culture were 0.47, 0.95, and 0.79, respectively. The study demonstrated that both the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were higher than those of bacterial culture, regardless of the kind of sample. Compared with drainage fluid NGS, the sensitivity of blood sample NGS was slightly lower (0.86 vs 0.92), but blood sample NGS showed higher specificity (0.96 vs 0.72). In total, the diagnostic value of blood sample NGS was superior to that of drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The majority of infected patients could be identified by blood sample NGS. Moreover, because of its high specificity, blood sample NGS can not only detect infectious bacteria but also distinguish infectious from non-infectious bacteria, which is dramatically different from using drainage fluid NGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingshi Zhang
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Mengnan Li
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Yawei Liu
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Binquan Zhang
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Zeming Liu
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Jia Huo
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| | - Yongtai Han
- Department of Osteonecrosis and Hip Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pacheco-Brousseau L, Stacey D, Desmeules F, Ben Amor S, Lambert D, Tanguay E, Hillaby A, Bechiau C, Charette M, Poitras S. Instruments to assess appropriateness of hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023:S1063-4584(23)00701-X. [PMID: 36898655 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.02.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess criteria and psychometric properties of instruments for assessing appropriateness of elective joint arthroplasty (JA) for adults with primary hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS A systematic review guided by Cochrane methods and PRISMA guidelines. Studies were searched in five databases. Eligible articles include all study designs developing, testing, and/or using an instrument to assess JA appropriateness. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data. Instruments were compared with Hawker et al. JA consensus criteria. Psychometric properties of instruments were described and appraised guided by Fitzpatrick's and COSMIN approaches. RESULTS Of 55 instruments included, none met all Hawker et al. JA consensus criteria. Criteria the most met were pain (n = 50), function (n = 49), quality of life (n = 33), and radiography (n = 24). Criteria the least met were clinical evidence of OA (n = 18), expectations (n = 15), readiness for surgery (n = 11), conservative treatments (n = 8), and patient/surgeon agree benefits outweigh risks (n = 0). Instrument by Arden et al. met the most criteria (6 of 9). The most tested psychometric properties were appropriateness (n = 55), face/content validity (n = 55), predictive validity (n = 29), construct validity and feasibility (n = 24). The least tested psychometric properties were intra-rater reliability (n = 3), internal consistency (n = 5), and inter-rater reliability (n = 13). Instruments by Gutacker et al. and Osborne et al. met the most psychometric properties (4 of 10). CONCLUSION Most instruments included traditional criteria for assessing JA appropriateness but did not include a trial of conservative treatments or shared decision-making elements. There was limited evidence on psychometric properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pacheco-Brousseau
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - D Stacey
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - F Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada; Orthopaedic Clinical Research Unit, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, Montréal, Canada.
| | - S Ben Amor
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - D Lambert
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - E Tanguay
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - A Hillaby
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - C Bechiau
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
| | - M Charette
- Population Health, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - S Poitras
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salman LA, Omari RY, Moghamis IS, Hantouly AT, Ahmed G. Appropriateness of carpal tunnel syndrome management compared with the AAOS appropriate use criteria: A retrospective review across various specialties. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 80:104140. [PMID: 36045855 PMCID: PMC9422078 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Loay A. Salman
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
- Corresponding author. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Rand Y. Omari
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Isam S. Moghamis
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ashraf T. Hantouly
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ghalib Ahmed
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|