Different sites and prognoses of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: report of 187 cases

Single-incision transgastric resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors in anatomically challenging locations

Surgical resection is the mainstay treatment for resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, resection in anatomically challenging locations, such as near the gastroesophageal junction, lesser curve and fundus, remain technically challenging. We herein report the outcomes of the largest series of patients who underwent single-incision transgastric resection of an intraluminal gastric GIST. Our reduced-port resection technique for intraluminal GISTs in these anatomically challenging locations involves a single incision in the left hypochondrium, deepened to access the gastric lumen, with the surgery completed in a transgastric manner. A total of 22 patients received surgery with this technique at the National University Hospital in Singapore from November 2012 to September 2020. The median operative time was 101 (range 50-253) min, with no conversions to open surgery, median lesion size 3.6 (range 1.8-8.2) cm and median postoperative length of stay 5 (range 1-13) days. There was no 30-day mortality and no recurrence during the follow-up period. Our laparoscopic approach for reduced-port transgastric excision of intraluminal GISTs allows for adequate surgical clearance, convenient extraction and secure gastrostomy closure with low morbidity.

Inflammation-related indicators to distinguish between gastric stromal tumors and leiomyomas: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastric leiomyomas and gastric stromal tumors are the most common types of gastric tumors encountered. In recent years, the incidence of the two types of tumors has been increasing, but the differential diagnosis is still a challenge in clinical work. However, as there are many reports on stromal tumors and inflammation-related indicators are gradually being paid attention to as important factors in predicting tumor prognosis, the two main purposes of this study were to explore the inflammation-related differences between the two types of tumors and to develop a nomogram as a predictive model.

AIM

To explore the differences in platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte mononuclear cell ratio (LMR), and SII between the two types of tumors, and simultaneously create the nomogram model.

METHODS

This study enrolled 88 patients in the gastric stromal tumor group and 56 patients in the gastric leiomyoma group, and the relevant data of the two groups were entered into the system for an integrated analysis. The primary objective of this study was to identify the differences in the inflammation index between the two types of tumors.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in sex, age, and tumor location. In comparison, gastric leiomyomas seem to be more common in women, young patients, and gastric cardia, which is in line with our previous research; the groups showed the following statistical differences: PLR (158.2% vs 134.3%, P = 0.028), NLR (2.35 vs 1.68, P = 0.000), LMR (5.75 vs 10.8, P = 0.004), and SII (546.2 vs 384.3, P = 0.003). The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sex, age, tumor location, and LMR were independent risk factors for the identification of the two types of tumors. After considering the risk factors selected by the above analysis into the predictive model, a predictive model for distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors from gastric leiomyomas was established as the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

Gastric leiomyomas and gastric stromal tumors are not only different in factors such as age of the patient, but also in inflammatory indicators such as LMR and PLR. We have established a predictive model related to the laboratory indicators and are looking forward to further research conducted in this clinical area.

A Retrospective Study of Postoperative Outcomes in 98 Patients Diagnosed with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) of the Upper, Middle, and Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Between 2009 and 2019 at a Single Center in Poland

BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arise in the smooth muscle pacemaker interstitial cells of Cajal, or similar cells. The aim of this retrospective study between 2009 and 2019 from a single center in Poland was to assess the selected prognostic factors (location, tumor size, mitotic index, body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay, age, sex, and coexistent neoplasm) and to investigate postoperative outcomes in 98 patients with GIST of the upper, middle, and lower gastrointestinal tract. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2009 and 2019, 98 patients (50 women and 48 men) with an average age of 63.8 years (range from 38 to 90 years) were operated on for GIST in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery in Katowice, Poland. Based on the intraoperative and postoperative investigations, the tumor size and mitotic index were determined in each case. RESULTS A statistically significant correlation between age and mitotic index (MI) was found (p=0.02). The higher the MI, the younger the age of the patients. However, regardless of sex, younger patients had a tendency to survive longer. A >60-year-old male patient's probability of survival was around 65% after 40 months. Higher mitotic index was also associated with larger tumor size (p<0.0001). Female patients had a tendency to survive longer than males. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this small retrospective study support the importance of preoperative evaluation and frequent postoperative follow-up for patients with GIST of the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in older male patients, and patients with malignant comorbidities, which are associated with increased mortality.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of coexistence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor and gastric cancer

