Ischemic preconditioning versus intermittent vascular inflow control during major liver resection in pigs

How much ischemia can the liver tolerate during resection?

The use of vascular inflow occlusion (VIO, also known as the Pringle maneuver) during liver surgery prevents severe blood loss and the need for blood transfusion. The most commonly used technique for VIO entails clamping of the portal triad, which simultaneously occludes the proper hepatic artery and portal vein. Although VIO is an effective technique to reduce intraoperative blood loss, it also inevitably inflicts hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury as a side effect. I/R injury induces formation of reactive oxygen species that cause oxidative stress and cell death, ultimately leading to a sterile inflammatory response that causes hepatocellular damage and liver dysfunction that can result in acute liver failure in most severe cases. Since the duration of ischemia correlates positively with the severity of liver injury, there is a need to find the balance between preventing severe blood loss and inducing liver damage through the use of VIO. Although research on the maximum duration of hepatic ischemia has intensified since the beginning of the 1980s, there still is no consensus on the tolerable upper limit. Based on the available literature, it is concluded that intermittent and continuous VIO can both be used safely when ischemia times do not exceed 120 min. However, intermittent VIO should be the preferred technique in cases that require >120 min duration of ischemia.

Hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury from bench to bedside

BACKGROUND

Vascular occlusion to prevent haemorrhage during liver resection causes ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Insights into the mechanisms of IR injury gathered from experimental models have contributed to the development of therapeutic approaches, some of which have already been tested in randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

The review was based on a PubMed search using the terms 'ischemia AND hepatectomy', 'ischemia AND liver', 'hepatectomy AND drug treatment', 'liver AND intermittent clamping' and 'liver AND ischemic preconditioning'; only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs reported on ischaemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping. Both strategies seem to confer protection and allow extension of ischaemia time. Fourteen RCTs evaluating pharmacological interventions, including antioxidants, anti-inflammatory drugs, vasodilators, pharmacological preconditioning and glucose infusion, were identified.

CONCLUSION

Several strategies to prevent hepatic IR have been developed, but few have been incorporated into clinical practice. Although some pharmacological strategies showed promising results with improved clinical outcome there is not sufficient evidence to recommend them.

Iron chelation prevents lung injury after major hepatectomy

AIM

Oxidative stress has been implicated in lung injury following ischemia/reperfusion and resection of the liver. We tested whether alleviating oxidative stress with iron chelation could improve lung injury after extended hepatectomy.

METHODS

Twelve adult female pigs subjected to liver ischemia for 150 min, 65-70% hepatectomy and reperfusion of the remnant liver for 24 h were randomized to a desferrioxamine (DF) group (n = 6) which received i.v. desferrioxamine to a total dose of 100 mg/kg during both ischemia and reperfusion, and a control (C) group (n = 6). We recorded hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, plasma interleukin-6 and malondialdehyde levels, as well as liver malondialdehyde and protein carbonyls content. Total non-heme iron was measured in lung and liver. Pulmonary tissue was evaluated histologically for its nitrotyrosine and protein carbonyls content and for superoxide dismutase (SOD) and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AcH) activities.

RESULTS

Reperfusion of the remnant liver resulted in gradual deterioration of gas-exchange and pulmonary vascular abnormalities. Iron chelation significantly decreased the oxidative markers in plasma, liver and the lung and lowered activities of pulmonary SOD and PAF-AcH. The improved liver function was followed by improved arterial oxygenation and pulmonary vascular resistance. DF also improved alveolar collapse and inflammatory cell infiltration, while serum interleukin-6 increased.

CONCLUSION

In an experimental pig model that combines liver resection with prolonged ischemia, iron chelation during reperfusion of the remnant liver is associated with improvement of several parameters of oxidative stress, lung injury and arterial oxygenation.

