Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Surgical site infections in thyroid and parathyroid surgery in Japan: An analysis of the Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance database from 2013 to 2020

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after thyroid surgery are rare complications, with incidence rates of 0.3%-1.6%. Using a Japanese database, we conducted exploratory analyses on the incidence of SSIs, investigated the incidence of SSIs by the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance risk index, and identified the causative bacteria of SSIs. SSIs occurred in 50 (0.7%) of 7388 thyroid surgery cases. Risk index-0 patients had the lowest incidence rate of SSIs (0.41%). The incidence of SSIs in risk index-1 patients was 3.05 times the incidence of SSIs in risk index-0 patients. The rate of SSI occurrence for risk index-2 patients was 4.22 times the rate of SSI occurrence for risk index-0 patients. Thirty-one bacterial species were identified as the cause of SSIs in thyroid surgery cases, of which 12 (38.7%) SSIs were caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Of the nine SSIs caused by Staphylococcus aureus, 55.6% (five cases) were attributed to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Therefore, routine prophylactic antibiotic administration should be avoided, while the target for administration should be narrowed, according to the SSI risk. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics, such as 2 g piperacillin or 1 g cefazolin, is considered appropriate.

[Outpatient parathyroid gland operations in the German system-Feasible and useful?]

BACKGROUND

In 2019 approximately 7500 procedures were carried out for parathyroid diseases in Germany (Statistisches Bundesamt 2020, https://www.destatis.de/DE/ ). All operations were performed as inpatient procedures. The catalogue of outpatient procedures for 2023 does not include operations on the parathyroid glands.

OBJECTIVE

Which conditions are prerequisites for parathyroid surgery on an outpatient basis?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Published data on outpatient parathyroid surgery were analyzed with respect to the underlying disease, procedures performed and patient-specific circumstances.

RESULTS

Initial operations for localized sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) seem to be suitable for outpatient surgery, provided that affected patients fulfil the general prerequisites for an outpatient operation. The procedures focused parathyroidectomy and unilateral exploration can be carried out using local or general anesthesia and have a very low risk for postoperative complications. The organization of the day of the operation and the postoperative treatment of the patient should be organized within a detailed standard of procedure. The remuneration for an outpatient parathyroidectomy is not included in the German outpatient surgery catalogue and is therefore currently not adequately financially reimbursed.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients a limited initial intervention for primary hyperparathyroidism can be safely performed on an outpatient basis; however, the present German reimbursement modalities have to be revised so that the cost of these outpatient operations can be adequately covered.

The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive Surgical Management of Secondary and Tertiary Renal Hyperparathyroidism

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based recommendations for safe, effective, and appropriate treatment of secondary (SHPT) and tertiary (THPT) renal hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND

Hyperparathyroidism is common among patients with chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and kidney transplant. The surgical management of SHPT and THPT is nuanced and requires a multidisciplinary approach. There are currently no clinical practice guidelines that address the surgical treatment of SHPT and THPT.

METHODS

Medical literature was reviewed from January 1, 1985 to present January 1, 2021 by a panel of 10 experts in SHPT and THPT. Recommendations using the best available evidence was constructed. The American College of Physicians grading system was used to determine levels of evidence. Recommendations were discussed to consensus. The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons membership reviewed and commented on preliminary drafts of the content.

RESULTS

These clinical guidelines present the epidemiology and pathophysiology of SHPT and THPT and provide recommendations for work-up and management of SHPT and THPT for all involved clinicians. It outlines the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of SHPT and THPT, as well as related definitions, operative techniques, morbidity, and outcomes. Specific topics include Pathogenesis and Epidemiology, Initial Evaluation, Imaging, Preoperative and Perioperative Care, Surgical Planning and Parathyroidectomy, Adjuncts and Approaches, Outcomes, and Reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines were created to assist clinicians in the optimal management of secondary and tertiary renal hyperparathyroidism.

