Effectiveness of a patient-specific guide for femoral stem implantation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized control trial

Feasibility and anteversion accuracy of a patient-specific instrument for femoral prosthesis implantation in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision and feasibility of patient-specific instruments (PSI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as compared to the traditional free-hand (FRH) approach.

METHODS

During the period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, a randomized allocation was used for patients receiving unilateral primary THA to either the PSI or conventional operation group. The placement and size of the PSI were specifically chosen to guide femoral neck resection and prosthesis implantation. The study analyzed component positions and evaluated radiographic and clinical outcomes in 30 patients who received PSI-assisted THAs and 30 patients who received FRH THAs. This study was registered at China Clinical Trial Registry (number: ChiCTR2300072325) on June 9th, 2023.

RESULTS

The use of PSI in THA resulted in significantly higher precision in achieving the desired component position as compared to the FRH approach. The PSI group showed significantly smaller absolute errors of femoral anteversion (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, hospitalization duration, or time to walk after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the application of patient-specific instruments in THA provides a simple and reliable solution to enhance the precision of femoral prosthesis placement with high accuracy and feasibility. This study highlights the potential benefits of using the PSI in THA.

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between bikini-incision via direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

The purpose of this study was to compare an oblique bikini-incision via direct anterior approach (BI-DAA) to a conventional posterolateral approach (PLA) during simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (simBTHA) in terms of early patient outcomes, postoperative functional recovery, and complications. From January 2017 to January 2020, 106 patients receiving simBTHA were enrolled and randomly allocated to the BI-DAA or PLA group. Primary outcomes were measured using hemoglobin (HGB) drop, transfusion rate, the length of stay (LOS), the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the scar cosmesis assessment and rating scale. Secondary outcomes were the operative time, radiographic measurements, including femoral offset, femoral anteversion, stem varus/valgus angle, and leg length discrepancy (LLD). The occurrence of postoperative complications was also recorded. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics before surgery. Compared to the PLA, the patients in the BI-DAA group had lower HGB drop (24.7 ± 13.3 g/L vs. 34.7 ± 16.7, P < .01) and transfusion rates (9/50 vs. 18/50, P = .04) and a shorter LOS (5.12 ± 1.5 vs. 6.40 ± 2.0 days, P < .01) without increasing the operative time (169.7 ± 17.3 vs. 167.5 ± 21.8 min, P = .58). The BI-DAA group yielded a smaller LLD (2.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.8 ± 3.0 mm, P < .01) and less variability in component orientation than the PLA group (100% vs. 93%, P = .01). As for the scar, the BI-DAA group produced a shorter incision length (9.7 ± 1.6 vs. 10.8 ± 2.0 mm, P < .01) and higher postoperative recovery satisfaction than the PLA group. Furthermore, the BI-DAA group had a reduced VAS score one week after surgery and had better functional recovery in three months postoperatively. The BI-DAA group had a higher incidence of LFCN dysesthesia (12/100 vs. 0/100 thighs, P < .01), while other complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. For simBTHA, the bikini incision offers early recovery, less variance in components orientation, better postoperative outcomes, and scar healing than the PLA. Therefore, the bikini incision could be a safe and feasible option for simBTHA recipients.

The efficacy of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested to reduce improper component positioning, though the effectiveness of PSI in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes comparing PSI and standard instrumentation (SI).

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies pertaining to the use of PSI in THA. Inclusion criteria included PSI used in THA, PSI was directly compared to SI, and publication in English. Exclusion criteria included non-primary THA, review articles, abstracts, book chapters, and animal models.

Results

2,458 studies were initially identified, with 13 studies (677 THAs: 338 controls, 339 PSI) meeting all criteria. PSI was favored for the deviation from the preoperative plan for acetabular cup position for anteversion (p = 0.04) and inclination (p = 0.0002); risk of acetabular cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone for anteversion (p = 0.005) and inclination (p < 0.0001); and postoperative Harris Hip Score (p = 0.0002). No significant differences were found for the deviation from the preoperative plan for femoral stem position for anteversion (p = 0.74) or varus/valgus (p = 0.15); intraoperative time (p = 0.55); or intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.62).

Conclusion

The use of PSI in THA is effective in improving acetabular component positioning and postoperative functional outcomes, without increasing intraoperative time or blood loss, compared to SI.