Investigative modalities for massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding

The Diagnostic Contribution of SPECT/CT Imaging in the Assessment of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Especially for Previously Operated Patients

Objectives:

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a life-threatening problem that requires a multidisciplinary approach for successful treatment. This study aims to emphasize the clinical contribution of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for the diagnosis of acute bleeding.

Methods:

All 14 patients referred to the nuclear medicine department in 3 years with suspicion of acute GIB were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical records were analyzed to assess the scintigraphic findings, emphasizing the correlative contribution of the CT portion on SPECT/CT studies.

Results:

Five patients were negative on dynamic and static planar images. SPECT/CT was performed in 9 patients who had positive findings on planar imaging. SPECT/CT could identify the same bleeding site originating from the anastomosis in four patients with a history of abdominal surgery. SPECT/CT confirmed bleeding from the cecum in a patient with cervical cancer. SPECT/CT showed the bleeding focus in the bladder neck of a patient with bladder cancer and the bleeding from peritoneal metastases of a patient with gastric cancer. In 1 patient, the right upper quadrant activity accumulation, which may cause false positives, was found to be the gallbladder on SPECT/CT. Delayed images showed the true bleeding focus in the cecum. In 1 patient, suspicious activity accumulation in the midline of the abdomen was found to be due to a previously unknown aortic aneurysm on SPECT/CT.

Conclusion:

SPECT/CT imaging is a feasible technique to facilitate image interpretation in patients with GIB. SPECT/CT imaging can guide the surgeon through more accurate localization. Therefore, for proper patient management, SPECT/CT should be applied to detect the bleeding focus, if present, especially in patients who had undergone a previous operation.

Localization and Definitive Control of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Angiography and Embolization

Angiography has long been a mainstay of lower gastrointestinal bleeding localization. More recently, angioembolism has been used therapeutically for bleeding control, but there are limited data on its efficacy. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of angiography and embolization for localizing and treating lower gastrointestinal bleeding as well evaluate the occurrence of bowel ischemia after embolization. This study is a retrospective descriptive review of all patients undergoing mesenteric angiography at a tertiary hospital over an eight-year period. Clinical data were recorded including patient demographics, causes of bleeding, procedures, and outcomes. Patients were excluded if the cause of bleeding was upper gastrointestinal bleeding or the medical record was missing data. Localization and definitive control of bleeding was the primary end point. One hundred fifty-nine angiograms were performed on 152 patients. Mean age was 72 years. Angiographic localization was successful in 23.7 per cent of patients. Although embolization after angiographic localization achieved definitive control of bleeding in 50 per cent of patients, the success rate was only 8.6 per cent of all patients who had angiography. One patient developed postembolization ischemia requiring laparotomy. Angiographic localization of lower gastrointestinal bleeding is successful in only 23.7 per cent of patients. Definitive hemostasis through embolization was successful in only 8.6 per cent of patients who underwent angiography for lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Nationwide Analysis of Resource Utilization and In-Hospital Outcomes in the Obese Patients With Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

GOALS

The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of obesity on the outcomes of patients with lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage (LGIH).

BACKGROUND

Obesity is considered as an independent risk factor for LGIH. We sought to analyze in-hospital outcomes and characteristics of nonobese and obese patients who presented with LGIH, and further, identify resource utilization during their hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With the use of National Inpatient Sample from January 2005 through December 2014, LGIH-related hospitalizations (age≥18 y) were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes. Patients were stratified into the nonobese and obese groups depending on their body mass index (>30 kg/m). The statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

Of the total 482,711 patients with LGIH-related hospitalizations, 38,592 patients were found to be obese. In a propensity-matched analysis, the in-hospital mortality was higher in the nonobese patients (4.2% vs. 3.8%, P=0.004), however, the mean length of hospital stay and mean cost was higher in the obese group which could be due to a higher number of comorbidities in the obese group. Secondary outcomes such as the need for mechanical ventilation vasopressor use and colonoscopy was significantly higher in the obese group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results demonstrate that 'obesity paradox' do exist for LGIH-related hospitalizations for mortality. LGIH hospitalizations in the obese patients are associated with higher resource utilization as evidenced by the longer length of stay and higher cost of hospitalizations as compared with the nonobese patients.

