Face-lift incision combined with sternomastoid muscular flap in parotidectomy

Endoscope-Assisted Hairline Approach for Head and Neck Masses: A Review

Conventional surgery through a transcervical incision is indicated for the treatment of certain tumors in the head and neck. However, this method can cause multiple problems, including scarring and cosmetic concerns. The endoscope-assisted hairline approach, which serves as an alternative to conventional surgical procedures, is gaining popularity due to its excellent cosmetic and functional outcomes. However, given the anatomical complexity involved, the endoscope-assisted hairline technique is not frequently employed in head and neck surgery. The evolution of the hairline surgical approach has been influenced by changes in disease conditions and recent advances in surgical tools. This review article discusses the use of endoscope-assisted hairline approaches in the resection of head and neck masses, focusing on the surgical procedure and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Comparison of various surgical incisions in parotidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

This network meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively compare the operative and postoperative outcomes of different parotidectomy incisions.

Methods

Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to April 2022. A complete Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the Markov Monte Carlo method in OpenBUGS.

Results

Seventeen studies with 1609 patients were included. Thirteen were retrospective cohort studies, three were prospective cohort studies, and one was a randomized controlled study. The quality of evidence was rated as very low in most comparisons. The incision satisfaction score of the modified facelift incision (MFI), retroauricular hairline incision (RAHI), V-shaped incision (VI) were higher than that of the modified Blair incision (MBI) (MBI vs. MFI: mean difference [MD] -1.39; 95% credible interval [CrI] -2.23, -0.57) (MBI vs. RAHI: MD -2.25; 95% CrI -3.40, -1.12) (MBI vs. VI: MD -2.58; 95% CrI -3.71, -1.46); the tumor size treated by VI was smaller than that by MBI (MD 5.15; 95% CrI 0.76, 9.38) and MFI (MD 5.16; 95% CrI 0.34, 9.86); and the risk of transient facial palsy in the MFI was lower than that in the MBI (OR 2.13; 95% CrI 1.28, 3.64). There were no differences in operation time, drainage volume, wound infection, hematoma, salivary complications, Frey syndrome, or permanent facial palsy between incision types.

Conclusion

The traditional MBI is frequently used for large tumor volumes, but the incision satisfaction score is low and postoperative complication control is poor. However, emerging incisions performed well in terms of incision satisfaction scores and control of complications. More randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the different parotidectomy incisions. Patients should be fully informed about the characteristics of each incision to make the most informed decision, along with the physician’s advice.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022331756

Efficacy of modified face lift incision for the resection of benign parotid gland tumor located anteriorly or superiorly

OBJECTIVES

The goals of resection of benign parotid gland tumor are complete resection of lesion and preservation of the facial nerve function. Traditionally, the bayonet-shaped incision (Blair incision: BI) and the modified face lift incision (mFLI) are commonly used for parotidectomy. However, concerns exist about the adequacy of exposure and identification of the facial nerve in anterior or superior parotid lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between BI and mFLI and to evaluate the adequacy, possible indications, and limitations of mFLI for the resection of benign parotid gland tumors located anteriorly or superiorly.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 175 patients with various types of benign parotid tumor who underwent partial parotidectomy via BI (97 patients) or mFLI (78 patients). Tumors were divided into five categories depending on their location: anterior, superior, inferior, middle, and deep lobe tumors. The outcomes of operation were analyzed according to tumor location between the incision types.

RESULTS

Tumor locations were not significantly different between the two groups. Transient facial palsy occurred in 23 out of 152 patients (15.1%); permanent palsy was not observed in either group. The incidence rates of facial palsy were higher among patients with superior and deep lobe tumors; in the mFLI and BI groups, proportions of superior tumors were 22.2% and 27.2%, respectively, and those of deep lobe tumors were 35.7% and 23.5%, respectively. With regard to superior and anterior tumors, the incidence rate of postoperative facial palsy was insignificantly lower in the mFLI group (10.5%) than in the BI group (18.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in the incidence rates of postoperative facial palsy between mFLI and BI for any tumor location. Use of the mFLI is feasible for the resection of most benign parotid tumors located anteriorly or superiorly.

