The influence of external ultrasound on the histologic architecture of the organic capsule around smooth silicone implants: experimental study in rats

The effects of human amniotic membrane on silicone related capsule formation in rats

Silicone breast implants are commonly used materials in plastic surgery for breast augmentation and reconstruction and the most severe complication of silicone implants are capsule contraction which occurs in 40% of patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate how the amniotic membrane alters the capsule formation effects of silicone 24 wistar rats were used in the study. We placed a bare silicone block into the left side (Subgroup A) and single layer amniotic membrane coated silicone block into the right side (Subgroup B) of the rats back. The rats were then separated into three groups and in group 1 rats were euthanized after 3 weeks, in group 2 after 12 weeks and in group 3 after 24 weeks. Then capsule thickness, fibroblast and lymphocyte cell counts were evaluated for each sample. In Group 2 and group 3, the capsule thickness in Subgroup B was detected to be statistically significantly lower than that in Subgroup A. In Group 1, 2, and 3, the lymphocyte count in the capsule tissue taken from Subgroup B was lower than Subgroup A but the difference was not statistically significant. In Group 2 and 3, the fibrocyte count detected in the capsule tissue in Subgroup B was found to be statistically significantly lower than Subgroup A. the amniotic membrane was demonstrated to reduce capsule thickness by the antifibrinolytic effect in our study.

Biological acellular pericardial mesh regulated tissue integration and remodeling in a rat model of breast prosthetic implantation

The use of biological meshes has proven beneficial in surgical restriction and periprosthetic capsular contracture following breast prosthetic-reconstruction. Three different types (smooth, texturized, and polyurethane) of silicone round mini prostheses were implanted under rat skin with or without two different bovine acellular pericardial biological meshes (APMs, BioRipar, and Tutomesh). One hundred eighty-six female rats were divided into 12 groups, sacrificed after 3, 6, and 24 weeks and tissue samples investigated by histology and immunohistochemistry. Implantation of both APMs, with or without prostheses, reduced capsular α-SMA expression and CD3⁺ inflammatory cell infiltration, increasing capillary density and cell proliferation, with some differences. In particular, Tutomesh was associated with higher peri-APM CD3⁺ inflammation, prosthetic capsular dermal α-SMA expression and less CD31⁺ vessels and cell proliferation compared with BioRipar. None differences were observed in tissue integration and remodeling following the APM + prostheses implantation; the different prostheses did not influence tissue remodeling. The aim of our study was to investigate if/how the use of different APMs, with peculiar intrinsic characteristics, may influence tissue integration. The structure of APMs critically influenced tissue remodeling after implantation. Further studies are needed to develop new APMs able to optimize tissue integration and neoangiogenesis minimizing periprosthetic inflammation and fibrosis.

Histological evaluation of capsules formed by silicon implants coated with polyurethane foam and with a textured surface in rats

PURPOSE:

To assess the capsules formed by silicone implants coated with polyurethane foam and with a textured surface.

METHODS:

Sixty-four Wistar albinus rats were divided into two groups of 32 each using polyurethane foam and textured surface. The capsules around the implants were analyzed for 30, 50, 70 and 90 days. Were analyzed the following parameters: foreign body reaction, granulation tissue, presence of myofibroblasts, neoangiogenesis, presence of synovial metaplasia, capsular thickness, total area and collagen percentage of type I and III, in capsules formed around silicone implants in both groups.

RESULTS:

The foreign body reaction was only present in the four polyurethane subgroups. The formation of granulation tissue and the presence of myofibroblasts were higher in the four polyurethane subgroups. Regarding to neoangiogenesis and synovial metaplasia, there was no statistical difference between the groups. Polyurethane group presented (all subgroups) a greater capsule thickness, a smaller total area and collagen percentage of type I and a higher percentage area of type III, with statistical difference.