The coexistence of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and gastric cancer is relatively high, and its prognosis is controversial due to the complex and variant kinds of presentation. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of gastric GIST with synchronous gastric cancer.From May 2010 to November 2015, a total of 241 gastric GIST patients were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. The patients with coexistence of gastric GIST and gastric cancer were recorded. The clinicopathological features and prognoses of patients were analyzed.Among 241 patients, 24 patients had synchronous gastric cancer (synchronous group) and 217 patients did not (no-synchronous group). The synchronous group presented a higher percentage of elders (66.7% vs 39.6%, P = 0.001) and males (87.5% vs 48.4%, P < 0.001) than the no-synchronous group. The tumor diameter, mitotic index, and National Institutes of Health degree were also significantly different between the 2 groups (all P < 0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival rates of synchronous group were significantly lower than those of no-synchronous group (54.9% vs 93.5%, P < 0.001; 37.9% vs 89.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). However, the 5-year overall survival rates between synchronous and gastric cancer groups were comparable (37.9% vs 57.6%, P = 0.474).The coexistence of gastric GIST and gastric cancer was common in elder male patients. The synchronous GIST was common in low-risk category. The prognosis of gastric GIST with synchronous gastric cancer was worse than that of primary-single gastric GIST, but was comparable with primary-single gastric cancer.

Synchronous occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and other digestive tract malignancies in the elderly

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) synchronous with other digestive tract malignancies have been rarely reported. In this study, clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated among elderly patients with GISTs with or without coexisting digestive tract malignancies.

METHODS

A total of 161 patients (≥65 years) were retrospectively reviewed at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2009 to June 2014.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were diagnosed with synchronous digestive tract malignancies (synchronous group), whereas 100 patients were diagnosed with no synchronous condition (no-synchronous group). The synchronous group exhibited a higher percentage of males (70.49% vs. 53.00%, P = 0.028) and poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status than the no-synchronous group (P = 0.029). The three-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower among patients with synchronous digestive tract malignancies than that among patients without synchronous condition (64.5% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of synchronous digestive tract malignancies (P = 0.002), co-morbidity (P = 0.004), and mitotic count ≥10 mitoses/50 high power fields (P = 0.012) were associated with poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

A synchronous condition with other digestive tract malignancies is common in elderly patients with GISTs. OS primarily depends on synchronous digestive tract malignancies, mitotic count, and co-morbidity.

Histopathological Features of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and the Contribution of DOG1 Expression to the Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα) mutations affecting receptor tyrosine kinase activity and do not benefit from classic treatment regimens.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the algorithm that may be followed for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis in GISTs by investigating the histomorphological parameters and expression characteristics of classical immunohistochemical antibodies used in routine tests in addition to DOG1 expression.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic accuracy study.

METHODS

We reevaluated the histological and immunohistochemical parameters of 37 GISTs. The standard immunohistochemical diagnosis and differential diagnosis panel antibodies (CD117, PDGFRα, CD34, vimentin, desmin, SMA, S-100, and Ki67) were studied on the tumor sections. We also used the popular marker DOG1 antibody with accepted sensitivity for GISTs in recent years and the PDGFRα immune marker for which the benefit in routine practice is discussed.

RESULTS

Classification according to progressive disease risk groups of the 37 cases revealed that 54% were in the high risk, 19% in the moderate risk, 16% in the low risk, 8% in the very low risk and 8% in the no risk group. Cytological atypia, necrosis, mucosal invasion and the Ki67 index were found to be related to the progressive disease risk groups of the tumors (p<0.05). Positive immunoreaction was observed with CD117 and PDGFRα in all GISTs in the study (100%). Positivity with the DOG1 antibody was found in 33 (89%) cases. CD34 was positive in 62% (23) of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The CD117 antibody still plays a key role in GIST diagnosis. However, the use of DOG1 and PDGFRα antibodies combined with CD117 as sensitive markers can be beneficial.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors outside the stomach

