Open Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia Using a Sublay Technique: Long-Term Follow-up

Clinician preferences in the treatment of acutely symptomatic hernia: the 'MASH' survey

INTRODUCTION

There is limited high-quality evidence to guide the management of acute hernia presentation. The aim of this study was to survey surgeons to assess current trends in assessment, treatment strategy and operative decisions in the management of acutely symptomatic hernia.

METHODS

A survey was developed with reference to current guidelines, and reported according to Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Sheffield (UREC:034047). The survey explored practice in groin, umbilical/paraumbilical and incisional hernia presenting acutely. It captured respondent demographics, and preferences for investigations, treatment strategies and repair techniques for each hernia type, using a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Some 145 responses were received, of which 39 declared a specialist hernia practice. Essential investigations included urea and electrolytes (58.6%) and inflammatory markers (55.6%). Computed tomography scan of the abdomen was essential for assessment of incisional hernia (90.9%), but not for other hernia types. Bowel compromise drives early surgery, and increasing American Society of Anesthesiology score pushes towards non-operative management. Type of repair was driven by hernia contents, with increasing contamination associated with increased rates of suture repair. Where mesh was proposed in contaminated settings, biological types were preferred. There was variation in the potential use of laparoscopy for groin hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provides a snapshot of current trends in the management of acutely symptomatic hernia. It demonstrates variation across aspects of assessment and repair technique. Additional data are required to inform practice in these areas.

Favourable outcomes after Retro-Rectus (Rives-Stoppa) Mesh Repair as Treatment for Non-Complex Ventral Abdominal Wall Hernia, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess prevalence of hernia recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, serious complications, and mortality after retro-rectus repair.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Ventral abdominal wall hernia is a common problem, tied to increasing frailty and obesity of patients undergoing surgery. For non-complex ventral hernia, retro-rectus (Rives-Stoppa) repair is considered the gold standard treatment. Level-1 evidence confirming this presumed superiority is lacking.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for studies reporting on retro-rectus repair. Single-armed and comparative randomized and non-randomized studies were included. Outcomes were pooled with mixed-effects, inverse variance or random-effects models.

RESULTS

Ninety-three studies representing 12440 patients undergoing retro-rectus repair were included. Pooled hernia recurrence was estimated at 3.2% (95%CI: 2.2-4.2%, n = 11049) after minimally 12 months and 4.1%, (95%CI: 2.9-5.5%, n = 3830) after minimally 24 months. Incidences of SSI and seroma were estimated at respectively 5.2% (95%CI: 4.2-6.4%, n = 4891) and 5.5% (95%CI: 4.4-6.8%, n = 3650). Retro-rectus repair was associated with lower recurrence rates compared to onlay repair (OR: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.15-0.51, p < 0.001) and equal recurrence rates compared to intraperitoneal onlay (IPOM) repair (OR: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.75-1.12, p = 0.400). Retro-rectus repair was associated with more SSI than IPOM repair (OR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.03-3.14, p = 0.038). Minimally invasive retro-rectus repair displayed low rates of recurrence (1.3%, 95%CI: 0.7-2.3%, n = 849) and SSI (1.5%, 95%CI: 0.8-2.8%, n = 982), albeit based on non-randomized studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Retro-rectus (Rives-Stoppa) repair results in excellent outcomes, superior or similar to other techniques for all outcomes except surgical site infection. The latter rarely occurred, yet less frequently after IPOM repair, which is usually performed by laparoscopy.

Mesh repair under the anterior lamina of the rectus sheath (MUAR) for abdominal incisional hernia

PURPOSE

Abdominal incisional hernia is a frequent complication of major abdominal operations. Our method of performing mesh repair under the anterior lamina of the rectus sheath (MUAR) involves placing mesh between the dorsal surface of the anterior rectus sheath and the rectus abdominis muscle. We evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of our MUAR method.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 80 patients with abdominal incisional hernia, who underwent MUAR at our hospital between August, 2009 and September, 2018. We investigated the rate of recurrence and postoperative complications in these patients, who were followed-up postoperatively for at least 18 months. Patients who completed all visits were then followed-up further with questionnaires.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate after MUAR was 0%. Postoperative complications consisted of subcutaneous wound infections in two patients (2.5%), successfully treated with wound cleansing and antibiotics; and subcutaneous hematoma in three patients (3.8%), which was spontaneously absorbed in two patients, and removed in one. There were no other complications, such as seroma, intestinal obstruction, mesh infection and bulging, or prolonged postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

Mesh repair under the anterior lamina of the rectus sheath is simple and safe with positive short-term and long-term outcomes, suggesting that it is a good option for incisional hernia repair.

