1
|
Corbett JM, Eriksson SE, Sarici IS, Jobe BA, Ayazi S. Complications After Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. Thorac Surg Clin 2024; 34:355-369. [PMID: 39332860 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2024.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2024]
Abstract
Paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is a challenging operation both technically and because the affected patient population is typically older with more comorbidities. As a result, PEHR is associated with substantial morbidity. Morbidity and mortality following PEHR vary significantly depending on the acuity of the operation and size of the hernia. In addition to a higher risk for general peri- and postoperative complications there are a variety of other foregut specific complications to consider including, acute perioperative, early, and late reherniation, mesh-related complications, perforation, gastroparesis, pulmonary and insufflation-related complications, among others. This review focuses on the complication-specific data on incidence, recognition etiology and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Corbett
- Foregut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 454, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA
| | - Sven E Eriksson
- Foregut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 454, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; Chevalier Jackson Research Foundation, Esophageal Institute, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Inanc Samil Sarici
- Foregut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 454, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; Chevalier Jackson Research Foundation, Esophageal Institute, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Foregut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 454, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; Chevalier Jackson Research Foundation, Esophageal Institute, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahin Ayazi
- Foregut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 454, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA; Chevalier Jackson Research Foundation, Esophageal Institute, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 454, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scharitzer M, Pokieser P, Ekberg O. Oesophageal fluoroscopy in adults-when and why? Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1222-1233. [PMID: 38547408 PMCID: PMC11186568 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Oesophageal fluoroscopy is a radiological procedure that uses dynamic recording of the swallowing process to evaluate morphology and function simultaneously, a characteristic not found in other clinical tests. It enables a comprehensive evaluation of the entire upper gastrointestinal tract, from the oropharynx to oesophagogastric bolus transport. The number of fluoroscopies of the oesophagus and the oropharynx has increased in recent decades, while the overall use of gastrointestinal fluoroscopic examinations has declined. Radiologists performing fluoroscopies need a good understanding of the appropriate clinical questions and the methodological advantages and limitations to adjust the examination to the patient's symptoms and clinical situation. This review provides an overview of the indications for oesophageal fluoroscopy and the various pathologies it can identify, ranging from motility disorders to structural abnormalities and assessment in the pre- and postoperative care. The strengths and weaknesses of this modality and its future role within different clinical scenarios in the adult population are discussed. We conclude that oesophageal fluoroscopy remains a valuable tool in diagnostic radiology for the evaluation of oesophageal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Scharitzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Pokieser
- Teaching Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Olle Ekberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Inga Marie Nilssons gata 49, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Depypere L, Van Veer H, Nafteux P, Coosemans W. Current practice in antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery: exploration of the Belgian field. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:647-653. [PMID: 36227741 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2136048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Belgium, no publicly available information exists on the spread, quality, results nor follow-up of antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery, in contrast to the recently centralized esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to create a snap shot of the current practice in Belgium. METHODS An online questionnaire was distributed among all members of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery in autumn 2021. A total of 33 questions spread over four sections were asked, covering demographics, current practice (case load, case mix, indications, preoperative workup, patient information, average length of stay, follow up, quality of life (QOL)), operative techniques and future thoughts. RESULTS Twenty-four surgeons completed the questionnaire. Surgical indications are discussed multidisciplinary and based on guidelines in 67%. Workup includes endoscopy, pH-monitoring and manometry in 100%. Barium swallow, impedance and gastric emptying tests were added in respectively 83%, 42% and 13%. Symptom or QOL scores were used in 17%. About 81% are performed as primary surgery, 18% redo surgery and 1% resections. Laparoscopic procedures are reported in 99%: Nissen(-Rosetti) 79%, Toupet/Lind 15%, partial gastrectomy 5% and Collis gastroplasty 1%. Discharge is planned on POD1 in 42% and on POD2 in 54%. 50% performs follow-up < 1 year. Interest in further clinical research collaboration was expressed in 92%. CONCLUSION Antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery is not standardized in Belgium. There is an evident variety in clinical practice, but this questionnaire shows similarity amongst respondents regarding workup and surgical approach. There is a willingness for future research collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Depypere
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Van Veer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Coosemans
