Impact of Autonomic Nerve Preservation and Lateral Node Dissection on Male Urogenital Function after Total Mesorectal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer

The Frequency of Urination Dysfunction in Patients Operated on for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

The frequency of long-term urination dysfunction after surgery for rectal cancer remains unclear, yet it is essential to establish this to improve treatment strategies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort studies were included with patients having undergone sphincter-preserving total (TME) or partial mesorectal excision (PME) for the treatment of primary rectal cancer in this review. The outcome was urination dysfunction reported at least three months postoperatively, both overall urination dysfunction and subdivided into specific symptoms. The online databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched, bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and results were synthesized using one-group frequency meta-analyses. A total of 55 studies with 15,072 adults were included. The median follow-up was 29 months (range 3-180). The pooled overall urination dysfunction was 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12%-30%) 3-11 months postoperatively and 25% (95% CI 19%-32%) ≥12 months postoperatively. Retention and incontinence were common 3-11 months postoperatively, with pooled frequencies of 11% and 14%, respectively. Increased urinary frequency, retention, and incontinence seemed even more common ≥12 months postoperatively, with pooled frequencies of 37%, 20%, and 23%, respectively. In conclusion, one in five patients experienced urination dysfunction more than a year following an operation for rectal cancer.

High prevalence of erectile dysfunction within the first year after surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the prevalence of erectile dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery within the first year.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Erectile dysfunction is a late complication of surgery for rectal cancer. Intraoperative mechanical nerve damage is a probable cause, but it can also be attributed to radio- and chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review per our protocol (CRD42023472998), searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in August 2023. We included studies reporting on men having surgery for rectal cancer and providing a prevalence of erectile dysfunction based on validated questionnaires published after 1997. The prevalence was estimated through forest plots. Bias was evaluated according to a checklist from the Joanna Briggs Institute.

RESULTS

Of the 4105 records identified in the search, we included 74 studies reporting on 9006 patients operated for rectal cancer. The studies evaluated erectile dysfunction through six validated questionnaires, especially the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) version 5 or 15 (84 %). The meta-analysis on 22 studies using IIEF showed that the prevalence of moderate to severe erectile dysfunction was 35 % (95 % CI 24-47 %) within the first year after surgery with very low certainty of evidence. Meta-regression on the prevalence of moderate to severe erectile dysfunction did not show a decrease in erectile dysfunction within the first year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Around every third patient experienced moderate to severe erectile dysfunction within the first year after surgery for rectum cancer, and the prevalence of erectile dysfunction did not improve within the first year after surgery.

MINI-ABSTRACT

This is a meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of erectile dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery within the first year. Erectile dysfunction was determined on the base of validated self-administered questionnaires. Moderate to severe erectile dysfunction was seen in one-third of patients within the first year after surgery for rectal cancer.

Identification of lateral pelvic nodes without metastasis in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy based on magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Intensive localized therapy is promising for the treatment of rectal cancer. In Japan, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are used as preoperative treatments for this disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to diagnose lateral pelvic node (LPN) metastases, but the changes in LPN findings on MRI following preoperative treatment are unclear. Furthermore, there may be patients in whom LPN dissection can be omitted after CRT/NAC.

Methods

Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with LPN dissection after CRT/NAC at 13 Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum member institutions between 2017 and 2019 were included. Changes in the short diameter of the LPNs after CRT/NAC and the reduction rate were examined.

Results

A total of 101 LPNs were examined in 28 patients who received CRT and 228 in 47 patients who received NAC. Comparison of LPNs before and after CRT/NAC showed that most LPNs shrank after CRT but that the size reduction was variable after NAC. Although some LPNs with a short diameter of <5 mm showed residual metastasis, no metastases were observed in LPNs that were <5 mm in short diameter before and after CRT/NAC and did not shrink after treatment.

Conclusion

Although the short diameter of LPNs was significantly reduced by both CRT and NAC, even LPNs with a short diameter of <5 mm could have residual metastases. However, dissection may be omitted for LPNs <5 mm in short diameter that do not shrink after preoperative CRT or NAC.

The erectile and ejaculatory implications of the surgical management of rectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a significant cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Although advances in surgical technology and technique have decreased mortality rates, surviving patients often experience sexual dysfunction as a common complication. The development of the lower anterior resection has greatly decreased the use of the radical abdominoperineal resection surgery, but even the less radical surgery can result in sexual dysfunction, including erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction. Improving the knowledge of the underlying causes of sexual dysfunction in this context and developing effective strategies for preventing and treating these adverse effects are essential to improving the quality of life for postoperative rectal cancer patients. This article aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in postoperative rectal cancer patients, including their pathophysiology and time course and strategies for prevention and treatment.

Risk factors for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is one of the prominent reasons for local recurrence (LR) in patients with rectal cancer (RC). The evaluation criteria of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for patients in eastern (mainly in Japan) and western countries have been controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in order to guide surgical methods.

Methods

We searched relevant databases (Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 05 October 2022 to evaluate the risk factors for LPLN metastasis in patients with RC in this meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 24 articles with 5843 patients were included in this study. The overall results showed that female sex, age <60 years, pretherapeutic CEA level >5 ng/ml, clinical T4 stage (cT4), clinical M1 stage (cM1), distance of the tumour from the anal verge (AV) <50 mm, tumour centre located below the peritoneal reflection (Rb), short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥8 mm before nCRT, short axis (SA) of LPLN ≥5 mm after nCRT, border irregularity of LPLN, tumour size ≥50 mm, pathological T3-4 stage (pT3-4), pathological N2 stage (pN2), mesorectal lymph node metastasis (MLNM), lymphatic invasion (LI), venous invasion (VI), CRM (+) and poor differentiation were significant risk factors for LPLN metastasis (P <0.05).

Conclusion

This study summarized almost all potential risk factors of LPLN metastasis and expected to provide effective treatment strategies for patients with LRC. According to the risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis, we can adopt different comprehensive treatment strategies. High-risk patients can perform lateral lymph node dissection to effectively reduce local recurrence; In low-risk patients, we can avoid overtreatment, reduce complications and trauma caused by lateral lymph node dissection, and maximize patient survival and quality of life.

Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer

Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) involvement occurs in 10%-25% of rectal cancer cases. Total mesorectal excision (TME) with routine LPLN dissection (LPLND) is predominantly applied in Japan whereas TME with neoadjuvant treatment are used in the West. LPLND is a morbid procedure and minimally invasive techniques may help reduce its morbidity. Selective lateral pelvic node dissection with TME following neoadjuvant treatment achieves acceptable disease-free and overall survival.