CONCLUSION:

The use of polyurethane-coated implants should be stimulated by the long-term results in a more stable capsule and a lower incidence of capsular contracture, despite developing a more intense and delayed inflammatory reaction in relation to implants with textured surface.

Biomedical implant capsule formation: lessons learned and the road ahead

Clinicians and investigators have been implanting biomedical devices into patients and experimental animals for centuries. There is a characteristic complex inflammatory response to the presence of the biomedical device with diverse cell signaling, followed by migration of fibroblasts to the implant surface and the eventual walling off of the implant in a collagen capsule. If the device is to interact with the surrounding tissues, the collagen envelope will eventually incapacitate the device or myofibroblasts can cause capsular contracture with resulting distortion, migration, or firmness. This review analyzes the various tactics used in the past to modify or control capsule formation with suggestions for future investigative approaches.

Evaluation of the biocompatibility of silicone gel implants - histomorphometric study

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

NONE DECLARED Breast implants are medical devices that are used to augment breast size or to reconstruct the breast following mastectomy or to correct a congenital abnormality. Breast implants consist of a silicone outer shell and a filler (most commonly silicone gel or saline). Approximately 5 to 10 million women worldwide have breast implants. Histomorphometric study to evaluate the biological tissue compatibility of silicone implants suitable for plastic surgery and the adverse effects and risks of this material. Thirty Wistar white rats received subcutaneous implants and the revestiment of silicone gel Silimed ®®, and randomized into six groups of five animals each, according to the type of implanted material and the time of sacrifice. Eight areas of 60.11mm2 corresponding to the obtained surgical pieces were analyzed, counting mesenchymal cells, eosinophils, and foreign body giant cells, observing an acceptable biocompatibility in all implants, for subsequent statistical analysis by Tukey test. Silicone gel showed inflammation slightly greater than for other groups, with tissue reactions varying from light to moderate, whose result was the formation of a fibrous capsule around the material, recognized by the organism as a foreign body. Despite frequent local complications and adverse outcomes, this research showed that the silicone and top layer presented an acceptable chronic inflammatory reaction, which did not significantly differ from the control group. In general, it is possible to affirm that silicone gel had acceptable levels of biocompatibility, confirmed the rare presence of foreign body giant cells, and when of the rupture, formed a fibrous capsule around the material, separating the material of the organism.

Is the shear wave sonographic elastography correlated with pain after breast augmentation with silicone implants an indication of inflammatory activity? A preliminary report

Introduction

Formation of a capsule is a natural inflammatory response to a foreign body such as a breast implant. Breast capsular contracture is the most severe complication of implant surgery.

Aim

To evaluate breast tissues and the periprosthetic reaction with sonoelastography.

Material and methods

Nineteen patients aged 20-41 underwent breast augmentation with silicone-filled implants. Their 38 breasts were evaluated before surgery, and 7 and 14 days after surgery. Whole breast stiffness was measured by applanation tonometry. Patients underwent shear wave elastography and Young's moduli of breast tissues and the periprosthetic capsule were estimated. During surgery patients underwent standard anaesthesia and were released home 2 days later after removal of drainage. Each day, patients completed the pain visual analogue scale questionnaire separately for left and right breasts.

Results

Applanation tonometry did not correlate with any parameter. In shear wave elastography we observed statistically significant changes in elasticity of all breast tissues with the highest values on day 7 after surgery and decreasing on day 14. The correlations between pain and capsule elasticity in lower quadrants measured were significant between days 4 and 10, whereas correlations of pain with applanation tonometry were insignificant. Glandular tissue elasticity in lower quadrants did not correlate with pain, whereas in upper quadrants there was a significant correlation on days 6-10. Fatty tissue, muscle and thoracic fascia elasticity did not correlate with breast pain. Breast implant volume correlated with pain only shortly after surgery, but did not correlate with any sonoelastographic parameters.

Conclusions

Breast pain correlates strongly with periprosthetic stiffness in elastography 4 to 10 days after breast augmentation, suggesting the possible role of an inflammatory reaction.