Living donor liver transplantation with special reference to ABO-incompatible grafts and small-for-size grafts

ABO-incompatible Pediatric Liver Transplantation With Antibody and B-cell Depletion-free Immunosuppressive Protocol in High Consanguinity Communities

The success of orthotopic liver transplantation as a life-saving treatment has led to new indications and a greater competition for organ grafts. Pediatric patients with acute liver-related crises can benefit from orthotopic liver transplantation, but organ availability in the limited time can be a major obstacle. Crossing ABO blood group barriers could increase the organs available to such patients.

METHODS

From November 2010 to June 2015, 176 children aged 0.2-to18 y were transplanted in the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center. Out of those, 19 children were transplanted across blood group barriers (ABO incompatible). The underlying diseases were biliary atresia (n = 6); progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (n = 4); Crigler-Najjar syndrome (n = 3); hepatoblastoma (n = 2); and urea cycle disorder, Caroli disease, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and neonatal sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1 each). Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and steroids. Pretransplant prophylactic plasmapheresis, high-dose immunoglobulins, and rituximab were not administered.

RESULTS

The grafts were from living donors (n = 17) and deceased donors (n = 2). Living donor morbidity was nil. The recipient median age was 21 mo (5-70 mo). After a median follow-up of 44 mo, 2 recipients (10%) died because of sepsis, 1 because of uncontrolled acute myeloid leukemia. The overall rejection rate was 7%, and no grafts were lost because of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). HLA matching was 3.8 of 6 (A, B, DR), and there were 2 patients presented with acute cellular rejection, 1 patient with AMR, and 1 patient with biliary strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO incompatible liver transplantation is a feasible and life-saving option even with antibody and B-cell depletion-free protocol without increasing the risks for AMR. We speculate that this excellent result is most likely because of presence of relatively low titer ABO isoagglutinins and the high HLA match compatibility caused by habit of longstanding interfamilial marriages as typical of Saudi Arabia.

Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation

AIM

To analyze the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Through-out more than 10 years: During the period from April 2003 to the end of 2013, 174 adult-to-adults LDLT (A-ALDLT) had been performed at National Liver Institute, Menoufiya University, Shibin Elkoom, Egypt. We collected the data of those patients to do this cohort study that is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database analyzing the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of SFSS in a period started from the end of 2013 to the end of 2015. The median period of follow-up reached 40.50 m, range (0-144 m).

RESULTS

SFSS was diagnosed in 20 (11.5%) of our recipients. While extra-small graft [small for size graft (SFSG)], portal hypertension, steatosis and left lobe graft were significant predictors of SFSS in univariate analysis (P = 0.00, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.00 respectively); graft size was the only independent predictor of SFSS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). On the other hand, there was lower incidence of SFSS in patients with SFSG who underwent splenectomy [4/10 (40%) SFSS vs 3/7 (42.9%) no SFSS] but without statistical significance, However, there was none significant lower incidence of the syndrome in patients with right lobe (RL) graft when drainage of the right anterior and/or posterior liver sectors by middle hepatic vein, V5, V8, and/or right inferior vein was done [4/10 (28.6%) SFSS vs 52/152 (34.2%) no SFSS]. The 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients with SFSS were 30%, 30%, 25%, 25%, 25% and 25% respectively, while, the 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients without SFSS were 70.1%, 65.6%, 61.7%, 61%, 59.7%, and 59.7% respectively, with statistical significant difference (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

SFSG is the independent and main factor for occurrence of SFSS after A-ALDLT leading to poor outcome. However, the management of this catastrophe depends upon its prevention (i.e., selecting graft with proper size, splenectomy to decrease portal venous inflow, and improving hepatic vein outflow by reconstructing large draining veins of the graft).

Small for size syndrome difficult dilemma: Lessons from 10 years single centre experience in living donor liver transplantation

AIM

To analyze the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Through-out more than 10 years: During the period from April 2003 to the end of 2013, 174 adult-to-adults LDLT (A-ALDLT) had been performed at National Liver Institute, Menoufiya University, Shibin Elkoom, Egypt. We collected the data of those patients to do this cohort study that is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database analyzing the incidence, risk factors, prevention, treatment and outcome of SFSS in a period started from the end of 2013 to the end of 2015. The median period of follow-up reached 40.50 m, range (0-144 m).