Two-team lateral lymph node dissection assisted by the transanal approach for locally advanced lower rectal cancer: comparison with the conventional transabdominal approach

BACKGROUND

An optimal surgical approach to lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) remains controversial. With the recent popularity of transanal total mesorectal excision, a two-team procedure combining the transabdominal and transanal approaches was established as a novel approach to LLND. This study aimed to clarify the safety and feasibility of two-team LLND (2team-LLND) and compare its short-term outcomes with those of conventional transabdominal LLND (Conv-LLND).

METHODS

Between April 2013 and March 2020, 463 patients diagnosed with primary locally advanced rectal cancer underwent a transanal total mesorectal excision; among them, 93 patients who underwent bilateral prophylactic LLND were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Among these patients, 50 and 43 patients underwent Conv-LLND (the Conv-LLND group) and 2team-LLND (the 2team-LLND group), respectively. The short-term outcomes, including the operation time, blood loss volume, number of complications, and number of harvested lymph nodes, were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The intraoperative and postoperative complications in the 2team-LLND group were equivalent to those in the Conv-LLND group; furthermore, the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the 2team-LLND group was acceptably low (9%). Compared with the Conv-LLND group, the 2team-LLND group had a significantly shorter operation time (P = 0.003), lower median blood loss (P = 0.02), and higher number of harvested lateral lymph nodes (P = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative and postoperative complications of 2team-LLND were comparable with those of Conv-LLND. Thus, 2team-LLND was safe and feasible for advanced lower rectal cancer. Moreover, it was superior to Conv-LLND in terms of the operation time, blood loss volume, and number of harvested lateral lymph nodes. Therefore, it can be a promising LLND approach.

Optimal diagnostic criteria for lateral lymph node dissection using magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

LLND in cases with suspected lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis has been focused on as a novel treatment strategy in recent years. However, the optimal indication for LLND in rectal cancer patients has not been determined. This study aimed to establish the optimal indication for lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in patients with rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 209 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision and LLND in 13 hospitals were prospectively registered. By matching the sizes of the harvested LNs and those in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the pathological outcome of each LN was confirmed one-by-one. Using parameters of the LLNs in MRI, the optimal diagnostic criteria for LLND were established.

RESULTS

Of 3241 harvested LLNs, including 83 metastatic nodes, 1010 (31.1%) were visualized on MRI. Although all parameters assessed showed strong correlations with the presence of metastasis, none of these parameters could discriminate metastatic LLNs from non-metastatic nodes with sufficient sensitivity. However, by using the combination of long axis and short/long ratio in pretreatment MRI, we could establish optimal criteria for LLND. The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria for LLN metastasis were 94.3% and 40.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we established novel criteria for LLND in rectal cancer patients using MRI. Our criteria will be of great clinical use in determining indications for LLND.

Functional outcomes after lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) may improve oncological outcomes for select patients with rectal cancer, though functional outcomes may be adversely impacted. The aim of this study is to assess the functional outcomes associated with LPLND for rectal cancer and compare these outcomes with standard surgical resection.

METHODS

A systematic search was undertaken to identify relevant studies reporting on urinary dysfunction (UD), sexual dysfunction (SD), and defecatory dysfunction (DD) for patients who underwent LPLND for rectal cancer. Studies comparing functional outcomes in patients who underwent surgery with and without LPLND were assessed. In addition, a comparison of functional outcomes in patients who underwent LPLND before and after the year 2000 was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies of predominantly non-randomised observational data were included. Ten were comparative studies. Male SD was worse in patients who underwent LPLND compared with those who did not (RR 1.68 (95% CI 1.41-1.99, P < 0.001)). No difference was observed for the rate of UD between treatment groups. The rates of UD and male SD in patients who underwent LPLND after the year 2000 were significantly lower than those who underwent LPLND before the year 2000 ((UD) RR = 4.5, p value = 0.0034; male SD RR = 28.7, p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is associated with worse male sexual dysfunction compared to standard surgical resection. However, the rates of urine dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction are better in contemporary cohorts which may reflect improved surgical technique and autonomic nerve preservation.

Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates

Despite innovative advancements, distally located rectal cancer remains a critical disease of challenging management. The crucial location of the tumor predisposes it to a circumferential resection margin (CRM) that tends to involve the anal sphincter complex and surrounding organs, with a high incidence of delayed anastomotic complications and the risk of the pelvic sidewall or rarely inguinal lymph node metastases. In this regard, colorectal surgeons should be aware of other issues beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) performance. For decades, the concept of extralevator abdominoperineal resection to avoid compromised CRM has been introduced. However, the complexity of deep pelvic dissection with poor visualization in low-lying rectal cancer has led to transanal TME. In contrast, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has allowed for the execution of more sphincter-saving procedures without oncologic compromise. Significant tumor regression after NCRT and complete pathologic response also permit applying the watch-and-wait protocol in some cases, now with more solid evidence. This review article will introduce the current surgical treatment options, their indication and technical details, and recent oncologic and functional outcomes. Lastly, the novel characteristics of distal rectal cancer, such as pelvic sidewall and inguinal lymph node metastases, will be discussed along with its tailored and individualized treatment approach.

Rise and fall of total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,366 patients

The role of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) during total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is still controversial. Many reviews were published on prophylactic LLND in rectal cancer surgery, some biased by heterogeneity of overall associated treatments. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to perform a timeline analysis of different treatments associated to prophylactic LLND vs no-LLND during TME for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS and WOS for publications up to 1 September 2020. We considered RCTs and CCTs comparing oncologic and functional outcomes of TME with or without LLND in patients with rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Thirty-four included articles and 29 studies enrolled 11,606 patients. No difference in 5-year local recurrence (in every subgroup analysis including preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy), 5-year distant and overall recurrence, 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival was found between LLND group and non LLND group. The analysis of post-operative functional outcomes reported hindered quality of life (urinary, evacuatory and sexual dysfunction) in LLND patients when compared to non LLND.

CONCLUSION

Our publication does not demonstrate that TME with LLND has any oncological advantage when compared to TME alone, showing that with the advent of neoadjuvant therapy, the advantage of LLND is lost. In this review, the most important bias is the heterogeneous characteristics of patients, cancer staging, different neoadjuvant therapy, different radiotherapy techniques and fractionation used in different studies. Higher rate of functional post-operative complications does not support routinely use of LLND.