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of primary small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) outside the stomach. The clinical data, clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of 20 patients with a pathologically-confirmed diagnosis of non-gastric GIST that were treated at Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute between July 2006 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 15 patients were male and 5 were female, with a median age of 58 years (range, 44–82 years). A change in bowel habits was the original symptom of rectal small GISTs in 6 out of 8 patients, while patients with small GISTs in other locations demonstrated no overt symptoms and the lesions were detected by systematic examinations of other diseases or abdominal surgical procedures performed on other organs. In total, 19 patients out of the total 20 patients underwent surgery, and 1 patient with rectal GIST received continuous oral imatinib mesylate (400 mg once a day) instead of undergoing surgery. The mean diameter of tumors was 1.55±0.54 cm (range, 0.3–2.0 cm) and the median was 1.70 cm. The pathomorphology of the lesions was mainly spindle cell, and immunohistochemistry revealed the expression rate of cluster of differentiation (CD)117, CD34 and discovered on GIST-1 were 85, 80 and 70%. According to the mitosis index, small rectal GISTs were more frequent compared with other positions (P<0.05), while the frequency of small GISTs >1 cm in size was not significantly different from the frequency of small GISTs ≤1 cm in size (P=0.995). All 20 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up duration of 49.5 months (range, 10.5–94.4 months). At the end of the follow-up period, tumor recurrence occurred in 5 patients and 1 patient succumbed following progression. According to the analysis of the tumor sites, the RFS time of patients with small rectal GISTs was significantly different than the RFS time in patients with small GISTs in other positions. The clinical symptoms of non-gastric small GISTs were not evident and were challenging to detect. Small GISTs, regardless of size, possessed malignant potential and once detected, GISTs should be surgically resected. Lesions located in the rectum demonstrated an increased degree of malignancy and were more likely to recur. The tumor size and Ki67 index could not be considered as prognostic factors of non-gastric small GISTs.

Prognostic angiogenic markers (endoglin, VEGF, CD31) and tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM: To evaluate the correlation between the immunoexpression of angiogenic markers [CD31, CD105 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)], proliferative index (Ki67), and prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 54 GIST cases. Medical records were searched to obtain the GIST patients’ demographic and clinical data, and paraffin-embedded blocks of tumor samples were retrieved from the hospital archives to conduct a new immunohistochemical evaluation. The tumor samples of GIST patients were subject to immunohistochemical evaluation for endoglin (CD105), CD31, VEGF, and Ki67 expression. The CD105 and CD31 intratumoral microvascular density (IMVD) was measured using automated analysis. We determined the correlation between the immunoexpression of CD105, CD31, VEGF, Ki67 and prognosis. In addition, we conducted a cutoff analysis using the receiver-operating characteristic curve. VEGF positivity was classified as either null/weak or strong. Ki67 was evaluated using a cutoff of 5% positive cells. The prognosis was classified as good (patient alive without recurrence) or poor (patient with recurrence/death).

RESULTS: The distribution of tumor sites among the 54 analyzed samples was as follows: 27 (50%) in the stomach, 20 (37.1%) in the small intestine, 6 (11.1%) in the colon, and 1 (1.8%) in the esophagus. The size of the tumors ranged from 2 to 33 cm (median: 8 cm); in 12 cases (22.2%), the tumor was below 5 cm at the largest diameter, but in 42 cases (77.7%), the tumor was larger than 5 cm. The means of CD105 and CD31 were significantly higher in the group with poor prognosis (P < 0.001). The cut-off values of CD105 (> 1.2%) and CD31 (> 2.5%) in the receiver-operating characteristic curve were related to a poorer prognosis. Cases with a better prognosis showed significantly null/weak staining for VEGF (P < 0.001). Ki-67 expression of ≥ 5% was strongly correlated with a worse prognosis (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, CD105 was the variable that most strongly correlated with prognosis.

CONCLUSION: The IMVD cutoff values for the angiogenic markers CD105 and CD31, may be prognostic factors for GIST, in addition to VEGF and Ki67.

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor is feasible irrespective of tumor size

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) by size-matched analysis and evaluate whether laparoscopic surgery for lesions of >5 cm is feasible.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 44 consecutive patients with gastric GIST who underwent surgery from 1988 to 2011 were reviewed. Twenty-three patients who underwent successful laparoscopic surgery were compared with 10 patients with similar tumor sizes who underwent open surgery. Among the 23 patients in the laparoscopic group, we compared postoperative results between GISTs of ≤5 cm and >5 cm.