RESULTS

SFSS was diagnosed in 20 (11.5%) of our recipients. While extra-small graft [small for size graft (SFSG)], portal hypertension, steatosis and left lobe graft were significant predictors of SFSS in univariate analysis (P = 0.00, 0.04, 0.03, and 0.00 respectively); graft size was the only independent predictor of SFSS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.03). On the other hand, there was lower incidence of SFSS in patients with SFSG who underwent splenectomy [4/10 (40%) SFSS vs 3/7 (42.9%) no SFSS] but without statistical significance, However, there was none significant lower incidence of the syndrome in patients with right lobe (RL) graft when drainage of the right anterior and/or posterior liver sectors by middle hepatic vein, V5, V8, and/or right inferior vein was done [4/10 (28.6%) SFSS vs 52/152 (34.2%) no SFSS]. The 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients with SFSS were 30%, 30%, 25%, 25%, 25% and 25% respectively, while, the 6-mo, 1-, 3-, 5-, 7- and 10-year survival in patients without SFSS were 70.1%, 65.6%, 61.7%, 61%, 59.7%, and 59.7% respectively, with statistical significant difference (P = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

SFSG is the independent and main factor for occurrence of SFSS after A-ALDLT leading to poor outcome. However, the management of this catastrophe depends upon its prevention (i.e., selecting graft with proper size, splenectomy to decrease portal venous inflow, and improving hepatic vein outflow by reconstructing large draining veins of the graft).

Impact of Portal Hemodynamic Changes in Partial Liver Grafts on Short-Term Graft Regeneration in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Regeneration of partial liver grafts is critical for successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), especially in adult recipients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the intraoperative hemodynamic changes in partial liver grafts and characterize their potential impact on post-transplant liver regeneration in LDLT.

METHODS

We examined the portal venous flow (PVF) and hepatic arterial flow (HAF) to partial liver grafts by means of ultrasonic transit time flowmeter of donors immediately before graft retrieval and of the corresponding recipients after vascular reconstruction in 48 LDLT cases. We evaluated post-transplant liver regeneration according to the changes in graft liver volume between the time of transplantation and the 7th post-transplant day.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in PVF to the partial liver grafts in recipients (rPVF) compared with that in donors. In contrast, graft HAF in recipients significantly decreased compared with that in donors. The rPVF inversely correlated with graft weight (GW)-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR), whereas HAF volume showed no significant correlation. The rPVF/GW positively correlated with the rate of liver regeneration (GRR), which inversely correlated with GRWR. The rPVF/GW was significantly higher, and GRR tended to be larger in the small graft group than in the non-small graft group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative portal hemodynamic changes in partial liver grafts strongly affect their post-transplant regeneration. In particular, in small liver grafts, an immediate and remarkable increase in graft PVF may contribute to rapid liver regeneration after LDLT if the increased PVF remains within a safe range.

Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Across ABO-Incompatibility

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of adult ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).ABO-incompatible LDLT is an aggressive treatment that crosses the blood-typing barrier for saving lives from liver diseases. Although graft and patient survival have been improved recently by various treatments, the results of adult ABO-incompatible LDLT require further evaluation.Two regimens were designed based on isoagglutinin IgG and IgM titers and the time course of immunological reactions at this institute. When isoagglutinin IgG and IgM titers were ≤64, liver transplantation was directly performed and rituximab (375 mg/m) was administrated on postoperative day 1 (regimen I). When isoagglutinin titers were >64, rituximab (375 mg/m) was administered preoperatively with or without plasmapheresis and boosted on postoperative day 1 (regimen II). Immunosuppression was achieved by administration of mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and steroids.Forty-six adult ABO-incompatible and 340 ABO-compatible LDLTs were performed from 2006 to 2013. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores for ABO-incompatible recipients ranged from 7 to 40, with a median of 14. The graft-to-recipient weight ratio ranged from 0.61% to 1.61% with a median of 0.91%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 81.7%, 75.7%, and 71.0%, respectively, for ABO-incompatible LDLT recipients, compared to 81.0%, 75.2%, and 71.5% for ABO-C recipients (P = 0.912). The biliary complication rate was higher in ABO-incompatible LDLT recipients than in the ABO-compatible recipients (50.0% vs 29.7%, P = 0.009).In the rituximab era, the blood type barrier can be crossed to achieve adult ABO-incompatible LDLT with survival rates comparable to those of ABO-compatible LDLT, but with more biliary complications.

Impact of recipient age and preoperative fasting blood glucose level as the risk factors of living donor liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients in the recent comprehensive era with knowledge of indications: Recent status in a Japanese single center

AIM

Recently, knowledge for indications of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been robustly accumulated in. For further improvement, risks should be reexamined in recent cases. In this study, we investigated preoperative risk factors in cirrhotic patients who underwent LDLT in recent era.

