1
|
Moreira IC, Ventura SR, Ramos I, Fougo JL, Rodrigues PP. Preoperative localisation techniques in breast conservative surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:351-373. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
2
|
Carlino G, Rinaldi P, Giuliani M, Rella R, Bufi E, Padovano F, Ciardi C, Romani M, Belli P, Manfredi R. Ultrasound-guided preoperative localization of breast lesions: a good choice. J Ultrasound 2018; 22:85-94. [PMID: 30367356 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-018-0335-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to verify whether ultrasound (US)-guided preoperative localization of breast lesions is an adequate technique for correct and safe surgical resection and to contribute positively and effectively to this topic in the literature with our results. METHODS From June 2016 to November 2016, 155 patients with both benign and malignant breast lesions were selected from our institute to undergo US localization before surgery. The lesions included were: sonographically visible and nonpalpable lesions; palpable lesions for which a surgeon had requested US localization to better evaluate the site and extension; sonographically visible, multifocal breast lesions, both palpable and nonpalpable. US localization was performed using standard linear transducers (Siemens 18 L6, 5.5-8 MHz, 5.6 cm, ACUSON S2000 System, Siemens Medical Solutions). The radiologist used a skin pen to mark the site of the lesion, and the reported lesion's depth and distance from the nipple and pectoral muscle were recorded. The lesions were completely excised by a team of breast surgeons, and the surgical specimens were sent to the Radiology Department for radiological evaluation and to the Pathology Department for histological assessment. RESULTS In 155 patients who underwent to preoperative US localization, 188 lesions were found, and the location of each lesion was marked with a skin pen. A total of 181 lesions were confirmed by the final histopathologic exam (96.28%); 132 of them (72.92%) were malignant, and 124 of these (93.93%) showed free margins. CONCLUSIONS US-guided preoperative localization of sonographically visible breast lesions is a simple and nontraumatic procedure with high specificity and is a useful tool for obtaining accurate surgical margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Carlino
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Pierluigi Rinaldi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Giuliani
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Rella
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Enida Bufi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Padovano
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Ciardi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Romani
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Belli
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Manfredi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mundinger A, Madjar H, Cosgrove D, Weismann C, Durante E, Wilson A. E09. Hot topics in advanced breast ultrasound. Eur J Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(14)70061-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
4
|
Barentsz MW, van Dalen T, Gobardhan PD, Bongers V, Perre CI, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MAAJ, Verkooijen HM. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 135:209-19. [PMID: 22872521 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2165-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2012] [Accepted: 07/09/2012] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) can be used in the operation theatre for localization of non-palpable breast cancers. In this prospective cohort study, we compared the yield of IOUS to guidewire localization (GWL). A total of 258 consecutive patients with non-palpable invasive breast cancer underwent breast conserving surgery between 1999 and 2010. GWL was performed in 138 (54 %) and IOUS in 120 (46 %) patients. Tumor dimensions, resection volume, margin status and re-excision rates were compared by means of multivariate regression analysis. The groups were similar in terms of age, histological subtype and presence of DCIS. Lesions in the IOUS group were larger (1.24 vs. 0.98 cm, P < 0.001), while microcalcifications were more common in the GWL group (19 vs. 3 %, P < 0.001). Even after stratification for tumor diameter, presence of DCIS and findings on mammography, resection volumes were similar in both groups. Tumor-free resection margins were obtained in >93 % of patients (93.5 % with GWL vs. 93.3 % with IOUS, P = 0.958) and re-excision was performed in 11 % of patients undergoing GWL and 12.5 % of patients undergoing IOUS (P = 0.684). For localization of non-palpable breast cancer, IOUS is a reliable alternative to GWL, as it achieves similar results in terms of complete tumor removal, re-excision rate and excised volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W Barentsz
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E.01.132, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|