Independent usefulness of flow phase 99mTc-red blood cell scintigraphy in predicting the results of angiography in acute gastrointestinal bleeding

OBJECTIVE:

In acute gastrointestinal bleeding, despite positive dynamic phase ⁹⁹mTc-red blood cell scintigraphy, invasive catheter angiography (CA) is frequently negative. In this study, we investigated the value of flow phase scintigraphy in predicting extravasation on CA.

METHODS:

Institutional review board approval with a waiver of informed consent was obtained for this retrospective study. A total of 173 scintigraphy procedures performed in 145 patients with GIB between January 2013 and August 2014 were analysed. Scintigraphy had two phases: flow (1 image/s for 1 min) followed by dynamic (1 image/30 s for 1 h). Patients who underwent CA within 24 hours of positive scintigraphy were assessed. Each scintigraphy phase was randomly and independently reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians blinded to the outcomes of the other phase and of CA.

RESULTS:

A total of 42 patients (29%) had positive scintigraphy. Of these patients, 29 underwent CA, and extravasation was seen in 6 (21%). In all, dynamic phase scintigraphy was positive. 13 of the 29 patients also had positive flow phase scintigraphy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of flow phase scintigraphy for extravasation on CA were 100, 70, 46, and 100%, respectively. Specificity and positive predictive value were higher when CA was performed within 4 hours of positive flow phase scintigraphy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Negative flow phase scintigraphy can identify patients who will not benefit from CA despite positive dynamic phase scintigraphy. The likelihood of extravasation on CA is higher when performed soon after positive flow phase scintigraphy.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

Negative flow phase scintigraphy identifies patients who will not benefit from invasive catheter angiography despite positive results on subsequent dynamic phase scintigraphy. Increasing the delay between positive red blood cell scintigraphy and catheter angiography progressively reduces the likelihood of identifying extravasation, which is required to target embolization.

Management of Diverticular Bleeding: Evaluation, Stabilization, Intervention, and Recurrence of Bleeding and Indications for Resection after Control of Bleeding

Diverticular bleeding is the most common cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding with nearly 200,000 admissions in the United States annually. Less than 5% of patients with diverticulosis present with diverticular bleeding and present usually as painless, intermittent, and large volume of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Management algorithm for patients presenting with diverticular bleeding includes resuscitation followed by diagnostic evaluation. Colonoscopy is the recommended first-line investigation and helps in identifying the stigmata of recent hemorrhage and endoscopic management of the bleeding. Radionuclide scanning is the most sensitive but least accurate test due to low spatial resolution. Angiography is helpful when patients are actively bleeding and therapeutic interventions are performed with angioembolization. Surgery for diverticular bleeding is necessary when associated with hemodynamic instability and after failed endoscopic or angiographic interventions. When the bleeding site is localized preoperatively, partial colectomy is sufficient, but subtotal colectomy is necessary when localization is not possible preoperatively.

Lower GI bleeding: a review of current management, controversies and advances

PURPOSE

Lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is defined as bleeding distal to the ligament of Treitz. In the UK, it represents approximately 3 % of all surgical referrals to the hospital. This review aims to provide review of the current evidence regarding the management of this condition.

METHODS

Literature was searched using Medline, Pubmed, and Cochrane for relevant evidence by two researchers. This was conducted in a manner that enabled a narrative review of the evidence covering the aetiology, clinical assessment and management options of continuously bleeding patients.

FINDINGS

The majority of patients with acute lower GI bleeding can be treated conservatively. In cases where ongoing bleeding occurs, colonoscopy is still the first line of investigation and treatment. Failure of endoscopy and persistent instability warrant angiography, possibly preceded by CT angiography and proceeding to superselective embolisation. Failure of embolisation warrants surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

There are still many unanswered questions. In particular, the development of a more reliable predictive tool for mortality, rebleeding and requirement for surgery needs to be the ultimate priority. There are a small number of encouraging developments on combination therapy with regard to angiography, endoscopy and surgery. Additionally, the increasing use of haemostatic agents provides an additional tool for the management of bleeding endoscopically in difficult situations.

