Predictive Value of Retroperitoneal Fat Area Measurement for Detecting Metabolic Syndrome in Patients Undergoing Adrenalectomy

Mayo adhesive probability score is associated with perioperative outcomes in retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to determine whether the Mayo adhesive probability score (MAP), which evaluated adherent perinephric fat (APF), is useful in evaluating the difficulty of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA), and to analyse the correlation between MAP and perioperative parameters.

METHODS

Clinical data of 104 patients with adrenal adenoma who underwent RLA were collected for retrospective analysis. According to the CT images obtained before surgery, patients were divided into two groups: High MAP group (2-5 points) and Low MAP group (0-1 points). Comparison of the general clinical characteristics and the perioperative data between the two groups was made.

RESULTS

There were more male patients (73.7% versus 34.3%), more patients with a smoking history (24.3% versus 7.5%), higher BMI (25.7 versus 23.2, kg/m² ), and bigger (23.8 versus 18.5, mm) neoplasm in the high MAP group (P < 0.05). Significant difference was observed in operative time (128.8 versus 102.3, min), estimated blood loss (47.2 versus 25.2, ml) and drainage tube removal time (4.0 versus 3.2, d) between the two groups (P < 0.05). A high MAP score (P < 0.001) and the size of tumour (P = 0.024) were independent risk factors for extended operative time. A higher BMI (OR = 1.525, P < 0.001) and larger tumour size (OR = 2.862, P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for a high MAP score.

CONCLUSIONS

MAP score was associated with the perioperative outcomes of RLA. BMI and tumour size were better indicators of MAP score, which can influence the difficulty of RLA.

Operation duration and adrenal gland size, but not BMI, are correlated with complication rate for posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for benign diseases

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether obesity is correlated with complications after posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for benign diseases and to develop surrogate markers of abdominal fat in preoperative computed tomography.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and preoperative computed tomography between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015. The cross-sectional components of fat assessed by computed tomography included total fat area, subcutaneous fat area, retroperitoneal fat area, and peritoneal fat area. The patients were grouped into 2 categories according to the absence or presence of a postoperative complication (the no-complications group and the complications group, respectively).

RESULTS

Of 116 study patients, 20 patients (17%) had a postoperative complication. Operations of greater duration and smaller adrenal gland size were significantly correlated with complications both in univariate and multivariate analyses. Body mass index, total fat area, subcutaneous fat area, retroperitoneal fat area, peritoneal fat area, and distance of skin to muscle (in axial and sagittal images) correlated with complications in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis. In the no-complications group, the removed adrenal gland was larger than that removed in the complications group (6 vs 4 cm, respectively, P = .001), whereas the complications group had a greater operative duration (139 vs 104 min, respectively, P = .001) and a greater duration of hospital stay (3 days vs 1 day, respectively, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, operations of greater duration and smaller adrenal gland size were better predictors of complications after posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for benign disease than measures of obesity, including body mass index.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy Versus Conventional Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy in Obese Patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the operative outcomes of obese patients undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy or standard laparoscopic (LAP) retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy.

METHODS

Between September 2011 and April 2015, 51 obese patients underwent LESS retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and their operative outcomes were compared with 65 obese patients who underwent standard retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy by the same surgeon. In the LESS group, a single-port access was positioned in the lumbar incision. The standard retroperitoneal adrenalectomy technique was performed with a combination of conventional and curved LAP instruments. The following parameters were adopted: patient demographics, surgical details, perioperative complications, postoperative outcome data, and short-term outcomes.

RESULTS

The LESS group was comparable with the LAP group in terms of total operative time (70.4 ± 21.3 vs 65.5 ± 24.8 minutes, p = 0.26), hospital length of stay (5.7 ± 1.2 vs 6.1 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.12), and incidence of complications (4/51 vs 5/65, p = 0.98) for patients with similar baseline demographics. The LESS group had significantly shorter surgical incisions (2.8 ± 0.3 vs 5.3 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.0001), lower in-hospital analgesic requirement (7.6 ± 3.3 mg morphine equivalent vs 10.5 ± 6.2 mg, p = 0.003), and significantly superior scar satisfaction score (9.3 ± 0.7 vs 7.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.0001) than the LAP group. Although estimated blood loss was greater in the LESS group (28.1 ± 10.6 vs 16.9 ± 7.2 mL in the LAP group, p < 0.0001), <50 mL overall blood loss was not clinically significant. During a mean follow-up of 20.2 months, no recurrences or deaths were documented in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

In properly selected patients, LESS retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for obese individuals is technically feasible and safe in experienced hands, offering perioperative outcomes comparable with those of the conventional multiport approach, but with a superior cosmetic outcome.

Measurement of visceral fat: should we include retroperitoneal fat?

Objective

Whether retroperitoneal fat should be included in the measurement of visceral fat remains controversial. We compared the relationships of fat areas in peritoneal, retroperitoneal, and subcutaneous compartments to metabolic syndrome, adipokines, and incident hypertension and diabetes.

Methods

We enrolled 432 adult participants (153 men and 279 women) in a community-based cohort study. Computed tomography at the umbilicus level was used to measure the fat areas.

Results

Retroperitoneal fat correlated significantly with metabolic syndrome (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 5.651, p<0.05) and the number of metabolic abnormalities (p<0.05). Retroperitoneal fat area was significantly associated with blood pressure, plasma glycemic indices, lipid profile, C-reactive protein, adiponectin (r = −0.244, P<0.05), and leptin (r = 0.323, p<0.05), but not plasma renin or aldosterone concentrations. During the 2.94±0.84 years of follow-up, 32 participants developed incident hypertension. Retroperitoneal fat area (hazard ration (HR) 1.62, p = 0.003) and peritoneal fat area (HR 1.62, p = 0.009), but not subcutaneous fat area (p = 0.14) were associated with incident hypertension. Neither retroperitoneal fat area, peritoneal fat area, nor subcutaneous fat areas was associated with incident diabetes after adjustment.

Conclusions

Retroperitoneal fat is similar to peritoneal fat, but differs from subcutaneous fat, in terms of its relationship with metabolic syndrome and incident hypertension. Retroperitoneal fat area should be included in the measurement of visceral fat for cardio-metabolic studies in human.