Iatrogenic effects of radical cancer surgery on male fertility

Iatrogenic causes of male infertility can include medications, chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. In this review, we discuss commonly performed urologic cancer surgeries and nonurologic surgeries that harbor a high risk of iatrogenic infertility. These include radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, pelvic colon surgery, and anterior spine surgery. In addition, we review the anatomy and surgical strategies that help to reduce the risks of infertility. With an increase in life expectancy and improvements in fertility preservation, it is important to properly counsel patients about the risks of infertility and provide options for fertility preservation before surgery.

Prognostic Value of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The benefit of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) for locally advanced rectal cancer remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LPLD in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for publications comparing radical resection plus LPLD (LPLD group) with single radical resection (non-LPLD group) for locally advanced rectal cancer. A total of 15 studies satisfied our inclusion criteria and were assessed. Random-effects and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed.

RESULTS

LPLD significantly increased grade 3-4 postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.02; P = 0.03) compared with non-LPLD. There were no significant differences in 5-y overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.05; P = 0.17), 5-y disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.60-2.09; P = 0.73), local recurrence (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.53-1.51; P = 0.68) or distant recurrence (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.12; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that LPLD significantly increased grade 3-4 postoperative complications but did not increase 5-y overall survival or 5-y disease-free survival compared with single radical resection for locally advanced rectal cancer. Furthermore, it did not decrease the local recurrence or distant recurrence rates. Thus, more multicenter large-scale randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further explore whether the long-term survival benefits of LPLD truly exist.

Potential benefit of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer on postoperative male sexual function

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the incidence of male sexual dysfunction after mid to low rectal cancer surgery and to identify factors associated with postoperative erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction.

METHODS

The subjects were 410 consecutive male patients who underwent surgery for mid to low rectal cancer from 2009 to 2015. Two questionnaires on sexual function were administered: the International Index of Erectile Function, and an original questionnaire on ejaculatory status. Erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction were examined before and 3, 6, 12 months after surgery. In patients without preoperative dysfunction, multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction at 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 410 patients, 234 (57%) gave complete responses to the questionnaires, of whom 108 (46%) and 155 (66%) had severe erectile dysfunction, while 115 (49%) and 168 (72%) had severe ejaculatory dysfunction before and 12 months after surgery, respectively. Of the patients who maintained sexual function preoperatively, the incidence of erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction at 12 months after surgery was 51% (64/126) and 49% (58/119), respectively. In multivariate analysis, age >60 years (P = 0.02), laparotomy (P = 0.002), and creation of a diverting ileostomy (P = 0.003) were independent factors associated with postoperative erectile dysfunction, while age >60 years (P = 0.005), laparotomy (P = 0.04), and lateral lymph node dissection (P = 0.001) were independent factors associated with postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Sexual dysfunction occurred in almost half of patients after rectal cancer surgery, and was independently associated with several factors, including laparotomy.

Is prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection needed for lower rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study

Background

The effectiveness of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in treating patients with lower rectal cancer remains controversial and has not been clearly established. Therefore, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the survival impact of prophylactic LLND in patients with lower rectal cancer.

Methods

Data of 301 patients with lower rectal cancer (tumor’s lower edge on the anal side of the peritoneal reflexion) with clinical T3 disease and negative preoperative lateral lymph node metastasis, who underwent radical resection (R0) at our hospital between April 2007 and March 2017, were included in this study. Patients who received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the dissection (prophylactic LLND, n = 37) and non-dissection (no prophylactic LLND, n = 264) groups.

Results

Significantly fewer men and younger patients were noted in the dissection group than in the non-dissection group. Post-surgery 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 69.6% and 66.8% in the dissection group and 75.1% and 72.5% in the non-dissection group, respectively (5-year post-surgery RFS, p = 0.58). In the dissection and non-dissection groups, the 5-year OS rates were 86.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.29), and the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 88.9% and 86.0%, respectively (p = 0.29), with no significant differences. Lateral lymph node recurrence was observed in one (2.7%) and 10 patients (3.8%) in the dissection and non-dissection groups, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the groups.

Conclusions

In this study, the effectiveness of prophylactic LLND was limited in patients with > T3 lower rectal cancer with no evidence of preoperative lymph node metastasis. Prophylactic LLND may not be necessary if there is no preoperative lymph node metastasis, even if the invasion depth is T3 or higher.

Optimal Size Criteria for Lateral Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery without lateral lymph node dissection is the current standard treatment in patients with rectal cancer, recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of adding lateral lymph node dissection to total mesorectal excision in patients with suspected lateral lymph node metastasis. However, the optimal indication for lateral lymph node dissection after chemoradiotherapy has not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish the optimal indication for lateral lymph node dissection after chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single referral hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 279 patients with rectal cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The largest lateral lymph nodes on CT were retrospectively assessed and compared with the pathologic results of dissected lateral lymph nodes and recurrences in lateral lymph node areas.

RESULTS

The incidence of lateral lymph node metastasis after chemoradiotherapy was estimated to be 9.3%. Although patients with lateral lymph node metastasis frequently developed distant recurrence, 40.4% survived for >5 years without recurrence. An analysis of the lateral lymph node sizes showed that lateral lymph node size ≥8 mm before chemoradiotherapy was the optimal criterion for lateral lymph node dissection, with a sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 78.7%. Using this criterion, 72.0% of the patients could be spared lateral lymph node dissection.

LIMITATIONS

Because of the retrospective nature of the present study, the selection of patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection was biased.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal indication for lateral lymph node dissection was lateral lymph node size ≥8 mm before chemoradiotherapy. Cancer could be eradicated in >30% of patients with lateral lymph node metastasis by dissecting metastatic lateral lymph nodes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B428.

CRITERIOS DE TAMAO PTIMO PARA LA DISECCIN DE GANGLIOS LINFTICOS LATERALES DESPUS DE LA QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO

ANTECEDENTES:Aunque la quimiorradioterapia seguida por cirugía radical sin disección de ganglios linfáticos laterales es el tratamiento estándar actual en pacientes con cáncer de recto, estudios recientes han demostrado beneficios de agregar disección de ganglios linfáticos laterales a la escisión mesorrectal total en pacientes con sospecha de metástasis de ganglios linfáticos laterales. Sin embargo, no se ha determinado la indicación óptima para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo establecer la indicación óptima para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia en pacientes con cáncer de recto.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un solo hospital de referencia.PACIENTES:Se inscribieron retrospectivamente un total de 279 pacientes con cáncer de recto que se sometieron a quimiorradioterapia seguida por cirugía radical entre 2007 y 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Los ganglios linfáticos laterales más grandes en la tomografía computarizada se evaluaron retrospectivamente y se compararon con los resultados patológicos de los ganglios linfáticos laterales disecados y recidivas en las áreas de los ganglios linfáticos laterales.RESULTADOS:Se estimó que la incidencia de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos laterales después de la quimiorradioterapia fue del 9,3%. Aunque los pacientes con metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos laterales con frecuencia desarrollaron recurrencia a distancia, el 40,4% sobrevivió durante más de 5 años sin recurrencia. Un análisis de los tamaños de los ganglios linfáticos laterales mostró que la mayor dimensión de los ganglios linfáticos laterales ≥ 8 mm antes de la quimiorradioterapia eran el criterio óptimo para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales, con una sensibilidad y especificidad del 92,3% y 78,7%, respectivamente. Utilizando este criterio, el 72,0% de los pacientes podría evitarse la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales.LIMITACIONES:Debido a la naturaleza retrospectiva del presente estudio, la selección de pacientes que fueron sometidos a disección de ganglios linfáticos laterales fue sesgada.CONCLUSIÓN:La indicación óptima para la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales fue la dimensión mayor de los ganglios linfáticos laterales ≥ 8 mm antes de la quimiorradioterapia. El cáncer se podría erradicar en más del 30% de los pacientes con metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos laterales disecando los ganglios linfáticos laterales metastásicos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B428.

Long-term effects of laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on urinary retention in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The addition of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in rectal cancer surgery has been reported to increase the incidence of post-operative urinary retention. Here, we assessed the predictive factors and long-term outcomes of urinary retention following laparoscopic LPLND (L-LPLND) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for advanced lower rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective single-institutional study reviewed post-operative urinary retention in 71 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent L-LPLND with TME. Patients with preoperative urinary dysfunction or who underwent unilateral LPLND were excluded. Detailed information regarding patient clinicopathologic characteristics, post-void residual urine volume, and the presence or absence of urinary retention over time was collected from clinical and histopathologic reports and telephone surveys. Urinary retention was defined as residual urine > 100 mL and the need for further treatment.

RESULTS

Post-operative urinary retention was observed in 25/71 patients (35.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed that blood loss ≥ 400 mL [odds ratio (OR) 4.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-16.43; p = 0.018] and inferior vesical artery (IVA) resection (OR 8.28; 95% CI 2.46-27.81; p < 0.001) were independently correlated with the incidence of urinary retention. Furthermore, bilateral IVA resection caused urinary retention in more patients than unilateral IVA resection (88.9% vs 47.1%, respectively; p = 0.049). Although urinary retention associated with unilateral IVA resection improved relatively quickly, urinary retention associated with bilateral IVA resection tended to persist over 1 year.

CONCLUSION

We identified the predictive factors of urinary retention following L-LPLND with TME, including increased blood loss (≥ 400 mL) and IVA resection. Urinary retention associated with unilateral IVA resection improved relatively quickly. L-LPLND with unilateral IVA resection is a feasible and safe procedure to improve oncological curability. However, if oncological curability is guaranteed, bilateral IVA resection should be avoided to prevent irreversible urinary retention.

Effect of lateral lymph node dissection on the quality of life and genitourinary function after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the quality of life and genitourinary function after total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection compared to those after total mesorectal excision alone following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Methods

Among patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery after completing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between September 2011 and October 2018 at the National Cancer Center, Korea, patients who completed the validated questionnaires before initiation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively were included in this study. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-CR38), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire were used for collecting data.

Results

The total mesorectal excision alone group and the total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection group included 52 and 38 patients, respectively. The second group included significantly younger patients (P = 0.024), had a higher incidence of clinical T4 stage disease (P = 0.033), estimated blood loss (P = 0.003), and longer operation time (P < 0.001). Significant differences were not observed between the groups with respect to the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR38, and IPSS. Multivariable analysis showed that lateral lymph node dissection had no statistically significant association with postoperative urinary dysfunction (P = 0.953).

Conclusion

The overall quality of life and urinary function after total mesorectal excision does not differ significantly when lateral lymph node dissection is performed as well.

Outcome of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with total mesorectal excision in treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard treatment of mid- and low-lying rectal cancer. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection has been suggested as an approach to decrease recurrence and improve survival. Our meta-analysis presented here aimed to review the current outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone.

METHODS

A systematic literature search querying electronic databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed articles that reported the outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. The main outcome measures were local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall and disease free-survival, and complications.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 29 studies of 10,646 patients. Of those patients, 39.4% underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operation time for the lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was significantly longer than total mesorectal excision alone (360 minutes versus 294.7 minutes, P = .02). Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was associated with higher odds of overall complications (odds ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.87, P < .001) and urinary dysfunction (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-3.67, P = .008) than total mesorectal excision alone. Both groups had similar rates of male sexual dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-2.79, P = .08), anastomotic leakage (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.93, P = .59), local recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.25, P = .79), distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.2, P = .72), overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.056, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.13, P = .13), and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.07, P = .37).

CONCLUSION

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was not associated with a significant reduction of recurrence rates or improvement in survival as compared with total mesorectal excision alone; however, LPLND was associated with longer operation time and increased complication rate.

Lateral lymph node dissection reduces local recurrence of locally advanced lower rectal cancer in the absence of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The impact of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in locally advanced lower rectal cancer remains controversial. This study is to compare total mesorectal excision (TME) with or without LLND in lower rectal cancer cases of stage II/III.

Methods

The electronic databases were systematically searched that compared TME with or without LLND among patients with lower rectal cancer in clinical stage II/III. Subgroup analysis was performed considering neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The hazard ratios (HR), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean difference (WMD) were pooled.

Results

Twelve studies of 4458 patients of this meta-analysis demonstrate, LLND alone significantly reduced the local recurrence rate of patients who did not receive nCRT (RR 0.71, P = 0.004), while the difference was not significant when combined with nCRT (RR 0.70, P = 0.36). The analysis shows TME with LLND was associated with significantly longer operation time (WMD 90.73 min, P < 0.001), more intraoperative blood loss (WMD 303.20 mL, P < 0.001), and postoperative complications (RR = 1.35, P =0.02). Whereas urinary dysfunction (RR 1.44, P = 0.38), sexual dysfunction (RR 1.41, P = 0.17), and postoperative mortality (RR = 1.52, P = 0.70), were similar between these two groups. Statistically, no significant differences were observed in OS (HR 0.93, P = 0.62), DFS (HR 0.99, P = 0.96), total recurrence (RR 0.98, P = 0.83), lateral recurrence (RR 0.49, P = 0.14), or distal recurrence (RR 0.95, P = 0.78) between these two groups regardless of whether nCRT was performed or not.