RESULTS

There were no differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the laparoscopic surgery group (LG) and the open surgery group (OG). The operation time was not different, but the blood loss (5.5 mL [range, 0-425 mL] in LG and 125 mL [range, 0-676 mL] in OG) (P=.008) and postoperative hospital stay (21 days in OG and 8 days in LG) (P<.001) were significantly less in the LG. Postoperative complications and recurrence were not different. Comparison between patients with lesions of >5 cm and patients with smaller lesions in the LG found that smaller lesions were associated with a shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.5 days versus 11 days) (P=.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection of primary gastric GISTs is feasible even for tumors of >5 cm.

Comparative study of the different degrees of risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the applicability of the main categories of risk and morphological factors in the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

METHODS

we retrospectively studied fifty-four cases of GIST, assessing the main prognostic factors of this neoplasis: risk levels, topography, size, mitotic index, necrosis, histological subtype and immunophenotype. We also verified their association and the reduction of overall survival.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that tumors with mitoses number greater than 5 per 50CGA (high-power fields), the presence of necrosis and a high risk for both the systems proposed by Fletcher and Miettinen had a significant association with reduced survival (p = 0.00001, 0.0056, 0.03 and 0.009, respectively). The remaining analyzed factors (size, histological subtype, topography and immunophenotype) had no such association. Multivariate analysis (Jacard index) showed that the Miettinen degree of risk was the one that best correlated with prognosis.

CONCLUSION

the risk criteria of Fletcher and Miettinen are important in assessing the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, especially the latter, which adds to the mitotic index and the presence of tumor necrosis.

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate our experience with the diagnosis and surgical resection of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS: Between January 2003 and August 2014, five esophageal GIST cases were admitted to our hospital. In this study, the hospital records, surgery outcomes, tumor recurrence and survival of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 45.6 years (range: 12-62 years). Three patients presented with dysphagia, and one patient presented with chest discomfort. The remaining patient was asymptomatic. Four patients were diagnosed with esophageal GISTs by a preoperative endoscopic biopsy. Three patients underwent esophagectomy, and two patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The mean operating time was 116 min (range: 95-148 min), and the mean blood loss was 176 mL (range: 30-300 mL). All tumors were completely resected. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.4 d (range: 6-12 d). All patients recovered and were discharged successfully. The median postoperative follow-up duration was 48 mo (range: 29-72 mo). One patient was diagnosed with recurrence, one patient was lost to follow-up, and three patients were asymptomatic and are currently being managed with close radiologic and clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Surgery is the standard, effective and successful treatment for esophageal GISTs. Long-term follow-up is required to monitor recurrence and metastasis.

Clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimics functional dyspepsia symptoms

AIM: To explore whether clinical presentations of gastric small gastrointestinal tumors (GISTs) mimics gastrointestinal dyspepsia symptoms.

METHODS: The endosonographic data of 167 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection at the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China between 2009 and 2011 were analyzed. GISTs and leiomyomas had a similar intragastric distribution and similar locations within the gastric wall. Therefore, patients with GISTs were chosen as the study group and those with leiomyomas were chosen as the control group. Dyspepsia symptom questionnaires were used to investigate and compare the gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with GISTs and those with gastric leiomyomas before and after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The questionnaires evaluated symptoms such as epigastric pain, heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric discomfort, nausea and vomiting, abdominal bloating, and eructation. Symptoms were assessed using a four-point scoring scale.

RESULTS: GISTs were the most common gastric submucosal lesion (67 cases, 40.12%), followed by leiomyomas (38 cases, 22.75%). Both groups were similar in terms of gender distribution (P = 0.49), intragastric location (P = 0.525), and originating layer within the gastric wall (P = 0.449), but leiomyomas were more commonly found in the proximal fundus (P < 0.05). Overall, 94.2% of the patients with small GISTs and 93.5% of those with gastric leiomyomas experienced some dyspepsia; however, total symptom scores were significantly lower in the GIST group than in the leiomyoma group (1.34 ± 1.27 vs 2.20 ± 1.70, P < 0.05). Each component of the symptom score demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the GIST patients after ESD (P < 0.05), including epigastric pain (0.80 ± 0.90 vs 0.13 ± 0.46), heartburn (0.63 ± 1.08 vs 0.13 ± 0.41), regurgitation (0.55 ± 0.87 vs 0.22 ± 0.57), epigastric discomfort (0.70 ± 0.98 vs 0.32 ± 0.47), nausea and vomiting (0.27 ± 0.62 vs 0.05 ± 0.21), abdominal bloating (0.70 ± 0.90 vs 0.27 ± 0.49), and eructation (0.36 ± 0.61 vs 0.21 ± 0.46). For leiomyoma patients, symptoms such as heartburn, nausea, vomiting, and eructation improved after treatment; however, these improvements were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Thus, the pathophysiology of dyspepsia symptoms may be different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Symptoms of gastric small GISTs may mimic those of functional dyspepsia. An alternative diagnosis should be considered in patients with functional dyspepsia and treatment failure.