Severe esophageal bleeding in colorectal cancer due to antitumor therapy: A case report

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer worldwide, with >1 million cases diagnosed each year. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common complication of colorectal cancer and is usually associated with the erosion and hemorrhage of the primary tumor. However, in patients who undergo a radical hemicolectomy and do not develop local recurrence, gastrointestinal bleeding may be a result of medical treatments or comorbidities. Esophageal bleeding in such patients is rare. Here, a case of severe esophageal bleeding due to anti-angiogenesis therapy with bevacizumab, and chemotherapy with the FOLFIRI regimen (irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil) in a patient with colorectal cancer is reported, and the possible pathogenesis of this event is analyzed based on the existing literature, in order to provide a reference for such cases.

Factors influencing the yield of mesenteric angiography in lower gastrointestinal bleed

AIM: To assess if certain triaging rules could be established to optimize the yield of mesenteric angiography.

METHODS: Medical records of 101 patients were retrospectively reviewed and parameters relating to age, gender, pulse rate, blood pressure, serum hemoglobin, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the number of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfused in the 12 and 24 h prior to the angiography were tabulated in two groups with positive and negative angiography results.

RESULTS: We found no correlation between gender, pulse rate, blood pressure or serum hemoglobin and positivity of the mesenteric angiogram. But patients with positive angiogram were found to be on average 7 years older (73.2 years vs 65.9 years old) (P = 0.02). Angiogram was positive in 39.3 % (11/28) of patients admitted in ICU vs 23.2% (17/73) who were admitted elsewhere in the hospital (P = 0.03). In the 12 and 24 h prior to angiography, patients with a positive angiogram received a mean of 2.7 ± 2.3 and 3.3 ± 2.6 units of PRBC s respectively, while patients with a negative angiogram had a mean of 1.6 ± 1.9 (P = 0.02) and 2.1 ± 2.6 units (P = 0.04) received respectively in the same period.

CONCLUSION: Older age, ICU admission, having received at least 4 units PRBC over 12 h or 5 units over 24 h prior to angiogram are leading indicators for a positive study.

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

The annual incidence of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is ∼20.5 in 100,000 in the general Western population and results in 1 to 2% of hospital emergencies. When medical management and endoscopic therapy are inadequate in cases of acute LGIB, endovascular intervention can be lifesaving. In these emergent situations it is important for the interventional radiologist to be well versed in the multidisciplinary preangiographic work-up, the angiographic presentations of LGIB, and the endovascular therapeutic options. We describe a case of LGIB managed with endovascular embolization and detail the angiographic techniques used, followed by a detailed discussion of the various treatment approaches to LGIB.

Emergency management of lower gastrointestinal bleed in children

Lower gastro intestinal bleed (LGIB) is defined as any bleeding that occurs distal to the ligament of Treitz (situated at the duodeno jejunal junction). It constitutes the chief complaint of about 0.3 % of children presenting to the pediatric emergency department(ED). Among Indian children the most common causes are colitis and polyps. In most of the cases of LGIB the bleeding is small and self limiting, but conditions like Meckel's diverticulum often presents with life threatening bleeds. The approach in ED should include in order of priority-assessment and maintenance of hemodynamic stability, confirmation of LGIB and then to attempt for specific diagnoses and their management. This is achieved with help of rapid cardiopulmonary assessment, focused history and examination. The management of all serious hemodynamically significant bleeds includes, rapid IV access, volume replacement with normal saline 20 ml/kg, blood sampling (for cross matching, hematocrit, platelet, coagulogram and liver function tests), Inj. Vit K 5-10 mg IV, acid suppression with H2 antagonists/PPI and nasogastric lavage to rule out upper gastrointestinal bleed. Continuous ongoing monitoring of vital signs is important after stabilization. In ill looking infant, infectious colitis, Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), Hirschsprung enterocolitis and volvulus and in older infants and children, intussusceptions, typhoid fever, volvulus should be looked for. Proctosigmoidoscopy remains the first investigation to be done and reveals majority of etiology. Multidetector CT scan, Tc 99 m RBC scan, angiography and Push enteroscopy are the further investigation choices according to the clinical condition of the child. Intra operative enteroscopy is reserved for refractory cases with an obscure etiology.

