Treating Excess Lower Eyelid Skin Without Incisions

Extending the Indications for Direct Transcutaneous Lower Blepharoplasty With an Infraorbital Incision to Tear Trough Deformities, Suborbicularis Oculi Fat, Festoons, and Revision Blepharoplasty

Introduction: Treatment of high-grade lower eyelid deformities with massive skin laxity and retroseptal fat pads can be challenging. Common techniques such as the transconjunctival approach and transcutaneous technique performed through a subciliary incision are associated with increased complication rates. Direct excision of the lower eyelid through an infraorbital incision is an alternative technique that allows safe treatment of dermatochalasis and pigmentation and correction of tear trough deformities, suborbicularis oculi fat, and festoons. This study aimed to determine whether direct transcutaneous blepharoplasty with an infraorbital incision could be indicated for these conditions instead of the established operative methods. Methods: A retrospective study of 21 patients with Fratila grades 9 or 10, Hirmand grade 3, and Barton grade 3 who underwent direct transcutaneous lower eyelid blepharoplasty via an infraorbital incision under local anesthesia was performed. All patients underwent surgery during a 9-year period from January 2010 to December 2018. The follow-up period was 12 months. Results were rated postoperatively using Barton grading. Results: Of 21 consecutive patients (13 women and 8 men), 18 required retroseptal fat pad removal, 3 had laxity of the skin and orbicularis muscle, and 5 had triangular cheek festoons. Combined lower and upper blepharoplasty was performed for 12 patients. All patients were satisfied with their surgical results and major improvements were observed. Scar quality was considered good by all patients. Conclusion: Direct transcutaneous lower blepharoplasty of the orbital rim can be indicated for different tear trough deformities, suborbicularis oculi fat laxity, and festoons.

Modern blepharoplasty: From bench to bedside

The demand for procedures aiming to rejuvenate the upper third part of the face and the periocular region has increased in the past several years. Blepharoplasty is one of the most frequently performed procedures worldwide to date. Surgery is currently the first choice in order to achieve permanent and effective results; however, it is burdened by potential surgical complications feared by patients. There is an increasing trend in individuals to request less invasive, non-surgical, effective, and safe procedures for eyelid treatment. The aim of this minireview is to present a brief overview of non-surgical blepharoplasty techniques that have been reported in the literature in the past 10 years. Numerous modern techniques that provide a rejuvenation of the entire area have been described. Numerous less invasive methods have been proposed in the current literature and in modern-day routine clinical settings. Dermal fillers are a commonly chosen option for providing enhanced aesthetic results, especially considering that volume loss can be one of the main underlying causes of facial and periorbital aging. Deoxycholic acid use may be considered when the problem is represented by periorbital excess fat deposits. The simultaneous excess and loss of elasticity of the skin can be assessed with techniques such as lasers and plasma exeresis. Furthermore, techniques such as platelet-rich plasma injections and the insertion of twisted polydioxanone threads are emerging as viable methods to rejuvenate the periorbital region.

Anesthesia using microcannula and sharp needle in upper blepharoplasty: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial evaluating pain, bruising, and ecchymoses

INTRODUCTION

With the emergence of blunt-tipped microcannulas, there is a hypothesis that these could cause less damage and reduce pain as compared to conventional sharp needles in eyelid surgery. The purpose is to determine whether an 18G blunt-tipped cannula can be better than a 26G needle.

METHODS

This prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2017 to December 2018. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive local anesthesia injections for upper blepharoplasty. Infiltration was performed by using a 26-gauge sharp needle on one side and on the other side, infiltration was performed by using an 18-gauge stainless-steel blunt-tipped microcannula. A numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 was used to blindly assess pain in patients receiving anesthesia injections with both needle types. Photographs of the eyelids of each patient were taken in five different periods and used by three blinded observers to identify bruise or ecchymoses.

RESULTS

A total of 136 eyelid operations were performed. There was no statistically significant difference when both groups were compared; however, the average score of pain was higher in patients taking the infiltration through the needle (2.85 versus 2.50). Regarding the evaluation of bruising and ecchymoses, the results showed that, in the five periods evaluated, there was no statistical difference in bruising and ecchymosis in the eyelids when taking the infiltration through a sharp needle when compared with that of the eyelids taking infiltration through a (blunt-tipped) microcannula.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of the blunt-tipped microcannula showed a lower pain score mean than that obtained for the sharp needle (2.5 versus 2.85) (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the bruising and ecchymosis courses.