Camouflage of the Nasal Dorsum in Thin-Skinned Patients with Diced Cartilage Combined with a New Cross-Linked Hyaluronan (NCH) Gel and Blood: A New Method

Thin Skin in Rhinoplasty: Considerations for Camouflaging Dorsal Nasal Irregularities

Thin skin presents a challenge for achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes and minimizing complications. The review analyzes various materials and techniques employed to achieve this goal. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across various medical databases, retrieved 965 studies, from which 15 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review with a total number of 679 patients with thin nasal skin. Techniques that promote graft integration, minimize resorption, and provide a smooth dorsal contour are crucial for thin-skinned patients. Diced cartilage with PRP, fascia lata grafts, and laser-assisted rhinoplasty appear to be particularly effective based on the available evidence. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) appears to play a role in some techniques by enhancing healing and tissue regeneration. Natural materials, like fascia lata and ligamentous grafts, offer potential benefits but require further exploration. Fat grafting techniques show promise but necessitate more research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of various techniques for addressing dorsal irregularities in rhinoplasty for patients with thin skin. Surgeons can utilize this information to select the most appropriate approach for achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes while minimizing complications.

Complications of Diced Cartilage Wrapped in Blood Products in Rhinoplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Diced cartilage wrapped in blood products has been increasingly advocated in rhinoplasty. The complication is a major concern of the procedure. This meta-analysis aims to assess the complication rates and revision rate of this procedure.

METHODS

All original articles published up to March 2022 were searched through PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Additional articles were added through reference searching. Articles were included for meta-analysis according to inclusion criteria. Data were extracted by 2 individuals independently and the analysis was conducted through Stata 12.0 software (StataCorp., College Station, Texas).

RESULTS

A total of 559 articles were initially found and an additional 1 article was added through reference searching. A total of 11 articles including 469 patients were included for meta-analysis. The results indicated that the total complication rates were 1.2% for irregularity, 0.2% for visibility, 0.7% for deviation, 1% for erythema, and 0% for graft resorption, depression, and infection. The revision rate was 1.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall complication and revision rates of diced cartilage wrapped in blood products in rhinoplasty were relatively low. Considering the limited number of related studies, a larger sample size, long-term follow-up, clear diagnostic criteria, and detailed methods of measurement are expected in further research.

A Combination Method of Costal Cartilage Injection Techniques for Augmentation Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

The multiple toothpick-shaped costal cartilage (MTCC) injection technique was introduced as an improvement based on the free diced costal cartilage (FDCC) injection technique for augmentation rhinoplasty. However, radix irregularities may occur when using the MTCC technique. Considering that the FDCC grafts are easier to shape at the nasal radix, we adopted a combination method of the 2 techniques to achieve natural and smooth contour.

METHODS

Four patients accepted this method for augmentation rhinoplasty. Through a unilateral marginal incision, the costal cartilage grafts were injected for nasal augmentation at the subperiosteal plane. The FDCC grafts and the MTCC grafts were used for nasal radix and dorsum augmentation, respectively. Nasal contour was adjusted by external shaping. The follow-up ranged from 24 to 43 months.

RESULTS

All patients were satisfied with the surgical outcome. There were no major complications occurred during the follow-up. One patient underwent rasping revision due to her own beauty-appreciation changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination method can take advantages of the FDCC and MTCC injection techniques. It can effectively lower the incidence of contour irregularities and graft displacement. Meanwhile, it is easy to perform without special procedure, and is time-saving and cartilage-saving.

Effects of Esterified Hyaluronic Acid, Adipose Tissue, and Blood Glue on Survival of Diced Cartilage Grafts

OBJECTIVES

Diced cartilage grafts are used for correcting nasal dorsal deformities and irregularities. However, cartilage resorption is among most common problems after rhinoplasty. The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate the effects of esterified hyaluronic acid, adipose tissue, and blood glue on the viability of diced cartilage grafts.

METHODS

A total of 24 Wistar albino rats were used for the study. Cartilage grafts were obtained from 1 side ear and diced. The rats were divided into 4 groups (6 in each group): bare diced cartilage (group 1), diced cartilage wrapped with adipose tissue (group 2), diced cartilage blended with blood glue (group 3), and diced cartilage wrapped with esterified hyaluronic acid (group 4). The grafts were inserted into the subcutaneous pockets of the back of same rat. After 2 months follow-up specimens were harvested for histopathological and dimensional examination. The sections were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin, Masson-Trichrome, and Elastic Van-Gieson. Chronic inflammation, loss of chondrocyte nucleus, vascularization, foreign body reaction, collagen content of matrix, and extent of elastic fiber were assessed under light microscopy.

RESULTS

Foreign body reaction in adipose tissue and blood group was significantly higher than bare cartilage and esterified hyaluronic acid group (P = 0.001). With respect to loss of chondrocyte nucleus esterified hyaluronic acid group had significant higher rate of nucleus loss than other groups (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that blood glue, esterified hyaluronic acid and autologous adipose tissue have not beneficial effects in improving viability of diced cartilage grafts.