Planar scintigraphic imaging of the gastrointestinal tract in clinical practice

In the last 30 years, nuclear medicine has paralleled other imaging fields with the development of 3-dimensional techniques, including single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography. However, conventional nuclear medicine planar scintigraphy remains a common procedure at most imaging centers. Gastrointestinal studies constitute a significant portion of these planar procedures. The most common gastrointestinal studies, including hepatobiliary, gastric emptying, and gastrointestinal bleeding evaluations, resemble their original protocol. However, serial improvements have optimized the diagnostic efficacy of these procedures. Conventional Technetium-99m sulfur colloid liver/spleen imaging and hepatic blood pool imaging with labeled red blood cells now mainly serve an adjunctive role in the evaluation of equivocal findings on computed tomography. Salivary gland imaging is a less commonly requested evaluation, but can be used to evaluate functional capacity in some disease entities.

Pros and cons of colonoscopy in management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a frequent gastrointestinal cause of hospitalization, particularly in the elderly, and its incidence appears to be on the rise. Endoscopic and radiographic measures are available for the evaluation and treatment of LGIB including flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, angiography, radionuclide scintigraphy and multi-detector row computed tomography. Although no modality has emerged as the gold standard in the management of LGIB, colonoscopy is the current preferred initial test for the majority of the patients presenting with hematochezia felt to be from a colon source. Colonoscopy has the ability to diagnose all sources of bleeding from the colon and, unlike the radiologic modalities, does not require active bleeding at the time of the examination. In addition, therapeutic interventions such as cautery and endoclips can be applied to achieve hemostasis and prevent recurrent bleeding. Studies suggest that colonoscopy, particularly when performed early in the hospitalization, can decrease hospital length of stay, rebleeding and the need for surgery. However, results from available small trials are conflicting and larger, multicenter studies are needed. Compared to other management options, colonoscopy is a safe procedure with complications reported in less than 2% of patients, including those undergoing urgent examinations. The requirement of bowel preparation (typically 4 or more liters of polyethylene glycol), the logistical complexity of coordinating after-hours colonoscopy, and the low prevalence of stigmata of hemorrhage complicate the use of colonoscopy for LGIB, particularly in urgent situations. This review discusses the above advantages and disadvantages of colonoscopy in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in further detail.

Detection and localization of active gastrointestinal bleeding with multidetector row computed tomography angiography: a 5-year prospective study in one medical center

GOAL

To prospectively assess the utility of multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) in the diagnosis of active gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).

BACKGROUND

MDCTA is a relatively recent advance in CT scanning technology enabling excellent vascular visualization and detection of various vascular abnormalities. However, there is no prospective study with a large population evaluating the role of MDCTA in the diagnosis of active GIB.

STUDY

From January 2006 to January 2011, 113 consecutive patients with clinical signs of active GIB underwent MDCTA (16-slice, 64-slice, or dual-source). The criteria for positive CT findings included active extravasation of contrast material within bowel lumen, abnormal bowel mucosal enhancement, vascular malformation, abnormally enhancing polyp or diverticulum, or tumor. Two radiologists reviewed the images and assessed CT findings in consensus. The standards of reference included digital subtraction angiography, endoscopy, surgery, or final pathology reports. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of MDCTA for detection of active GIB were evaluated.

RESULTS

Positive CT findings for active GIB were identified in 80 of 113 patients (70.8%), all of which were confirmed by 1 or more reference standard. Negative MDCTA results were obtained in 33 patients (29.2%). Of these, 27 patients did not require any further intervention and were discharged without incident. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of MDCTA was 86.0%, 100%, 100%, 60.6%, and 88.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MDCTA is an accurate first-line screening method for detection and localization of GIB and can guide triage in patients with active GIB.

Sixty-four multi-detector computerised tomography in the detection of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is a serious and life-threatening condition. Many diagnostic procedures and tests are being used to detect the site of bleeding with different success rates. The aim of our study is to prospectively evaluate accuracy of 64-slice multi-detector computerised tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of lower AGIB.

METHODS

Between September 2007 and January 2009, patients with presumed lower AGIB were referred to the radiology department of our institution for 64-slice MDCT examination as part of the investigation for the lower AGIB. Any abnormalities to account for bleeding, such as tumours, bowel wall enhancement and increased intraluminal density, were recorded.

