Aesthetic treatment of pectus excavatum: a new endoscopic technique using a porous polyethylene implant

Occurrence of Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscles in Patients with Medial Pectus Excavatum

Since 1994, we have used soft silicone blocks sculpted intraoperatively to correct pectus excavatum in male patients. This technique involves a horizontal access incision in the region of the lower edge of the sternum. During the dissection to expose the sternum, we observed a constant diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle and changes of the anatomy at its superior insertion. There is no report on this association.

Methods

Male patients with untreated medial pectus excavatum with indication for silicone block correction were enrolled. Age, weight, height, and the presence of other associated conditions were noted. Ultrasound examination was performed. During the surgery, the width of the linea alba was evaluated and the anatomical positioning of the insertion of rectus abdominis muscle was noted.

Results

From 2017 to 2019, 10 patients were submitted to surgery. The mean age was 27 years. All patients presented diastasis at the preoperative physical examination. Imaging examination reports showed diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle: seven partial epigastric separations and three total separations, two of which were associated with umbilical hernia. The intraoperative findings showed the line alba with a minimum of 23 mm and a maximum of 45 mm width at 4 cm from the xiphoid process edge. The muscle borders presented a curved lateral deviation up to the insertion in the costal arches with a distance ranging from 35 mm to 60 mm.

Conclusions

This study confirms the anatomical alterations of the superior portion of the rectus abdominis muscle. The authors discuss the surgical consequences and suggest that the semiology of rectus abdominis muscle is an important preoperative action in pectus excavatum patients.

Is breast asymmetry caused by volume differences in women with pectus excavatum?

This study determined the breast volumes of female patients with pectus excavatum that led to asymmetry and hypoplasia compared with normal women. This retrospective study enrolled 13 patients diagnosed with pectus excavatum and 13 normal women, randomly selected from a healthcare centre (n = 26), between January 2012 and December 2014. We measured breast volumes (n = 52) based on chest computed tomography (CT) of all patients using Image J software and divided them into four groups according to the side and presence of pectus excavatum. The mean volumes of the right and left breasts of patients with pectus excavatum were 209 ± 64 mL and 218 ± 67 mL, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.736). The mean volumes of the right and left breasts of normal women were 415 ± 197 mL and 439 ± 197 mL, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.754). The breasts of patients with pectus excavatum were significantly smaller than those of normal women (P < 0.001). Both breasts of patients with pectus excavatum were similar in size but were smaller than the breasts of normal women. Skeletal correction for breast asymmetry correction, followed by breast augmentation for breast hypoplasty correction, with a one- or two-step approach may be useful to improve the aesthetics of breast deformities in women with pectus excavatum.

Systematic review of surgical treatment techniques for adult and pediatric patients with pectus excavatum

This compares outcome measures of current pectus excavatum (PEx) treatments, namely the Nuss and Ravitch procedures, in pediatric and adult patients. Original investigations that stratified PEx patients based on current treatment and age (pediatric=0-21; adult 17-99) were considered for inclusion. Outcome measures were: operation duration, analgesia duration, blood loss, length of stay (LOS), outcome ratings, complications, and percentage requiring reoperations. Adult implant patients (18.8%) had higher reoperation rates than adult Nuss or Ravitch patients (5.3% and 3.3% respectively). Adult Nuss patients had longer LOS (7.3 days), more strut/bar displacement (6.1%), and more epidural analgesia (3 days) than adult Ravitch patients (2.9 days, 0%, 0 days). Excluding pectus bar and strut displacements, pediatric and adult Nuss patients tended to have higher complication rates (pediatric - 38%; adult - 21%) compared to pediatric and adult Ravitch patients (12.5%; 8%). Pediatric Ravitch patients clearly had more strut displacements than adult Ravitch patients (0% and 6.4% respectively). These results suggest significantly better results in common PEx surgical repair techniques (i.e. Nuss and Ravitch) than uncommon techniques (i.e. Implants and Robicsek). The results suggest slightly better outcomes in pediatric Nuss procedure patients as compared with all other groups. We recommend that symptomatic pediatric patients with uncomplicated PEx receive the Nuss procedure. We suggest that adult patients receive the Nuss or Ravitch procedure, even though the long-term complication rates of the adult Nuss procedure require more investigation.

The internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) breast-flap harvested from an asymmetric hyperplastic breast for correction of a mild funnel chest deformity

Pectus excavatum deformity is the most frequent congenital anomaly of the thoracic wall. If the invasive surgical procedures of thoracoplasty are not indicated or the patient refuses them, alternative treatment options should be considered. In such cases, local or distant transposition of autologous tissue could be appropriate. This report presents a selected case of funnel chest deformity and concomitant unilateral breast hyperplasia. Both deformities were corrected simultaneously using a pedicled internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap dissected from the hyperplastic breast. This is a safe, reliable, low-morbidity, one-stage option for adult women that uses an easy-to-harvest flap for simultaneous correction of mild funnel chest deformity and concomitant breast hyperplasia with a single resulting scar.

How to perform breast augmentation safely for a pectus excavatum patient

BACKGROUND

Pectus excavatum is the most common chest wall deformity. Women with pectus excavatum may have associated hypoplastic breasts and often desire breast augmentation. This report describes how to perform breast augmentation safely for a pectus excavatum patient.

METHODS

In the past 5 years, the authors have treated 11 women with hypoplastic breasts and pectus excavatum. Their ages have varied from 21 to 39 years. The women generally were healthy without cardiovascular function impairment. Four of the women had breast asymmetry, with a smaller right breast. It was decided to use wide silicone implants to augment the breast and to camouflage the chest wall deformity. The implants were placed under the pectoralis major muscle in all cases.

RESULTS

The follow-up period varied from 10 months to 4.5 years. No acute or late complications related to the breast augmentation were encountered. All the patients were satisfied with the result, and none desired further surgical treatment for pectus excavatum. For two patients, a small depression in the upper part of the breast was persistent after surgery due to insufficient implant coverage.

CONCLUSION

Most women with pectus excavatum desire to have the deformity corrected with minimal or no scarring. The chest is known to be an area prone to hypertrophic or keloid scars. The reported approach is simple and safe, easily camouflaging the deformity. It is a short procedure that results in high satisfaction.