Individualized Use of Facelift, Retroauricular Hairline, and V-Shaped Incisions for Parotidectomy

PURPOSE

Despite the increased need for better cosmetic outcomes following parotidectomy, there is no study on the individualized use of esthetic approaches for parotidectomy. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of individualzsed esthetic approaches for parotidectomy using facelift (FL), retroauricular hairline (RAH), and V-shaped incisions, and compare their surgical and cosmetic outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Between 2015 and 2019, we included patients who underwent parotidectomy using FL, RAH, and V-shaped incisions for the treatment of benign parotid tumors. The surgical approach for parotidectomy was determined based on tumor location and each patient's cosmetic demand, following a comprehensive discussion of available esthetic approaches. Surgical and cosmetic outcomes were assessed as primary outcome variables, which were compared among the 3 incision groups. One-way analysis of variance/Kruskal-Wallis test and the chi-squared test were used to inspect differences in continuous and categorical variables, respectively, among the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients, consisting of 122, 50, and 41 patients in the FL, RAH, and V-shaped groups, respectively, were included in the present study. In the FL, RAH, and V-shaped groups, the patient age was 53.5, 51.8, and 42.1 years, respectively (P < .001), and the tumor size was 2.8, 2.7, and 1.9 cm, respectively (P < .001). All parotidectomies were successfully completed with no incision extension or major complications. The subjective scar satisfaction scores assessed at 3 months postoperatively were 8.5, 9.1, 9.2 in the FL, RAH, and V-shaped groups, respectively (P < .001). However, the Vancouver scar scale was consistent across all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized use of esthetic approaches for parotidectomy is feasible and yields improved cosmetic results, leading to high patient satisfaction. Although FL incision is still the standard approach for esthetic parotidectomy, both RAH and the V-shaped incisions could further enhance the cosmetic outcomes of parotidectomy.

Optimizing the Aesthetic Result of Parotidectomy with a Facelift Incision and Temporoparietal Fascia Flap

The 3 most common problems after a parotidectomy are cheek contour deformity, Frey syndrome (gustatory sweating), and a visible scar on the neck. These problems can potentially be prevented by (1) facelift type incisions, which eliminate the neck incision and (2) interposition of temporoparietal fascia at the parotidectomy site that fills the defect and provides a barrier to aberrant neuronal regeneration. We followed 11 patients who underwent parotidectomy (9 superficial and 2 total parotidectomies) for a variety of parotid tumors between December 2001 and January 2018. Facelift type incisions were used in all patients, and temporoparietal fascia flaps were used to fill the parotidectomy defects. The last 6 patients were tested for objective evidence of Frey syndrome with the Minor Starch Iodine test. Patients were then followed for up to 7 years (11 months to 7 years, average 3 years). All patients had well-hidden scars and good contour of the cheeks. None of the patients developed subjective or objective evidence of Frey syndrome. This small series suggests that the aesthetic result after parotidectomy can be improved by using a facelift incision and placement of a temporoparietal fascia flap into the parotidectomy defect. Additionally, the tissue barrier thus provided may also help to prevent Frey syndrome.

Use of the SMAS flap for reconstruction of the parotid lodge

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the benefits of the SMAS flap in patients with benign tumours of the parotid gland treated by superficial parotidectomy. We carried out a retrospective chart review on 123 patients suffering from benign tumours of the parotid gland admitted to our Institution between March 1997 and March 2010. A superficial parotidectomy was performed in all the cases reported. Our sample was divided in two groups basing SMAS flap reconstruction done (Group 2) or not (Group 1) after superficial parotidectomy. Reconstruction using SMAS flap was accomplished in 64 patients. Chi-square test was used to assess statistical difference between the two groups. The level of statistical significance was P < 0.05. No significant differences concerning hematoma, wound infection and facial paralysis were observed between the first and second group (3.38 vs 1.56% [P > 0.05], 8.47% vs 4.68% [P > 0.05], 5.08% vs 0.00% [P > 0.05]). Transient facial nerve weakness, fistula, dip skin and Frey's syndrome were significantly more frequent without SMAS flap reconstruction (10.16% vs 3.125% [P < 0.05], 13.55% vs 3.125% [P < 0.05], 13.55% vs 3.125% [P < 0.05], 20.33% vs 0% [P < 0.05] respectively). The use of the SMAS flap is able to reduce the cosmetic and functional complications that occur after the removal of a benign tumour of the parotid through the superficial parotidectomy technique, above all, it reduces the occurrence of Frey's syndrome.