METHODS

Seventy-four cirrhotic patients who underwent LDLT at our institution between 2003 and 2011 were included. Recipient and donor age and sex, existence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride, total cholesterol, serum creatinine, hemoglobin A1c, graft : recipient weight ratio, ABO compatibility and choice of calcineurin inhibitor were analyzed. A proportional hazard model was applied and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, recipient age (hazard ratio = 1.188, P = 0.011) and FBG (hazard ratio = 1.009, P = 0.016) showed as significant independent factors. Theoretical mortalities were 9.2%, 21.9% and 51.7% in patients with normal FBG at 55, 60 and 65 years old, respectively, and 34.3% and 53.6% in patients with FBG of 150 and 200 mg/dL, respectively, at 60 years old.

CONCLUSION

Recipient age and FBG remain important risk factors for LDLT in cirrhotic patients even in the recent era. These factors should be considered for selecting liver transplant candidates in cirrhotic patients.

Extended donors in liver transplantation

Several criteria are used to differentiate between standard and extended allograft donors. These criteria include deceased after cardiac death, advanced donor age, steatosis, previous malignancy in the donor, hepatitis C virus-positive allografts, human T-cell lymphotropic virus-positive allografts, active infections in the donor, high-risk donors, split liver transplantations, and living donor liver transplantations. Review of the literature can lead each practitioner to incorporate extended criteria donors into their transplant program, thereby individualizing the use of these allografts, increasing the donor pool, and decreasing overall waitlist mortality.

A survival case of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation complicated with severe preoperative infection and subsequent overwhelming postsplenectomy infection

A 47-year-old Japanese man was transferred to our hospital because of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B virus infection. On admission, he was suffering from sepsis due to a catheter infection and respiratory failure caused by pulmonary edema and pneumonia, but, as a result of preoperative intensive care, we avoided septic shock. ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABO-I-LT) was performed. In accordance with our ABO-I-LT protocol, we administered, rituximab and performed plasma exchange, splenectomy as well as hepatic artery infusion. The patient was discharged 80 days after living donor transplantation (LDLT). However, 136 days after LDLT, he experienced recurrent respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia. At that time, the CD19(+) B-cell count in the peripheral blood flow remained below 1%. We suspected a mixed infection involving Streptococcus pneumonia, Pneumocystis carinii, and fungus. The cause of the complication was overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI). We started administration of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, and micafungin sodium therapy as well as gamma-globulin. Oxygenation improved gradually; the patient was discharged at 41 days after re-admission. Although this patient survived the OPSI, it was clear that some aspects of the ABO-I-LT protocol should also be altered.

In-hospital cerebrovascular complications following orthotopic liver transplantation: a retrospective study

Background

Cerebrovascular complications are severe events following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study aimed to observe the clinical and neuroimaging features and possible risk factors of in-hospital cerebrovascular complications in the patients who underwent OLT.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 337 consecutive patients who underwent 358 OLTs. Cerebrovascular complications were determined by clinical and neuroimaging manifestations, and the possible risk factors were analyzed in the patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

Results

Ten of 337 (3.0%) patients developed in-hospital cerebrovascular complications (8 cases experienced intracranial hemorrhage and 2 cases had cerebral infarction), and 6 of them died. The clinical presentations were similar to common stroke, but with rapid deterioration at early stage. The hematomas on brain CT scan were massive, irregular, multifocal and diffuse, and most of them were located at brain lobes and might enlarge or rebleed. Infarcts presented lacunar and multifocal lesions in basal gangliar but with possible hemorrhagic transformation. The patients with intracranial hemorrhage had older age and a more frequency of systemic infection than non-intracranial hemorrhage patients. (P = 0.011 and 0.029, respectively).

Conclusion

Posttransplant cerebrovascular complications have severe impact on outcome of the patients who received OLT. Older age and systemic infection may be the possible risk factors of in-hospital intracranial hemorrhage following OLT.

Indication for splenectomy in the era of living-donor liver transplantation

Although end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is often associated with splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia, splenectomy is not necessary in liver transplantation (OLT) except in special situations. In this paper, we examined the indications for splenectomy in the era of living-donor living transplantation. Six of 46 patients underwent splenectomies. Among them, one received a cadaveric graft. Three splenectomies were performed at 6, 7, and 44 days after OLT because of a huge spleen, massive ascites, or impaired liver function. The other two patients received simultaneous splenectomy during OLT to prevent rejection of ABO-incompatible grafts with a positive anti-T-cell test; and one, for postoperative therapy of hepatitis C. All six patients had a good response to splenectomy. We concluded that splenectomy may be indicated for recipients with severe thrombocytopenia, small-for-size syndrome, ABO incompatibility with positive anti-T/B-cell tests and post-OLT therapy for hepatitis C.

