Dual Coverage of the Inferior Pole with Conjoined Fascial Flap and Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with a Prosthetic Implant

Immediate surgical mesh-free implant-based breast reconstruction with fascial flap in breast cancer patients after mastectomy

PURPOSE

Surgical meshes are often used in retro-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) to improve lower pole expansion. However, using of surgical meshes is associated with increased complications and costs. To solve this problem, we have adopted a modified fascia-based IBBR technique using fasciae of pectoral major, serratus anterior, and external oblique muscles to form a sling covering the lower pole of prosthesis since 2014.

METHODS

Data of 788 retro-pectoral IBBR cases, including 250 fascia-based IBBR cases (fascial group) and 538 traditional IBBR cases (control group), treated between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical outcomes of the fascial and control group were compared. The primary endpoint was the rate of post-operative complications requiring interventions. The secondary endpoint was the rate of explantation. The exploratory endpoint was the time from surgery to complication and explantation.

RESULTS

The fascial group had significantly lower rates of developing major post-operative complications (1.2 vs. 6.1%, p = 0.002) and losing prostheses (1.2 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.025), as compared with the control group. The median time from surgery to complication and explantation were 61 (range, 35-115) days and 92 (range, 77-134) days for the fascial group and 35 (range, 6-239) days and 63 (range, 23-483) days for the control group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Fascia-based IBBR technique had low rates of major post-operative complications and explantation. Fascia-based IBBR technique could be considered as an alternative reconstruction method in properly selected patients.

Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy with the Use of an Implant and Serratus Anterior Fascia Flap-Initial Clinical Evaluation

Prosthesis-based techniques are the predominant form of breast reconstruction worldwide. The most performed surgical technique involves the placement of the expander in a partial submuscular plane. The coverage of the implant remains a difficult management problem that can lead to complications and poor outcomes. The use of the serratus fascia flap may be the best choice to create a subpectoral pocket for the placement of a tissue expander, with excellent results in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness. A total of 20 breast reconstructions with the inferolateral coverage with the serratus fascia were performed. Patients demonstrated a low overall complication rate (9.5%), such as seroma and infection, with complete resolution during the follow-up and no major complications. The US examination of the soft tissues over the implant reported thickness measurements that demonstrated a good coverage over the inferolateral area. Our study shows that using the serratus fascia flap to create a pocket with the pectoralis major for the placement of the tissue expander is an effective technique during two-stage breast reconstruction. The resulting low rate of morbidity and the US findings collected reveal the safety of this procedure. Its success relies on appropriate patient selection and specific intraoperative technique principles.

The modified serratus anterior fascia flap improves satisfaction and long-term results in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: A retrospective study

After immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) following skin-sparing mastectomy, postoperative complications such as implant exposure or badly defined mammary folds can occur. Acellular dermal matrix can provide good esthetic outcomes but remain expensive. This study evaluates a new technique of one-stage IIBR by using a modified serratus anterior fascia flap (MSFF group), providing lower implant coverage, as compared to the classical submuscular technique. In this retrospective study, we included all patients who underwent IIBR using either the MSFF technique or the classic technique between November 2012 and February 2015. We collected data regarding demographics, perioperative factors, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction (Breast-Q score), and esthetic outcomes. One hundred twenty-three patients who underwent IIBR, of which 61 breasts (59 patients) using the MSFF and 67 breasts (64 patients) the classical technique, were included. The size of the implants used were significantly higher in the MSFF group (p = 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to the immediate complications rate. After a mean follow-up of 43.9 months, we observed more capsular contractures in the classic group (p < 0.001). In the classic group, patients required more revision surgeries (p = 0.008), more implant changes (p < 0.001), and higher volume of additional lipofilling (p < 0.001). According to the Breast Q scores, patients' satisfaction was better in the MSFF group regarding their breasts (p = 0.001) and the outcomes (p = 0.009). The MSFF is a simple, safe, effective, and inexpensive autologous technique for IIBR, which improves implant coverage with a vascularized flap and provides satisfying outcomes as compared to classic IIBR, with less complications.

Inframammary Fold Incision Can Reduce Skin Flap Necrosis in Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant and Conjoined Fascial Flap

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction with implant (IBRI) can produce good aesthetic results after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Various surgical incisions can be used for NSM. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of using an IBRI with dual-coverage fascial flap after NSM with an inframammary fold (IMF) or a radial (Rd) incision.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 88 women who underwent IBRI with dual-coverage fascial flap from March 2015 to June 2018. Inframammary fold incision was used in 19 patients (22 breasts) and Rd incision in 69 patients (75 breasts). In the dual-coverage method, acellular dermal matrix covered the inferomedial quadrant of the breast, and conjoined fascial flap covered the remaining inferolateral quadrant. Patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using the Breast-Q questionnaire, and plastic surgeons assessed aesthetic postoperative scores.

RESULTS

Complications and reoperation rates of 2 incisions were as follows: skin flap necrosis rate showed significant difference between 2 groups (IMF, 0.0% [0/22]; Rd, 16.0% [12/75]; P < 0.05). The other complication rates, hematoma, seroma, infection, capsular contracture, and total reoperations showed no significant difference. Postoperative Breast-Q scores were higher in the IMF group (331.9 ± 10.1) than in the Rd group (311.4 ± 11.0; P < 0.05), indicating higher satisfactory rate in the IMF group than in the Rd group. Surgeon-reported scores for breast symmetry, contour, and scar appearance were also higher in the IMF group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate breast reconstruction with implant with dual-coverage fascial flap after NSM with IMF incision was associated with a lower rate of postoperative skin flap necrosis and improved patient satisfaction, compared with Rd incision. Inframammary fold incisions were associated with improved scar and breast appearance.