Conclusions

The study shows LLND alone decreases the local recurrence without using nCRT irrespective of the survival advantage in locally advanced lower rectal cancer. The benefit of controlling local recurrence by LLND alone makes us reconsider the usage of nCRT with LLND.

Trial registration

The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42020135575) on 16 May 2019.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-020-02078-1.

Meta-analysis of survival and functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision with or without lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

To compare outcomes of total mesorectal excision with or without lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for the treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS

The electronic data sources were explored to capture all studies comparing total mesorectal excision with and without lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing operation for rectal cancer. Random effects modelling was utilized for the analyses. The uncertainties associated with varying follow-up periods among the included studies were resolved by analysis of time-to-event outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighteen comparative studies enrolling 6,133 patients were eligible. No difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.10, P = .36, I² = 67%), overall survival at maximum follow-up (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.25, P = .86, I² = 22%), 5-year overall survival (odds ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.30, P = .94, I² = 50%), disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.82, P = .23, I² = 74%), disease-free survival at maximum follow-up (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.88-1.31, P = .50, I² = 0%), 5-year disease-free survival (odds ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.32, P = .54, I² = 0%), local recurrence (odds ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.42, P = .97, I² = 34%), distant recurrence (odds ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.46, P = .84, I² = 18%), and total recurrence (odds ratio: 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.29, P = .82, I² = 0%). Total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection resulted in longer operative time (mean difference: 116.02, 95% confidence interval 89.20-142.83, P < .00001, I² = 68%) and higher risks of postoperative complications (odds ratio: 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.14-2.24, P = .007, I² = 0%), urinary dysfunction (odds ratio: 6.66, 95% confidence interval 3.31-13.39, P < .00001, I² = 23%), and sexual dysfunction (odds ratio: 9.67, 95% confidence interval 2.38-39.26, P = .002; I² = 51%). The results remained consistent through separate analyses for randomized trials, observational studies, and patients with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests that lateral pelvic lymph node dissection results in greater postoperative morbidity, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction without improving recurrence and survival. Further evidence is needed from randomized controlled trials to enable experts in the nerve-sparing surgical experiences and neoadjuvant therapy experience to advise on the best treatment strategies for the management of rectal cancer patients including those with possible positive nodes on pretreatment imaging.

Total mesorectal excision plus lateral lymph node dissection vs TME on rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our study is the first meta-analysis to compare total mesorectal excision (TME) plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) with TME on rectal cancer patients regarding outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, complications, urinary dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for publications up to October 2019. Two investigators independently screened the studies for eligibility and extracted specific data. Relevant data were analyzed by Review Manager version 5.3.

RESULTS

Patients in TME + LLND group suffered more complications (OR = 1.48, 95% CI [1.07, 2.03], P = 0.02) compared with TME group; no significant difference was observed in overall survival (HR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.77, 1.61], P = 0.57), disease-free survival (HR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.85, 1.30], P = 0.64), local recurrence (OR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.56, 1.54], P = 0.78), and urinary dysfunction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI [0.66, 3.87], P = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

TME + LLND may cause more complications compared with TME on rectal cancer patients. However, the definite conclusion still requires more researches.

Controversies in the Management of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Advanced Rectal Cancer: East or West?

The presence of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) in advanced rectal cancer entails challenges with ongoing debate regarding the role of prophylactic dissection vs. neoadjuvant radiation treatment. This article highlights the most recent data of both approaches: bilateral LPLN dissection in every patient with low rectal cancer (Rb) as per the Japanese guidelines, vs. the developing approach of neoadjuvant radiotherapy as per Eastern countries. In addition, we also accentuate the importance of a combined approach published by Sammour et al. where a simple "one-size-fits-all" strategy should be abandoned. Rectal cancer treatment is well-established in Western countries. Patients with advanced rectal cancer will undergo radiation ± chemo neoadjuvant therapy followed by TME. In the Dutch TME trial, TME plus radiotherapy showed that the presacral area was the most frequent site of recurrence and not the lateral pelvic wall. Supporting this data, the Swedish study also concluded that LPLN metastasis is not an important cause of local recurrence in patients with low rectal cancer. Therefore, Western approach is CRM-orientated and prophylactic LPLN dissection is not performed routinely as the NCCN guideline does not recommend its surgical removal unless metastases are clinically suspicious. The paradigm in Eastern countries differs somewhat. The Korean study demonstrated that adjuvant radiotherapy without lateral lymph node dissection was not enough to control local recurrence and LPLN metastases. The Japanese Trial JCOG 0212 demonstrated the effects of LPLN dissection in reducing local recurrence in the lateral pelvic compartment. We agree with Sammour and Chang on the fact that rather than a mutual exclusivity approach, we should claim for an approach where all available modalities are considered and used to optimize treatment outcomes, classifying patients into 3 categories of LPLN: low risk cT1/T2/earlyT3 (and Ra) with clinically negative LPLN on MRI; Moderate risk (cT3+/T4 with negative LPLN on MRI) and high risk (clinically abnormal LPLN on MRI). Treatment modality should be based on detailed pretreatment workup and an individualized approach that considers all options to optimize the treatment of patients with rectal cancer in the West or the East.

The efficacy and safety of lateral lymph node dissection for patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer was first reported in the 1950s, since then, there has been an on-going debate about the value of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) in the management of rectal cancer. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the value of LLND for the patients with rectal cancer. To collect clinical studies for the comparison of LLND and non-LLND in patients with rectal cancer, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to 2019.A total of 26 studies, including 6865 patients were enrolled. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 software and Review Manager 5.3 software. Outcome measures included the 5-year survival rate, recurrence rate, perioperative outcomes, urinary function, and male sexual function. Regarding efficacy, our meta-analysis results showed no difference in 5-year disease-free survival rate and local recurrences between the two groups, the Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was1.07 and 0.89 to 1.28 (P = 0.496),and the Odds Ratio(OR) and 95% CI were 0.90 and 0.76 to 1.06 (P = 0.208), respectively. Concerning safety, the incidence of urinary dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction was significantly increased in the LLND group (OR = 2.14, 95%CI = 1.21-3.79, P = 0.009), and (OR = 4.19, 95%CI = 1.55-11.33, P = 0.005), respectively. In conclusion, LLND did not improve the long-term prognosis of patients with rectal cancer, and was associated with increased urinary dysfunction and male sexual dysfunction.