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retromuscular mesh repair for ventral hernia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retromuscular repair (eTEP-RM) was recently introduced as a new technique for ventral hernia repair. The aim of the current study was to examine the outcomes of laparoscopic eTEP-RM compared with laparoscopic IPOM for patients with primary ventral and incisional hernia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at a single University Hospital from June 2017 to November 2020. Medical charts of all patients subjected to IPOM and eTEP-RM were evaluated to identify patient- and procedure related variables, as well as postoperative 30-day outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included in the study, 43 and 29 of whom underwent IPOM and eTEP-RM repair, respectively. Patient demographics showed no differences in terms of gender, age, smoking and comorbidity. The median age was 57 years and body mass index 30.5 kg/m². The rate of patients with incisional hernia was higher in the IPOM group (39.5% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.154). There was no difference in horizontal and vertical hernia size defect. The duration of surgery was significantly shorter for IPOM (mean 82.4 vs. 103.4 min, p = 0.010), whereas the length of stay was significantly longer after IPOM (median 1 days vs. 0 days (p < 0.001). The rate of patients requiring postoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or epidural analgesia was significantly higher after IPOM (33% vs. 0%, p = 0.002). A subgroup analysis on patients undergoing primary ventral hernia showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

The study found laparoscopic eTEP-RM safe and effective compared to traditional laparoscopic IPOM. The patients undergoing eTEP-RM had significantly reduced need for additional analgesic treatment and length of stay.

Outcomes of Incisional Hernia Repair Surgery After Multiple Re-recurrences: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Background

Patients with a re-recurrent hernia may account for up to 20% of all incisional hernia (IH) patients. IH repair in this population may be complex due to an altered anatomical and biological situation as a result of previous procedures and outcomes of IH repair in this population have not been thoroughly assessed. This study aims to assess outcomes of IH repair by dedicated hernia surgeons in patients who have already had two or more re-recurrences.

Methods

A propensity score matched analysis was performed using a registry-based, prospective cohort. Patients who underwent IH repair after ≥ 2 re-recurrences operated between 2011 and 2018 and who fulfilled 1 year follow-up visit were included. Patients with similar follow-up who underwent primary IH repair were propensity score matched (1:3) and served as control group. Patient baseline characteristics, surgical and functional outcomes were analyzed and compared between both groups.

Results

Seventy-three patients operated on after ≥ 2 IH re-recurrences were matched to 219 patients undergoing primary IH repair. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in patient baseline characteristics were present between groups. The incidence of re-recurrence was similar between groups (≥ 2 re-recurrences: 25% versus control 24%, p = 0.811). The incidence of complications, as well as long-term pain, was similar between both groups.

Conclusion

IH repair in patients who have experienced multiple re-recurrences results in outcomes comparable to patients operated for a primary IH with a similar risk profile. Further surgery in patients who have already experienced multiple hernia re-recurrences is justifiable when performed by a dedicated hernia surgeon.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00268-021-05952-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Incisional hernia formation in hepatobiliary surgery using transverse and hybrid incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Evidence suggests that midline incisions should be closed with the small-bite technique to reduce IH formation. No recommendations exist for the closure of transverse incisions used in hepatobiliary surgery. This work systematically summarises rates of IH formation and associated technical factors for these transverse incisions.

METHODS

A systematic search was undertaken. Studies describing the incidence of IH were included. Incisions were classified as transverse (two incision types) or hybrid (transverse with midline extension, comprising five incision types). The primary outcome measure was the pooled proportion of IH. Subgroup analysis based on minimum follow-up of two years and a priori definition of IH with clinical and radiological diagnosis was undertaken.

FINDINGS

Thirteen studies were identified and included 5,427 patients; 1,427 patients (26.3%) underwent surgery for benign conditions, 3,465 (63.8%) for malignancy and 535 (9.9%) for conditions that were not stated or classified as 'other'. The pooled incidence of IH was 6.0% (2.0-10.0%) at a weighted mean follow-up of 17.5 months in the transverse group, compared with 15.0% (11.0-19.0%) at a weighted mean follow-up of 42.0 months in the hybrid group (p = 0.045). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a statistical difference in IH formation between the hybrid versus transverse groups.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the limitations in study design and heterogeneity, there is limited evidence to guide incision choice and methods of closure in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. There is an urgent need for a high-quality prospective cohort study to understand the techniques used and their outcomes, to inform future research.