Simple Prediction Score for Developing Surgical Site Infection after Clean Neck Operation

Background: Clean neck operations (thyroidectomies, parathyroidectomies, and lymph node resection) are among the most common procedures performed in the United States. Surgical site infections (SSIs) after clean neck operations are rare, but the consequences are devastating and often life-threatening. The aim of this study was to develop a score that will identify patients at high risk for developing a SSI after a clean neck procedure. Materials and Methods: Patients with either thyroidectomies, parathyroidectomies, or lymph node resection of the neck were identified from the 2016 and 2017 databases of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and were used for this analysis. Our primary goal was to build a scoring system with which we will be able to identify patients at high risk for SSI after a clean neck operation. Results: Of a total of 99,877 patients, 72,719 patients had a thyroidectomy, 22,043 patients had parathyroidectomy, and 5,115 patients had lymph node resection of the neck. Multivariable logistic regression identified the following independent risk factors associated with post-operative SSI: male gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.51), diabetes mellitus (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.67), smoking (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.36-2.04), pre-operative steroid use (aOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.21-2.53), cancer diagnosis (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.77), radical lymphadenectomies (aOR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.16-4), and total operative time ≥198 minutes (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.82-2.78). Afterward, we developed a prognostic score for calculating the odds of having post-operative SSI. One point was allotted for each of the aforementioned factors, except lymphadenectomies where two points were allotted, and operative time was excluded. Our score was associated with a stepwise higher risk of post-operative SSI after a clean neck operation. Conclusions: Pre-operative and intra-operative factors can predict which patients undergoing a clean neck surgery may develop SSI. Our prognostic score may help guide surgeons identify patients at high-risk for SSI after clean neck surgery and these patients might benefit from prophylactic use of antibiotic agents.

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infection in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Thyroid and parathyroid surgery are considered clean procedures, with an incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after thyroidectomy ranging from 0.09% to 2.9%. International guidelines do not recommend routine antibiotic prophylaxis (AP), while AP seems to be employed commonly in clinical practice. The purpose of this systematic review is analyzing whether the postoperative SSI rate in thyroid and parathyroid surgery is altered by the practice of AP. We searched Pubmed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (WOS) for studies comparing AP to no preoperative antibiotics up to October 2021. Data on the SSI rate was evaluated and summarized as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Risk of bias of studies were assessed with standard methods. Nine studies (4 RCTs and 5 nRCTs), including 8710 participants, were eligible for quantitative analysis. A meta-analysis showed that the SSI rate was not significantly different between AP and no preoperative antibiotics (SSI rate: 0.6% in AP vs. 2.4% in control group; RR 0.69, 0.43–1.10 95% CI, p = 0.13, I2 = 0%). A sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis on RCTs were consistent with the main findings. Evidence of low quality supports that AP in thyroid and parathyroid surgery produce similar SSI rates as to the absence of perioperative antibiotics.

Nonuse of antimicrobial prophylaxis in clean surgeries for adrenal and renal tumors: Results of the risk-based strategy in 1362 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of perioperative infections without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing clean surgeries for adrenal and renal tumors.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 1362 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy (n = 303), radical nephrectomy (n = 499), and partial nephrectomy (n = 560) using the gasless laparoendoscopic single-port surgery technique between 2005 and 2019. In 1059 patients, antimicrobial prophylaxis was not administered. The remaining 303 patients were considered at high risk for infection and received single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. The endpoint was the incidence of perioperative infections within 1 month from the surgery date. Perioperative infections were classified into surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, and remote infections.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients whose collecting systems were opened during partial nephrectomy were excluded, and the remaining 1013 patients with nonuse of antimicrobial prophylaxis and 275 patients with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of superficial surgical site infections, deep/organ-space surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, and remote infections was 1.6%, 0.7%, 2.8%, and 1.3%, respectively, in patients with nonuse of antimicrobial prophylaxis and 0.4%, 1.8%, 1.5%, and 1.5%, respectively, in patients with single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. All patients who developed perioperative infections were successfully treated. No clinical or surgical variables were significantly associated with the incidence of surgical site infections. One limitation of the present study was its nonrandomized and noncontrolled design.

CONCLUSIONS

In minimally invasive clean surgeries for adrenal and renal tumors, antimicrobial prophylaxis is not necessary when individual risk of infection is considered low.

Management of primary and renal hyperparathyroidism: guidelines from the German Association of Endocrine Surgeons (CAEK)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this review is to provide updated recommendations for the surgical management of primary (pHPT) and renal (rHPT) hyperparathyroidism, formulating a new guideline of the German Association of Endocrine Surgeons (CAEK).

METHODS

Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and therapy of pHPT and rHPT were assessed by a multidisciplinary panel using PubMed for a comprehensive literature search together with a structured consensus dialogue (S2k guideline of the Association of the German Scientific Medical Societies, AWMF).

