Outcome of histologically node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Characteristics of Postoperative Recurrence in Lymph Node-Negative Superficial Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the recurrence rates, timings, locations, and risk factors, and survival in patients with lymph node-negative superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs).

METHODS

We investigated 167 patients with pathological T1 thoracic ESCC who underwent curative esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy between 1986 and 2013. They were classified into lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive groups, each of which included 15 relapsed patients. The recurrence rates, timings, locations, and risk factors, and survival were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

Significantly better recurrence (12.4 %) and the 5-year overall survival (85.7 %) rates were seen in patients with node-negative superficial ESCC compared with those with node-positive superficial ESCC. Relapsed patients with node-negative superficial ESCC showed a 5-month delay in the time to recurrence compared with relapsed patients with node-positive superficial ESCC, but the recurrence locations were similar. Upper thoracic tumors and the presence of lymph node metastases were independent risk factors for recurrence in superficial ESCC patients, but we did not determine any risk factors in patients who were node negative only. The 5-year overall survival rates did not differ between relapsed node-negative and node-positive patients. Furthermore, the mean times to death and the survival rates from recurrence to death were similar in the node-negative (20.3 months and 9.3 %, respectively) and in the node-positive patients (19.1 months and 13.6 %, respectively) who had relapsed.

CONCLUSIONS

Node-negative and node-positive superficial ESCC patients should be followed up similarly, because when recurrences occur, the prognoses and the times to death are similar in node-negative and node-positive superficial ESCC patients.

Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus is the standard surgical treatment for cure or palliation. Esophagogastric anastomotic leakage is a life-threatening postoperative complication, more so if the leakage occurs in the chest.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized study was conducted on 238 patients treated for carcinoma of the esophagus between January 2000 and January 2006. The study excluded 44 patients (18.49%) who were inoperable. The patients were assigned to two treatment groups of 97 each (A and B) according to a restricted permuted block randomization plan. Group A patients underwent esophagogastrectomy with wrapping of the pedicled omentum around the esophagogastric anastomosis. Group B patients underwent esophagogastrectomy without using the omental graft. An Ivor-Lewis type esophagogastrectomy (TTE) was done in 122 patients (62.89%) and a transhiatal esophagogastrectomy (THE) was done in 72 (37.11%).

RESULTS

Anastomotic leaks occurred in 3 group A patients (3.09%) and in 14 (14.43%) group B patients. In group A, 54 patients underwent THE and 43 had TTE, with anastomotic leakage in 2 (3.70%) and 1 (2.33%) patients, respectively. In group B, 48 patients had THE and 49 had TTE, with anastomotic leakage in 8 (16.26%) and 6 (12.24%), respectively. The difference in the incidence of leakage was statistically significant (p = 0.005). There was no complication related to the omental graft technique nor was there a significant difference in the mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicled omental transposition for reinforcing the anastomotic suture line significantly reduces the incidence of leakage after esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus, thus decreasing the morbidity and mortality of the procedure.