Scoring Systems Used to Predict Bladder Dysfunction After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery

Essential updates 2020/2021: Advancing precision medicine for comprehensive rectal cancer treatment

In the paradigm shift related to rectal cancer treatment, we have to understand a variety of new emerging topics to provide appropriate treatment for individual patients as precision medicine. However, information on surgery, genomic medicine, and pharmacotherapy is highly specialized and subdivided, creating a barrier to achieving thorough knowledge. In this review, we summarize the perspective for rectal cancer treatment and management from the current standard-of-care to the latest findings to help optimize treatment strategy.

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following colorectal surgery. The incidence of POUR among colorectal surgery patients varies widely, and the risk factors and outcomes of POUR are also debatable. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the risk factors for POUR in patients after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Chinese databases (CBM, CNKI, and WanFang Databases) were searched to identify relevant cohort studies (from inception to August 2022). Two researchers independently conducted literature quality evaluation and data extraction. All data were analyzed by using the Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies with 101,025 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The risk factors for POUR in colorectal surgery patients were male sex, older age, diabetes mellitus, urological diseases, tumor location in the lower rectum, APR, laparoscopic surgery, operation time ≥ 4 h, postoperative date of urinary catheter removal, excessive intraoperative intravenous fluid volume, and postoperative ileus. The postoperative anastomotic leak, on the other hand, was not a risk factor for POUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple risk factors influence the incidence of POUR in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. To reduce the incidence of POUR in colorectal surgery patients, medical staff should identify risk factors early and enforce interventions to prevent them.

Validation of a scoring system to predict bladder dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

A recent trend in  urinary catheter management in patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is early removal. However, some patients develop bladder dysfunction and require urinary re-catheterization. In 2016, a scoring system to predict bladder dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery was developed in our institution. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the validity of this scoring system and to determine the suitability of patients for early removal of urinary catheter.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study from a prospective database was conducted on 234 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2019. According to bladder dysfunction predictive score, the urinary catheter was removed on the first postoperative day (low-risk group) and fifth postoperative day (high-risk group). After catheter removal, all patients were managed using in-house protocols.

RESULTS

Of 234 patients, 130 (55.6%) were classified as a low-risk group. The overall incidence of bladder dysfunction was 8.5% (11/130) in the low-risk group and 13.5% (14/104) in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system developed to predict bladder dysfunction showed good overall performance for discriminating between patients suitable or not for early removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of early removal of urinary catheter after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal anastomosis

AIM OF THE STUDY

To review and to analyse the feasibility of using no urinary catheter or a catheter for less than 24 h compared with longer post-operative catheter after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal dissection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing no urinary catheter or a catheter for less than 24 h (early removal, ER) and urinary catheter drainage for 2 days or longer (late removal, LR) after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal dissection. Primary endpoint was acute urinary retention (AUR) requiring a re-catheterization. Secondary endpoints were urinary tract infection (UTI), overall morbidity and hospital length of stay. Meta-analysis met the PRISMA criteria, with a random model.

RESULTS

Out of 3659 articles found, 82 comparative studies on catheter duration were selected, of which five were in colorectal surgery: three randomized trials, one retrospective and one prospective series. There were 396 ER and 410 LR patients. All had undergone surgery with infraperitoneal dissection. There was no significant difference regarding AUR (OR = 2.09 [95%CI 0.97-4.52]) but significantly less UTI (OR = 0.39 [95%CI 0.22-0.67]) for early urinary catheter removal. The number needed to harm was much higher for AUR than for UTI (23.3 vs. 8).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that, in terms of benefit/risk ratio, in colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal anastomosis, early removal (< 24 h) of the urinary catheter would be beneficial (because of a more frequent UTI after LR than AUR after ER) and would reduce the occurrence of UTI if no AUR risk factors are present. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of evidence.

Retrospective risk analysis for acute urinary dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in patients receiving epidural analgesia

PURPOSE

Urinary dysfunction (UD) is a frequent complication following rectal surgery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the risk factors for acute UD after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LALAR) for rectal cancer in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 131 patients who underwent LALAR among those receiving epidural analgesia in a single institution between October 2008 and December 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the clinicopathological factors associated with acute UD.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of acute UD was 16.0% (21/131). Univariate analysis showed that older age (P = 0.016) and earlier urinary catheter removal (P = 0.036) were associated with acute UD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that older age (10-year increments; odds ratio (OR) 2.046, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.171-3.543, P = 0.011), urinary catheter removal before epidural analgesia discontinuation (OR 6.393, 95% CI 1.540-26.534, P = 0.011), and a large tumor circumference rate (10% increments; OR 1.263, 95% CI 1.043-1.530, P = 0.017) were independent risk factors for acute UD.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that older age, early removal of urinal catheter before epidural analgesia discontinuation, and large tumor circumference rate are risk factors of acute UD after LALAR for rectal cancer in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