RESULTS

Out of 139 patients with AGIB that were admitted to our casualty department, 27 patients (19 men and 8 women) in the age range of 24-88 years (mean age, 56 years) were suspected to have lower AGIB. Sixty-four-slice MDCT was performed and considered positive for bleeding in 19 (70%) cases, and in all the cases, the bleeding source was indentified in the arterial phase, showing a focal dense wall enhancement in 8 (42%) cases, circumferential wall enhancement in 4 (22%) cases and progressive increasing intraluminal density in 7 (36%) cases. The venous phase scan showed increased dispersion of the contrast within the lumen as an additional clue for active extravasation in 15 (79%) out of the 19 cases. Delayed 5-min scanning showed the same findings as venous phase in all the 19 positive cases and failed to depict any additional findings in the eight cases that were negative on arterial or venous phases.

CONCLUSION

The study supports the high accuracy of 64-slice MDCT in locating the site of AGIB in patients thought to have a distal source of bleeding. Its accuracy in clinically proximal bleeding is not clear from this study, but MDCT is capable of showing such sources.

[Gastrointestinal bleeding: the role of radiology]

Gastrointestinal bleeding represents a diagnostic challenge both in its acute presentation, which requires the point of bleeding to be located quickly, and in its chronic presentation, which requires repeated examinations to determine its etiology. Although the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding is based on endoscopic examinations, radiological studies like computed tomography (CT) angiography for acute bleeding or CT enterography for chronic bleeding are becoming more and more common in clinical practice, even though they have not yet been included in the clinical guidelines for gastrointestinal bleeding. CT can replace angiography as the diagnostic test of choice in acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding, and CT can complement the endoscopic capsule and scintigraphy in chronic or recurrent bleeding suspected to originate in the small bowel. Angiography is currently used to complement endoscopy for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding.

The role of colonoscopy and radiological procedures in the management of acute lower intestinal bleeding

There are multiple strategies for evaluating and treating lower intestinal bleeding (LIB). Colonoscopy has become the preferred initial test for most patients with LIB because of its diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities and its safety. However, few studies have directly compared colonoscopy with other techniques and there are controversies regarding the optimal timing of colonoscopy, the importance of colon preparation, the prevalence of stigmata of hemorrhage, and the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis. Angiography, radionuclide scintigraphy, and multidetector computed tomography scanning are complementary modalities, but the requirement of active bleeding at the time of the examination limits their routine use. In addition, angiography can result in serious complications. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding colonoscopy and radiographic studies in the management of acute LIB.

Prospective study comparing multi-detector row CT and endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Upper and lower acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The latest computerized tomography (CT) imaging techniques play an important role in the treatment of this pathology.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with severe AGIB (11 upper, 18 lower), all hemodynamically stable, underwent endoscopy followed by a multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scan. Endoscopic and MDCT accuracy for the anatomical localization and etiology of AGIB was assessed, the diagnosis being considered correct when the two procedures were concordant or when the diagnosis was confirmed by angiographic, surgical, or post-mortem findings.

RESULTS

The sensitivity in identifying the site and etiology of bleeding was, respectively, 100% and 90.9% for the MDCT scan, compared with 72.7% and 54.5% for endoscopy in upper AGIB, and 100% and 88.2% for the MDCT scan, compared with 52.9% and 52.9% for endoscopy, in lower AGIB.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the advantages of MDCT over endoscopy, we propose a new diagnostic algorithm for AGIB.

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in 1,112 patients admitted to an urban emergency medical center

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to elucidate the etiology, effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, and outcomes in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of 1,112 consecutive patients admitted to the surgical service of a single urban emergency hospital with lower gastrointestinal bleeding from 1988 to 2006. Two groups were compared: 1988-1997 and 1998-2006.

RESULTS

All patients underwent colonoscopy, 33.2% within 24 h of admission. Hematochezia was the most frequent presentation (55.5%), followed by maroon stool (16.7%) and melena (11.0%). Most patients, 690 (62.1%) also had upper endoscopy. Sixty-six patients subsequently had barium enemas. Eleven of 27 nuclide scans were positive. Arteriography was performed on 22 patients, with 11 positive results and 2 therapeutic. No statistical difference was found in procedures performed in our 2 time periods. Diverticulosis (33.5%), hemorrhoids (22.5%), and carcinoma (12.7%) were the most common etiologies with the diagnosis of diverticulosis more common in the 1998-2006 time period. The small bowel was the source in 14 total patients. Spontaneous cessation of the bleeding occurred in 863 (77.6%) patients. Endoscopic control increased from 1% in 1997-1998 to 4.4% in 1998-2006 (P < .05) with a corresponding decrease in the need for operative control from 22.6% to 16.6% in this same time period (P < .05). Furthermore, among elective operations, there was a decrease in right hemicolectomies from 31.6% of total elective cases to 13.9% (P < .05). Emergent operations were needed in 3.4% and 4.8% of patients. The readmission rate did not change over time and was 5.2% overall with >50% because of diverticular bleeding.