RESULTS

During the last 20 years, a variety of new preoperative localization procedures, such as sestamibi-SPECT, 4D-CT, and various PET/CT procedures, were established for pHPT. High-resolution imaging, together with intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) measurement, enabled focused or minimally invasive surgery to become the most favored surgical technique. Patients with pHPT and nonlocalizing imaging have a higher risk of multiglandular disease. Surgical therapy provides very high cure rates, with a clear relation to the surgeon's experience in parathyroid procedures. Reoperative parathyroidectomy, children with pHPT or familial forms, and parathyroid carcinoma are addressed and require special surgical expertise. A multidisciplinary team of experienced nephrologists, transplant, and endocrine surgeons should assess the diagnosis and treatment of renal HPT.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is the only curative treatment for pHPT and should be considered for all patients with pHPT. For rHPT, a more selective approach is required, and parathyroidectomy is indicated only when conservative treatment options fail. In parathyroid carcinoma, the adequacy of local resection influences local disease control.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

Although thyroid and parathyroid surgery is considered a clean procedure with a low incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs), a great number of endocrine surgeons use antibiotic prophylaxis (AP). The aim of this study was to assess whether AP is significantly effective in reducing the incidence of SSIs in this kind of surgery.

Data Sources

A systematic literature search was performed with PubMed, Scopus, and ISI–Web of Science. Studies addressing the efficacy of AP in reducing the incidence of SSIs in thyroid and parathyroid surgery were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Review Methods

The random effects model was assumed to account for different sources of variation among studies. The overall effect size was computed through the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity across studies, possible outlier studies, and publication bias were evaluated.

Results

A total of 6 studies with 4428 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. The incidence of SSI was 0.6% in the case group and 0.4% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.3-3.81; P = .915). There was no evidence of heterogeneity among the studies ( Q = 8.36, P = .138; I2 = 40.17). The analysis of several continuous moderators, including age, use of drain, and duration of surgery, did not generate any significant result.

Conclusion

AP is not effective in reducing the incidence of SSI in thyroid and parathyroid surgery and should be avoided, notwithstanding the negative impact on social costs and the risk of development of antibiotic resistance.

The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive Surgical Management of Thyroid Disease in Adults

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based recommendations for safe, effective, and appropriate thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of thyroid disease has evolved considerably over several decades leading to variability in rendered care. Over 100,000 thyroid operations are performed annually in the US.

METHODS

The medical literature from 1/1/1985 to 11/9/2018 was reviewed by a panel of 19 experts in thyroid disorders representing multiple disciplines. The authors used the best available evidence to construct surgical management recommendations. Levels of evidence were determined using the American College of Physicians grading system, and management recommendations were discussed to consensus. Members of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons reviewed and commented on preliminary drafts of the content.

RESULTS

These clinical guidelines analyze the indications for thyroidectomy as well as its definitions, technique, morbidity, and outcomes. Specific topics include Pathogenesis and Epidemiology, Initial Evaluation, Imaging, Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Diagnosis, Molecular Testing, Indications, Extent and Outcomes of Surgery, Preoperative Care, Initial Thyroidectomy, Perioperative Tissue Diagnosis, Nodal Dissection, Concurrent Parathyroidectomy, Hyperthyroid Conditions, Goiter, Adjuncts and Approaches to Thyroidectomy, Laryngology, Familial Thyroid Cancer, Postoperative Care and Complications, Cancer Management, and Reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines were created to assist clinicians in the optimal surgical management of thyroid disease.

Risks and complications of thyroglossal duct cyst removal

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Thyroglossal duct cysts (TGDCs) are the most common congenital neck cyst and typically present in childhood or adolescence, although a subset remains asymptomatic until adulthood. Although treatment involves surgical excision, few large-scale studies exist regarding the risks of surgical treatment of TGDCs in adults. This study aims to describe the characteristics of adult patients undergoing TGDC excision and to analyze risk factors associated with reoperation or other postoperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

METHODS

Patients age ≥ 18 years in the NSQIP database who underwent TGDC removal from 2005 to 2014 were included. Covariates included patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative variables, and intraoperative variables. Outcomes included reoperation, complications, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 793 cases met inclusion criteria. Patients were predominantly female (57.0%) and white (64.3%), with a mean age of 44.3 years. Thirty-day mortality did not occur in this cohort, but 3.0% of patients experienced at least one complication. Forty-eight patients (6.1%) underwent reoperation. Wound infection rates were higher in revision operations compared with primary operations (8.3% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .003). Low preoperative sodium was associated with reoperation (P = .047). Additionally, length of hospital stay was associated with increased total operative time (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

TGDC excision is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in the adult population, with low complication rates. However, the risk of reoperation, surgical-site infections, and medical complications should be taken into consideration during preoperative planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:381-384, 2020.