Liver regeneration in donors and adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation

In living donor liver transplantation, the safety of the donor operation is the highest priority. The introduction of the right lobe graft was late because of concerns about donor safety. We investigated donor liver regeneration by the types of resected segments as well as recipients to assess that appropriate regeneration was occurring. Eighty-seven donors were classified into 3 groups: left lateral section donors, left lobe donors, and right lobe donors. Forty-seven adult recipients were classified as either left or right lobe grafted recipients. Volumetry was retrospectively performed at 1 week, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year after the operation. In the right lobe donor group, the remnant liver volume was 45.4%, and it rapidly increased to 68.9% at 1 month and 89.8% at 6 months. At 6 months, the regeneration ratios were almost the same in all donor groups. The recipient liver volume increased rapidly until 2 months, exceeding the standard liver volume, and then gradually decreased to 90% of the standard liver volume. Livers of the right lobe donor group regenerated fastest in the donor groups, and the recipient liver regenerated faster than the donor liver. Analyzing liver regeneration many times with a large number of donors enabled us to understand the normal liver regeneration pattern. Although the donor livers did not reach their initial volume, the donors showed normal liver function at 1 year. The donors have returned to their normal daily activities. Donor hepatectomy, even right hepatectomy, can be safely performed with accurate preoperative volumetry and careful decision-making concerning graft-type selection.

Clinical characteristics of thrombotic microangiopathy following ABO incompatible living donor liver transplantation

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) may develop after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), but the mechanism is not fully understood. We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing LDLT at our center, including TMA patients, to elucidate the clinical characteristics and presentation and to determine which patients have a higher risk of occurrence of TMA. In all, 57 adult patients were reviewed after LDLT at our institution. TMA was diagnosed by sudden and severe thrombocytopenia, followed by hemolytic anemia with fractionated erythrocytes in the blood smear. Clinical features were compared between the TMA group and the non-TMA group. Of the 57 patients, 4 were diagnosed with posttransplantation TMA. ABO blood group (ABO)-incompatibility, cyclophosphamide (CPA), and recipient blood group (type O) were closely correlated with the occurrence of TMA. Thrombocytopenia appeared 1 to 5 days before hemolytic anemia. Coagulative function markers stayed at the same level after TMA, while marked elevation was shown in fibrinolytic function markers such as plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1). TMA occurred at a higher prevalence in ABO-incompatible graft recipients. Additional factors associated with ABO-incompatible transplantation, such as an overdose of immunosuppressants, may affect the likelihood of TMA. Sudden and severe thrombocytopenia presented before hemolytic anemia and the serum levels of PAI-1 correlated well with the clinical course of TMA. In conclusion, early recognition of thrombocytopenia and elevation of PAI-1 is crucial to diagnose TMA especially in ABO-incompatible LDLT.

Consequences of living-donor liver transplantation for upper gastrointestinal lesions: high incidence of reflux esophagitis

There is little information available regarding the consequences of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for upper gastrointestinal lesions. We retrospectively compared the pre- and posttransplant incidences of noninfectious reflux esophagitis, portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG), esophageal varix, gastroduodenal ulcer, Helicobacter pylori infection, and abnormal gastroesophageal valve in 29 adult patients (16 males, 13 females) who underwent LDLT for end-stage liver disease. Here we present four findings from this study. First, the posttransplant incidence of noninfectious esophagitis was significantly higher than the pretransplant incidence (27.6% vs. 3.4%; P < 0.001), irrespective of postoperative use of standard-dose H2RA. Second, PHG and esophageal varix, which were noted in 65.5% and 96.6% of pretransplant recipients, respectively, spontaneously resolved postoperatively in all cases. Third, H. pylori infection, which was observed in 50.0% of preoperative recipients, decreased to 5.6% postoperatively, although no significant difference was observed between the pre- and the posttransplant incidences of gastroduodenal ulcer (6.9% vs. 6.9%). Finally, the incidence of abnormal gastroesophageal valve did not change following LDLT (34.5% vs. 34.5%). In conclusion, this study suggests that noninfectious reflux esophagitis occurs more frequently following LDLT. Although the disease is the results of a very complex interaction of various factors, spontaneous resolution of PHG and serendipitous H. pylori eradication might have contributed to increased incidence of postoperative esophagitis, possibly through gastric acid hypersecretion. In contrast, morphological change of the gastroesophageal valve was not considered to be the cause of this disease. Because this study was a retrospective analysis of a small population of LDLT recipients, prospective randomized controlled studies of a sufficient number of cases are required to substantiate these conclusions.