CONCLUSION

In this urban setting, diverticulosis, hemorrhoids, and carcinoma were the most common causes of severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) with diverticular bleed causing the highest recurrence. Colonoscopy allows for diagnosis in most patients with severe acute LGIB requiring hospitalization. Furthermore, it is now being used more effectively for hemostasis resulting in less operative intervention to control bleeding.

Gross lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy: endoscopic findings, management, and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Gross gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a serious complication of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drug therapy. This study compares the frequencies of colorectal pathologies, endoscopic and resuscitative management measures, and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with lower GI bleeding (LGIB) while using anticoagulants/antiplatelets with those of patients not using them.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the records of 166 admissions for patients with gross LGIB over 12 years was conducted. The colonoscopic findings, management measures, and clinical outcomes were compared between 2 groups. Group A composed of 100 patients using any antiplatelet/anticoagulant, and group B 66 patients not using any such drugs. Independent t tests and chi were used to test for association between taking antiplatelet/anticoagulant and other variables.

RESULTS

Patients in group A were older and had more comorbidities than patients in group B. Severe LGIB occurred in 55.1% and 35.4% in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.01). Severity was not related to old age or the presence of comorbidities. A higher percentage of patients in group A had a hospital stay > or =6 days (44% vs. 27.3%; P<0.03), required blood transfusions (68% vs. 51.5%; P=0.03), and had in-hospital complications (37% vs. 22.7%; P=0.052). The most common source of bleeding was diverticulosis in both groups. Colorectal abnormalities were present in most patients; and in those using warfarin, colon cancer was common.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of antiplatelets/anticoagulant drugs is an independent predictor of severe LGIB and is associated with adverse outcomes. Colonoscopy is required in patients who bleed while using such drugs.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a review

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) continues to be a problem for physicians. Acute LGIB is defined as bleeding that emanates from a source distal to the ligament of Treitz. Although 80% of all LGIB will stop spontaneously, the identification of the bleeding source remains challenging and rebleeding can occur in 25% of cases. Some patients with severe hematochezia require urgent attention to minimize further bleeding and complications. This article reviews the causes, diagnostic methods, and endoscopic treatment of LGIB.

Negative Endoskopie sowie Mehrzeilendetektor-CT bei Patienten mit akuter unterer Gastrointestinalblutung

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical use of (99m)Tc red blood cell imaging (RBC imaging) in patients presenting with acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and negative endoscopy and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 31 consecutive patients with acute lower GI bleeding in whom the endoscopy findings were negative or the procedure was not feasible, dual-phase MSCT of the abdomen was performed [collimation 4x1 mm (arterial phase), 4x2.5 mm (venous phase)]. MSCT was followed by a (99m)Tc red blood cell scan in patients in whom no active bleeding was visible by CT. Images were created within 24 h after administration of the tracer, depending on the clinical symptoms. The results of the imaging modalities were correlated with clinical course and surgical treatment.

RESULTS

In 20 of 31 patients MSCT showed no active bleeding and a (99m)Tc red blood cell scan was performed. In 8 of 20 patients RBC imaging was also negative. Of these eight patients five were stable and did not require further diagnostic work-up; in the other three bleeding persisted and these patients required surgical treatment. In 12 of 20 patients active bleeding was demonstrated using a (99m)Tc red blood cell scan. Of 12 patients with positive RBC scintigraphy findings, 8 underwent surgery, where the site of bleeding was confirmed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute lower GI bleeding with negative or nondiagnostic endoscopy or MSCT findings, (99m)Tc red blood cell imaging is a useful tool in an emergency algorithm, improving the overall bleeding detection rate.

Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate accuracy of arterial phase multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT) for detection and localization of acute massive gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, with angiography as reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approved this study; written informed consent was obtained from each patient or patient's family after procedures, including radiation dose, were explained. Twenty-six consecutive patients (17 men, nine women; age range, 18-89 years) had acute massive GI bleeding (defined as requirement of transfusion of at least 4 units of blood during 24 hours in the hospital or as hypotension with systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and underwent arterial phase multi-detector row CT before angiography. Scans were obtained during arterial phase to identify extravasation of contrast material with attenuation greater than 90 HU within bowel lumen; this finding was considered diagnostic for active GI bleeding. Presence of contrast medium extravasation in each anatomic location was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of multi-detector row CT for detection of acute GI bleeding were assessed. Accuracy for localization of acute GI bleeding was assessed by comparing locations of active bleeding at both multi-detector row CT and angiography in each patient who had active bleeding.

RESULTS

Arterial phase multi-detector row CT depicted extravasation of contrast material in 21 of 26 patients. Overall location-based sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multi-detector row CT for detection of GI bleeding were 90.9% (20 of 22), 99% (107 of 108), 97.6% (127 of 130), 95% (20 of 21), and 98% (107 of 109), respectively. Overall patient-based accuracy of multi-detector row CT for detection of acute GI bleeding was 88.5% (23 of 26). The location of contrast material extravasation on multi-detector row CT scans corresponded exactly to that of active bleeding on angiograms in all patients with contrast medium extravasation at both multi-detector row CT and angiography.

CONCLUSION

Arterial phase multi-detector row CT is accurate for detection and localization of bleeding sites in patients with acute massive GI bleeding.

Treatment of gastrointestinal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

We assessed the value of selective arteriography in the diagnosis and management of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 107 consecutive patients who had gastrointestinal hemorrhage and underwent selective arteriography between January 1992 and October 2003: 10 had upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 79 had lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and 18 had varicose bleeding with portal hypertension. Selective embolization was attempted in 15 patients to obtain hemostasis. Angiographic findings were reviewed and prospective reports were compared with the final diagnosis and outcome.

RESULTS

Of 129 angiographic studies, 36 correctly revealed the bleeding site and 93 were negative. Extravasation was seen in 24 cases at the level of stomach (n = 2), duodenum (n = 1), small bowel (n = 5), or colon (n = 16). Indirect signs of bleeding sources were identified in 12 patients (stomach in one, small bowel in four, large bowel in four, liver in three). Transcatheter embolization induced definitive hemostasis in 11 of 15 patients (73%), namely in the stomach (n = 2), small bowel (n = 3), colon (n = 7), and liver (n = 3). Three patients required surgery after embolization.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal arteriography may localize gastrointestinal bleeding sources in approximately one-third of cases. Selective embolization may provide definitive hemostasis in most instances.

Lower GI bleeding: epidemiology and diagnosis

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the most common gastrointestinal indications for hospital admission, particularly in the elderly. Diverticulosis accounts for up to 50% of cases, followed by ischemic colitis and anorectal lesions. Though most patients stop bleeding spontaneously and have favorable outcomes, long-term recurrence is a substantial problem for patients with bleeding from diverticulosis and angiodysplasia. The management of LGIB is challenging because of the diverse range of bleeding sources, the large extent of bowel involved, the intermittent nature of bleeding, and the various complicated and often invasive investigative modalities. Advances in endoscopic technology have brought colonoscopy to the forefront of the management of LGIB. However, many questions remained to be answered about its usefulness in routine clinical practice. More randomized controlled trials comparing available diagnostic strategies for LGIB are needed.