Urine drainage management in colorectal surgery

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) is aimed at reducing a patient's surgical stress response, specifically by reducing the duration of catheterization. In cases of colorectal surgery, there is pronounced heterogeneity in urinary catheterization, which is largely explained by fear of acute urinary retention (AUR).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the work is to report on the current literature on postoperative urinary catheterization following colorectal surgery, particularly with regard to the risk of AUR, and thereby contribute to the standardization of perioperative practices.

RESULTS

In colon surgery without preoperative urinary disorders, catheterization must not exceed 24h. In rectal surgery, catheter removal starting on postoperative D2 seems reasonable in the absence of AUR risk factor (RF). Male sex, past history of lower urinary tract obstruction, abdomino-perineal amputation (APA) and low rectal anastomosis are AUR risk factors that must be taken into account when deciding to withdraw the urinary catheter. While the role of a suprapubic catheter is not clearly defined, it may be of use following APA. The epidural catheter is another AUR risk factor, but it seems possible to withdraw the urinary catheter on postoperative D1, before the epidural catheter, provided that the other risk factors have been taken into full account. Lastly, up until now no satisfactorily conducted study has assessed the prophylactic value of systematic perioperative alpha-blocker treatment in colorectal surgery.

Urinary dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study

AIM

Urinary dysfunction is one of many complications after treatment for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of patient-reported urinary dysfunction at the time of diagnosis and at 1-year follow-up and to assess the risk factors linked to urinary incontinence.

METHOD

Patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer were included in the QoLiRECT study between 2012 and 2015. Questionnaires from the time of diagnosis and 1-year follow-up were analysed, with 1085 and 916 patients, respectively, eligible for analysis. Regression analyses were made to investigate possible risk factors for incontinence. The patient cohort was also compared with a cohort from the Swedish general population.

RESULTS

At baseline, the prevalence of urinary dysfunction (14% of women, 8% of men) was similar to that in the general population. At 1-year follow-up, 20% of patients experienced urinary incontinence (29% of women, 14% of men). Emptying difficulties were experienced by 46% (41% of women, 49% of men) and urgency by 58% across both sexes. Abdominoperineal excision and urinary dysfunction at baseline were found to be independent risk factors for incontinence at 1-year follow-up. Among patients who were continent at baseline, risk factors were female sex, physical inactivity at baseline, comorbidity and abdominoperineal excision.

CONCLUSION

Urinary dysfunction is frequent among patients with rectal cancer, with up to a two-fold increase in symptoms 1 year after diagnosis. Unfortunately, few factors are modifiable and these results stress the importance of informing patients of possible outcomes related to urinary dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer.

Outcomes of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter Following Rectal Resection for Cancer

PURPOSE

Early postoperative urinary catheter removal decreases urinary tract infection (UTI) rate and accelerates patient mobilization. The aim of this study is to determine the results of systematic urinary catheter removal on postoperative day (POD) 1 in patients undergoing rectal resection for cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained database of 469 patients who underwent rectal resection for cancer, a retrospective review of all patients with urinary catheter removal on POD1 was conducted. Patients unable to void 6 h after catheter removal underwent in and out urinary catheterization (IOC group) and were compared with patients who voided spontaneously (non-IOC group) to determine risk factors for IOC.

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients were identified, including 274 (66%) men. Median age was 59 (50-68) years. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 134 (32%), and complex surgery with resection of at least one other organ in 72 (17%) patients. Non-IOC and IOC groups included 245 (59%) and 172 (41%) patients, respectively. Five independent predictive factors for IOC were male gender, obesity, history of obstructive urinary disease, APR, and metastatic disease. The cumulative risk of IOC in patients with zero, one, two, and at least three risk factors was 8%, 31%, 52%, and 68% on POD1, and 2%, 12%, 23%, and 30% on POD5, respectively (p < 0.001). Thirteen patients (3%) developed UTI.

CONCLUSIONS

Early removal of urinary catheter resulted in 59% of patients voiding spontaneously with no need for IOC following rectal resection. Patients without any predictive factors had less than 10% risk of urinary dysfunction.