Comparison of Free Diced and Multiple Toothpick-Shaped Costal Cartilage Injection Techniques for Augmentation Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

The free diced costal cartilage (FDCC) injection technique has been used in the augmentation rhinoplasty for a long time. In order to lower the incidence of nasal contour irregularities and graft displacement, we developed the multiple toothpick-shaped costal cartilage (MTCC) injection technique. This comparative study was conducted to introduce and assess this new technique.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 51 patients who underwent augmentation rhinoplasty with either the FDCC or MTCC injection technique at the 17th Department of Plastic Surgery in the Plastic Surgery Hospital between July 2014 and May 2020. The patients were divided into the FDCC (n = 30, 58.82%) and MTCC (n = 21, 41.18%) groups. General data, postoperative patient satisfaction, complications and revision rate were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Except for the follow-up period, there were no significant differences in general data (age, sex, preoperative dorsum deformity, preoperative rhinoplasty history) between the groups. Postoperative patient satisfaction, complications and revision rate were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTCC injection is a safe and effective technique for augmentation rhinoplasty. Like the FDCC injection technique, the new technique is relatively easy to perform and time-saving with concealed scarring and minimal postoperative edema. Most of its revision surgeries are also easy to perform by simple rasping and reinjection. According to our experience, the new technique may have wider indication as well as lower incidence of nasal contour irregularities and graft displacement. Therefore, we suggest that the MTCC injection technique is reliable and worthy of recommendation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Role of Skin Thickness in the Choice of a Rhinoplasty Technique for Thin-Skinned Patients: Analysis of Long-Term Results and Patient Satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

This randomized controlled study aimed to analyse the long-term results of thin-skinned patients who underwent rhinoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the included study patients had the following characteristics: underwent primary rhinoplasty for functional and/or cosmetic problems, were thin-skinned, had been followed for almost 2 years, underwent both standard pre- and post-operative photography, had a good understanding of the Italian language, and had signed a consent form for inclusion in the study. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1, camouflage of the dorsum by diced cartilage; group 2, camouflage of the dorsum with lipofilling; group 3, camouflage of the dorsum by a temporal fascia graft; and group 4 (control group), without camouflage of the dorsum. Patients answered the Italian version of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. The Obagi skin pinch test was used to measure nasal skin thickness. We compared pre- and post-operative patient satisfaction with the appearance of their nose between the 4 patient groups by the Chi-squared test for unpaired data. Two plastic surgeons reviewed all the post-operative photographs of the study patients and rated the photographs on a scale of 1 to 5.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty between January 2016 and March 2018 in our department of plastic surgery and satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. The mean patient age was 38.5 years. The mean follow-up time was 2.5 years. The differences between the preoperative and post-operative FACE-Q values for group 1 were significant (P < 0.01), whereas the differences between the preoperative and post-operative FACE-Q values for the other groups were not significant. The results for group 1 patients remained stable over the long-term follow-up compared with the results for other groups (P < 0.01). Groups 2 and 4 underwent more secondary procedures than groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.01). The 2 reviewers determined that patient groups 1 and 3 obtained more satisfactory outcomes than groups 1 and 4 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first randomized study to demonstrate that diced cartilage grafts used for thin-skinned patients was the best approach for obtaining a satisfactory long-term outcome and durable natural appearance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Shaved Cartilage Gel Versus Diced Cartilage on Final Dorsal Camouflage: Prospective Study of 200 Patients

Importance: Diced cartilage (DC) is a reported technique that has been used for dorsal camouflage after reduction rhinoplasty. Nevertheless, there are certain issues regarding its use on nasal dorsum, especially its variable resorption rate and risk of graft distortion or migration, especially in thin-skinned patients. Recently, regenerative medicine protocols have been used to overcome drawbacks of methods based on DC. Thus, cartilage embedded in platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been described as a promising and reliable alternative to existing procedures. Objective: To compare long-term aesthetic outcomes of two different techniques for dorsal camouflage: DC versus shaved cartilage plus platelet-rich fibrin (SC+PRF)-shaved cartilage gel. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study at an academic tertiary medical center. Participants were 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary reduction rhinoplasty by spare roof technique (SRT) or component dorsal reduction (CDR). Materials and Methods: The inclusion criteria were primary rhinoplasty, in Caucasian patients with dorsal hump, and camouflage of the dorsum by DC or SC+PRF. Exclusion criteria were ≤18 years of age, revision rhinoplasty and reconstructive rhinoplasty for neoplasic or severe traumatic nasal deformities. The "Utrecht Questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty" was used. Patients answered it before and after surgery (3 and 12 months after). Results: The study population included 200 patients divided into two groups considering the type of dorsal camouflage: DC (n = 132) and shaved cartilage gel (n = 68). The mean age at the time of surgery was 35.44 years (standard deviation ±9.78) and the study population included 130 females (65.0%) and 70 males (35.0%). Regarding aesthetic outcomes, analyses of postoperative means showed a significant improvement, in both groups, over time. However, self-assessment, based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), at 12 months postsurgery, was higher for patients with SC+PRF than with DC (p = 0.004). Twelve months after surgery, patients with thin skin had better aesthetic outcome with SC+PRF than with DC (p = 0.001). For both reduction rhinoplasty techniques, aesthetic outcomes, based on the VAS at 12 months after surgery, were significantly better for patients with SC+PRF (SRT: p = 0.016; CDR: p = 0.004). For both rhinoplasty approaches, either open or closed, aesthetic outcomes, based on the VAS at 12 months after surgery, were significantly better for patients with SC+PRF (closed approach: p = 0.046; open approach: p = 0.017). Conclusions: SC+PRF provides better long-term aesthetic outcomes, not only for thin-skinned patients, but also for patients who had undergone rhinoplasty by a structured or preservation technique, or by an open or closed approach, for dorsal hump reduction.