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic large hiatal hernia (LHH) repair remains a challenge despite three decades of ongoing attempts at improving surgical outcome. Its rarity and complexity, coupled with suboptimal initial approach that is usually best suited for small symptomatic herniae have contributed to unacceptable higher failure rates. Results We have therefore undertaken a systematic appraisal of LHH with a view to clear out our misunderstandings of this entity and to address dogmatic practices that may have contributed to poor outcomes. Conclusions First, we propose strict criteria to define nomenclature in LHH and discuss ways of subcategorising them. Next, we discuss preoperative workup strategies, paying particular attention to any relevant often atypical symptoms, indications for surgery, timing of surgery, role of surgery in the elderly and emphasizing the key role of a preoperative CT imaging in evaluating the mediastinum. Some key dissection methods are then discussed with respect to approach to the mediastinal sac, techniques to avoid/deal with pleural breach and rationale to avoid Collis gastroplasty. The issues pertaining to the repair phase are also discussed by evaluating the merits of the cruroplasty, fundoplication types and gastropexy. We end up debating the role of mesh reinforcement and assess the evidence with regards to recurrence, reoperation rate, complications, esophageal dilatation, delayed gastric emptying and mortality. Lastly, we propose a rationale for routine postoperative investigations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Is There a Role for Elective Early Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study in Neurologically Impaired Children following Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication? CHILDREN-BASEL 2021; 8:children8090813. [PMID: 34572245 PMCID: PMC8472647 DOI: 10.3390/children8090813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Assessment of discomfort as a sign for early postoperative complications in neurologically impaired (NI) children is challenging. The necessity of early routine upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in NI children is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the role of scheduled UGI contrast studies to identify early postoperative complications following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in NI children. Data for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications performed in NI children between January 2004 and June 2021 were reviewed. A total of 103 patients were included, with 60 of these being boys. Mean age at initial operation was 6.51 (0.11-18.41) years. Mean body weight was 16.22 (3.3-62.5) kg. Mean duration of follow up was 4.15 (0.01-16.65 years) years. Thirteen redo fundoplications (12.5%) were performed during the follow up period; eleven had one redo and two had 2 redos. Elective postoperative UGI contrast studies were performed in 94 patients (91%). Early postoperative UGI contrast studies were able to identify only one complication: an intrathoracal wrap herniation on postoperative day five, necessitating a reoperation on day six. The use of early UGI contrast imaging following pediatric laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is not necessary as it does not identify a significant number of acute postoperative complications requiring re-intervention.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mayo D, Darbyshire A, Mercer S, Carter N, Toh S, Somers S, Wainwright D, Fajksova V, Knight B. Technique and outcome of day case laparoscopic hiatus hernia surgery for small and large hernias: a five-year retrospective review from a high-volume UK centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2020; 102:611-615. [PMID: 32735121 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is the standard surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients for who long-term pharmacotherapy is intolerable or ineffective. Advances in anaesthesia and minimally invasive surgery have led to day case treatment being adopted by some centres. The objective of this study is to describe our day case pathway and peri- and postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a single centre, retrospective case series review of a prospectively collected database from October 2014 to August 2019 performed in a tertiary centre for upper gastrointestinal surgery. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, indications, complications, length of stay and readmission. RESULTS A total of 362 patients underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with or without hiatus hernia repair of up to 10cm, with day case rates of 59%. Unplanned admission following day surgery was 5.1% (13/225) and 30-day readmission was 2.2% (8/362); 90.6% of patients remained in hospital for less than 24 hours. There was one intraoperative complication and one patient required revisional surgery within 30 days. The rate of all postoperative complications was 1.38% (5/362) with one postoperative mortality. DISCUSSION The inclusion of larger hernias is unusual, as most studies limit size to 5cm or less. Our results show the safety and feasibility of the procedure even when applied to hiatus hernias up to 10cm. Success was multifactorial and based on standardisation of procedures and support from dedicated specialist nursing staff. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery can be performed safely as a day case procedure even in larger hiatus hernias, with a dedicated care pathway and specialist nurse practitioners to support it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mayo
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - S Mercer
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - N Carter
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - S Toh
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - S Somers
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - V Fajksova
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - B Knight
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Paraesophageal hernia represents a complex surgical problem involving significant distortion of the anatomy and function of the esophagus, stomach, gastroesophageal junction, mediastinum, lungs, and heart. Surgeons operating in the area must have deep understanding of the normal anatomy and pathologic derangements in patients with paraesophageal hernias. This article describes the normal anatomy and anatomic abnormalities in application to the various approaches used in the surgical repair of a paraesophageal hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman V Petrov
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 North Broad Street C-501, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue C-312, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
