How to pass on expertise: pancreatoduodenectomy at a teaching hospital

Can trainees safely perform pancreatoenteric anastomosis? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and risk-adjusted analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula

BACKGROUND

The complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy and fear of morbidity, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula, can be a barrier to surgical trainees gaining operative experience. This meta-analysis sought to compare the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatoenteric anastomosis by trainees or established surgeons.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, with differences in postoperative pancreatic fistula rates after pancreatoenteric anastomosis between trainee-led versus consultant/attending surgeons pooled using meta-analysis. Variation in rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula was further explored using risk-adjusted outcomes using published risk scores and cumulative sum control chart analysis in a retrospective cohort.

RESULTS

Across 14 cohorts included in the meta-analysis, trainees tended toward a lower but nonsignificant rate of all postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.77, P = .45) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.69, P = .37). However, there was evidence of case selection, with trainees being less likely to operate on patients with a pancreatic duct width <3 mm (odds ratio: 0.45, P = .05). Similarly, analysis of a retrospective cohort (N = 756 cases) found patients operated by trainees to have significantly lower predicted all postoperative pancreatic fistula (median: 20 vs 26%, P < .001) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (7 vs 9%, P = .020) rates than consultant/attending surgeons, based on preoperative risk scores. After adjusting for this on multivariable analysis, the risks of all postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 1.18, P = .604) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio: 0.85, P = .693) remained similar after pancreatoenteric anastomosis by trainees or consultant/attending surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatoenteric anastomosis, when performed by trainees, is associated with acceptable outcomes. There is evidence of case selection among patients undergoing surgery by trainees; hence, risk adjustment provides a critical tool for the objective evaluation of performance.

Resident Participation as Co-Surgeon Does Not Adversely Impact Patient Outcomes in Pancreatic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

In academic settings, surgical residents often serve as co-surgeon in complex operations such as pancreatic resections. These operations are typically performed by fellowship-trained primary surgeons with extensive experience in the field. Our study aimed to evaluate how the participation of general surgery residents in these complex operations affected patient outcomes. Our hypothesis was that resident involvement as co-surgeon would not adversely impact key patient outcomes including complications, readmission, and mortality.

DESIGN

A REDCap database of perioperative variables for patients undergoing pancreatic resection was established at a single independent academic medical center. The database was populated via retrospective chart review. Patient demographics, surgical indications, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, postoperative complications, and 30- and 90-day survival for patients with and without cancer were reviewed. We further categorized the data based on the designation of a general surgery resident or a second staff surgeon as co-surgeon in each operation.

SETTING

The study was performed at the Marshfield Clinic Health System-Marshfield Medical Center, an independent academic medical center located in central Wisconsin.

PARTICIPANTS

Data were abstracted from the medical records of all adult patients (18 years of age and older) who underwent pancreatic resection from 2007 to 2018 (n = 173).

RESULTS

173 pancreatic resections were performed by 8 different primary staff surgeons over 10.5 years. All co-surgeons were either another staff surgeon or a senior-level (postgraduate year 4 or 5) general surgery resident. Perioperative and postoperative patient outcomes were statistically similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement as co-surgeon in complex pancreatic resections constituted no increased risk for patients at our institution. Senior residents should continue to operate on these important learning cases under appropriate staff supervision.

A Critical Appraisal of the July Effect: Evaluating Complications Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Reports of higher rates of medical errors in the month of July have generated concern regarding major surgery at academic institutions early in the yearly promotion cycle. This study was designed to evaluate perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at different times of the year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes were retrospectively evaluated for patients treated in July versus the rest of the year and in the first quarter (July-September) versus the remaining quarters. The primary outcome was operative morbidity as measured by Clavien-Dindo grade, a classification system of surgical complications. Secondary outcomes included mortality, operative blood loss, pancreatic fistula formation, delayed gastric emptying, intraabdominal abscess, anastomotic leak, reoperation, and other variables of interest.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to September 2015, 472 patients underwent PD by a single academic surgeon. Overall, 77.1% of PDs were performed for malignancy. The number of patients did not significantly vary by month or by quarter. The incidence of major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) in patients who had a PD was 12.2% in July and 17.5% in all other months (P = 0.79). The rate of pancreatic fistula, intraabdominal abscess, reoperation, readmission, and mortality did not differ significantly by month or by quarter (P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study does not find any correlation between time of year and operative morbidity or mortality, suggesting that PD can be safely performed irrespective of timing.

The impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative outcomes in pancreatic surgery

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

1281 patients that underwent pancreatic resections from 1993 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed using logistic regression models. All cases were stratified according to the surgeon's level of experience, which was based on the number of previously performed pancreatic resections and the extent of received supervision (novice: n <  20 / intensive; intermediate: n = 21-90 / decreasing; and experienced surgeon: n > 90 / none). Additional stratification was based on the frequency of practice (sporadic: 3 resections > 6 weeks, frequent: 3 resections ≤6 weeks).

RESULTS

The novice and experienced categories were related to a decreased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.82 and 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.82) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.17-1.16 and 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.83) compared to the intermediate category. Frequent practice was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the importance of supervision within a pancreatic surgery training program. In addition, our data underline the need of a sufficient patient caseload to ensure frequent practice.

Whipple's Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Pediatric Patients: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

Purpose:

Whipple's pancreaticoduodenectomy (WPD) is rarely required in children. However, WPD is the only option with pathologies involving the head of the pancreas requiring surgical excision. The objective of our study was to review our experience with WPD performed on children.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of case records was conducted on all patients <18 years of age, who underwent WPD at our center over the last 20 years. Data regarding demographics, signs, and symptoms at presentation, diagnostic imaging and procedures, pathologic reports, surgical and medical treatment, and follow-up were collected to study the indications and safety and outcomes of WPD in children.

Results:

Five patients had been planned for a WPD during the study (1995–2015); but in one patient, the procedure was abandoned, the rest four patients formed the study group. Male to female ratio was 3:1. Median age at the time of surgery was 9 years (11 months–12 years). The most common presentation was obstructive jaundice (50%, 2/4). Radiological imaging was able to accurately predict the surgical procedure required in all except one case. The mean operating time was 205 min (180–240 min). There were no intraoperative complications. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 85 mL (20–150 mL). The youngest patient requiring WPD was an 11-month-old child. Oral feeding was established by the 7^th postoperative day (range 5–7 days) in all cases. There were no cases of anastomotic leak or pancreatic or jejunal fistulae. One patient developed features of subacute intestinal obstruction after discharge and required re-exploration. There was no intra- or post-operative mortality.

Conclusion:

WPD is safe and efficacious procedure in a selected group of children. The overall efficacy of surgical treatment combined with the relatively low severity of complications leads us to recommend WPD in children when indicated.

Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This systematic review aimed to identify all scoring systems to predict POPF after a PD, consider their clinical applicability and assess the study quality.

METHOD

An electronic search was performed of Medline (1946-2014) and EMBASE (1996-2014) databases. Results were screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and quality assessed according to the QUIPS (quality in prognostic studies) tool.

RESULTS

Six eligible scoring systems were identified. Five studies used the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition. The proposed scores feature between two and five variables and of the 16 total variables, the majority (12) featured in only one score. Three scores could be fully completed pre-operatively whereas 1 score included intra-operative and two studies post-operative variables. Four scores were internally validated and of these, two scores have been subject to subsequent multicentre review. The median QUIPS score was 38 out of 50 (range 16-50).

CONCLUSION

These scores show potential in calculating the individualized patient risk of POPF. There is, however, much variation in current scoring systems and further validation in large multicentre cohorts is now needed.

Unplanned reoperation and reintervention after pancreatic resections: an analysis of risk factors

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence of any unplanned reoperation or reintervention procedure after pancreatic resection and to identify the underlying risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 189 consecutive pancreatic resections performed from 2001-2008 were searched for any unplanned reoperation, percutaneous drainage, or angiographic reintervention. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, details of surgery, specific complications, incidence of reoperation/reintervention, and mortality was performed.

RESULTS

Overall rates of reoperation, reintervention, and mortality were 6.3% (12/189), 7.9% (15/189), and 1.6% (3/189), respectively. Four patients underwent reintervention and reoperation, so the combined reoperation/reintervention rate was 12.2% (23/189). Reoperation (P < 0.001) and reintervention (P = 0.002) correlated with mortality. Hemorrhage (relative risk [RR], 58; P = 0.0017) and the combination of hemorrhage and pancreatic fistula (RR, 117; P < 0.0001) were identified as risk factors for unplanned reoperation, hemorrhage (RR, 82; P = 0.005), pancreatic fistula (RR, 42; P < 0.001), and the combination of both complications (RR, 246; P < 0.001) for reoperation and/or reintervention. Other patient- or procedure-related factors did not influence the reoperation and/or reintervention rates significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic fistula and hemorrhage are the predominant factors that afford unplanned reoperation/reintervention. Although reporting the incidence of unplanned reoperation will include the most severe postoperative complications, a considerable number of reinterventions are missed. Therefore, in outcome analyses of pancreatic surgery, not only reoperations but also any interventional therapies should be included.