The risk factors for urinary dysfunction after autonomic nerve-preserving rectal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective study at Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group (YCOG1307)

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of urinary dysfunction after autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multiinstitution study of 1002 rectal cancer patients conducted between January 2008 and December 2012 in Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group. Patients who had preoperative urinary dysfunction or had not undergone autonomic nerve preservation surgery were excluded. Urinary dysfunction was defined as that with a Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 2. Patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 887 patients were analyzed. Postoperative urinary dysfunction was observed in 77 patients (8.8%). A multivariate logistic analysis showed that a tumor location in lower rectum (odds ratio [OR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.71; p = 0.02), tumor diameter ≥ 40 mm (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.19-4.44; p < 0.01), operation time ≥ 240 min (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.19-4.44; p < 0.01), blood loss ≥ 300 ml (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.12-3.84; p = 0.02), and diabetes (OR 3.26; 95% CI 1.80-5.89; p < 0.01) were independent risk factors of urinary dysfunction. The incidence of urinary dysfunction exceeded 20% in patients with 3 preoperative predictors (tumor location, tumor diameter, diabetes).

CONCLUSIONS

This result demonstrated that high-risk patients with more than two risk factors should be informed of the risk of urinary dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000033688.

Intraoperative monitoring of pelvic autonomic nerves during laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer

Background

Some patients with low rectal cancer experience anorectal and urogenital dysfunctions after surgery, which can influence the long-term quality of life. In this study, we aimed to protect nerve function in such scenarios by performing intraoperative monitoring of pelvic autonomic nerves (IMPAN).

Patients and methods

We retrospectively investigated a series of 87 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer. Nerve-sparing was evaluated both visually and electrophysiologically. IMPAN was performed by stimulating the pelvic autonomic nerves under processed electromyography of the internal anal sphincter. Urination, defecation, sexual function, and the quality of life were evaluated using validated and standardized questionnaires preoperatively and at follow-up, 12 months after surgery.

Results

Among a total of 87 patients (53 male and 34 female patients), IMPAN with simultaneous electromyography of the internal anal sphincter was performed in 58 (66.7%) patients. Bilateral positive IMPAN results for both measurements, indicating successfully confirmed pelvic autonomic nerve preservation, were obtained in 45 (51.7%) patients. No significant difference was found in terms of urogenital and anorectal functions between preoperative and postoperative patients with bilateral positive IMPAN (P>0.05). Compared to preoperative patients with IMPAN (unilateral) or without IMPAN, these patients exhibited higher International Prostate Symptom Score, a lower International Index of Erectile Function-5, and a lower Female Sexual Function Index score at 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05).

Conclusion

IMPAN is an appropriate method with which to laparoscopically protect nerve function.

Lateral Lymph Node Dissection With the Focus on Indications, Functional Outcomes, and Minimally Invasive Surgery

The lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is still a subject of great debate as to the appropriate treatment for patients with mid to low advanced rectal cancer. The guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum recommend a LLND for patients with T3/4 rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. However, in most Western countries, a routine LLND is not recommended unless a node or nodes are clinically suspicious for metastasis. Even after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), an 8% to 12% lateral pelvic recurrence was noted. The size of the lateral lymph node and responsiveness to preoperative CRT should be the main factors for selecting appropriate patients to undergo a LLND. In addition, from the recent literature, a laparoscopic LLND is safe and oncologically feasible and might have some advantages in short-term outcomes.

Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: Results from a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or III lower rectal cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study, JCOG0212)

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary dysfunction is a major complication of rectal cancer surgery. A randomized controlled trial (JCOG0212) concluded that the noninferiority of mesorectal excision alone to mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection was not confirmed in terms of relapse-free survival.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included histologically proven clinical stage II/III rectal cancer, a main lesion located in the rectum with the lower margin below the peritoneal reflection, and the absence of lateral lymph node enlargement. After confirming R0 resection by mesorectal excision, patients were randomized intraoperatively. The residual urine volume was measured three times. Urinary dysfunction was defined as ≥50 mL residual urine occurring at least once or no measurement of residual urinary volume. This trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000034.

RESULTS

In the mesorectal excision alone and the mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection groups, the incidence of early urinary dysfunction were 58% and 59%, respectively. A tumor location in the lower rectum (vs. upper rectum) and a blood loss of ≥500 mL (vs. <500 mL) were associated with an increased risk of early urinary dysfunction. However, only blood loss was independently predictive of early urinary dysfunction (relative risk, 1.25 [95% CI: 1.10-1.55], p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection is not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of urinary dysfunction. Urinary dysfunction is associated with tumor location and blood loss.

Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: a comparative study of the robotic versus laparoscopic approach

BACKGROUND

Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) is a challenging procedure due to its technical difficulty and higher incidence of surgical morbidity. We compared short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic LPND in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

Between May 2006 and December 2014, prospectively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing robotic or laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) with LPND were retrospectively compared. Patients' demographics, perioperative outcomes, functional results, and initial oncologic outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty and 35 patients underwent robotic or laparoscopic TME with LPND, respectively. Bilateral LPND was performed in 10 patients (20%) in the robotic group and 6 (17.1%) in the laparoscopic group. For unilateral pelvic dissection, the mean operative time was not significantly different between groups (robotic vs. laparoscopic group, 41.0 ± 15.8 min vs. 35.3 ± 13.4 min; P = 0.146), but the EBL was significantly lower in the robotic group (34.6 ± 21.9 mL vs. 50.6 ± 23.8 mL; P = 0.002). Two patients (4.0%) in the robotic group and 7 (20.0%) in the laparoscopic group underwent Foley catheter reinsertion for urinary retention postoperatively (P = 0.029). The mean number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) was 6.6 (range 0-25) in the robotic group and 6.4 (range 1-14) in the laparoscopic group. Pathologic LPN metastatic rate was not different between groups (robotic vs. laparoscopic group, 28.0 vs. 41.2%; P = 0.243). During the median follow-up of 26.3 months, overall recurrence rate was not different between groups (robotic vs. laparoscopic group, 30.0 vs. 31.2%; P = 0.850). Three patients (6.0%) in the robotic group and 4 (11.4%) in the laparoscopic group developed local recurrence (P = 0.653).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic TME with LPND is safe and feasible with favorable short-term surgical outcomes.

Inspection of Perirectal Lymph Nodes by One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Predicts Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is performed for advanced rectal cancers in Japan; however, it can cause sexual and urinary dysfunction. The incidence of lateral LN metastasis is estimated at 7-13.9%; therefore, excessive rectal surgery with LLND should be avoided, especially for prophylactic purposes. To identify the patients who require LLND, we examined metastases in perirectal LNs by using a one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay to predict lateral LN metastases.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent surgery with bilateral LN dissection due to T3-T4 rectal cancers were prospectively included in this study. Twenty-two patients (88.0%) received preoperative chemotherapy. Among 1052 LNs from 25 patients (median 40 per case), 135 perirectal LNs (median 6 per patient) were divided into three pieces and analyzed by OSNA, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for carcinoembryonic antigen mRNA, and pathological examination after surgery. These results were compared with the pathological diagnosis of lateral LNs.

