Quality of Life and Concurrent Procedures in Truncal Body Contouring Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Abdominoplasty and Lower Body Lift Surgery Improves the Quality of Life after Massive Weight Loss: A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to assess the impact of abdominoplasty and lower body lift surgery following massive weight loss on both the general quality of life and the sexual life of patients.

METHODS

The authors performed a multicenter prospective study on the quality of life after massive weight loss using three scoring questionnaires: The Short-Form 36 questionnaire, the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire, and the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire. Seventy-two patients who underwent lower body lift and 57 patients who underwent abdominoplasty in three centers with preoperative and postoperative evaluation were included.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 43.2 ± 13.2 years. All categories of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Status Survey questionnaire were statistically significant at 6 months, and all categories except health change were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively. Overall, the Moorehead-Ardelt questionnaire showed a higher quality of life in general (1.78 ± 0.92 and 1.64 ± 1.03 at 6 and 12 months, respectively) and in all domains (ie, self-esteem, physical activity, social relationships, work performance, and sexual activity). Interestingly, global sexual activity improved at 6 months but not at 12 months. Some domains of sexual life improved at 6 months (ie, desire, arousal, lubrication, satisfaction), but only desire remained improved at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominoplasty and lower body lift improve the quality of life of patients after massive weight loss and the sexual quality of life. This should be an additional valid reason for promoting reconstructive surgery for massive weight loss patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Comparative Analysis of Ventral Hernia Repair and Transverse Abdominis Release With and Without Panniculectomy: A 4-Year Match-Pair Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Amid rising obesity, concurrent ventral hernia repair and panniculectomy procedures are increasing. Long-term outcomes of transverse abdominis release (TAR) combined with panniculectomy remain understudied. This study compares clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after TAR, with or without panniculectomy.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review from 2016 to 2022 evaluated patients undergoing TAR with and without panniculectomy. Propensity-scored matching was based on age, body mass index, ASA, and ventral hernia working group. Patients with parastomal hernias were excluded. Patient/operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and QoL were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty subjects were identified (25 per group) with a median follow-up of 48.8 months (interquartile range, 43-69.7 months). The median age and body mass index were 57 years (47-64 years) and 31.8 kg/m2 (28-36 kg/m2), respectively. The average hernia defect size was 354.5 cm2 ± 188.5 cm2. There were no significant differences in hernia recurrence, emergency visits, readmissions, or reoperations between groups. However, ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy demonstrated a significant increase in delayed healing (44% vs 4%, P < 0.05) and seromas (24% vs 4%, P < 0.05). Postoperative QoL improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.005) across multiple domains, which continued throughout the 4-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences in QoL among ventral hernia working group, wound class, surgical site occurrences, or surgical site occurrences requiring intervention (P > 0.05). Patients with concurrent panniculectomy demonstrated a significantly greater percentage change in overall scores and appearance scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy can be performed safely with low recurrence and complication rates at long-term follow-up. Despite increased short-term postoperative complications, patients have a significantly greater improvement in disease specific QoL.

BODY-Q Normative Scores: Psychometric Validation of the BODY-Q in the General Population in Europe and North America

Background

BODY-Q is a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure designed to measure outcomes of weight loss and body contouring patients. To allow interpretation and comparison of BODY-Q scores across studies, normative BODY-Q values were generated from the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of BODY-Q in the normative population.

Methods

Data were collected using two crowdsourcing platforms (Prolific and Amazon Mechanical Turk) in 12 European and North American countries. Rasch measurement theory (RMT) was used to examine reliability and validity of BODY-Q scales.

Results

RMT analysis supported the psychometric properties of BODY-Q in the normative sample with ordered thresholds in all items and nonsignificant chi-square values for 167 of 176 items. Reliability was high with person separation index of greater than or equal to 0.70 in 20 of 22 scales and Cronbach alpha values of greater than or equal to 0.90 in 17 of 22 scales. Mean scale scores measuring appearance, health-related quality of life, and eating-related concerns scales varied as predicted across subgroups with higher scores reported by participants who were more satisfied with their weight. Analysis to explore differential item functioning by sample (normative versus field-test) flagged some potential issues, but subsequent comparison of adjusted and unadjusted person estimates provided evidence that the scoring algorithm worked equivalently for the normative sample as in the field-test samples.

Conclusions

The BODY-Q scales showed acceptable reliability and validity in the normative sample. The normative values can be used as reference in research and clinical practice in combination with local estimates for parallel analysis and comparison.