Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Surgery Improves the Identification and Characterization of Nodules

Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound has an outcome-relevant impact on surgery of primary and metastatic liver lesions

PURPOSE

Complete resection of the affected tissue remains the best curative treatment option for liver-derived tumors and colorectal liver metastases. In addition to preoperative cross-sectional imaging, contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) plays a crucial role in the detection and localization of all liver lesions. However, its exact role is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical and oncological impact of using CE-IOUS in the surgical treatment of these diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over the three-year study period, 206 patients with primary liver tumors and hepatic metastases were enrolled in this prospective, monocentric study to evaluate the impact of CE-IOUS in liver surgery. Secondary outcomes included comparing the sensitivity and specificity of CE-IOUS with existing preoperative imaging modalities and identifying preoperative parameters that could predict a strategic impact of CE-IOUS. In addition, the oncological significance of CE-IOUS was evaluated using a case-cohort design with a minimum follow-up of 18 months.

RESULTS

CE-IOUS findings led to a change in surgical strategy in 34% of cases (n=70/206). The accuracy in cases with a major change could be confirmed histopathologically in 71.4% of cases (n=25/35). The impact could not be predicted using parameters assumed to be clinically relevant. An oncological benefit of a CE-IOUS adapted surgical approach was demonstrated in patients suffering from HCC and colorectal liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

CE-IOUS may significantly increase R0 resection rates and should therefore be used routinely as an additional staging method, especially in complex liver surgery.

Recent advances in computerized imaging and its vital roles in liver disease diagnosis, preoperative planning, and interventional liver surgery: A review

The earliest and most accurate detection of the pathological manifestations of hepatic diseases ensures effective treatments and thus positive prognostic outcomes. In clinical settings, screening and determining the extent of a pathology are prominent factors in preparing remedial agents and administering appropriate therapeutic procedures. Moreover, in a patient undergoing liver resection, a realistic preoperative simulation of the subject-specific anatomy and physiology also plays a vital part in conducting initial assessments, making surgical decisions during the procedure, and anticipating postoperative results. Conventionally, various medical imaging modalities, e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, have been employed to assist in these tasks. In fact, several standardized procedures, such as lesion detection and liver segmentation, are also incorporated into prominent commercial software packages. Thus far, most integrated software as a medical device typically involves tedious interactions from the physician, such as manual delineation and empirical adjustments, as per a given patient. With the rapid progress in digital health approaches, especially medical image analysis, a wide range of computer algorithms have been proposed to facilitate those procedures. They include pattern recognition of a liver, its periphery, and lesion, as well as pre- and postoperative simulations. Prior to clinical adoption, however, software must conform to regulatory requirements set by the governing agency, for instance, valid clinical association and analytical and clinical validation. Therefore, this paper provides a detailed account and discussion of the state-of-the-art methods for liver image analyses, visualization, and simulation in the literature. Emphasis is placed upon their concepts, algorithmic classifications, merits, limitations, clinical considerations, and future research trends.

Improved sensitivity and positive predictive value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is an effective treatment for improving the survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). However, accurately determining the resection margin of liver lesions during surgery remains challenging. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and predictive value of intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-IOUS) in CRLM patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu databases using the following search terms: metastatic liver cancer, colorectal cancer, sensitivity, contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound, CE-IOUS, colorectal liver metastases, and CRLM. The search period was set from the date of establishment of the database to September 2021. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis results showed that the overall sensitivity and specificity of CE-IOUS were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-0.97] and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80), respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of IOUS were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.86) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.87), respectively. The area under the summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curves (AUCs) of CE-IOUS and IOUS were 0.9753 and 0.8590, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI of CE-IOUS changed the surgical margin were 0.205 and 0.071-0.465, P=0.000, the difference was statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, CE-IOUS improved the sensitivity and predictive value of CRLM detection compared with IOUS, and is more suitable for intraoperative planning of surgical margins. At present, it is the most sensitive imaging method available, and is recommended for use during liver resection to provide doctors with more reliable information during surgery.

Intraoperative (Contrast-Enhanced) Ultrasound Has the Highest Diagnostic Accuracy of Any Imaging Modality in Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

AIM

Defining sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy for detection of colorectal liver metastases in imaging compared to intraoperative assessment. Defining a cutoff, where accuracy of detection is impaired.

METHODS

Prospective single-institution clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01522209). Patients underwent CEUS, MDCT, and 3 Tesla EOB-MRI within 2 weeks preoperatively. Intraoperative palpation, IOUS, and CEIOUS were performed. A patient and lesion-based database was analyzed for accuracy of detection of CEUS, CT, MRI, and Palp/IOUS/CEIOUS combined read. Histology was standard of reference.