Prognostic analysis of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with synchronous gastric cancer

Background

Many patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and synchronous gastric cancer have been described, most in single case studies. We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathologic features and prognostic effects of gastric GIST in patients with synchronous gastric cancer.

Methods

The study enrolled 170 patients with gastric GIST, who had undergone complete surgical resection (R0) from January 2000 to December 2011. Forty-two patients had synchronous gastric cancer (CA Group), whereas 128 did not (Non-CA Group). The clinicopathologic features and potential prognostic factors in the two groups were compared.

Results

Patients in the CA Group had more obvious symptoms, but a lower rate of preoperative diagnosis of gastric GIST (P <0.05). The two groups differed significantly in gender, age, greatest tumor diameter, risk stratification, tumor-associated ulcers, and CD117 and CD34 expression (P <0.05 each). Univariate analysis showed that age, risk stratification, postoperative oral imatinib and synchronous gastric cancer were predictive factors of survival (P <0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that risk stratification, postoperative oral imatinib and synchronous gastric cancer were independent predictors of survival (P <0.05). Stratified analysis showed that the 5-year overall survival rate was lower in patients with synchronous gastric cancer than in those without synchronous gastric cancer.

Conclusions

Gastric GIST with synchronous gastric cancer had a lower rate of preoperative diagnosis, with correct diagnosis often missed. Survival, however, depended primarily on the gastric cancer.

Prognositic factors and clinicopathologic characteristics of small gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: a retrospective analysis of 31 cases in one center

Objective

To analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of small gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the stomach.

Methods

A total of 31 small gastric GIST patients, including 10 males and 21 females, with a median age of 58 years (37-81 years), who underwent surgery at any time from 1999 to 2012 were included in this study. The clinical records of the patients were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Abdominal discomfort and pain (10 cases, 32.3%, respectively) were the two most common complaints among the patients. All patients received surgery, 11 received gastric wedge resection, 11 received subtotal gastrectomy, 5 received laparoscopic gastric wedge resection, and 4 received endoscopic submucosal dissection. No severe adverse complication was observed. A total of 29 patients (93.5%) were followed up. During the follow-up, 2 patients were found to exhibit tumor recurrence, and 1 patient had liver metastases. One patient died of tumor progression, while another died of another malignant tumor. Median progression free survival (PFS) time was 120.3 months, and median overall survival (OS) time was 130.4 months.

Conclusion

Small gastric GIST has better prognosis. Surgery is the best choice for therapy. Micro-invasive procedures are safe and effective for elective patients. Tumor necrosis, tumor bleeding, and muscle invasion are potential prognostic factors of small gastric GIST.

Clinicopathological and molecular aspects of foregut gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumour. This study describes clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in association with clinical outcome, in patients undergoing foregut GIST resection.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data were collated retrospectively for 40 consecutive foregut GISTs. Mutational analysis (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) for KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17 and PDGFRa exon 18 was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue (40 primary tumours and three metastases).

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years (range: 40-92), and melaena was the most common presentation (30%). Patients undergoing a totally laparoscopic excision had the shortest mean hospital stay (5.5 days). Over a median of 72-month follow-up, seven patients developed recurrence/metastases. Tumour size and mitotic rate correlated with recurrence (P < 0.01; <0.01) and mortality (P = 0.03; <0.01). KIT (23/40) or PDGFRa (12/40) mutations were found in 87.5% of the primary tumours. Only patients with KIT mutations suffered mortality (n = 4; P = 0.19) and no patient with a PDGFRa developed recurrence (P = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour site, size and mitotic rate were confirmed as prognostic markers. While KIT and PDGFRa mutations were associated with negative and positive outcomes, respectively, this did not prove to be significant. The clinical impact of these findings may only become apparent in larger series.