RESULTS

Lateral LN metastases were present in 4 of 25 patients (16.0%). All of these patients were positive by OSNA for perirectal LN metastases. The OSNA assay had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 57%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for predicting lateral LN metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this prospective study suggest that the OSNA assay of perirectal LNs may be useful for determining when LLND is necessary because of its high NPV, even in patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy.

Extended lymphadenectomy for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the value of extended (lateral) lymphadenectomy (EL) in the operative management of locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients that underwent exenterative surgery for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer between 2006 and 2009 were included in the study. A decision for EL was taken at the local multidisciplinary meeting based on the radiological findings. Perioperative and oncological outcomes were assessed and compared between the EL and non-EL group prospectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one consecutive patients were included in the study (EL = 17). The median age was 57 (40-71) for EL and 66 (39-81) years for non-EL. Of patients, 27 (EL = 13) and 14 (EL = 4) underwent pelvic exenteration and abdominosacral resection, respectively. Twelve (EL = 7) patients were diagnosed with locally advanced primary rectal cancer. Thirty-one (EL = 12) patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The median intraoperative time, blood loss and hospital stay were 9 h (3-13), 1.5 l (0.3-7) and 14 days (12-72), respectively, for the EL group, and 8 h (4-15), 1.6 l (0.25-17) and 14 days (10-86), respectively, for the non-EL (p ≥ 0.394). Morbidity was similar between the two groups (EL = 4, non-EL = 9; p = 0.344). Complete tumour resection (R0) was achieved in 30 (73.17%) patients, 12 (70.58%) in the EL group and 18 (75%) in the non-EL group (p = 0.649). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival (EL = 60.7%, non-EL = 75.2%; p = 0.447), local recurrence (EL = 53.6%, non-EL = 65.4%; p = 0.489) and disease-free survival (EL = 53.6%, non-EL = 51.4%; p = 0.814).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that EL does not provide a statistically significant advantage in survival or recurrence rates, for patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer.

The pathophysiology of delayed ejaculation

Delayed ejaculation (DE) is probably least studied, and least understood of male sexual dysfunctions, with an estimated prevalence of 1–4% of the male population. Pathophysiology of DE is multifactorial and including psychosexual-behavioral and cultural factors, disruption of ejaculatory apparatus, central and peripheral neurotransmitters, hormonal or neurochemical ejaculatory control and psychosocial factors. Although knowledge of the physiology of the DE has increased in the last two decade, our understanding of the different pathophysiological process of the causes of DE remains limited. To provide a systematic update on the pathophysiology of DE. A systematic review of Medline and PubMed for relevant publications on ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD), DE, retarded ejaculation, inhibited ejaculation, and climax was performed. The search was limited to the articles published between the January 1960 and December 2015 in English. Of 178 articles, 105 were selected for this review. Only those publications relevant to the pathophysiology, epidemiology and prevalence of DE were included. The pathophysiology of DE involves cerebral sensory areas, motor centers, and several spinal nuclei that are tightly interconnected. The biogenic, psychogenic and other factors strongly affect the pathophysiology of DE. Despite the many publications on this disorder, there still is a paucity of publications dedicated to the subject.

Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in radical rectal cancer surgery: changes in the past 3 decades

The advent of total mesorectal excision (TME) together with minimally invasive techniques such as laparoscopic colorectal surgery and robotic surgery has improved surgical results. However, the incidence of bladder and sexual dysfunction remains high. This may be particularly distressing for the patient and troublesome to manage for the surgeon when it does occur. The increased use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiotherapy is also associated with poorer functional outcomes. In this review, we evaluate current understanding of the anatomy of pelvic nerves which are divided into the areas of the inferior mesenteric artery pedicle, the lateral pelvic wall and dissection around the urogenital organs. Surgical techniques in these areas are discussed. We also discuss the results in functional outcomes of the various techniques including open, laparoscopic and robotic over the last 30 years.

Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015

During the last decade, robotic surgery for rectal cancer has rapidly gained acceptance among colorectal surgeons worldwide, with well-established safety and feasibility. The lower conversion rate and better surgical specimen quality of robotic compared with laparoscopic surgery potentially improves survival. Earlier recovery of voiding and sexual function after robotic total mesorectal excision is another favorable outcome. Long-term survival data are sparse with no evidence that robotic surgery offers major benefits in oncological outcomes. Although initial reports are promising, more rigorous scientific evaluation in multicenter, randomized clinical trials should be performed to definitely determine the advantages of robotic rectal cancer surgery.

Urogenital dysfunctions after treatment of rectal cancer

A significant part of rectal cancer survivors will experience urogenital dysfunction induced by the treatment. Significant progress has been made in order to improve the total mesorectal technique through different approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic, transanal). Rectal cancer surgery is technically difficult notably deep in the pelvis, and therefore the most frequent cause of the postoperative dysfunction is the surgical nerve damage of the autonomic nerves at this level. The main objectives of these efforts were to obtain maximal oncological results and to achieve better functional outcomes including less postoperative urogenital dysfunctions. Our purpose was to build a comprehensive review of the existing literature data regarding this issue from past to present.

Total mesorectal excision with water-jet dissection in patients with rectal cancer: surgical and morphological aspects

AIM

This publication will describe our own experience of using the ERBEJET2(®) water-jet dissector during surgical interventions for rectal cancer.

METHOD

We utilized the water-jet dissection technique to obtain tissue specimens in 10 patients with rectal cancer. All patients thus underwent nerve-sparing low anterior resection of the rectum along with para-aortic lymphadenectomy. No intraoperative complications were registered. The postoperative period went uncomplicated in all patients. No dysuria was observed. Obtained tissue specimens were examined morphologically. Macroscopic examination included assessments of the preservation of the rectal fascia propria and the amount of cellular tissue along the anterior, posterior, and lateral surfaces of the rectum. We performed microscopy of the circumferential resection margin to characterize the surgical clearance and the intensity and depth of damage to the mesorectal tissue. On morphological examination, the quality of mesorectal excision was found to be good (Grade 3) in all 10 patients.

RESULTS

As the results of our study demonstrate, the depth of lateral tissue damage is minimal with the water-jet dissector.

