Closed-Suction Drains After Subcutaneous Mastectomy for Gynecomastia: Do They Reduce Complications?

Liposuction and port site nipple sparing mastectomy: an alternative method for the operative treatment of gynecomastia at Alexandria main university hospital

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is characterized by unusually large masses that radiate concentrically from the base of the nipple and is caused by abnormal growth of the glandular tissue of the male breast. An alternative strategy for the surgical treatment of gynecomastia was used in this experimental study, which aims to use liposuction and port site nipple sparing mastectomy.

METHODS

The study was conducted in the surgical oncology unit at Alexandria Main University Hospital included 103 patients with a mean age of 27 and no medical history. 100 patients had bilateral gynecomastia, and three patients had unilateral gynecomastia,with two having it on the right side and one on the left.

RESULTS

Among the 103 participants, 83 had grade II gynecomastia and 20 had grade I. Only one of the three patients who participated in the study had an expanding hematoma on one side that needed to be surgically evacuated in the operating room. None of our patients experienced an infection or seroma following surgery. Furthermore, only three of our patients experienced nipple areolar complicated superficial epidermolysis, which need regular dressings until recovery. Of the 103 patients, 97 (94.17%) were pleased with the outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Liposuction and port site nipple sparing mastectomy are viable options for treating grade I to II gynecomastia, particularly if the patient prefers a more aesthetically pleasing chest contour; no scars equals better patient satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered.

Aesthetic training concept during plastic surgery residency - Opportunity or risk?

Background

Aesthetic surgery training renders to be challenging to acquire sufficient hands-on experience during residency. To resolve this problem, the "Munich Model" was established in our clinic: Senior residents perform aesthetic surgeries, supervised by an experienced plastic surgeon while patients benefit from reduced surgery costs. With this model, we hypothesize no significant differences in the postoperative outcome between procedures performed by residents and plastic surgeons.

Methods

Between August 2012 and December 2017, 481 aesthetic surgeries were included in this retrospective single-center study, of which 283 were performed by residents and 198 by plastic surgeons. Procedures included mastopexy, abdominoplasty, extremity lift, breast reduction, breast augmentation, facial surgery, aesthetic liposuction and lipedema liposuction. Postoperative outcomes were compared regarding surgery time, time of drain removal, inpatient length of stay, duration of wound healing, perioperative blood loss and occurrence of major (surgical revision needed) and minor complications (no surgery needed).

Results

We found no significant differences in aesthetic surgical procedures between residents and board-certified plastic surgeons in the outcome measures of surgery duration, time of drain removal, inpatient length of stay, perioperative blood loss and complication rate, including major and minor complications. Only the inpatient stay was prolonged in aesthetic liposuctions performed by residents.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates comparatively that supervised aesthetic surgeries at a university hospital utilizing the "Munich Model" widely meet the specialist surgeons' standards.

Measurement of Postoperative Quality of Pain in Abdominoplasty Patients-An Outcome Oriented Prospective Study

(1) Background: Postoperative pain is a frequently underestimated complication significantly influencing surgical outcome and patient satisfaction. While abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed plastic surgery procedures, studies investigating postoperative pain are limited in current literature. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, 55 subjects who underwent horizontal abdominoplasty were included. Pain assessment was performed by using the standardized questionnaire of the Benchmark Quality Assurance in Postoperative Pain Management (QUIPS). Surgical, process and outcome parameters were then used for subgroup analysis. (3) Results: We found a significantly decreased minimal pain level in patients with high resection weight compared to the low resection weight group (p = 0.01 *). Additionally, Spearman correlation shows significant negative correlation between resection weight and the parameter "Minimal pain since surgery" (rs = -0.332; p = 0.013). Furthermore, average mood is impaired in the low weight resection group, indicating a statistical tendency (p = 0.06 and a Χ² = 3.56). We found statistically significant higher maximum reported pain scores (rs = 0.271; p = 0.045) in elderly patients. Patients with shorter surgery showed a statistically significant (Χ² = 4.61, p = 0.03) increased claim for painkillers. Moreover, "mood impairment after surgery" shows a dramatic trend to be enhanced in the group with shorter OP duration (Χ² = 3.56, p = 0.06). (4) Conclusions: While QUIPS has proven to be a useful tool for the evaluation of postoperative pain therapy after abdominoplasty, only continuous re-evaluation of pain therapy is a prerequisite for constant improvement of postoperative pain management and may be the first approach to develop a procedure-specific pain guideline for abdominoplasty. Despite a high satisfaction score, we detected a subpopulation with inadequate pain management in elderly patients, patients with low resection weight and a short duration of surgery.