Living donor liver transplantation for pediatric and adult recipients

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was initially developed to provide suitable liver grafts for pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease. This innovation was remarkable for the prospective nature of its development and the public discussions that resolved the ethical dilemma of removing a portion of a liver from a healthy donor for the benefit of another person. Since its inception, this procedure has been uniformly adopted by most pediatric transplant centers, with excellent results. Unfortunately, liver grafts obtained from this procedure did not provide sufficient hepatocyte mass for use in adult recipients. An adult donor procedure was, therefore, developed to provide larger liver grafts, which were derived from the right lobe of the liver. Much of the driving force for adult-to-adult LDLT has been in countries that lack the health-care infrastructure for obtaining deceased donors or have cultural objections to deceased donor transplantation. In developed countries, the initial growth of adult-to-adult LDLT has been tempered by notable donor complications, including death, but it continues to have an important role in providing life-saving liver grafts for recipients who are unable to compete for deceased donor grafts in the current organ-allocation system.

Effect of intraportal infusion to improve small for size graft injury in living donor adult liver transplantation

The most important problem in the living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) is a small for size graft. Although a right lobe graft is used in many cases in order to avoid small for size graft, for a donor, the risk has few in left lobe graft. We evaluate the effect of an intraportal infusion treatment to the small for size graft. One hundred and twelve patients who underwent LDALT were studied. The graft weight recipient standard liver volume ratio (GV/SLV) of these patients were 50% or less. We divided the patients into following two groups; infusion group (n = 53) and control group (n = 59). For the infusion group, 16 G double lumen catheter was inserted into portal vein and nafamostat mesilate (protease inhibitor which stabilize coagulofibrinolytic state; 200 mg/day), prostaglandin E(1) (vasodilator and hepatoprotective effect; 500 microg/day) and thromboxane A(2) synthetase inhibitor (vasodilator and anticoagulant effect; 160 mg/day) were administrated continuously for 7 days. Small-for-size graft syndrome was defined as bilirubin >10 mg/dl and ascites >1000 cc on postoperative day (POD) 14. Comparison examination of a background factors and postoperative bilirubin and amount of ascites was carried out. The mean GV/SLV did not have the difference at 39.1% of infusion group, and 38.3% of control group (P = 0.58). By the control group, 15 patients (25.4%) were small-for-size graft syndrome, however, there was only two (3.8%) small-for-size graft syndrome in infusion group (P = 0.04). The bilirubin levels of infusion and control group on 7 and 14 POD were 9.9 and 7.8 vs. 9.5 and 10.5 mg/dl, respectively. The amount of ascites of infusion group on 7 and 14 POD were 870 and 430 cc, respectively. On the contrary, in control group, the amount of ascites on 7 and 14 POD were 1290 and 1070 cc, respectively. Bilirubin levels and the amount of ascites on 7 and 14 POD were lower in the patients with infusion group then those with control group. There were no differences between infusion group and control group in age, sex and Child's classification. The intraportal infusion had an effect in prevention of hyperbilirubinemia and loss in quality of excessive ascites in the patients with small for size graft. This was suggested to be what is depended on the improvement of the microcirculation insufficiency considered one of the causes of small-for-size graft syndrome.

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: a new therapeutic option for patients with acute liver failure in Chile

Different ways have been suggested to expand donor numbers for liver transplantation. Transplantation using ABO-incompatible hepatic grafts has recently been a controversial issue due to the high risk of hyperacute rejection mediated by preformed anti-ABO antibodies. We report three patients with acute liver failure who were transplanted with ABO-incompatible livers: A to O in two patients and A to B in one case. We used pre- and posttransplant total plasma exchange, splenectomy, and triple immunosuppression. All three patients are alive; one graft was lost, probably secondary to thrombotic microangiopathy with low isohemagglutinin titers of 1:8. One patient developed acute cellular rejection that was reversed with a bolus of methylprednisolone. No antibody-mediated rejection occurred. Financial and infectious considerations have to be considered. In our series, the final liver transplantation cost was higher than average for acute liver failure. Plasmapheresis has the highest cost of all the additional procedures. ABO-incompatible liver transplantation, because of the splenectomy it requires, has been associated with more infections due to encapsulated organisms. However, with splenectomy in our three patients, none had infections due to these bacteria. In our country, we do not consider ABO-incompatible liver transplantation as a first-line option, except for highly selected patients.