CONCLUSION

Water-jet dissectors have their own place in the long list of armamentarium used in surgical interventions performed for rectal cancer and contribute to improving oncological and functional outcomes of surgical treatment in this patient population.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy affects the indications for lateral pelvic node dissection in mid/low rectal cancer with clinically suspected lateral node involvement: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) is recommended for rectal cancer with clinically metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs), LPNs may respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Our aim was to determine the optimal indication for LPND after nCRT for mid/low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Of 2,263 patients with clinical stage II/III mid/low rectal cancer who were managed at three tertiary referral hospitals, 66 patients underwent curative surgery including LPND after nCRT were included in this study. Risk factors for LPN metastasis were retrospectively analyzed and oncologic outcomes determined according to LPN response to nCRT.

RESULTS

Persistent LPNs greater than 5 mm on post-nCRT magnetic resonance imaging were significantly associated with residual tumor metastasis, unlike responsive LPN after nCRT (short-axis diameter ≤ 5 mm) (pathologically, 61.1 % [22 of 36] vs. 0 % [0 of 30], P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed post-nCRT LPN size as a significant and independent risk factor for LPN metastasis (odds ratio 2.390; 95 % confidence interval 1.104-4.069). Over a median follow-up of 39.3 months, the recurrence rate was lower in patients with responsive nodes than in patients with persistent nodes (20 % [6 of 30] vs. 47.2 % [17 of 36], P = 0.012). The 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival rates were lower in patients with persistent LPN than in patients with responsive LPN (44.6 % vs. 77.1 %, P = 0.034; 33.7 % vs. 72.5 %, P = 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In mid/low rectal cancer with clinically metastatic LPNs, the decision to perform LPND should be based on the LPN response to nCRT.

Functional long-term results after rectal cancer surgery--technique of the athermal mesorectal excision

PURPOSE

The total mesorectal excision (TME), embedded in a multimodal therapeutic concept, is accepted as the standard therapy of the advanced adenocarcinoma of the middle and lower thirds. The thermal damages of the autonomous nerves in the little pelvis caused by dissection devices remains a large problem. For our patients, we use water-jet dissection (WJD)-aided TME with the intention to minimise the rate of bladder and sexual function disorders.

METHODS

From October 2001 until June 2010, we recorded 125 patients with an adenocarcinoma of the middle and lower third of the rectum. Ninety deep anterior rectum resections and 35 abdominoperineal rectum extirpations by WJD were performed. Of the patients, 27.2 % received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Bladder and sexual function disorders were assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 46 (2-117) months. Considering a local recurrence rate of 9.6 %, the tumour-specific 5-year survival of the entire collective was 75.4 %. Long-term bladder function disorders showed in 6.0 % (4/64) and sexual function disorders in 25.0 % (9/36) of the male patients in the course of time.

CONCLUSION

The specific advantage of the WJD technique is not only the facilitated dissection between the mesorectal fascia and the surrounding nervous structures in the little pelvis but also a completely athermal TME. The rate of bladder and sexual function disorders is an excellent result compared to that of international centres. Due to the size of the patient collective and the retrospective character of the study, further studies are necessary to validate the presented results.

Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic colectomy has been used for training of surgical residents and has been considered as a model for technical skills assessment of board-eligible colorectal surgeons. However, construct validity (the ability to distinguish between skill levels) must be confirmed before widespread implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to specifically determine which metrics for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy have evidence of construct validity.

DESIGN

General surgeons that had performed fewer than 30 laparoscopic colon resections and laparoscopic colorectal experts (>200 laparoscopic colon resections) performed laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on the LAP Mentor model. All participants received a 15-minute instructional warm-up and had never used the simulator before the study. Performance was then compared between each group for 21 metrics (procedural, 14; intraoperative errors, 7) to determine specifically which measurements demonstrate construct validity. Performance was compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05 was significant).

RESULTS

Fifty-three surgeons; 29 general surgeons, and 24 colorectal surgeons enrolled in the study. The virtual reality simulators for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy demonstrated construct validity for 8 of 14 procedural metrics by distinguishing levels of surgical experience (p < 0.05). The most discriminatory procedural metrics (p < 0.01) favoring experts were reduced instrument path length, accuracy of the peritoneal/medial mobilization, and dissection of the inferior mesenteric artery. Intraoperative errors were not discriminatory for most metrics and favored general surgeons for colonic wall injury (general surgeons, 0.7; colorectal surgeons, 3.5; p = 0.045).

LIMITATIONS

Individual variability within the general surgeon and colorectal surgeon groups was not accounted for.

CONCLUSIONS

The virtual reality simulators for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy demonstrated construct validity for 8 procedure-specific metrics. However, using virtual reality simulator metrics to detect intraoperative errors did not discriminate between groups. If the virtual reality simulator continues to be used for the technical assessment of trainees and board-eligible surgeons, the evaluation of performance should be limited to procedural metrics.

Intraoperative monitoring of bladder and internal anal sphincter innervation: a predictor of erectile function following low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer? Results of a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

The objective was to investigate whether two-dimensional intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of pelvic autonomic nerves has the potential to predict erectile function (EF) following surgery for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 17 sexually active male rectal cancer patients undergoing IONM-based nerve-sparing low anterior rectal resection were evaluated prospectively. IONM was performed by electric stimulation of the pelvic splanchnic nerves with concomitant electromyography of the internal anal sphincter and cystomanometry. Sexual function was assessed using a validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

The degree of agreement between electromyography-based and cystomanometry-based IONM with postoperative EF was moderate and good (κ = 0.43 and κ = 0.66). Combined assessment yielded the best agreement (κ = 0.76) with sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 90%, negative predictive value of 86%, and overall accuracy of 88%, respectively, in terms of prediction of postoperative EF.

CONCLUSION

The method may be suitable to predict male EF following rectal resection.

Urinary function following laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for male rectal cancer

Objectives

Urinary function can be protected following open lateral node dissection (LND) with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP) for advanced rectal cancer. However data regarding urinary function after laparoscopic LND with PANP have not been reported. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of laparoscopic LND with PANP on urinary function in male patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

Urine flowmetry was performed using an Urodyn flowmeter. Patients were also asked to complete the standardized International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire before surgery and 6 months after. In total, this study consisted of 60 males with advanced rectal cancer.

Results

No significant differences were seen in maximal urinary flow rate, voided volume or residual volume before and after surgery. The total IPSS score increased significantly after surgery and at least 41 patients (68.3%) reported there was no change in one of the seven IPSS questions.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic LND with PANP was relatively safe in preserving urinary function.