|
1
|
Galanis A, Karampitianis S, Vlamis J, Karampinas P, Vavourakis M, Vlachos C, Papagrigorakis E, Zachariou D, Sakellariou E, Varsamos I, Patilas C, Tsiplakou S, Papaioannou V, Kamariotis S. Corynebacterium striatum Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection: An Uncommon Pathogen of Concern? Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:273. [PMID: 38275553 PMCID: PMC10815444 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty is indubitably a dominant elective surgery in orthopaedics, contributing to prodigious improvement in the quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis. One of the most potentially devastating complications of this operation is periprosthetic joint infection. Immunocompromised patients might be afflicted by infrequent low-virulence organisms not typically detected with conventional procedures. Consequently, employing advanced identification methods, such as the circumstantial sonication of orthopaedic implants, could be crucial to managing such cases. CASE PRESENTATION We present a peculiar case of a 72-year-old female patient suffering from a chronic periprosthetic hip infection due to Corynebacterium striatum. The pathogen was only identified after rigorous sonication of the extracted implants. The overall management of this case was immensely exacting, primarily because of the patient's impaired immune system, and was finally treated with two-stage revision in our Institution. LITERATURE REVIEW Although copious literature exists concerning managing periprosthetic hip infections, no concrete guidelines are available for such infections in multimorbid or immunocompromised patients with rare low-virulence microorganisms. Hence, a diagnostic work-up, antibiotic treatment and appropriate revision timeline must be determined. Sonication of extracted implants could be a powerful tool in the diagnostic arsenal, as it can aid in identifying rare microbes, such as Corynebacterium spp. Pertinent antibiotic treatment based on antibiogram analysis and apposite final revision-surgery timing are the pillars for effective therapy of such infections. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Corynebacterium striatum has been increasingly recognized as an emerging cause of periprosthetic hip infection in the last decade. A conspicuous rise in such reports has been observed in multimorbid or immunocompromised patients after the COVID-19 pandemic. This case is the first report of Corynebacterium striatum periprosthetic hip infection diagnosed solely after the sonication of extracted implants. This paper aims to increase awareness surrounding Corynebacterium spp. prosthetic joint infections, while highlighting the fields for further apposite research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Galanis
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Spyridon Karampitianis
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - John Vlamis
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Panagiotis Karampinas
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Michail Vavourakis
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Christos Vlachos
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Eftychios Papagrigorakis
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Dimitrios Zachariou
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Evangelos Sakellariou
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Iordanis Varsamos
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Christos Patilas
- 3rd Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (A.G.); (S.K.); (J.V.); (P.K.); (C.V.); (E.P.); (D.Z.); (E.S.); (I.V.); (C.P.)
| | - Sofia Tsiplakou
- Department of Microbiology, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (S.T.); (V.P.); (S.K.)
| | - Vasiliki Papaioannou
- Department of Microbiology, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (S.T.); (V.P.); (S.K.)
| | - Spyridon Kamariotis
- Department of Microbiology, KAT General Hospital, Kifisia, 14561 Athens, Greece; (S.T.); (V.P.); (S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Pritchett JW. Hip Resurfacing in Teenagers. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:2618-2622. [PMID: 37295620 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goals of hip resurfacing are to relieve pain, restore function, and preserve future reconstructive options. Hip resurfacing is an attractive and sometimes the only option when the femoral canal is blocked, making total hip arthroplasty (THA) difficult. Hip resurfacing also can be an attractive option for a teenager on the rare occasion when a hip implant is needed. METHODS A cementless ceramic-coated femoral resurfacing implant matched with a highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular bearing was used in 105 patients (117 hips) aged 12 to 19 years. The mean follow-up was 14 years (range, 5 to 25). No patients were lost to follow-up before 19 years. Osteonecrosis, residuals of trauma, developmental dysplasia, and childhood hip diseases were the common reasons requiring surgery. Patients were evaluated using patient-reported outcomes, patient acceptable symptom states (PASS), and implant survivorships. Radiographs and retrievals were also examined. RESULTS There were 2 revisions (polyethylene liner exchange at 12 years and femoral revision for osteonecrosis at 14 years). The mean postoperative Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was 94 points (range, 80 to 100) and the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) score was 96 points (range, 80 to 100). All patients achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference improvement in their HHS and HOOS scores. There were 99 (85%) hip resurfacing procedures achieving a satisfactory PASS and 72 (69%) patients were active in sports. CONCLUSION Hip resurfacing is a highly technical procedure. Careful implant selection is required. The meticulous preoperative planning, careful extensile surgical exposure, and exacting implant placement in this study likely contributed to the favorable results achieved. Hip resurfacing allows THA as a future option in patients where the lifetime revision rate is a major consideration.
Collapse
|