RESULTS

Forty-seven high tumor load (mean 5, 4 lesions) patients were analyzed. Histopathology confirmed 264 lesions (245 malignant: 19 benign). Accuracy for detection of all lesions: CEUS 63%, CT 71%, MRI 92%, and PALP/IOUS/CEIOUS 98%. ROC analysis for lesion size showed severe impairment of accuracy in lesion detection smaller than 5mm. Intraoperative imaging was not impaired by lesion size. Patient-based analysis revealed a change of resection plan after IOUS/CEIOUS in 35% of patients.

CONCLUSION

At 5-mm lesion size, preoperative imaging shows a drop in accuracy of detection. In patients with multiple lesions, addition of MRI to MDCT seems useful. Accuracy of intraoperative ultrasound is not impacted by lesion size and should be mandatory. CEIOUS can improve intraoperative decision-making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Study registered with clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01522209.

A meta-analysis evaluating contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) in the context of surgery for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the outcomes of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) undergoing surgery.

METHOD

A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The Odds Ratio, Weighted Mean Difference, and 95% Confidence Interval were evaluated, by means of Random-Effects model.

RESULTS

Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria and incorporated 497 patients. The present study shows that CE-IOUS is associated with higher sensitivity and accuracy compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in identifying CRLMs (p < 0.05). The positive predictive value was similar among the different modalities. Furthermore, new CRLMs were identified by CE-IOUS, thus affecting the surgical plan in 128 patients (51.8% of the patients with new CRLMs). Moreover, 91 patients (71%) underwent a more extensive hepatectomy and 15 patients (11.7%) were considered non-operable. Two alternative contrast agents, Sonazoid and Sonovue, were employed with similar sensitivity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These outcomes suggest the superiority of the CE-IOUS over MDCT, MRI, and IOUS for the staging of patients with CRLMs undergoing surgery. However, they should be treated with caution given the small number of the included studies.

A new rapid diagnostic system with ambient mass spectrometry and machine learning for colorectal liver metastasis

Background

Probe electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (PESI-MS) can rapidly visualize mass spectra of small, surgically obtained tissue samples, and is a promising novel diagnostic tool when combined with machine learning which discriminates malignant spectrum patterns from others. The present study was performed to evaluate the utility of this device for rapid diagnosis of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

Methods

A prospectively planned study using retrospectively obtained tissues was performed. In total, 103 CRLM samples and 80 non-cancer liver tissues cut from surgically extracted specimens were analyzed using PESI-MS. Mass spectra obtained by PESI-MS were classified into cancer or non-cancer groups by using logistic regression, a kind of machine learning. Next, to identify the exact molecules responsible for the difference between CRLM and non-cancerous tissues, we performed liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-MS (LC-ESI-MS), which visualizes sample molecular composition in more detail.

Results

This diagnostic system distinguished CRLM from non-cancer liver parenchyma with an accuracy rate of 99.5%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve reached 0.9999. LC-ESI-MS analysis showed higher ion intensities of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in CRLM than in non-cancer liver parenchyma (P < 0.01, respectively). The proportion of phospholipids categorized as monounsaturated fatty acids was higher in CRLM (37.2%) than in non-cancer liver parenchyma (10.7%; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The combination of PESI-MS and machine learning distinguished CRLM from non-cancer tissue with high accuracy. Phospholipids categorized as monounsaturated fatty acids contributed to the difference between CRLM and normal parenchyma and might also be a useful diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target for CRLM.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08001-5.

Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound Improved Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has improved in recent years, therefore the role of current imaging techniques needs to be defined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging, preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography), intraoperative ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in the detection of CRLM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible trials published before 30 March 2020 were identified from the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, and descriptive and quantitative data were extracted. Study quality was evaluated for the identified studies and a random-effects model was used to determine the integrated diagnosis estimation. Meta-regression was implemented to explore the possible contributors to heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 studies were included for analysis, comprising 682 patients with a total of 2303 liver lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.97), 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-0.92), and 79 (95% CI 32-196), respectively. The overall weighted area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97). In univariate meta-regression analysis, disappearing liver metastasis, contrast agent, and Kupffer phase were the potent sources of heterogeneity; however, in multivariate meta-regression, no definite variable was the source of the study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for screening CRLM.

Routine Intraoperative Ultrasound for the Detection of Liver Metastases during Resection of Primary Colorectal Cancer - A Systematic Review

During the discovery of ColoRectal Cancer (CRC), 20% to 30% of patients have synchronous liver metastases. Ten to 30% of patients have non-evidence of Liver Metasteses (LM) following preoperative imaging such as Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CE-US), multi-slice Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CE-CT), Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CE-MRI), and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT). Today, IntraOperative UltraSound (IOUS) in open surgery and Laparoscopic UltraSound (LUS) in laparoscopic or robotic surgery are considered the "gold standard" for detecting liver metastases. The object of this review is to demonstrate the higher sensitivity and specificity of IOUS and LUS in the detection rate of liver metastases.

