Early data from the first population-wide breast cancer-specific registry in Hong Kong

Survival analysis of breast cancer liver metastasis treated by hepatectomy: A propensity score analysis for Chinese women in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with breast cancer liver metastasis is very poor. This study aimed to analyze the survival outcome of hepatectomy for this patient population.

METHODS

From January 1995 to December 2014, 2522 patients with liver cancer received hepatectomy at our hospital. Twenty-one of them, all female, received the operation for breast cancer liver metastasis. Performance was compared with patients with colorectal liver metastasis treated with hepatectomy after propensity score analysis in a ratio of 1:3.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received hepatectomy for breast cancer. After propensity score matching, 63 patients who had hepatectomy for colorectal cancer were selected for comparison. There was no significant difference in immediate or short-term outcomes between the two groups of patients in terms of operative time, blood loss and surgical morbidities. All patients with breast cancer had R0 resection. No hospital death occurred. After hepatectomy, the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 58.9% and 58.9% respectively in patients with breast cancer. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.0%, 57.2% and 39.7% respectively in patients with colorectal cancer (P = 0.572). On multivariate analysis, triple negative status was the only independent poor prognostic factor in breast cancer liver metastasis (OR = 6.411; 95% CI: 1.351-30.435; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy is a safe and effective way of treating breast cancer liver metastasis at experienced centers where multidisciplinary adjuvant treatments are available. It can be considered more frequently as part of the multidisciplinary care for this patient population.

Nipple Preservation in Breast Cancer Associated with Nipple Discharge

BACKGROUND

Breast carcinoma presented with nipple discharge is a rare condition. There is theoretical concern about preserving nipple in these patients since the risk of nipple-areolar complex involvement may be greater, but not many studies in the literature have addressed on this issue. The aim of the current study was to determine the incidence and outcome of nipple preservation in breast cancer associated with nipple discharge.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who were diagnosed to have breast carcinoma and presented with nipple discharge from May 2009 to October 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients presented with nipple discharge were diagnosed with breast cancer, which represent 3.8 % of all patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in our unit during the study period. Forty-six patients (76.7 %) had nipple discharge as their only symptom, while the rest also presented with breast mass clinically or radiologically. All patients had mammogram and ultrasound performed, and 53.3 and 63.3 % respectively showed suspicious findings. Forty-one out of 46 (89.1 %) nipple discharge cytology were inadequate or benign. Thirty-two microdochectomy were performed. Routine frozen section was utilized intra-operatively to ensure clear margins. The most common histology was ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 29, 48.3 %), followed by DCIS with invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 23, 38.3 %). Regarding treatment, 26 patients (43.3 %) had nipple preserved, including 21 breast conservative surgery and five nipple-sparing mastectomies. Overall, no local or systemic recurrence was observed at a median follow-up of 27 months. Ten out of 34 (29.4 %) mastectomy specimens showed NAC involvement on pathology. By comparing patients with NAC preserved to patients with NAC removed, no significant preoperative predictors were identified.

CONCLUSION

Breast carcinoma patients who present with nipple discharge usually have early-stage cancer. Presence of nipple discharge is not equivalent to NAC involvement. Nipple preservation can be oncologically safe if negative margins are ascertained.

Surgical options for Chinese patients with early invasive breast cancer: Data from the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is preferred for suitable candidates, while mastectomy (MTX) with reconstruction (MTX + R) is considered a better option for patients requiring MTX. In Hong Kong, the rates of BCS and breast reconstruction are relatively low. This paper aims to study the surgical options and their predictors among Hong Kong breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Data is retrieved from the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry (HKBCR) from 2007 to 2013. A total of 4519 Stage I-II breast cancer patients who had surgical treatments were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Our multivariate logistic regression shows that people who were younger (age < 40 years: OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; p = 0.010), more educated (undergraduate/postgraduate: OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.4; p < 0.0001), never married (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; p = 0.002), had regular mammography screening (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.8; p < 0.0001), had screen-detected cancers (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; p = 0.031), and who underwent surgery at a private medical service facility (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.2; p < 0.0001) were more likely to receive BCS. In addition, people who were younger (age < 40 years: OR, 15.9; 95% CI, 6.5-39.2; p < 0.0001), more educated (undergraduate/postgraduate: OR, 26.8; 95% CI, 3.6-201.4; p = 0.001), had regular mammography screening (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3; p = 0.008), had screen-detected cancers (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3; p = 0.001), and had smaller tumor (≤ 2.0 cm: OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.76; p = 0.005) were more likely to have reconstruction after MTX.

CONCLUSION

Chinese patients have lower BCS and breast reconstruction rate. Besides cultural difference, patient-related factors such as age, education, marital status, mammography screening, the use of private medical facilities, and clinical characteristics including smaller tumor size and peripherally located tumor were significant predictors for type of surgical treatments in Chinese women with early breast cancer.

Screening mammography--early detection or over-diagnosis? Contribution from Australian data

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to examine the benefits and harms of organized screening mammography, with particular reference to data from Australia.

METHODS

Published literature was examined relating to the impact of screening mammography on breast cancer-specific mortality, the trends in use of adjuvant treatments for breast cancer, the effectiveness of adjuvant treatment in terms of breast cancer-specific mortality, the impact of breast cancer treatment on non-breast cancer mortality and the magnitude of the issue of over-diagnosis.

RESULTS

Most of the recent reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality is explained by use of adjuvant therapy rather than screening mammography. The impact of screening mammography in countries where women present with early disease and have access to adjuvant treatment is modest. There is a wide range of estimates for the magnitude of over-diagnosis. All-cause mortality (rather than breast cancer-specific mortality) should be used when assessing the impact of mammographic screening as otherwise the harm of breast cancer treatment in women who are over-diagnosed will be missed.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits and harms of screening mammography are finely balanced. The impact of screening mammography is at best neutral but may result in overall harm. Women should be informed of the issue of over-diagnosis. It is time to review whether organized mammographic screening programs should continue.