Modification of Blair Approach With a Modified Endaural Component to Access the Parotid Region

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to present our experience with a modification of the Blair approach to the parotid area, by means of a modified endaural component, which provides both excellent exposure and optimal functional and esthetic results, mainly over the preauricular area.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case series study was performed. It included surgical cases of patients who were operated on the parotid region in which the mentioned approach was indicated. The information was collected from the database available at the Universidad El Bosque Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department in Bogota, Colombia from 2008 to 2013.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 12 patients, with ages ranging from 23 to 56 years and a mean age of 38 years. A total of 8 patients were women and 4 patients were men. Parotid pathologies included salivary gland tumor (10 patients) and cranial base tumor (2 patients). Procedures executed were: superficial lobe and total parotidectomy resection, pharynx extended and cranial base tumor resections.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation presents our experience with a modified approach to the parotid region. This approach gives an extended and safe exposure to the region with excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Esthetic outcome after soft tissue reconstruction of the face using deep dissection and composite facelift technique

PURPOSE

Large defects in the face resulting from the excision of malignant tumors, trauma, and congenital malformation pose a significant challenge to reconstructive surgeons. Achieving good esthetic and functional outcomes is often very demanding.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A facelift technique was used in 47 patients (25 female, 22 male; age range, 17.5 to 82.3 years; mean age, 49.3 years) to replace lost tissue of the face from 2009 through 2012. The minimum defect size was 2 cm in diameter and the maximum was 8 cm. To achieve tension-free coverage with a reliable blood supply, a deep-plane dissection, including the skin and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), was performed. The deep sub-SMAS dissection was extended into the neck and the contralateral part, as needed. A thick flap was created and composite lifting was performed.

RESULTS

No significant deformity concerning the lower eyelids, nose, and lip was registered. Most scars could be placed in hidden regions and became undetectable after a year. The facial nerve function remained intact in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Using these facelift techniques, including the incision, sub-SMAS dissection for volumetric positioning of the skin, and the SMAS flap, the closure of extensive facial defects with excellent functional and esthetic results is conceivable.

Facelift approach for parotidectomy: an evolving aesthetic technique

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on the modified facelift incision for parotidectomy and to identify the scope and safety of this approach, along with cosmetic outcomes. Where available, a direct comparison was made with Blair's incision (BI).

DATA SOURCES

Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and CINHAL databases for English-language studies published between 1960 and 2011 on the facelift approach for parotidectomy.

REVIEW METHODS

Exclusion criteria were studies reporting on concurrent facelift, studies that used synthetic material for reconstruction of the surgical bed, descriptive studies, and studies with duplicate patient data. Outcome measures were candidacy for surgery, variations in incision, cosmetic outcomes, surgical time, complication rates, and limitations.

RESULTS

Of the initial 139 studies, 11 studies encompassing 628 patients were included. Male-to-female ratio was 0.49:1, and average age was 47.1 years. In total, 582 surgeries were performed for benign lesions. Only 10 studies specified the extent of surgery: 8 authors used it for performing superficial/partial parotidectomy, and 2 described 17 cases of total parotidectomy. Tumors up to 8 cm have been excised, with a median value of 4 cm. Operative time, formally analyzed in 3 studies, was not significantly different when compared with BI. Complication rates were not increased with this approach. Aesthetic outcomes pertaining to postoperative scar were good, as reported by the patients.

CONCLUSION

The facelift approach is a cosmetically superior approach to parotid tumors as proven by objective data. Most publications in the literature pertaining to the modified facelift incision for parotidectomy have been in the past decade, lending credence to its rising popularity.

Parotid surgery for benign tumours

PURPOSE

The majority of parotid tumours are benign, making parotid surgery a compromise between adequate tumour excision and preservation of function and facial harmony. Besides the traditional superficial or total parotidectomy, less invasive techniques have been described with similar recurrent rates. The aim of this review is to assess the evidence in the published literature and to summarise the advantages and disadvantages of the available techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search in Pubmed for studies on surgery of benign parotid tumours (BPTs) published between January 2000 and January 2012 was conducted. Case series with a clear description of the surgical technique and a minimum number of 10 patients were included.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-three articles were found, 49 abstracts reviewed and 37 case series were selected for this review. The surgical techniques for benign parotid tumours can largely be grouped into facial nerve dissecting (superficial parotidectomy, partial superficial parotidectomy and total parotidectomy) and non-nerve dissecting techniques (extracapsular dissection). With all of the currently used techniques, a low recurrence (<3 %) with a low incidence of permanent facial nerve morbidity (0.2-4 %) can be achieved. The tumour-facial nerve interface and pseudopodia are areas at risk for positive margins.

CONCLUSION

There is currently no agreement in the literature about the extent of surgery for BPTs to obtain an adequate margin. The tumour nerve interface is the predetermined area at risk for tumour spillage and positive margin. A prolonged follow-up is recommended. Further long-term randomised clinical trials are required to address the question of the extent of the excision in benign parotid surgery.