Functional outcomes in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients undergoing incisional hernia repair: Replacing one problem with another? A prospective cohort study in 1312 patients

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernias can be associated with pain or discomfort. Surgical repair especially mesh reinforcement, may likewise induce pain. The primary objective was to assess the incidence of pain after hernia repair in patients with and without pre-operative pain or discomfort. The secondary objectives were to determine the preferred mesh type, mesh location and surgical technique in minimizing postoperative pain or discomfort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A registry-based prospective cohort study was performed, including patients undergoing incisional hernia repair between September 2011 and May 2019. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 3-6 months were included. The incidence of hernia related pain and discomfort was recorded perioperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 1312 patients were included. Pre-operatively, 1091 (83%) patients reported pain or discomfort. After hernia repair, 961 (73%) patients did not report pain or discomfort (mean follow-up = 11.1 months). Of the pre-operative asymptomatic patients (n = 221), 44 (20%, moderate or severe pain: n = 14, 32%) reported pain or discomfort after mean follow-up of 10.5 months. Of those patients initially reporting pain or discomfort (n = 1091), 307 (28%, moderate or severe pain: n = 80, 26%) still reported pain or discomfort after a mean follow-up of 11.3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic incisional hernia patients, hernia related complaints may be resolved in the majority of cases undergoing surgical repair. In asymptomatic incisional hernia patients, pain or discomfort may be induced in a considerable number of patients due to surgical repair and one should be aware if this postoperative complication.

Is the sublay self-gripping mesh effective for incisional ventral hernia repair? Our experience and a systematic review of the literature

Sublay mesh repair seems to be the most effective method for treating incisional hernias (IHs). The aim of this study was to report our experience with retromuscular repair and self-gripping mesh for the treatment of midline IHs. In addition, we provided a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of this novel combination. All patients undergoing elective IH repair from June 2016 to November 2018 were included. The self-gripping mesh was placed in the sublay position. Demographic data, defect sizes, postoperative complications and follow-up durations were collected. A systematic review of the available literature was conducted in January 2020 using main databases. A total of 37 patients (20/17M/F) were included in this study, and the mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 58 years and 27 kg/m2, respectively. Minor complications occurred in six patients. Long-term follow-up demonstrated recurrence in three patients. Regarding the review, five publications were considered relevant. The highest complication rate was 28.6%, and the recurrence rate varied from 0 to 5.1%. This is the first review of the literature regarding sublay IH repair using a self-gripping mesh. The low rates of postoperative complications and recurrence in our experience and those reported by most of the reviewed articles demonstrate that this is a safe and effective method for repairing IHs.

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open intraperitoneal onlay mesh incisional hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) of incisional hernia is performed by laparoscopic and open access. The aim of the present study is to compare open versus laparoscopic surgery specifically using an IPOM technique for incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

A propensity score-matched observational single center study of patients that underwent IPOM between 2004 and 2015 was conducted. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence; secondary outcomes include length of stay, surgical site infections (SSI), complications, and localization of recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 553 patients with incisional hernia repair, 59% underwent laparoscopic and 41% open IPOM. A total of 184 patients completed follow-up. After a mean follow-up of 5.5 years recurrence rate was 20% in laparoscopic and 19% in open repair (p = 1.000). Patients undergoing laparoscopic IPOM had significantly reduced operation time (median 120 vs. 180 min, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stays (6 vs. 8 days, p = 0.002), less complications (10 vs. 23%, p = 0.046), and fewer SSI (1 vs. 21%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic IPOM is associated with reduced morbidity compared to open IPOM for incisional hernia repair.

A New Approach to an Old Technique—The S.U.T.R. First Technique

Ventral and incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are common problems treated by surgeons around the globe. Incisional hernias are common postoperative complications of abdominal laparotomies with a reported incidence of up to 20 per cent. The increasing use of prosthetic mesh in open ventral hernia repairs necessitated the development of different operative techniques used in the repairs. It also required that surgeons become facile with placement of the mesh in different anatomical positions on the abdominal wall. One of the most common locations is placement of the mesh in the underlay position. Many surgeons who use the underlay technique have expressed significant concerns. Among these are fear of an inadvertent bowel injury while placing the mesh, poor visualization during mesh placement, and the inability to use the underlay technique for difficult hernias. We present a very useful, if not, novel technique of open hernia repair using mesh in the underlay position that helps to 1) prevent complications, 2) facilitate easier mesh fixation, 3) simplify open repair of atypical ventral hernias, and 4) reduce total operative time while still adhering to the important fundamental principles of a tension-free hernia repair. This technique as we describe it has been compared with the old parachute technique, but we think this is a significant improvement of that seldom used technique. We believe the use of this technique for the underlay position makes open ventral hernia repair safer, faster, and easier; however, our goal for this article is to describe the procedure in detail. In addition, we recently have started using this technique to fix the mesh when doing the retrorectus approach as well.

Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia

Objective

Incisional hernia is a significant problem after laparotomy, and there is still no consensus on an ideal treatment method. The aim of this study was to compare the results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques.

Material and Methods

In this randomized prospective trial, 100 patients were divided into two groups: onlay and sublay groups. Recurrences were evaluated by performing a physical examination.

Results

The median follow-up was 37.1 (26.6 to 46.5) months. In the onlay group, the mean operation time was significantly shorter. However, in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications, the sublay group had significantly better results. The recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups (6% in the onlay group and 2% in the sublay group).

Conclusion

In the treatment of incisional hernia, sublay mesh repair is superior to onlay mesh repair in terms of postoperative pain and wound complications. Both techniques have similar recurrence rates.

[Treatment of postoperative ventral hernias in recipients of solitary organs]

AIM

To perform retrospective analysis of treatment of postoperative ventral hernias (PVH) in kidney and extrarenal organs recipients, to assess its safety and effectiveness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Hernia repair has been performed in 84 PVH patients for the period from May 2006 to November 2017. The main group consisted of 41 patients (24 males, 17 females, mean age 55 (44; 59)) years with PVH due to previous transplantation. The control group included 43 PVH patients (21 males, 22 females, mean age 51 (50, 56)) years without previous transplantation.

RESULTS

Incidence of surgical complications was similar in two groups: 63.4% in group 1 vs. 53.5% in group 2 (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of surgical complications depending on immunosuppressive therapy and synthetic endoprosthesis deployment technique.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of postoperative ventral hernias using synthetic endoprostheses in recipients of solid organs is effective and safe and should be considered as a preferable in treatment of this pathology.

Long-term results of retromuscular hernia repair: a single center experience

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernia (IH) is one of the most frequent postoperative complications after abdominal surgery. There are multiple surgical techniques described for IH repair. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of primary fascial closure on long-term results in retromuscular hernia repair (RHR) for incisional hernias.

METHODS

A total of 132 patients underwent RHR for IH were included in our study. 109 patients were evaluated in 2009 and 55 patients in 2015 for short and long-term results.

RESULTS

Among 132 patients perfromed RHR, fascia was closed in 107 (81%) and left open in 25 (19%) patients. The mean age of patients was 57.9 ± 11.8 years. Average mesh area was 439.8 ± 194.6 cm², hernia area was 112 ± 77.5 cm² and open area after repair was 40.8 ± 43.3 cm². Mean follow-up of 104 patients regarding postoperative complications evaluated in 2009 was 30.7 ± 14.1 months. Recurrent IH was observed in 6 (4.5%) patients according to data collected in 2009. Long-term results were; mean follow-up period was 91 ± 20.2 months (20-112 months) and recurrent IH was observed in 4 (7.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Retromuscular repair for incisional hernia regardless of the fascial closure gives high patient satisfaction, less recurrence rates and complications in long-term follow-up.

A Randomised Prospective Study to Evaluate Preperitoneal Mesh Repair Versus Onlay Mesh Repair and Laparoscopic IPOM in Incisional Hernia Surgery

Incisional hernia remains a very common postoperative complication. These are encountered with an incidence of up to 20 % following laparotomy. These hernias enlarge over time, making the repair difficult, and serious complications like bowel obstruction, strangulation and enterocutaneous fistula can occur. Hence, elective repair is indicated to avoid these complications. Implantation of a prosthetic mesh is nowadays considered as the standard treatment due to low hernia recurrence. The most common mesh repair techniques used are the onlay repair, sublay repair and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). However, it is still not clear which technique among the three is superior. A study consisting of 30 patients who underwent incisional hernia repair by onlay, laparoscopic and preperitoneal mesh repair with abdominoplasty was conducted in the Coimbatore Medical College and Hospital. Of the three groups, the preperitoneal repair with abdominoplasty was found to have better patient compliance and satisfaction with regard to occurrence of complications and appearance of the abdominal wall without laxity in a single sitting.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open mesh repairs in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia who are operated in an elective setting: systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUNDS

Current open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair have shown similar recurrence rates. However, chronic pain has been associated with Lichtenstein mesh repair, the most common surgical procedure for inguinal hernia in the UK. The position of the mesh is probably an important factor. The Lichtenstein method requires dissection of the inguinal wall and fixation of the mesh. In contrast, in the open preperitoneal approach the mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space and held in place with intra-abdominal pressure. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best open approach for repair of inguinal hernia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open preperitoneal mesh repair compared with Lichtenstein mesh repair in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

DATA SOURCES

We searched major electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) from inception to November 2014 and contacted experts in the field.

REVIEW METHODS

Evidence was considered from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared open preperitoneal mesh repair with Lichtenstein mesh repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. One reviewer completed data extraction and assessed risk of bias for included studies, and two reviewers independently cross-checked the details extracted. Meta-analyses techniques were used to combine results from included studies. A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of open mesh procedures from a NHS health services perspective over a 25-year time horizon.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs involving 1568 participants were included. Participants who underwent open preperitoneal mesh repair returned to work and normal activities significantly earlier than those who underwent Lichtenstein mesh repair [mean difference -1.49 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.78 to -0.20 days]. Although no significant differences were observed between the two open approaches for incidence of pain [risk ratio (RR) 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.27], numbness (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.56), recurrences (Peto odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.52) or postoperative complications, fewer events were generally reported after open preperitoneal mesh repair. The results of the economic evaluation indicate that the open preperitoneal mesh repair was £256 less costly and improved health outcomes by 0.041 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with Lichtenstein mesh repair. The open preperitoneal procedure was the most efficient and dominant treatment strategy with a high (> 98%) probability of being cost-effectiveness for the NHS at a willingness to pay of £20,000 for a QALY. Results were robust to a range of sensitivity analyses. However, the magnitude of cost saving or QALY gain was sensitive to some model assumptions.

LIMITATIONS

Overall, the included trials were of small sample size (mean 130.7 participants) and at high or unclear risk of bias. Meta-analyses results demonstrated significant statistical heterogeneity for most of the assessed outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Open preperitoneal mesh repair appears to be a safe and efficacious alternative to Lichtenstein mesh repair. Further research is required to determine the long-term effects of these surgical procedures as well as the most effective open preperitoneal repair technique in terms of both clinical efficacy and costs.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013510.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

A modified approach to component separation using biologic graft as a load-sharing onlay reinforcement for the repair of complex ventral hernia

BACKGROUND

Components separation has been proposed as a means to close large ventral hernia without undue tension. We report a modification on open components separation that allows for the incorporation of onlaid noncrosslinked porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice, LifeCell Corp, Branchburg, NJ) as a load-sharing structure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series including all cases using Strattice from July 2008 through December 2009. Data evaluated included patient demographics, comorbidities associated with risk of recurrence, hernia grade, and postoperative complications. The primary outcomes were hernia recurrence and surgical site occurrences.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients; 60.8% presented with a recurrent incisional hernia. Average length of follow-up was 384 days. There were 4 hernia recurrences (7.9%). Complications included surgical site infection (20.7%), seroma (15.5%), and hematoma (5%) requiring intervention. Four deaths occurred in the series due to causes unrelated to the hernia repair, only 1 within 30 days of operation.

CONCLUSIONS

This series demonstrates that components separation reinforced with noncrosslinked porcine acellular dermal matrix onlay is an efficacious, single-stage repair with a low rate of recurrence and surgical site occurrences.

Outcomes of open intraperitoneal incisional hernia repair based on patient-reported outcomes

PURPOSE

The outcomes of open incisional hernia repair from the patients' point of view have variations over time, and only continuous follow-up would reflect the real outcomes. The purpose of this study is to validate a standard measurement instrument in the form of a questionnaire to report the evolutionary outcomes of a specific open technique to repair incisional hernias.

METHODS

Prospective study follows up a cohort of 82 consecutive patients submitted to elective intraperitoneal open hernioplasty of midline incisional hernias. The follow-up consisted in an interview and physical examination 30 days after surgery, at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years. Primary outcome measure was reporting the outcomes of hernia repair according to a standardized scale obtained from a questionnaire.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between complications suffered by patients and score results (p = 0.722). The length of hospital stay was 6.5 ± 4.3 days, and a prolonged hospital stay was related to complications (p = 0.002) and did not influence the score results (p = 0.365). The final score demonstrated that patients had a very good impression on this procedure 1 month after surgery (p = 0.003). This impression shifted to an excellent perception 1 year after surgery remaining similar until the last control (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the intraperitoneal hernioplasty was a procedure associated with minor morbidity and without recurrences 4 years after the operation. The outcomes from the patients' point of view were excellent 1 year after the procedure with a tendency to improve in the long term.

Repair of large and giant incisional hernia with onlay mesh: perspective of a tertiary care hospital of a developing country

PURPOSE

Ventral incisional hernias, especially large and giant, carry significant post repair complications. This retrospective review is undertaken to determine the outcomes of large and giant incisional hernia repair as well as the risk factors of recurrence and surgical site infection at a tertiary care hospital in developing country.

METHOD

This case series included adult patients, operated between January 2001 and June 2009 for incisional hernia of size ≥ 10 cm (vertical or horizontal dimension) at our institute with follow up of at least one year. The charts of selected patients were reviewed by a general surgery fellow for hernia recurrence, complications, mortality and the predictive factors.

RESULTS

Sixty out of 391 patients operated for incisional hernia were found eligible; of them 29 (48.3%) had large (defect of 10-15 cm) and 31 (51.7%) had giant hernia (defect size >15 cm). Mean age of patients was 43.8 ± 11.8 with female preponderance (male: female; 1:1.6). Fourteen (23.33%) patients developed complications and there was no mortality. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) was observed in 13 (21.67%) patients and significant predisposing factors for SSI (with or without mesh infection) were diabetes mellitus, emergency surgery, contaminated surgery and recurrent incisional hernia. With a mean follow up of 20.05 ± 8.8 months (range: 12-48 months), four (6.67%) patients had recurrence of hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

Repair of large and giant incisional hernia using prosthetic non-absorbable mesh, mainly onlay, carry acceptable rates of complications.

A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The implantation of a polymer mesh is considered as the standard treatment for incisional hernia. It leads to lower recurrence rates compared to suture techniques without mesh implantation; however, there are also some drawbacks to mesh repair. The operation is more complex and peri-operative infectious complications are increased. Yet it is not clear to what extent a mesh implantation influences quality of life or leads to chronic pain or discomfort. The influence of the material, textile structure and size of the mesh remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a non-absorbable, large pore-sized, lightweight polypropylene (PP) mesh leads to a better health outcome compared to a partly absorbable mesh.

METHODS/DESIGN

In this randomised, double-blinded study, 80 patients with incisional hernia after a median laparotomy received in sublay technique either a non-absorbable mesh (Optilene® Mesh Elastic) or a partly absorbable mesh (Ultrapro® Mesh). Primary endpoint was the physical health score from the SF-36 questionnaire 21 days post-operatively. Secondary variables were patients' daily activity score, pain score, wound assessment and post-surgical complications until 6 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

SF-36, daily activity and pain scores were similar in both groups after 21 days and 6 months, respectively. No hernia recurrence was observed during the observation period. Post-operative complication rates also showed no difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of a non-absorbable, large pore-sized, lightweight PP mesh for incisional hernia leads to similar patient-related outcome parameters, recurrence and complication rates as a partly absorbable mesh.

Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of incisional hernia (IH) on quality of life and body image.

METHODS

Open abdominal surgery patients were included in a prospective cohort study performed between 2007 and 2009 in an academic hospital. Main outcomes were incidence of IH after approximately 12 months and Short-Form 36 and body image questionnaire results.

RESULTS

There were 374 patients who were examined after a median follow-up period of 16 months (range, 10-24 mo). Seventy-five patients had developed IH (20%); 63 (84%) were symptomatic. Adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score, patients with IH reported significantly lower mean scores for components physical functioning (P = .033), role physical (P = .002), and physical component summary (P = .010). A trend toward significance was found for general health (P = .061). Patients with IH reported significantly lower mean cosmetic scores (P = .002), and body image and total body image scores (both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IH reported lower mean scores on physical components of health-related quality of life and body image.

Repair of large abdominal incisional hernia by reconstructing the midline and use of an onlay of biological material

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of repairing large abdominal incisional hernias by reconstructing the midline using bilateral abdominis rectus muscle sheath (ARS) relaxing incisions and a biological material onlay.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2008, 71 patients underwent repair of large incisional hernias at 2 community hospitals. After replacement of hernia sac contents into the peritoneal cavity, a relaxing incision was made in the ARS bilaterally. Then, the midline was closed primarily. The biological material was used as an onlay and sutured to the lateral edges of the relaxed ARS. Main outcome measures were postoperative complications and hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

Median defect size was 195 cm(2) (range, 150-420 cm(2)), median surgical time was 125 minutes, and median hospital stay was 6 days. There were no deaths and no wound infections. Wound seroma, the most frequent postoperative complication, occurred in 51 (72%) of the 71 patients. There was 1 (1.4%) recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In these 71 patients, our technique for repair of large abdominal incisional hernias was safe and effective.

One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of incisional hernia after midline laparotomies ranges from 10 to 20%. The recurrence rate after this hernia surgery varies from 25 to 52% using autogenous tissue. The use of prosthetic meshes can decrease the postoperative hernia recurrence by up to 10%. The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study was to analyze and compare the results of three different incisional hernia surgical techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and sixty-one patients who underwent incisional hernia surgery were randomized into three groups. The Keel technique was used in the first group, the "Onlay" technique (prosthetic mesh is fixed on the external abdominal muscle slip) in the second group, and the "Sublay" technique (prosthetic mesh is placed on the posterior abdominal muscle sheath) in the third group. Age, sex, hospitalization time, body mass index (BMI), intraabdominal pressure, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, normal physical activity recovery time, and recurrence rate were compared between the groups. The postoperative follow-up period was 12 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients in the Keel group, 57 patients in the "Onlay" group, and 50 patients in the "Sublay" group were operated. Age, hospitalization time, and BMI were similar in all of the groups. The operative time was significantly longer in the prosthetic mesh groups compared with the Keel group. The intraabdominal pressure changes before and after surgery was significantly higher in the Keel group compared with the prosthetic mesh groups (5.66 ± 2.5 mmHg vs. 1.88 ± 1 mmHg vs. 1.76 ± 1 mmHg; P < 0.05). The postoperative wound complications rate was significantly higher in the "Onlay" technique group compared with the Keel and "Sublay" technique groups (49.1% vs. 22.2% vs. 24%; P < 0.05). Postoperative pain (VAS score) was significantly lower in the "Onlay" and "Sublay" groups (5.53 ± 1.59 vs. 3.96 ± 1.56 vs. 3.78 ± 1.97; P < 0.05). All of the patients in "Sublay" group recovered to normal physical activity during the 6 months follow-up period compared with 94.4% of patients in the Keel group and 98.3% of patients in the "Onlay" group. The recurrence rate was 22.2% in the Keel group, 10.5% in the "Onlay" group, and 2% in the "Sublay" group during the follow-up period. The general complications rate after hernia surgery was 5.6%. Postoperative pneumonia was the most frequent complication, which appeared in 4.3% of patients. There was no postoperative death in our prospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh repair is the first-choice technique for incisional hernia treatment. The results of the "Sublay" technique are better than the "Onlay" technique.

How safe is the use of prosthetic materials in the repair of abdominal-wall defects in malnourished subjects?

Incisional hernias and abdominal-wall defects consume large amounts of healthcare resources. Use of mesh is effective in treatment of these disorders and can decrease the rate of recurrence. This experimental study focused on the safety of mesh use in the setting of malnutrition, a condition that impairs wound healing. Rats were divided into two groups: normally fed and food-restricted. An abdominal-wall defect, 2 by 2 cm, was covered with polypropylene mesh, 2.5 by 2.5 cm. After sacrifice of the rats at the 21st and 60th days, tissue samples were sent for tensiometric and histopathological studies. No significant difference in infectious complications was observed between the two groups. Tensiometry revealed no significant differences between the groups. On histopathological examination, the only difference noted was in the vascularization scores of normally fed rats. For malnourished subjects that survived after surgery, the use of polypropylene mesh appeared safe in the closure of abdominal-wall defects, with no increase in infection rate and satisfactory wound healing.

Surgical progress in inguinal and ventral incisional hernia repair

The goals of this article are to describe the history of hernia repair and how innovations in surgical technique, prosthetics, and technology have shaped current practice.