The actual management of colorectal liver metastases

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world and between 50% and 60% of patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the disease. There have been great improvements in the management of CRLM during the last decades. The combination of modern chemotherapeutic and biological systemic treatments with aggressive surgical resection strategies is currently the base for the treatment of patients considered unresectable until few years ago. Furthermore, several new treatments for the local control of CRLM have been developed and are now part of the arsenal of multidisciplinary teams for the treatment of these complex patients. The aim of this review was to summarize and update the management of CRLM, its controversies and relevant evidence.

Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative liver ultrasound appears superior to liver-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to stage colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Most of the data come from studies on open surgery. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) is technically demanding and its reliability is poor investigated. Aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of LUS staging for CRLMs compared to MRI.

METHODS

All patients with CRLMs scheduled for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) between 01/2010 and 06/2019 who underwent preoperative MRI were considered for the study. LUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient by patient basis. Reference standards were final pathology and 6 months follow-up results.

RESULTS

Amongst 189 LLR for CRLMs, 146 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 391 CRLMs were preoperatively detected by MRI. 24 new nodules in 16 (10.9%) patients were found by LUS and resected. Median diameter of new nodules was 5.5 mm (2-10 mm) and 10 (41.6%) were located in the hepatic dome. Pathology confirmed 17 newly detected malignant nodules (median size 4 mm) in 11 (7.5%) patients. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumours differed between LUS and MRI in 9 patients (6.1%). Intraoperative surgical strategy changed according LUS findings in 19 (13%) patients, requiring conversion to open approach in 3 (15.8%) of them. The sensitivity of LUS was superior to MRI (93.1% vs 85.6% whilst specificity was similar (98.6% MRI vs 96.5% LUS).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic liver ultrasound improves liver staging for CRLMs compared to liver-specific MRI.

Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?

Background

To assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs).

Methods

From January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied.

Results

A total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1–31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%, p=0.006) and DF survival (45.1% vs 33%, p=0.002) were significantly worse among patients with new CRLMs than without.

Conclusions

IOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.

Outcomes of Resectability Assessment of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Liver Metastases Expert Panel

BACKGROUND

Decision making on optimal treatment strategy in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) remains complex because uniform criteria for (un)resectability are lacking. This study reports on the feasibility and short-term outcomes of The Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group Liver Expert Panel.

STUDY DESIGN

The Expert Panel consists of 13 hepatobiliary surgeons and 4 radiologists. Resectability assessment is performed independently by 3 randomly assigned surgeons, and CRLM are scored as resectable, potentially resectable, or permanently unresectable. In absence of consensus, 2 additional surgeons are invited for a majority consensus. Patients with potentially resectable or unresectable CRLM at baseline are evaluated every 2 months of systemic therapy. Once CRLM are considered resectable, a treatment strategy is proposed.

RESULTS

Overall, 398 panel evaluations in 183 patients were analyzed. The median time to panel conclusion was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5-11 days). Intersurgeon disagreement was observed in 205 (52%) evaluations, with major disagreement (resectable vs permanently unresectable) in 42 (11%) evaluations. After systemic treatment, 106 patients were considered to have resectable CRLM, 84 of whom (79%) underwent a curative procedure. R0 resection (n = 41), R0 resection in combination with ablative treatment (n = 26), or ablative treatment only (n = 4) was achieved in 67 of 84 (80%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study analyzed prospective resectability evaluation of patients with CRLM by a panel of radiologists and liver surgeons. The high rate of disagreement among experienced liver surgeons reflects the complexity in defining treatment strategies for CRLM and supports the use of a panel rather than a single-surgeon decision.

Value of intraoperative ultrasound with conventional probes and its usefulness in surgical and therapeutic management of patients

OBJECTIVE

To prove both the reliability and the applications presented by intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in surgical and therapeutic management of diverse pathologies and the possibility of doing it by using conventional equipment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of 145 IOUS performed by using conventional equipment in 135 patients between January 2011 and June 2016. We assessed the organs studied by ultrasound, underlying conditions of patients, preoperative imaging and the degree of matching them with the histological findings. The functions of the intraoperative ultrasound were assessed in each case.

RESULTS

91,7% of the scans performed were hepatic, being other locations varied but less common. They had a high concordance with the histological results of the lesions analyzed (95.4%) and in 24% of the cases their results did not coincide with those of the preoperative imaging tests, being decisive for the management of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations of our study, IOUS has proven to be a reliable and safe diagnostic test with advantages over conventional imaging techniques. It contributes to get a correct diagnosis in those lesions not characterized by the preoperative imaging tests, to locate and delimit the extension of a lesion within an organ and facilitate the performance of diagnostic procedures (intraoperative biopsy) even in centers where we do not have specific probes.