| | - Stacey Su
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue C-312, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | - Charles T Bakhos
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 North Broad Street C-501, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Abbas El-Sayed Abbas
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 North Broad Street C-501, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue C-312, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Early Routine Use of Upper GI Contrast Series Post Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: A Single Institution Consecutive Case Series. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29:203-206. [PMID: 30730396 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is conflicting evidence with regard to the routine use of upper gastrointestinal contrast series in detecting early complications post paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR). METHODS All cases booked for a PEHR between January 2007 and September 2015 were identified using hospital records. Standard demographic, operation, and imaging data were extracted. RESULTS We retrospectively identified 391 PEHR cases between January 2007 and September 2015. The mean age at the index operation was 66.7 years with a female predominance. The majority of index operations were elective and completed for a large paraesophageal hernia. Contrast studies were reported as normal in 70.6%, a leak in 0.3%, an obstruction in 27.9%, and early recurrence in 1.0%. Reoperation was required in 1.8% of cases. CONCLUSION Routine upper gastrointestinal contrast studies post-PEHR changed management in 0.8% of cases and were unhelpful in determining the need for early reoperation in 57.1% of cases requiring reoperation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kao AM, Otero J, Schlosser KA, Marx JE, Prasad T, Colavita PD, Heniford BT. One More Time: Redo Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Results in Safe, Durable Outcomes Compared with Primary Repairs. Am Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481808400727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The incidence and causes of failed paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEHR) remain poorly understood. Our study aimed to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after reoperative fundoplication as compared with initial PEHR. A prospectively maintained institutional hernia-specific database was queried for PEHR between 2008 and 2017. Patients with prior history of PEHR were categorized as “redo” paraesophageal hernia (RPEH). Primary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, mortality, symptom resolution, and hernia recurrence. A total of 402 patients underwent minimally invasive PEHR (Initial PEH = 305, RPEH = 97). Redo PEHR had more prevalent preoperative nausea/vomiting (50.6% vs 34.1%, P < 0.007) and weight loss (24.1% vs 13.5%, P < 0.02). RPEH had had longer mean operative time (256.4 ± 91.2 vs 190.3 ± 59.9 minutes, P < 0.0001) and higher rate of conversion to open (10.3% vs 0.67%, P < 0.0001); however, no difference was noted in postoperative complications, hernia recurrence, or mortality between cohorts. Laparoscopic revision of prior PEHR in symptomatic patients can be safely performed with favorable outcomes compared with initial PEHR. Despite redo procedures seeming to be more technically demanding (as noted by longer operative time and higher conversion rates), outcomes are similar and overall resolution of symptoms is achieved in most patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M. Kao
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Javier Otero
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn A. Schlosser
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Julia E. Marx
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Tanushree Prasad
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Paul D. Colavita
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - B. Todd Heniford
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anti-reflux procedures: complications, radiologic findings, and surgical and gastroenterologic perspectives. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:1308-1318. [PMID: 29302737 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1446-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the current surgical anti-reflux procedures and their imaging findings, as well as the surgical complications. Accurate and timely clinical assessment requires an engaged radiologist fluoroscopist who understands the perspectives of their interdisciplinary colleagues, including the surgeon and gastroenterologist. The complex pathophysiology calls for an interdisciplinary approach, and the radiologist needs to tailor their evaluation to answer the specific questions posed by their clinical colleagues and by the presenting symptomatology.
Collapse
|
11
|
Scharitzer M, Pokieser P. Radiology of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Stomach in Patients with Swallowing Disorders. Dysphagia 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/174_2017_115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
12
|
Scharitzer M, Pokieser P. What is the role of radiological testing of lower esophageal sphincter function? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016; 1380:67-77. [PMID: 27496165 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiological fluoroscopic evaluation remains the primary imaging modality of choice to evaluate patients with swallowing disorders, despite the increasing availability and technical advantages of nonradiological techniques and the current radiological focus on cross-sectional imaging studies, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The radiological swallowing evaluation should be tailored to assess the entire upper gastrointestinal tract, including the lower esophageal sphincter. Fluoroscopy enables the simultaneous assessment of esophageal motility disorders, as well as structural pathologies, including strictures, webs, rings, diverticula, and tumors. Mono- and double-contrast esophagrams and solid bolus tests together allow assessment of lower esophageal sphincter function and complement other methods, such as endoscopy, manometry, or impedance planimetry. Here we review the role of radiological studies for correct assessment of structural and functional pathologies at the level of the lower esophageal sphincter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Pokieser