Complications and Quality of Life following Gynecomastia Correction in Adolescents and Young Men

BACKGROUND

Persistent adolescent gynecomastia negatively affects health-related quality of life. Surgery results in psychosocial improvements, but the effects of postoperative complications on health-related quality of life are unknown. The authors examined whether complications following adolescent gynecomastia surgery impact postoperative health-related quality of life.

METHODS

Patients aged 12 to 21 years who underwent surgical correction of unilateral/bilateral gynecomastia between 2007 and 2019 were enrolled (n = 145). Relevant demographic and clinical data were obtained from medical records. Fifty-one patients completed the following surveys preoperatively, and at 6 months and 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 years postoperatively: 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Version 2), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the 26-item Eating Attitudes Test.

RESULTS

Within a median period of 8.6 months, 36 percent of breasts experienced at least one complication. The most common were residual tissue (12.6 percent), contour irregularities (9.2 percent), and hematomas (7.8 percent). Patients reported significant postoperative improvements in self-esteem and in seven health-related quality-of-life domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health) at a median of 33.3 months. Postoperative survey scores did not vary by grade or procedure, or largely by body mass index category or complication status. However, patients aged younger than 17 years at surgery scored significantly higher than older patients in the Short-Form Health Survey Vitality and Mental Health domains postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related quality-of-life improvements are achievable in adolescents through surgical correction of persistent gynecomastia. Postoperatively, patients largely experienced similar health-related quality-of-life gains irrespective of complication status, grade, surgical technique, or body mass index category. Minor postcorrection complications are but do not appear to limit postoperative health-related quality-of-life benefits.

Hematoma following gender-affirming mastectomy: A systematic review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Hematomas are reported to be the most common immediate complication in patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy, with rates substantially higher than those associated with other types of breast surgery. This study sought to examine the breadth of current literature and provide evidence-based explanations regarding the development of hematomas in chest masculinizing surgery and technical considerations for reducing their incidence.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify all articles related to gender-affirming mastectomy published through September 2021. Literature search yielded 2,661 articles for screening, of which 20 met inclusion criteria. Themes from the selected articles were compiled to generate consensus statements qualified by associated level of evidence (LOE).

RESULTS

The rate of hematoma following gender-affirming mastectomy is reported in the literature ranging from 0% to 31.2%. The use of more limited, nipple-sparing incisions is associated with a higher hematoma rate than mastectomy with free nipple grafting (Level III). There is no conclusive evidence indicating any relationship between the use of masculinizing hormones and the incidence of hematoma (Level IV). Factors such as body mass index (Level III) and breast size (Level III) were not found to influence hematoma risk, though nicotine use (Level IV) was significantly associated with the incidence of hematoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Hematoma is a known complication following gender-affirming mastectomy. The use of limited incision approaches has the strongest association with an increased risk of hematoma. There is no evidence indicating an association between hormone use (i.e., testosterone) and hematoma incidence. Future studies are needed to better define factors, interventions, and protocols to reduce the rate of hematoma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Perioperative Risk Factors for Prolonged Blood Loss and Drainage Fluid Secretion after Breast Reconstruction

Background: Surgical breast reconstruction is an integral part of cancer treatment but must not compromise oncological safety. Patient-dependent risk factors (smoking, BMI, etc.) are said to influence perioperative outcomes and have often been investigated. Here, we analyzed independent perioperative risk factors for increased postoperative blood loss or drainage fluid volume loss and their possible impact. Methods: Patients undergoing breast reconstructions after breast cancer with either tissue expanders, definitive breast implants, or autologous breast reconstruction were analyzed. The collected data on patients’ characteristics, blood, and drainage fluid loss were correlated and statistically investigated. Results: Traditional patient-dependent risk factors did not influence blood loss or drainage volumes. On the contrary, patients with preoperative anemia had significantly higher drainage outputs compared to non-anemic patients (U = 2448.5; p = 0.0012). The administration of low molecular weight heparin showed a tendency of increased drainage output. Similar correlations could be seen in prolonged procedure time, all of which contributed to prolonged hospital stay (τb = 0.371; p < 0.00001). Conclusion: Preoperative anemia is one of the most critical factors influencing postoperative drainage fluid output. Previously assumed patient-dependent risk factors did not affect drainage output. Preoperative anemia must be monitored, and if possible, treated preoperatively to reduce postoperative morbidity.