Usefulness and validity of diagnostic nasogastric aspiration in patients without hematemesis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We estimate the test characteristics of nasogastric aspiration to diagnose upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage in patients without hematemesis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, medical records from patients admitted to 2 urban hospitals between 1997 and 2002 for gastrointestinal tract bleeding without hematemesis were reviewed. Positive nasogastric aspiration results were classified by the severity of hemorrhage, and negative results were classified by the presence or absence of bile. The reference standard for nasogastric aspiration was the source of bleeding-upper versus non--upper gastrointestinal tract--from the hospital discharge summary. Confidence intervals (CIs) for proportions and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 333 eligible patients, 235 were offered nasogastric aspiration, and 220 accepted the test. Results of 220 attempts were distributed as follows: negative, 158 (72%), including 9 (4%) with bile; nasogastric aspiration aborted, 13 (6%); and positive, 49 (23%), including 4 (2%) that were strongly positive (> or =450 mL red blood). Test characteristics of nasogastric aspiration to detect upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in 213 patients with a reference standard diagnosis were as follows: sensitivity 42% (95% CI 32% to 51%), specificity 91% (95% CI 83% to 95%), negative predictive value 64% (95% CI 56% to 71%), and positive predictive value 92% (95% CI 79% to 97%). The nasogastric aspiration accurately predicted the source of bleeding in 66% of patients (95% CI 59% to 72%). The likelihood ratio of a positive nasogastric aspiration was 11 (95% CI 4 to 30), and the likelihood ratio of a negative nasogastric aspiration was 0.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7).

CONCLUSION

In patients without hematemesis, a positive nasogastric aspiration, seen in 23%, indicates probable upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (LR+ 11), but a negative nasogastric aspiration, seen in 72%, provides little information (LR- 0.6).

111Indium-labelled red-cell scintigraphy to detect intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding from synchronous small- and large-bowel adenocarcinomas

A 70-year-old woman presented with symptoms of profound anaemia and evidence of intermittent gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, abdominal computerised tomography, sulphur colloid scintigraphy and selective mesenteric angiography were non-diagnostic. An indium-labelled red-cell scan was performed, which suggested bleeding from the ileum at 36 h. At laparotomy, a primary small-bowel adenocarcinoma was resected. Six weeks later, she was again anaemic. Repeat colonoscopy showed a synchronous primary colonic adenocarcinoma, which had been masked by intraluminal blood during the original indium scan. The lesion was impalpable, even after full mobilisation of the colon. A right hemicolectomy was performed. Indium has a longer half-life (67 h) than the more commonly used technetium isotope (18 h). This allows serial imaging for up to 5 days, which may increase diagnostic efficiency in intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinicians should be aware that persisting activity from intraluminal blood may mask synchronous lesions.

Management of massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding: should there be surgical intervention without initial endoscopy and radiological evidence of the source of bleeding?

We report two case histories of patients with massive rectal blood loss. Endoscopic and radiological investigations could not identify the source of bleeding at admission. Initially, both patients recovered without surgical intervention, receiving a large number of blood transfusions only. Extensive subsequent radiological analysis showed that the bleeding was due to a pathological part of the proximal jejunum in one case and of the colon transversum in the other. Although immediate surgical intervention was not needed at presentation, both patients underwent resection of a part of the bowel some time thereafter. Surgery was performed after hemodynamic stabilization in the first case. However, in the second case, emergency surgical intervention was needed due to persistent bleeding 4 days after admission. Both patients are still doing well half a year after this massive gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. Aside from a small area of chronic inflammation and fibrosis of the jejunum in one patient, histopathological evaluation of the surgical resection specimens revealed no specific cause for these massive gastrointestinal bleedings. We discuss the general approach of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and the several (dis)advantages of the various imaging techniques and the order in which they should be used.

The clinical utility of nuclear medicine imaging for the detection of occult gastrointestinal haemorrhage

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is often intermittent and the bleeding source may be difficult to locate, resulting in delay of potentially life-saving treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of 99mTc labelled red blood cell imaging and [99mTc]pertechnetate (Meckel's scan) imaging in a series of 137 patients admitted over a 5 year period to hospital for management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Of the 137 patients, 70 had positive 99mTc red blood cell studies. Eleven of 24 patients who had imaging performed beyond 3 h had positive scans that would otherwise have been missed. Only 47 patients had a definite final diagnosis at the time of hospital discharge, of which six were negative on 99mTc red blood cell imaging. The correct site of bleeding was localized in seven of 21 patients with foregut bleeding, and 15 of 20 patients with colonic bleeding. Endoscopy yielded a diagnosis in 13 of the 47 patients (28%). Eleven patients had Meckel's scans but all were negative. Angiography was diagnostic in one of 17 patients studied. 99mTc red blood cell imaging is a useful test in the management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging beyond 3 h may further improve the bleeding detection rate. This test, however, may be an unreliable means of localization of bleeding, particularly in the foregut.