A Nested Case-Control Study on the Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Thyroid Surgery

Introduction

It is unclear if antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in thyroid surgery. This study assessed risk factors for SSI and antibiotic prophylaxis in subgroups of patients.

Method and design

A nested case–control study on patients registered in the Swedish National Register for Endocrine Surgery was performed. Patients with SSI were matched 1:1 by age and gender to controls. Additional information on patients with SSI and controls was queried from attending surgeons using a questionnaire. Risk factors for SSI were evaluated by logistic regression analysis and presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

There were 9494 operations; 109 (1.2%) patients had SSI. Patients with SSI were older (median 53 vs. 49 years) than patients without SSI p = 0.01 and more often had a cancer diagnosis 23 (21.1%) versus 1137 (12.1%) p = 0.01. In the analysis of patients with SSI versus controls, patients with SSI more often had post-operative drainage 68 (62.4%) versus 46 (42.2%) p = 0.01 and lymph node surgery 40 (36.7%) versus 14 (13.0%) p < 0.01, and both were independent risk factors for SSI, drain OR 1.82 (CI 1.04–3.18) and lymph node dissection, OR 3.22 (95% CI 1.32–7.82). A higher number of 26(62%) patients with independent risk factors for SSI and diagnosed with SSI did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis. Data were missing for 8 (31%) patients.

Conclusion

Lymph node dissection and drain are independent risk factors for SSI after thyroidectomy. Antibiotic prophylaxis might be considered in patients with these risk factors.

Are Perioperative Antibiotics Necessary During Direct Microlaryngoscopy?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

There are currently no established recommendations for the use of perioperative antibiotics (PAs) to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) for direct microlaryngoscopy (DML). This study examined the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing DML with and without PAs.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, multi-institutional chart review.

METHODS

A retrospective, multi-institutional chart review was performed at four tertiary referral academic medical centers. Patients undergoing DML from 2010 to 2017 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical records of patients undergoing DML with biopsy, microsurgery, laser ablation, or vocal fold injection who had adequate follow-up were reviewed. Procedures with significant cartilage destruction, concurrent open surgery, or esophageal surgery were excluded. Data recorded included age, gender, pacemaker history, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, wound class, indication for surgery, use of laser, complications, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, pain, fever, and postoperative steroid and antibiotic prescriptions. Presence or absence of SSIs was evaluated by a fellowship-trained laryngologist.

RESULTS

There were 834 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of those, 698 did not receive PAs and 136 received PAs. The median age of patients was 54 years of age in the PA group and 57.5 years of age in the non-PA group, and all cases were recorded as wound class II. Overall, 58% of surgeries involved use of carbon dioxide or potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser. Only one SSI was reported on follow-up in a patient who did receive PAs.

CONCLUSIONS

SSIs are exceedingly rare following DML. PA use is not indicated for routine DML.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 128:2838-2843, 2018.

Incidence of Surgical Site Infections after Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: No Role for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis

To better define the value of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) and antiseptic skin preparation (ASP) in thyroid and parathyroid surgery, we examined the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) with and without AMP. Retrospective analysis was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database at a single institution. Patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery with data entered into the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database at our institution between November 2007 and June 2015 were studied, including patient demographics, wound classification, other risk factors for SSI, and wound outcome. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for AMP, ASP, and use of drains. Of the 534 patients who underwent thyroid (n = 358) or parathyroid (n = 176) surgery, 58 (10.9%) were diabetic, 54 (10.1%) used tobacco, and 14 (2.6%) were on steroids. Most wounds were classified as “clean” (99.6%). Betadine was used for ASP in 96 per cent. AMP was given to 141 patients (26%) using cefazolin, vancomycin, or clindamycin. The remaining 393 patients (74%) received no AMP. Zero infections occurred in the group who did not receive AMP. One (0.7%) superficial, nonpurulent SSI occurred in the group that received AMP which was not statistically significantly different (P = 0.319). The rates of SSI after thyroid and parathyroid surgery are extremely low, around two per 1000 cases, and do not decrease with AMP. Therefore, AMP is not necessary in thyroid and parathyroid surgery and should be avoided to reduce costs, adverse reactions, and antibiotic resistance.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in thyroid surgery

Use of antibiotic prophylactic (AP) in clean surgery is still controversial. We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to identify the best way to approach the use of prophylactic antibiotic in thyroid surgery. In thyroid surgery, it is a highly controversial topic primarily due to the lack of evidence in "support" of or "against" antibiotic use. In this review, the authors analyze the literature on the use of AP in thyroid surgery in order to evaluate if the available data support or contradict this use routinely.