Gynecomastia and Chest Masculinization: An Updated Comprehensive Reconstructive Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia is a common finding in males. Clinical aspect varies widely in world populations showing peculiar hallmarks according to different body shapes reflecting personal expectations; therefore, a surgical plan must be tailored on individual basis to all type of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A total of 522 patients, treated for bilateral gynecomastia from January 2007 to January 2019, were included and reviewed in this retrospective study. Considering physical status BMI, muscular trophism, hypertrophy of the mammary region, nipple-areola disorder, gland and skin cover consistency, a four-tier classification system has been used to classify the deformity and to assess a surgical plan. In all cases, a subcutaneous mastectomy was performed under direct vision.

RESULTS

No recurrence of the deformity was observed as well as major complications such as necrosis, and high level of satisfaction was observed in all groups. No breast cancer was found at the histological examinations Operative time ranged from 25 minutes up to 120 minutes and hospitalization time ranged from 1 to 3 days.

CONCLUSION

Since the physical status is strictly related to the clinical features of the disorder, a comprehensive classification system and a reconstructive algorithm are proposed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Method for Flushing Surgical Drains Using a Butterfly Needle

Surgical drains placed during breast surgery can become blocked by clots or other debris, which may lead to infection of the prosthetic and seroma or hematoma formation from improper drainage. Current methods involve stripping the drain, which does not clear the pores inside the cavity, or flushing the drain at the opposite end using a syringe with the debris going into the cavity being drained. The authors propose an easily available flushing option using a butterfly needle inserted at an angle that provides a sterile and efficient method for flushing the drain near the body cavity and clearing blockages. This creates a self-sealing valve that can be reinforced with Tegaderm and allows for the use of antibiotics or hemostatic agents through it. The primary author has performed this technique in-office in multiple patients undergoing breast augmentation, mastopexy/mammaplasty, breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and breast revision surgeries requiring implants or expanders with satisfactory results and no complications. This method is limited in that it must be performed by a health care professional, but it is easy to perform.

[Personal preference, experience, intuition and school of surgery dominate the use of wound drainage in dermatosurgery]

Hintergrund

Die Verwendung von Drainagesystemen in der Dermatochirurgie erfolgt bislang ohne evidenzbasierte Daten. Indikationen, Komplikationen und Kontraindikationen werden traditionell von Operateur zu Operateur weitergegeben, sind jedoch bisher nicht definiert.

Methodik

Es wurde eine internetbasierte Umfrage erstellt und unter den Mitgliedern der DGDC e. V. (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Dermatochirurgie e. V.) ausgesandt. Abgefragt wurden das allgemeine Behandlungsverhalten im deutschsprachigen Raum in Bezug auf die Anwendung der Wunddrainage nach dermatologischen Operationen sowie die Nutzungsgewohnheiten und Erfahrungen der Kollegen mit Drainage-assoziierten Komplikationen.

Ergebnisse

Es haben 12,73 % der angeschriebenen DGDC-Mitglieder den Fragebogen beantwortet. Drainagen werden überwiegend im klinischen Umfeld eingesetzt, es werden alle abgefragten Drainagesysteme verwendet. Ausmaß und Komplexität des Eingriffs sind die wesentlichen Kriterien bei der Indikationsstellung. Der Einsatz von Drainagen ist abhängig vom Alter des Teilnehmers und erfolgt mehrheitlich bei Patienten, bei denen Komplikationen im postoperativen Verlauf erwartet werden (Adipositas, Nikotinabusus, Diabetiker).

Diskussion

Zusammenfassend verwendet die Mehrzahl der Teilnehmer Wunddrainagen und dies mehrheitlich intuitiv. Einheitliche fixe evidenzbasierte Parameter rund um die Verwendung von Wunddrainagen fehlen. Bei der Beurteilung der Notwendigkeit einer Wunddrainage scheint ein individuell unterschiedlich ausgeprägtes Sicherheitsbedürfnis bei den einen und „eminenzbasiertes“ Handeln bei den anderen Dermatochirurgen eine große Rolle zu spielen.

