1
|
Chen K, Aggarwal S, Baker H, Athiviraham A. Biologic Augmentation of Isolated Meniscal Repair. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2024; 17:223-234. [PMID: 38652368 PMCID: PMC11156815 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-024-09898-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The limited blood supply and intrinsic healing capacity of the meniscus contributes to suboptimal tissue regeneration following injury and surgical repair. Biologic augmentation techniques have been utilized in combination with isolated meniscal repair to improve tissue regeneration. Several innovative strategies such as Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), fibrin clots, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), bone marrow stimulation, meniscal scaffolds, and meniscal wrapping, are being explored to enhance repair outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of recent findings and conclusions regarding biologic augmentation techniques. RECENT FINDINGS Studies on PRP reveal mixed outcomes, with some suggesting benefits in reducing failure rates of isolated meniscal repair, while others question its efficacy. Fibrin clots and PRF (Platelet-rich fibrin), although promising, show inconsistent results and lack sufficient evidence for definitive conclusions. MSCs demonstrate potential in preclinical studies, but clinical trials have been limited and inconclusive. Bone marrow stimulation appears effective in certain contexts, but its broader applicability remains uncertain. Meniscal scaffolds, including CMI (Collagen Meniscal Implants) and Actifit (polyurethane scaffolds), show encouraging short- and mid-term outcomes but have not consistently surpassed traditional methods in the long term. Meniscal wrapping is infrequently studied but demonstrates positive short-term results with certain applications. The review reveals a diverse range of outcomes for biologic augmentation in meniscal repair. While certain techniques show promise, particularly in specific scenarios, the overall efficacy of these methods has yet to reach a consensus. The review underscores the necessity for standardized, high-quality research to establish the definitive effectiveness of these biologic augmentation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Chen
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sarthak Aggarwal
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hayden Baker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave MC 3079, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Aravind Athiviraham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave MC 3079, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vicens MH, Pujol O, Portas-Torres I, Aguilar M, Joshi N, Minguell J, Castellet E, Casaccia M. Treatment of chronic and complex meniscal tears with arthroscopic meniscus repair augmented with collagen matrix wrapping: failure rate and functional outcomes. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2024:10.1007/s00264-024-06241-1. [PMID: 38942964 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06241-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Meniscal wrapping is a fully arthroscopic technique that involves enhanced meniscal repair with a tissue-engineered collagen matrix wrapping. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using the meniscal wrapping technique for the treatment of chronic or complex meniscal tears. The primary objective is to assess its failure rate. The secondary objectives are to analyse complication rate, functional outcomes and overall patient satisfaction. METHODS This retrospective case series study included patients who sustained chronic and complex tears undergoing meniscal wrapping with autologous liquid bone marrow injection. Failure rate was considered if the patient underwent partial or complete meniscectomy or knee replacement during the follow-up, while other unexpected knee reoperations were considered as complications. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Score and Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were included (15 non-acute bucket-handle tears, three non-acute horizontal tears and three non-acute complex injuries). The failure rate was 9.5% at 33 months. The rate of other unplanned reoperations was 14.3%, but none of these complications were apparently directly related to the wrapping technique. The average postoperative IKDC was 73.3/100. No statistically significant difference was encountered between preinjury and postoperative Tegner Activity Score. The mean overall patient satisfaction was 88.3/100. CONCLUSIONS Meniscal wrapping can be safely used as an adjunctive technique to meniscal repair in such difficult-to-treat cases to preserve the meniscus. The technique achieves a low failure rate and promising results of knee function, and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marga H Vicens
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Pujol
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Reconstructive Surgery of the Locomotor System Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Irene Portas-Torres
- Reconstructive Surgery of the Locomotor System Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Aguilar
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of the Locomotor System Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nayana Joshi
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of the Locomotor System Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Minguell
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of the Locomotor System Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Castellet
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Reconstructive Surgery of the Locomotor System Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marcelo Casaccia
- Departament de Cirurgia I Ciències Morfològiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Knee Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demir IH, Karslı B. The Impact of Bone Marrow Venting Augmentation on Knee Functions in the Repair of Vertical/Longitudinal Meniscus Tears: A Triple Comparison. Indian J Orthop 2024; 58:527-534. [PMID: 38694689 PMCID: PMC11058150 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01135-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective Preserving and restoring meniscus function is crucial for maintaining knee biomechanics and overall functionality. To enhance the healing process after meniscus repair, various biological techniques have been introduced. In this study, three treatment approaches examined were bone marrow venting with stem cells (BMVP), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with meniscus repair, and isolated meniscus repair. Materials and Methods From 2015 to 2019, we retrospectively analyzed data from 83 patients who presented with complaints of knee pain or pain in addition to instability, were diagnosed with vertical/longitudinal meniscus tears, and underwent arthroscopic repair (30 with isolated repair, 28 with ACLR repair, and 25 with BMVP) at our University Hospital. Among the 28 patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture, pain and instability were the predominant complaints, whereas 55 patients with meniscus tear primarily complained pain. Clinical and functional conditions were assessed using Lysholm, WOMAC, IKDC, and VAS scores before and 18 months after surgery. Surgical success was evaluated based on Barrett's criteria. Causes of failure were analyzed considering demographic data, smoking status, injury time, tear location, shape, zone, and suture type and number. Results Of the participants, 58 were male, 25 were female, 61 had medial meniscus lesions, and 22 had lateral meniscus lesions. The tear types included 51 simple longitudinal tears, 18 bucket handle tears, and 14 complex tears. A significant improvement was observed in the postoperative 18 month Lysholm, WOMAC, and IKDC values in all three groups (p: 0.001). At the 18 month mark, clinical and functional outcomes were comparable between BMVP and ACLR repair groups (Lysholm p: 0.951, WOMAC p: 0.241, IKDC p: 0.984). Both of these procedures yielded better results compared to isolated meniscus repair (Lysholm p: 0.001, WOMAC p: 0.027, IKDC p: 0.001). Conclusion The superior clinical and functional outcomes observed after meniscus repair with BMVP and ACLR, compared to isolated meniscus repair, indicate positive effects of bone marrow stem cells, blood components, and tissue healing factors on meniscus repair and knee function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Halil Demir
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, T.C. Ministry of Health Gaziantep City Hospital, 27470 Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Burcin Karslı
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, 27310 Gaziantep, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wood A, Pyrz K, Lane P, Brabston E, Evely T, Casp A, Momaya A. Repair of a Radial Tear of the Meniscus Augmented With a Biocomposite Scaffold. Arthrosc Tech 2023; 12:e2353-e2357. [PMID: 38196862 PMCID: PMC10773256 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Meniscal tears are a common musculoskeletal pathology in the United States, affecting 61 in every 100,000 people. Surgical repair is indicated for certain tear patterns to reduce the risk of joint degeneration, normalize contact forces in the knee, and help restore normal knee kinematics. However, radial meniscus tear repairs fail to completely heal 38% of the time due to tear characteristics, biology, surgical technique, and inadequate rehabilitation. Recent efforts have incorporated biological augmentation to enhance the healing potential of the meniscus. The BioBrace is a biocomposite scaffold designed to mechanically reinforce tissue and biologically enhance healing. The purpose of this article is to describe an all-inside, meniscal radial tear repair augmented with BioBrace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audria Wood
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| | - Kaitlin Pyrz
- Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, U.S.A
| | - Pearce Lane
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| | - Eugene Brabston
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| | - Thomas Evely
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| | - Aaron Casp
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| | - Amit Momaya
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|