Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach

Reamed intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal multifragmentary femur fractures (AO/OTA 32-C) without fluoroscopy guidance: prospective analysis of methods and short-term outcomes in a low-resource setting

PURPOSE

To describe the methods and outcomes of reamed intramedullary nailing (IMN) of diaphyseal multifragmentary femur (AO/OTA C2 and C3) fractures (DMFFs) in a low-resource setting without fluoroscopy and fracture table.

METHODS

The prospective study involved 35 DMFFs among 318 femur fractures treated ≤ 3 weeks post-injury with SIGN nails. The fractures were fixed without fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming. Closed, mini-open or open reduction was done. Anatomical length and alignment were ensured using a surgical support triangle during retrograde nailing, and by an assistant during antegrade nailing. Follow-ups were done at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months.

RESULTS

DMFFs constituted 11.0% of the 318 fractures. Twenty-four (68.6%) were males. The mean age was 39.0 years (range 17-75 years). About 94.3% were injured in road traffic accidents. Fracture reduction was closed in 18, mini-open in 8 and full-open in 9. The operative times were significantly shorter for closed than open reduction (p = 0.001). Five fractures received a supplemental fixation with plate or lag screws. By the 12th post-operative week, 97.1% demonstrated continuing radiographic healing, 94.1% tolerated painless weight-bearing and 91.2% could squat & smile. There was no infection or noticeable rotational malunion. Five fractures healed with a limb-length discrepancy of < 2 cm.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility of reamed IMN of DMFFs without fluoroscopy. The outcomes were satisfactory. Although the small sample size and short follow-up period are limitations, the study could serve as a basis for future larger studies in low-resource settings.

Standard or Fin SIGN® nail? which option is better for the treatment of femoral fractures in low and middle-income countries?

PURPOSE

Femoral fractures are common in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), predominantly caused by high-energy trauma. The surgical implant generation network (SIGN®) program offers two different intramedullary nails in LMIC which are designed to be used without image intensifier free of charge for the patients: the SIGN standard nail (SSN®) and the SIGN Fin nail (SFN®). This study aimed to compare the results of the SSN® and the SFN® for the treatment of middle and distal shaft femoral fractures through a retrograde approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive, and non-experimental study including all consecutive patients who underwent surgical management of middle or distal shaft femoral fracture between January 2017 and May 2022 in an NGO hospital located in Freetown, Sierra Leone. The duration of surgery, type of reduction, complications like screw loosening, implant migration, anterior knee pain and non-union rate at six months of follow up were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were included in the study. Group A: 60 patients were managed with SSN® and Group B: 62 patients with SFN®. The mean operative time was 104 min with SSN® and 78 with SFN® (p < 0.001). Open reduction of the fracture was necessary in ten (16.7%) patients with SSN® and 12 (19.4%) patients treated with SFN® (p = 0.69). Non-union was observed in one (1.7%) patient with SSN® and two (3.2%) patients with SFN® (p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Both options seem equally effective in treating midshaft and distal femoral shaft fractures. The SFN® reduces the surgical time, due to this fact, in polytraumatized patients, patients with bilateral femur fracture or patients with ipsilateral tibia fracture, it can be considered as the best option to be used. There was no statistical difference in the complications presented by the two groups.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing with supplemental plate and lag screws allows early weight bearing following distal end-segment femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) in a low-resource setting

PURPOSE

To underline the feasibility of achieving early weight bearing in patients with distal end-segment femur fractures (AO/OTA 33) treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing and supplemental plate or lag screws in the absence of C-arm.

METHODS

41 distal end-segment femur fractures (DFFs) included in the study were treated with SIGN nails with or without a side plate in a center that lacked intraoperative fluoroscopy and fracture table. A medial or lateral para-patellar incision was used for fracture reduction, nail insertion and side plate placement. Follow-ups were done at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Distal end-segment fractures constituted 13.2% of all femur fractures treated. The patients' mean age and range were 49.6 and 23-83 years respectively. They were mostly injured in road traffic accidents. 27 were daily-income earners. By the 12th week post-operatively, 82.1% of them could flex their knee beyond 90°, all of them could bear weight fully, and 71.8% could squat & smile.

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted the procedure for retrograde nailing of DFFs in a setting without the requisite facilities for minimally-invasive surgeries. The findings demonstrated the feasibility of achieving an expedited weight bearing for the predominantly daily-income-earning victims to ensure early return to work and poverty reduction. While the small sample size is a limitation, the study does provide information that could serve as a basis for future randomized controlled trials in low-resource settings.