Anthropometric Analysis of the Human Skull for Developmental Left-Sided Asymmetry, New Finding

Exploring Nasal Wall Cartilage Asymmetry in Rhinoplasty: Implications for Postoperative Symmetry

INTRODUCTION

Facial symmetry is prized for its association with health, genetic quality, and attractiveness, but minor asymmetries are common. Human asymmetry tends to favor the left side and is noticeable in various nose parts. However, the discrepancy in cartilage thickness between the nose's right and left sides remains understudied.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients undergoing primary open rhinoplasty. During routine rhinoplasty Procedure, upper and lower lateral cartilage strips were excised from each patient, yielding four tissue samples. Tissue thickness and width were measured using a microscope stage calibration slide. This approach systematically assessed left and right cartilage thickness differences in primary open rhinoplasty patients, offering insights into nasal asymmetry and potential surgical implications.

RESULTS

Out of 60 patients, 43 were female (72%) and 17 were male (28%). The mean thickness of upper lateral (UL) cartilage was 0.53 mm on the right and 0.54 mm on the left side (P value= 0.52). For lower lateral (LL) cartilage, the mean thickness was 0.50 mm on the right and 0.54 mm on the left side (P value < 0.001), indicating significant left-sided dominance. This dominance was consistent across both sexes.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the significance of addressing subtle nasal cartilage asymmetries to improve postoperative symmetry. Modifying nasal cartilage microstructures during rhinoplasty can enhance both aesthetic and functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Combining Patient-specific Implant With Malar Reduction to Repair Mid-facial Asymmetry Caused by Craniofacial Fractures in Asians

Mid-facial asymmetry caused by bone defect or deformation resulted from craniofacial fracture was a common secondary complication needed to repair. Patient-specific implant (PSI) designed with the unaffected side as a template is a good choice to repair this kind of facial asymmetry. However, in Asians, the broad and prominent zygomatic bone in unaffected side is not an optimal template, because the oval facial shape was considered as a more attractive appearance in Asian esthetic concept. To repair the mid-facial asymmetry and to improve the facial contour, the authors combined PSI implantation with malar reduction in one-stage surgery. The authors referred the facial proportion index (the optimal ratio of mid and lower face was 1.27) as a basis for preoperative precise design to determine the ideal facial shape of unaffected side, and used mirror image overlay technique with the ideal shape of unaffected side as a template to design the PSI. With this surgical strategy, patients not only can repair facial asymmetry but also can get a more attractive appearance.

Changes in Facial Symmetry Following Computer-Assisted Secondary Correction of Craniofacial Fractures

OBJECTIVE

For patients without dysfunctions, the main purpose of secondary correction for craniofacial fractures is restoring facial symmetry. Computer-assisted surgery techniques including virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation provide the help to restore the bony symmetry as much as possible. The authors retrospectively quantitatively analyzed patients who received computer-assisted secondary correction for craniofacial fractures on facial symmetry pre and postoperation.

METHODS

This observational study reviewed the medical records of 17 patients requiring secondary correction for craniofacial fractures. Pre and postoperative computed tomography data were used to quantitatively analyze the changes in facial symmetry and enophthalmos.

RESULT

All patients enrolled in this study showed mid-facial asymmetry but without dysfunctions except for enophthalmos, and 5 patients had bone defects in the frontal-temporal area. The corrective surgical techniques were different for each patient according to their specific condition. Virtual surgical planning with or without intraoperative navigation was performed for all patients. Compared with the preoperative condition, their facial symmetry was significantly improved. The maximum discrepancy value between the affected side and the mirrored unaffected side decreased from 8.10 ± 2.69 to 3.74 ± 2.02 mm postoperatively, and the mean discrepancy value decreased from 3.58 ± 1.29 to 1.57 ± 0.68 mm. In addition, the Enophthalmos Index decreased from 2.65 to 0.35 mm.

CONCLUSION

This observational study objectively demonstrated that computer-assisted secondary correction for craniofacial fractures can significantly improve facial symmetry. And the authors recommend that virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation should be a must step in craniofacial fracture correction.

Subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional simulated images among the orthodontists and laypersons: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We used three-dimensional (3D) virtual images to undertake a subjective evaluation of how different factors affect the perception of facial asymmetry among orthodontists and laypersons with the aim of providing a quantitative reference for clinics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3D virtual symmetrical facial image was acquired using FaceGen Modeller software. The left chin, mandible, lip and cheek of the virtual face were simulated in the horizontal (interior/exterior), vertical (up/down), or sagittal (forward or backward) direction in 3, 5, and 7 mm respectively with Maya software to increase asymmetry for the further subjective evaluation. A pilot study was performed among ten volunteers and 30 subjects of each group were expected to be included based on 80% sensitivity in this study. The sample size was increased by 60% to exclude incomplete and unqualified questionnaires. Eventually, a total of 48 orthodontists and 40 laypersons evaluated these images with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). The images were presented in random order. Each image would stop for 30 s for observers with a two-second interval between images. Asymmetry ratings and recognition accuracy for asymmetric virtual faces were analyzed to explore how different factors affect the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. Multivariate linear regression and multivariate logistic regression models were used for statistical data analysis.

RESULTS

Orthodontists were found to be more critical of asymmetry than laypersons. Our results showed that observers progressively decreased ratings by 1.219 on the VAS scale and increased recognition rates by 2.301-fold as the degree of asymmetry increased by 2 mm; asymmetry in the sagittal direction was the least noticeable compared with the horizontal and vertical directions; and chin asymmetry turned out to be the most sensitive part among the four parts we simulated. Mandible asymmetry was easily confused with cheek asymmetry in the horizontal direction.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree, types and parts of asymmetry can affect ratings for facial deformity as well as the accuracy rate of identifying the asymmetrical part. Although orthodontists have higher accuracy in diagnosing asymmetrical faces than laypersons, they fail to correctly distinguish some specific asymmetrical areas.

Development of 3D printed patient-specific skull implants based on 3d surface scans

Sometimes cranioplasty is necessary to reconstruct skull bone defects after a neurosurgical operation. If an autologous bone is unavailable, alloplastic materials are used. The standard technical approach for the fabrication of cranial implants is based on 3D imaging by computed tomography using the defect and the contralateral site. A new approach uses 3D surface scans, which accurately replicate the curvature of the removed bone flap. For this purpose, the removed bone flap is scanned intraoperatively and digitized accordingly. When using a design procedure developed for this purpose creating a patient-specific implant for each bone flap shape in short time is possible. The designed skull implants have complex free-form surfaces analogous to the curvature of the skull, which is why additive manufacturing is the ideal manufacturing technology here. In this study, we will describe the intraoperative procedure for the acquisition of scanned data and its further processing up to the creation of the implant.