Ischemic preconditioning confers antiapoptotic protection during major hepatectomies performed under combined inflow and outflow exclusion of the liver. A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Extensive experimental studies and a few clinical series have shown that ischemic preconditioning (IPC) attenuates oxidative ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injuries in liver resections performed under inflow vascular control. Selective hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE) employed during hepatectomies completely deprives the liver of blood flow, as it entails simultaneous clamping of the portal triad and the main hepatic veins. The aim of the present study was to identify whether IPC can also protect hepatocytes during liver resections performed under SHVE.

METHODS

Patients undergoing major liver resection were randomly assigned to have either only SHVE (control group, n = 43) or SHVE combined with IPC--10 min of ischemia followed by 15 min of reperfusion before SHVE was applied (IPC group, n = 41).

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with regard to age, liver resection volume, blood loss and transfusions, warm ischemic time, and total operative time. In liver remnant biopsies obtained 60 min post-reperfusion, IPC patients had significantly fewer cells stained positive by TUNEL compared to controls (19% +/- 8% versus 45% +/- 12%; p < 0.05). Also IPC patients had attenuated hepatocyte necrosis, systemic inflammatory response, and oxidative stress as manifested by lower postoperative peak values of aspartate transaminase, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and malondialdehyde compared to controls. Morbidity was similar for the two groups, as were duration of intensive care unit stay and extent of total hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In major hepatectomies performed under SHVE, ischemic preconditioning appears to attenuate apoptotic response of the liver remnant, possibly through alteration of inflammatory and oxidative pathways.

Role of ischaemic preconditioning in liver regeneration following major liver resection and transplantation

Liver ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) is known to protect the liver from the detrimental effects of ischaemic-reperfusion injury (IRI), which contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality following major liver surgery. Recent studies have focused on the role of IPC in liver regeneration, the precise mechanism of which are not completely understood. This review discusses the current understanding of the mechanism of liver regeneration and the role of IPC in this setting. Relevant articles were reviewed from the published literature using the Medline database. The search was performed using the keywords “liver”, “ischaemic reperfusion”, “ischaemic preconditioning”, “regeneration”, “hepatectomy” and “transplantation”. The underlying mechanism of liver regeneration is a complex process involving the interaction of cytokines, growth factors and the metabolic demand of the liver. IPC, through various mediators, promotes liver regeneration by up-regulating growth-promoting factors and suppresses growth-inhibiting factors as well as damaging stresses. The increased understanding of the cellular mechanisms involved in IPC will enable the development of alternative treatment modalities aimed at promoting liver regeneration following major liver resection and transplantation.

Ischemic preconditioning versus intermittent vascular occlusion in liver resections performed under selective vascular exclusion: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare ischemic preconditioning with the intermittent vascular occlusion technique in liver resections performed under inflow and outflow occlusion.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with resectable liver tumors assigned were randomly to undergo surgery with either ischemic preconditioning (IP group, n = 27) or with intermittent vascular occlusion (IVO group, n = 27). Both groups were compared regarding surgical parameters, aspartate transaminase levels, and apoptosis.

RESULTS

For warm ischemic time less than 40 minutes, no significant difference was noticed between the 2 groups apart from caspase-3 activity, which was higher in the IVO group than in the IP group (17.2 +/- 3.4 vs. 10.3 +/- 5.2, P < .05). When warm ischemia exceeded 40 minutes, the IP group showed higher levels in blood aspartate transaminase levels on day 3 (442 +/- 178 IU/L vs. 305 +/- 104 IU/L, P < .05) and higher caspase-3 levels (26.5 +/- 5.7 count/high-power field [hpf] vs. 20.7 +/- 3.6 count/hpf, P < .05) and apoptotic activity (28.5 +/- 7.5 count/hpf vs. 20.2 +/- 4.1 count/hpf, P < .05), as compared with the IVO group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both techniques showed comparable efficacy for short ischemic times, intermittent vascular occlusion provided better cytoprotection when ischemia exceeded 40 minutes.