- Unified Patient Project, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Routine versus selective contrast imaging to identify the need for early re-intervention following laparoscopic fundoplication: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 20:123-7. [PMID: 26118598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prompt recognition of complications is essential in reducing morbidity following anti-reflux surgery. Consequently, many centres employ a policy of routine post-operative contrast studies. The study aimed to examine whether routine contrast studies more effectively recognised early post-operative complications following anti-reflux surgery compared with selective use. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of 240 adults who had undergone primary anti-reflux surgery. Selective use of water-soluble contrast swallows was employed for 115 patients (Group 1) while 125 patients (Group 2) had routine studies. RESULTS 10 (0.9%) patients from Group 1 underwent contrast studies, four (40%) of which were abnormal. Routine studies in Group 2 identified thirty-two abnormalities (27%) however the inter-group difference was not significant (p = 0.32). Only one case from group 2 required immediate re-intervention. This was not statistically significant (p = 0.78). Multivariate analysis found no significant association between selective or routine imaging and re-intervention rates. One patient from group 2 presented three days following discharge with wrap migration requiring reoperation despite a normal post-operative study. CONCLUSION Routine use of contrast imaging following anti-reflux and hiatus hernia surgery is not necessary. It does not identify a significantly greater number of post-operative complications in comparison to selective use. Additionally, routine use of contrast studies does not ensure the diagnosis of all complications in the post-operative period.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gatenby PAC, Bright T, Watson DI. Anterior 180° partial fundoplication--how I do it. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:2297-303. [PMID: 22767082 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1954-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2012] [Accepted: 06/24/2012] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is the standard operation for the surgical control of gastro-oesophageal reflux in many centres. However, in some patients, it can be followed by troublesome side effects, and to minimise the risk of these, partial fundoplications have been recommended. One approach is to construct an anterior 180° partial fundoplication. Randomised trials and a large outcome study have confirmed that in most patients, this approach achieves effective reflux control, as well as a reduced incidence of side effects. In this paper, we describe our approach to this procedure. The procedure entails full dissection of the oesophageal hiatus, hiatal repair with posteriorly placed sutures and then construction of an anterior 180° partial fundoplication using three sutures to attach the anterior gastric fundus to the oesophagus and right hiatal pillar, and two further sutures between the fundus and the apex of the hiatus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piers A C Gatenby
- Flinders University Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Strangulation of the stomach and the transverse colon following laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2012; 7:311-4. [PMID: 23362434 PMCID: PMC3557735 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.29251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2011] [Revised: 12/30/2011] [Accepted: 05/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The authors present a 32-year-old male patient with incarceration of a recurrent esophageal hiatal hernia after laparoscopic repair. A life-threatening strangulation of the stomach and the transverse colon occurred within a few days after the operation. Relapse of hiatal hernias amounts to almost half of early complications characteristic for the laparoscopic approach. General recommendations regarding surgical technique as well as perioperative care have been proposed in order to decrease the risk of relapse. Also, routine contrast radiology on the first or second day following the laparoscopic operation facilitates early diagnosis of relapse of hiatal hernia with emergent reoperation. This may result in decreased morbidity and improved overall outcome of the treatment.
Collapse
|
16
|
Raeside MC, Madigan D, Myers JC, Devitt PG, Jamieson GG, Thompson SK. Post-fundoplication contrast studies: is there room for improvement? Br J Radiol 2011; 85:792-9. [PMID: 21791506 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/57095992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Since the mid-1990s, laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has become the surgical procedure of choice. Several surgical groups perform routine post-operative contrast studies to exclude any (asymptomatic) anatomical abnormality and to expedite discharge from hospital. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and interobserver reliability for surgeons and radiologists in contrast study interpretation. METHODS 11 surgeons and 13 radiologists (all blinded to outcome) retrospectively reviewed the contrast studies of 20 patients who had undergone a laparoscopic fundoplication. Each observer reported on fundal wrap position, leak or extravasation of contrast and contrast hold-up at the gastro-oesophageal junction (on a scale of 0-4). A κ coefficient was used to evaluate interobserver reliability. RESULTS Surgeons were more accurate than radiologists in identifying normal studies (specificity = 91.6% vs 78.9%), whereas both groups had similar accuracy in identifying abnormal studies (sensitivity = 82.3% vs 85.2%). There was higher agreement amongst surgeons than amongst radiologists when determining wrap position (κ = 0.65 vs 0.54). Both groups had low agreement when classifying a wrap migration as partial or total (κ = 0.33 vs 0.06). Radiologists were more likely to interpret the position of the wrap as abnormal (relative risk = 1.25) while surgeons reported a greater degree of hold-up of contrast at the gastro-oesophageal junction (mean score = 1.17 vs 0.86). CONCLUSION Radiologists would benefit from more information about the technical details of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Standardised protocols for performing post-fundoplication contrast studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Raeside
- Department of Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|