Ten-Year experience with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of abdominoperineal resection defects

Purpose

We evaluate outcomes of our single center using vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flaps for reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection (APR). Our goal was to analyze factors that may affect perineal wound healing, a problematic complication with APR reconstructions due to location and high frequency of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study analyzed all VRAM flap perineal reconstruction patients after APR defect over a 10-year period (from July 2008 to June 2018). Outcome measures focused on factors that may affect perineal wound healing complication rates: cancer stage (I/II vs III/IV), neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgeon's years in practice (<5 years vs >5 years), and pelvic closed suction drain use.

Results

Twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The overall major perineal wound complication rate was 14.3% (4 patients). Lack of perioperative closed suction pelvic drain use was associated with a significantly higher rate of major perineal wound complications (28.6% vs 0% and p = 0.031). All four major wound complications occurred in patients who did not have a pelvic drain. The major perineal wound complication rate for patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation was 22% vs 0% with no neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.107).

Conclusion

While our cohort represents a relatively small single-center study, our 14.3% rate of major perineal wound complications is consistent with previous studies in the literature. Our findings show that perioperative pelvic closed suction drain use is associated with a lower rate of perineal wound complications. While neoadjuvant chemoradiation trended toward a higher incidence of perineal wound complications, it did not reach statistical significance.

50 Shades of Red: The Predictive Value of Closed Suction Drains for the Detection of Postoperative Bleeding in Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

While closed suction drains (CSDs) are still frequently employed in clinical practice, the supporting evidence is limited with some studies demonstrating a failure of routine CSD use in preventing hematoma or seroma. Nonetheless, CSD quantity and quality fluid assessment is still appreciated by clinicians to detect postoperative bleeding. This study investigates the value of routine CSD use, in breast surgery, to predict postoperative bleeding.

METHODS

A retrospective, intra-individual analysis, of CSD fluid volumes between the hematoma side and the unaffected contralateral breast, was undertaken in patients (n = 20) with unilateral postoperative bleeding following bilateral breast surgery (2003-2018). Statistical analysis was undertaken to establish a minimum cutoff fluid volume that might assist in the detection of postoperative bleeding. To determine the usefulness of quality assessment of CSD fluid output by visual inspection, surgeons (n = 56) prospectively matched six eligible hemoglobin concentrations corresponding to pre-filled CSDs.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis did not yield a clinically reliable cutoff fluid volume indicating postoperative bleeding. All six eligible hemoglobin concentrations were completely successfully matched to pre-filled CSDs by 30.4% (17/56) of surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

This study questions the significance of routine CSD use to assist in the decision-making process to return to the theater and address postoperative bleeding. Quantity as well as quality analysis of CSD fluid output failed the reliability and diagnostic validity tests. Hemoglobin measurements in drain fluid specimens via blood gas analysis might contribute to the detection of postoperative bleeding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Closed-Suction Drains After Subcutaneous Mastectomy for Gynecomastia: Do They Reduce Complications? A Different Approach

INTRODUCTION

We read the manuscript entitled "Closed-suction drains after subcutaneous mastectomy for gynecomastia: do they reduce complications? » published by Chao et al. (Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0959-z ). They have concluded that drains may reduce rates of seromas requiring needle aspiration after surgical treatment, but also that there are several adverse effects of drains: patients' discomfort, anxiety, cost and additional clinic visits. They also recalled several limitations: (1) bias in terms of surgeon decision to place a drain, (2) nuances in technique. Here we want to discuss our different technique of drainage. To prevent all the disadvantages, we have chosen to replace closed-suction drains with silicone blades and a wide scar opening at the level of the periareolar scar.

METHOD

We carried out a retrospective study in our department in 2016.

RESULTS

This series consisted of 83 patients (153 breasts) aged 26.7 years of age (15-67), with an average BMI of 28.6 (19.5-39). All were followed during the 12 months postoperatively. We considered here only grade 1-2a gynecomastia with palpable fibrous glandular tissue. The surgical procedure consisted of initial liposuction, then open surgical excision via the periareolar approach. We did not notice any seroma or collection requiring intervention. However, 4 patients (4/153; 2.6%) had hematomas requiring intervention the day after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our technique presents a lot of advantages, reduced length of stay in the hospital, costs from drain site care and clinic visits, patients' discomfort, and antibiotic prescriptions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .