Pancreatic insulinoma: a surgical experience

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol ablation versus surgical resection of insulinomas

PURPOSE

Insulinoma is a rare tumor of the pancreas that can lead to hypoglycemia. To date, the standard therapy is surgical resection. After the first case report of successful endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) ethanol injection 16 years ago, the need for establishing an alternative treatment method remains unchanged given the high morbidity rates of surgery and its unsuitability in some patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here, we provide retrospective data from 33 insulinoma patients that were treated at our center between 2010 and 2021. Of these, 9 patients were treated with EUS-guided ethanol injection and 24 underwent pancreatic surgery.

RESULTS

The ethanol group was older (ethanol: mean ± SE 67.8±11.2 years vs. surgery: 52.3±15.7, p=0.014) with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.0 (1.0;4.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0;2.0), p=0.008). The lowest glucose values were similar between groups before (ethanol: 2.09±0.17 mmol/l vs. surgery: 1.81±0.08, p=0.158) and after (4.95±0.74 vs. 5.41±0.28, p=0.581) the respective treatments. Complications occurred more frequently in the surgery group (11 % vs. 54 %, p=0.026). One patient after prior partial pancreatectomy died postoperatively. The hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the ethanol group (4.78±0.78 days vs. 19.88±4.07, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided ethanol injection can be similarly effective for the treatment of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia compared with pancreatic surgery but seems to be associated with less severe complications. This implies the need for prospective randomized trials in insulinoma patients with a low risk for malignancy.

Pancreatic Insulinoma Masquerading as Neurological Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment of a Rare Tumor

Insulinomas are rare functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that typically manifest with classic hypoglycemic symptoms, such as diaphoresis, palpitations, and tremors. Although infrequent, neuroglycopenic symptoms associated with insulinomas have been reported, often leading to delayed diagnoses. Here, we present the case of a 31-year-old male with pancreatic insulinoma who experienced recurrent episodes of seizures and confusion preceded by diaphoresis, tremors, and palpitations. During these episodes, he was found to be hypoglycemic. Comprehensive evaluations, including brain and abdominal imaging, as well as biochemical and serological testing, were conducted. The findings confirmed a diagnosis of pancreatic insulinoma. The patient underwent surgical resection of the tumor, and a biopsy confirmed the insulinoma diagnosis. He remained asymptomatic during subsequent follow-ups.

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided ablation and minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aims

Most pancreatic insulinomas can be treated by minimally invasive modalities. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablation and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma.

Materials and methods

Online databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary aim was to compare the rates of adverse events (AEs) and the secondary aims were to compare the clinical and technical success rates, length of hospital stays, and symptom recurrence rates between EUS and MIS approaches.

Results

Eight studies with 150 patients were identified that reported EUS-guided ablation outcomes, forming the EUS group, and 9 studies with 236 patients reported MIS outcomes, forming the MIS group. The pooled median age of the included patients in the EUS group was greater than that of the MIS group (64.06 vs. 44.98 years old, p < 0.001). Also, the technical success rate was significantly higher in the EUS group (100% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.025), while the clinical success was significantly higher (6%) in the MIS group (94% vs. 98.7%, p = 0.021). The AE rates (18.7% vs. 31.1%, p = 0.012) and severe AE rates (1.3% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.011) were significantly lower in the EUS group. The median length of hospital stay in the EUS group (2.68 days, 95% CI: 1.88-3.48, I2 = 60.3%) was significantly shorter than in the MIS group (7.40 days, 95% CI: 6.22-8.58, I2 = 42.2%, p < 0.001). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the EUS group (15.3% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

EUS-guided ablation is associated with a lower AE rate and a shorter length of hospital stay, but a higher recurrence rate for the treatment of insulinoma compared with MIS. The EUS approach may be an alternative, even first-line, treatment for poor surgery candidates.

[Current views on the treatment of insulinoma]

RELEVANCE

Insulinoma is the most common hormonally active neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the pancreas. In recent years, there has been a trend towards an increase in the incidence of NET especially insulinoma.

AIM

Summarizing and analyzing current data on various approaches to the treatment of insulinoma. Our review includes a comprehensive assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of currently available insulinoma treatment methods in comparison with past experience, as well as a review of promising methods that are not currently widely used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of literature from such databases as scientific electronic library elibrary.ru, Pubmed, Google Scholar, MedLine, Scopus and Web of Science.

RESULTS

The most common treatment for insulinoma is surgery. For patients with high operative risk, alternative methods such as alcohol ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and tumor embolization may be used. Medications include the use of somatostatin analogues, diazoxide. The literature describes the potential benefit of the use of beta-blockers, phenytoin, glucagon, however, in clinical trials, these drugs have not demonstrated a significant effect. For the treatment of malignant and metastatically advanced insulinoma, targeted therapy (primarily Everolimus), chemotherapy, as well as embolization (including chemoembolization, radioembolization), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation and cryoablation, ultrasound ablation (HIFU), laser ablation, brachytherapy, irreversible electroporation are used.

CONCLUSION

The study of new drugs is an important task for scientists, among medications the most promising are new generations of somatostatin analogues, targeted drugs and chemotherapy drugs. The rare frequency of insulinoma makes it difficult to conduct randomized controlled trials and prospective studies. That is why physicians and scientists need to maintain close contacts with each other and take into account the experience of treating each patient with such disease, which will help develop effective treatment algorithms in the future.

A rare case of insulinoma presented with neurological manifestations: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Insulinoma is a rare, most commonly benign tumor with several manifestations that may be misattributed to psychiatric, cardiac, or neurological disorders.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this report, we describe the case of a 47-year-old woman who presented with neurological manifestations, including seizures, that were misdiagnosed initially as seizures due to small vessel ischemic disease and managed accordingly with various antiepileptic drugs without any benefit. An endocrinologist's assessment suggested measuring the levels of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. The results were abnormal. Subsequently, an enhanced-contract CT scan followed by an MRI of the abdomen was requested, and it revealed a well-delineated lesion measuring about (3,2 × 2,1 × 2,2) cm located in the tail of the pancreas. On laparoscopic visualization, a partial pancreatectomy was accomplished using a stapler. Histopathology of the surgical specimen revealed a benign insulinoma with free margins. The follow-up after three months demonstrated that the patient was doing well.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Although insulinoma is mostly benign, conservative surgery such as enucleation or partial pancreatectomy is usually the cornerstone of treatment. If other indicators such as large size, multiplicity, proximity to the major pancreatic duct, association with MEN1, and malignancy were present, radical resection was considered.

CONCLUSION

A high index of suspicion is requested to establish the diagnosis of insulinoma, especially when presenting with severe neurological symptoms like seizures and coma. It should be kept in mind that insulinoma is the most common cause of hypoglycemia associated with endogenous hyperinsulinism.

Clinical Characteristics and Incidences of Benign and Malignant Insulinoma Using a National Inpatient Database in Japan

CONTEXT

Insulinoma is the most common pancreatic functional neuroendocrine neoplasm, yet little information on recent clinical practice in patients with insulinoma, especially malignant insulinoma, is available.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to clarify the characteristics and practice patterns in patients with insulinoma using a national inpatient database.

METHODS

Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we retrospectively identified patients with insulinoma admitted between 2010 and 2018. We compared background characteristics and therapeutic interventions between patients with benign and malignant insulinoma. We also estimated the incidence of insulinoma using the number of patients with newly diagnosed insulinoma in 2012.

RESULTS

We identified 844 patients with benign insulinoma and 102 patients with malignant insulinoma. Patients with malignant insulinoma were younger (median, 55.5 vs 66.0 years, P < .001) and less likely to be female (55.9% vs 65.3%, P = .061) than patients with benign insulinoma. Analysis of therapeutic interventions revealed that patients with malignant insulinoma more frequently received medications (71.6% vs 49.6%, P < .001) but less frequently underwent pancreatic surgery (57.8% vs 72.0%, P = .003). Older patients were a smaller proportion of those undergoing surgery and a larger proportion of those managed with medications without surgery (P < .001). The incidence of insulinoma was estimated to be 3.27 (95% CI, 2.93-3.61) individuals per million Japanese adult population per year.

CONCLUSION

The present study using a nationwide database had a larger sample size than previous studies and revealed definitive differences in patient characteristics and therapeutic patterns between benign and malignant insulinoma.

JNETS clinical practice guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up: a synopsis

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare neoplasms that occur in various organs and present with diverse clinical manifestations. Pathological classification is important in the diagnosis of NENs. Treatment strategies must be selected according to the status of differentiation and malignancy by accurately determining whether the neoplasm is functioning or nonfunctioning, degree of disease progression, and presence of metastasis. The newly revised Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs) comprises 5 chapters-diagnosis, pathology, surgical treatment, medical and multidisciplinary treatment, and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)/von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-and includes 51 clinical questions and 19 columns. These guidelines aim to provide direction and practical clinical content for the management of GEP-NEN preferentially based on clinically useful reports. These revised guidelines also refer to the new concept of "neuroendocrine tumor" (NET) grade 3, which is based on the 2017 and 2019 WHO criteria; this includes health insurance coverage of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for NEN, everolimus for lung and gastrointestinal NET, and lanreotide for GEP-NET. The guidelines also newly refer to the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of NEN associated with VHL disease and MEN1. The accuracy of these guidelines has been improved by examining and adopting new evidence obtained after the first edition was published.

Preoperative stenting in insulinoma located nearby pancreatic duct: a case report and literature review

Insulinoma is a rare functional neuroendocrine tumor of pancreas. The only recommended treatment is surgical removal. We present a case of a 46-year-old female patient who underwent the enucleation of insulinoma localized nearby pancreatic main duct after preoperative endoscopic insertion of pancreatic stent. The tumor was safely identified during the surgery and was enucleated without injury of pancreatic duct or postoperative complications.

Updated Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with those of open pancreas surgery (OPS) for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).

METHODS

Studies reporting the effects of MIS and OPS for pNENs, published on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library before May 2020 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventeen cohort studies with a total of 1853 patients were eligible for analysis, including 655 patients in the MIS group and 1198 patients in the OPS group. The estimated blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, overall complications, severe complications, spleen preservation, mortality, and recurrence in the MIS group were lower than those in the OPS group. The R0 rate, 3-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year OS in the MIS group were higher than those in the OPS group. There were no significant differences in operative time, postoperative pancreatic fistula, clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding, reoperation, readmission, and 1-year OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery can reach lower recurrence rate, higher long-term survival rate, and better outcomes in terms of estimated blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, R0 rate, mortality, overall complications, and severe complications for pNENs. More high quality studies need to be conducted for further verification.

Homogenously isoattenuating insulinoma on biphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: Little benefits of diffusion-weighted imaging for lesion detection

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic benefit of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the detection of homogenous isoattenuating insulinoma on biphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) preoperatively and to determine which magnetic resonance (MR) sequences exhibited the best diagnostic performance. A total of 44 consecutive patients who underwent biphasic contrast-enhanced CT and conventional MR imaging (MRI), including DWI on a 3T scanner, were identified retrospectively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of insulinomas and the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of four randomized image sets [T2-weighted image (WI), axial T1WI, DWI and T2WI + DWI] for each reader. Axial T1-weighted MRI exhibited the highest relative sensitivity for each reader; DWI alone exhibited the lowest relative sensitivity and the lower inter-reader agreement. There was no significant difference in lesion detection between T2WI and T2WI + DWI image sets for each reader. The ADC values of the insulinoma were significantly lower compared with those of the surrounding parenchyma. In conclusion, DWI does not benefit the detection of homogenous isoattenuating insulinoma. Axial T1WI is the optimal pulse sequence. Quantitative assessment of the tumor ADC values may be a useful tool to characterize identified pancreatic neoplasms.

Role of surgery in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs) are rare. They are generally accepted to be slow-growing and have an indolent course. These tumours can be non-functioning or functioning, consisting of a biochemically heterogeneous group of tumours including insulinomas, gastrinomas, carcinoids and glucagonomas. Although surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, controversy still exists especially for non-functioning tumours <2 cm in size. Whether these should be resected or undergo intensive surveillance remains unclear. The surgical approach depends on local expertise. Many studies have shown comparable short-term surgical outcome with laparoscopic pancreatic resection compared to open techniques, however data on long-term oncological outcome are still lacking. On the other hand, liver metastasis occurs in as high as 80% of PNET patients. Five-year survival rate is only 30% if left untreated compared to 60-80% if complete resection is achieved. Current evidence supports liver resection with an aim for symptomatic control and to improve survival in those with respectable disease and no extra-hepatic metastasis. Palliative debunking can be considered in those with intractable symptoms. This article reviews the current evidence on pancreatic resection for PNETs, in particular the role of laparoscopic resection and the management of liver metastasis.

Laparoscopic management of neuroendocrine tumors: state-of-the-art

Over recent years, minimally invasive pancreatic resections have increasingly been reported in the literature. Even though pancreatic surgery is still considered a challenge for surgeons due to its technical difficulties and high morbidity, the consolidation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery has included the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). This article presents a systematic review of the literature with regards to the laparoscopic treatment of PNETs in order to assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatic resections.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic pancreatic resections for neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs)

The safety of laparoscopic resections (LPS) of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) has been well established in the literature. Areas covered: Studies conducted between January 2003 and December 2015 that reported on LPS and open surgery (OPS) were reviewed. The primary outcomes were the rate of post-operative complications and the length of hospital stay (LoS) after laparoscopic and open surgical resection. The rate of recurrence was the secondary outcome. Eleven studies were included with a total of 907 pancreatic resections for PNENs, of whom, 298 (32.8%) underwent LPS and 609 (67.2%) underwent open surgery. LPS resulted in a significantly shorter LoS (p < 0.0001) and lower blood loss (p < 0.0001). The meta-analysis did not show any significant difference in the pancreatic fistula rate, recurrence rate or post-operative mortality between the two groups. Expert commentary: LPS is a safe approach even for PNENs and it is associated with a shorter LoS.

Efficacy of laparoscopic ultrasonography in laparoscopic resection of insulinoma

Insulinoma is the most common functioning islet cell tumor of the pancreas, with an annual incidence of 4 cases/1 million individuals. It is treated by surgical methods. Open surgery was once considered the standard approach for the treatment of insulinoma. However, the procedure is traumatic and requires a large incision, which does not satisfy the growing expectations of minimally invasive management of small-sized tumors. Insulinomas are usually benign solitary tumors and mostly occur sporadically, which makes them suitable candidates for laparoscopic management. The potential advantages of laparoscopic management of insulinoma over open surgery include shorter duration of hospitalization, quicker recovery, and better cosmetic effect. However, because of the small tumor size as well as the depth and uncertainty of the location of the tumor, laparoscopic localization of the lesion without tactile sensation is difficult. Laparoscopic ultrasonography can detect about 90% of insulinomas, and its sensitivity is comparable to that of manual palpation along with intraoperative ultrasonography during open surgery; thus, it ensures the feasibility of laparoscopic management of insulinoma and reinforces its advantage as a minimally invasive procedure. Laparoscopic ultrasonography is vital for the localization of insulinomas and characterization of the surrounding pancreatic structure and should, therefore, be considered an integral part of the laparoscopic management of insulinoma.

Isoattenuating insulinomas at biphasic contrast-enhanced CT: frequency, clinicopathologic features and perfusion characteristics

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the frequency of isoattenuating insulinomas, to investigate their clinicopathological features and to assess their regional pancreatic perfusion characteristics.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained, and patient informed consent was waived. From July 2010 to June 2014, 170 patients (66 male, 104 female) with endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia underwent biphasic contrast-enhanced CT before surgery, and 129 of those patients also received preoperative whole-pancreas CT perfusion. A total of 181 tumours were proved histopathologically after surgery. Enhancement pattern and regional pancreatic perfusion characteristics were analyzed. Clinical features, tumour size and pathological grading were investigated.

RESULTS

The frequency of isoattenuating tumours was 24.9 %. Tumour size and WHO grading was not significantly different between isoattenuating and hyperattenuating tumours. Tumour-free regions had identical blood flow (BF) regardless of their location (p = 0.35). Isoattenuating tumour-harbouring regions had lower BF compared with hyperattenuating tumour-harbouring regions; both showed higher BF compared with tumour-free neighbourhood regions (all p < 0.01). For patients with isoattenuating tumours, the overall hospital stay was longer (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial subset of insulinomas were isoattenuating on biphasic CT. CT perfusion showed higher BF in tumour-harbouring regions compared to tumour-free regions, providing a clue for tumour regionalization.

KEY POINTS

• About a quarter of all insulinomas were isoattenuating on biphasic contrast-enhanced CT. • CT perfusion finds tumour-harbouring regions have higher blood-flow compared to tumour-free regions. • CT perfusion provides important information for tumour regionalization, for isoattenuating tumours.

Pancreatic insulinomas: Laparoscopic management

Insulinomas are rare pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that are most commonly benign, solitary, and intrapancreatic. Uncontrolled insulin overproduction from the tumor produces neurological and adrenergic symptoms of hypoglycemia. Biochemical diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of Whipple’s triad, along with corroborating measurements of blood glucose, insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, β-hydroxybutyrate, and negative tests for hypoglycemic agents during a supervised fasting period. This is accompanied by accurate preoperative localization using both invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities. Following this, careful preoperative planning is required, with the ensuing procedure being preferably carried out laparoscopically. An integral part of the laparoscopic approach is the application of laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound, which is indispensable for accurate intraoperative localization of the lesion in the pancreatic region. The extent of laparoscopic resection is dependent on preoperative and intraoperative findings, but most commonly involves tumor enucleation or distal pancreatectomy. When performed in an experienced surgical unit, laparoscopic resection is associated with minimal mortality and excellent long-term cure rates. Furthermore, this approach confers equivalent safety and efficacy rates to open resection, while improving cosmesis and reducing hospital stay. As such, laparoscopic resection should be considered in all cases of benign insulinoma where adequate surgical expertise is available.

Determinants of surgical resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) include functioning and non-functional tumors. Functioning tumors consist of tumors that produce a variety of hormones and their clinical effects. Therefore, determinants of resection of pNETs should be discussed for each group of tumors. Less than 10% of insulinomas are malignant, therefore more than 90% of the cases can be cured by surgical resection. Lymphadenectomy is generally not necessary in insulinoma operation. If preoperative localization of the insulinoma is completed, enucleation from the pancreatic body or tail, and distal pancreatectomy can be performed safely by laparoscopy. When preoperative localization of a sporadic insulinoma is not confirmed, surgical exploration is needed. Intraoperative localization of a tumor, intraoperative insulin sampling and frozen section are required. The crucial purpose of surgical resection is to control inappropriate insulin secretion by removing all insulinomas. Gastrinomas are usually located in the duodenum or pancreas, which secrete gastrin and cause Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Duodenal gastrinomas are usually small, therefore they are not seen on preoperative imaging studies or endoscopic ultrasound, and can be found only at surgery if a duodenotomy is performed. In addition, lymph node metastasis is found in 40-60% of cases. Therefore, the experienced surgeons should direct operation for gastrinomas. Surgical exploration with duodenotomy should be performed at a laparotomy. Other functioning pNETs can occur in the pancreas or in other locations. Curative resection is always recommended whenever possible after optimal symptomatic control of the clinical syndrome by medical treatment. Indications for surgery depend on clinical symptom control, tumor size, location, extent, malignancy and presence of metastasis. A lot of non-functioning pNETs are found incidentally according to the quality improvement of imaging techniques. Localized, small, malignant non-functioning pNETs should be operated on aggressively, while in possibly benign tumors smaller than 2 cm the surgical risk-benefit ratio should be carefully weighted. Surgical liver resection is generally proposed in curative intent to all patients with operable metastases from G1 or G2 pNET. The benefits of surgical resection of liver metastases have been demonstrated in terms of overall survival and quality of life. Complete resection is associated with better long-term survival.

Assessing the short- and long-term outcomes after resection of benign insulinoma

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma is a rare functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) believed to have an excellent long-term outcome, but few studies have solely focused on this issue after apparently curative resection. This study aimed to assess post-operative and long-term outcomes after resection of benign insulinomas.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2013, 36 consecutive patients with insulinomas underwent surgery. Three patients had multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 (MEN-1). Demographics, operative findings, tumour grade (2010 World Health Organization (WHO) NET classification), post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade (International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF)), complications and recurrence were analysed.

RESULTS

Eighteen (50%) had enucleation while the rest underwent pancreatic resection. The majority (86.1%) of insulinomas belonged to WHO NET grade G1. POPF occurred in 58.3% of patients while clinical fistula (ISGPF grades B and C) occurred in 19.4%. One (2.8%) patient required reoperation. The occurrence of POPF was not related to type of resection or surgical approach. There was no perioperative mortality. After a mean follow-up of 83.6 months, two patients (5.7%) developed disease recurrence at 34.4 and 131.9 months after initial surgery. No patients developed distant metastasis. The 10- and 15-year disease-free rates were 95.6 and 85.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

POPF occurred frequently and posed a significant morbidity after resection of insulinoma. However, it occurred independently of type of resection or surgical approach. Although the immediate cure rate after resection was high (100%), long-term disease recurrence in sporadic (non-MEN-1) cases was not insignificant. Regular long-term follow-up is recommended.

Update on surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are rare and account for only 2%-4% of all pancreatic neoplasms. All PNENs are potential (neurendocrine tumors PNETs) or overt (neuroendocrine carcinomas PNECs) malignant, but a subset of PNETs is low-risk. Even in case of low-risk PNETs surgical resection is frequently required to treat hormone-related symptoms and to obtain an appropriate pathological diagnosis. Low-risk PNETs in the body and the tail are ideal for minimally-invasive approaches which should be tailored to the individual patient. Generally, surgeons must aim for parenchyma sparing in these cases. In high-risk and malignant PNENs, indications for tumor resection are much wider than for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, in many cases due to the relatively benign tumor biology. Thus, patients with locally advanced and metastatic PNETs may benefit from extensive resection. In experienced hands, even multi-organ resections are accomplished with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates and are associated with excellent long term survival. However, poorly differentiated neoplasms with high proliferation rates are associated with a dismal prognosis and may frequently only be treated with chemotherapy. The evidence on surgical treatment of PNENs stems from reviews of mostly single-center series and some analyses of nation-wide tumor registries. No randomized trial has been performed to compare surgical and non-surgical therapies in potentially resectable PNEN. Though such a trial would principally be desirable, ethical considerations and the heterogeneity of PNENs preclude realization of such a study. In the current review, we summarize recent advances in the surgical treatment of PNENs.

Laparoscopic versus open pancreas resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) has emerged as an alternative to open pancreatic surgery (OPS) in selected patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the pancreas (PNET). Evidence on the safety and efficacy of LPS is available from non-comparative studies.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed as a meta-analysis of studies which allow a comparison of LPS and OPS for resection of PNET.

METHODS

Studies conducted from 1994 to 2012 and reporting on LPS and OPS were reviewed. Studies considered were required to report on outcomes in more than 10 patients on at least one of the following: operative time; hospital length of stay (LoS); intraoperative blood loss; postoperative morbidity; pancreatic fistula rates, and mortality. Outcomes were compared using weighted mean differences and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included. These referred to 906 patients with PNET, of whom 22% underwent LPS and 78% underwent OPS. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery was associated with a lower overall complication rate (38% in LPS versus 46% in OPS; P < 0.001). Blood loss and LoS were lower in LPS by 67 ml (P < 0.001) and 5 days (P < 0.001), respectively. There were no differences in rates of pancreatic fistula, operative time or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The nature of this meta-analysis is limited; nevertheless LPS for PNET appears to be safe and is associated with a reduced complication rate and shorter LoS than OPS.

Is laparoscopic approach for pancreatic insulinomas safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists as to whether laparoscopic treatment for pancreatic insulinomas (PIs) is safe and feasible. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of laparoscopic approach (LA) for PIs. The abovementioned approach is also compared with open surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, and Ovid journals) was performed to identify relevant articles. Articles that compare the use of LA and open approach to treat PI published on or before April 30, 2013, were included in the meta-analysis. The evaluated end points were operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Seven observational clinical studies that recruited a total of 452 patients were included. The rates of conversion from LA to open surgery ranged from 0%-41.3%. The meta-analysis revealed that LA for PIs is associated with reduced length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -5.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.11 to -4.16; P < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed between LA and open surgery in terms of operation time (weighted mean difference, 2.57; 95% CI, -10.91 to 16.05; P = 0.71), postoperative mortality, overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-1.17; P = 0.14], incidence of pancreatic fistula (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.51-1.44; P = 0.56), and recurrence of hyperglycemia (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.41-7.95; P = 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic treatment for PIs is a safe and feasible approach associated with reduction in length of hospital stay and comparable rates of postoperative complications in relation with open surgery.

Diagnosis and management of insulinoma

Insulinomas, the most common cause of hypoglycemia related to endogenous hyperinsulinism, occur in 1-4 people per million of the general population. Common autonomic symptoms of insulinoma include diaphroresis, tremor, and palpitations, whereas neuroglycopenenic symptoms include confusion, behavioural changes, personality changes, visual disturbances, seizure, and coma. Diagnosis of suspected cases is based on standard endocrine tests, especially the prolonged fasting test. Non-invasive imaging procedures, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, are used when a diagnosis of insulinoma has been made to localize the source of pathological insulin secretion. Invasive modalities, such as endoscopic ultrasonography and arterial stimulation venous sampling, are highly accurate in the preoperative localization of insulinomas and have frequently been shown to be superior to non-invasive localization techniques. The range of techniques available for the localization of insulinomas means that blind resection can be avoided. Intraoperative manual palpation of the pancreas by an experienced surgeon and intraoperative ultrasonography are both sensitive methods with which to finalize the location of insulinomas. A high proportion of patients with insulinomas can be cured with surgery. In patients with malignant insulinomas, an aggressive medical approach, including extended pancreatic resection, liver resection, liver transplantation, chemoembolization, or radiofrequency ablation, is recommended to improve both survival and quality of life. In patients with unresectable or uncontrollable insulinomas, such as malignant insulinoma of the pancreas, several techniques should be considered, including administration of ocreotide and/or continuous glucose monitoring, to prevent hypoglycemic episodes and to improve quality of life.

Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with insulinomas: analysis of 292 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains the most challenging complication in pancreatic surgery, yet few published studies have focused on the risk factors for postoperative PF in patients undergoing surgery for insulinomas.

METHODS

From January 1990 to February 2010, a total of 292 patients with insulinomas underwent surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Demographic data, intraoperative procedures, and postoperative data were collected. Particular attention was paid to variables associated with PF as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify possible risk factors for PF.

RESULTS

PF was found in 132 (45.2%) patients, of whom 90 were classified into ISGPF grade A, 33 grade B, and 9 grade C. Multivariate analysis showed that male patients (OR=2.56; P=0.007) and operative time >180 minutes (OR=3.756; P<0.0001) were independent risk factors for clinical PF. Pancreatic resection with stapler was a protective factor for both total PF (OR=0.022; P=0.010) and clinical PF (OR=0.097; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Male gender and operative time >180 minutes were independent risk factors for clinical PF, while pancreatic resection with a stapler was a protective factor. Whether body mass index (BMI) and other variables during operation are risk factors of PF needs further study.

Surgical management of patients with insulinomas: Result of 292 cases in a single institution

BACKGROUND

Insulinoma is rare tumor with an incidence of approximately four cases per million per year. There are few large sample, single-center series that focus on the surgical management strategy of insulinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients diagnosed as insulinoma from 1990 to 2010 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical data were collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients were diagnosed with insulinomas; 292 of them underwent 320 operations, which included 46 laparoscopic surgeries. Tumor enucleation was the most common operative procedure. Multiple tumors were found in 30 cases; 17 cases were multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 syndrome. Thirteen patients with malignant insulinomas underwent tumor resection. Pancreatic fistula (PF) was the most frequent complication, and the incidence of clinical PFs (Grades B and C) was 14.4%. There was no significant statistical difference between open and laparoscopic surgery in blood loss, operative time, and complications. Metachronous tumors were noted in 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is the best treatment of choice for insulinoma patients. Surgical approach depends on tumor size, location, and its pathological characters. Laparoscopic management of insulinomas is feasible and safe for tumors located in the body or tail of the pancreas. Open surgery combined with intraoperative ultrasonography is recommended to avoid omission of lesions in patients with multiple insulinomas. An aggressive surgical approach is indicated for malignant insulinoma patients.