Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer

Association of resection margin distance with anastomotic recurrence in stage I-III colon cancer: data from the National Colorectal Cancer Cohort (NCRCC) study in China

PURPOSE

Few studies have focused on anastomotic recurrence (AR) in colon cancer. This study aimed to clarify the association of resection margin distance with AR and compare the prognosis with nonanastomotic local recurrence (NAR).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included the clinical data of patients who underwent radical colon cancer surgery between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 1958 colon cancer patients were included in the study. 34 of whom (1.7%) had AR and 105 of whom (5.4%) had NAR. Multivariate analysis revealed that the lower distal resection margin distance, advanced N stage, and number of lymph nodes dissected were risk factors for AR. In the proximal resection margin, the risk of AR was lowest at a distance of 6 cm or greater, with a 3-year rate of 1.3%. In the distal resection margin, the 3-year AR risk increased rapidly if the distance was less than 3 cm. The prognosis of patients in the AR group was similar to that of patients in the NAR group, regardless of synchronous distant metastases. Furthermore, the radical surgery rate for AR was significantly higher than that for NAR, but the prognosis of AR was comparable to that of NAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal resection margin distance, advanced N stage, and less number of lymph nodes dissected are associated with AR of colon cancer. The prognosis of patients with AR was similar to that of patients with NAR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Numbers NCT04074538 ( clinicaltrials.gov ), August 26, 2019, registered, retrospectively registered.

A case of lymphatic flow evaluation using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for recurrence of anastomotic site after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic recurrence of colorectal cancer is rare, but reoperation improves prognosis. However, there is no clear evidence regarding the extent of dissection, and there are few reports on the details of surgery. We used intraoperative lymphatic flow imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence as a reference to determine the range of additional resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 75-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and extracorporeal functional terminal anastomosis for ascending colon cancer 4 years ago. Histopathological examination revealed a well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma, T4aN0M0, pathological stageIIB. During follow-up, anemia was observed, and colonoscopy indicated anastomotic recurrence, so additional laparoscopic resection was performed. Intraoperatively, ICG was injected into the anastomotic site, and the operation proceeded under near-infrared light observation. Lymphatic vessels along the middle colonic artery were visualized down to the root of the vessel. Using this as an indicator, the vessel was ligated from the root. Using the fact that the lymphatic vessels were also depicted in the small intestinal mesentery on the oral side of the anastomosis as an indicator, the small intestine and mesentery were resected about 7 cm from the anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal surgical approach for anastomotic recurrence of colorectal cancer has not been defined. Intraoperative ICG fluorescence imaging can provide images of lymphatic flow from the site of recurrence and may be an indicator of lymph node dissection in the case of anastomotic recurrence.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Anastomotic Recurrence After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Comparison With Nonanastomotic Local Recurrences

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic recurrence is thought to be caused by implantation of tumor cells to the anastomotic line; however, its risk factors and prognostic significance remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence in colorectal cancer and assess the prognosis in comparison to nonanastomotic local recurrence.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective observational study.

SETTINGS

The medical records of the study participants were retrospectively collected from the Department of Surgical Oncology at the University of Tokyo Hospital database.

PATIENTS

This study included 1584 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2005 and December 2017. We focused on 15 patients who had an anastomotic recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were the risk factors of anastomotic recurrence at the primary resection and prognosis data in comparison to that of nonanastomotic local recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 15 patients (0.95%) with anastomotic recurrence and 35 (2.21%) with nonanastomotic local recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage are the risk factors for anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that of those with nonanastomotic local recurrence who underwent resection.

LIMITATIONS

The small number of patients with anastomotic recurrence is a major limitation of this study. Additionally, the retrospective study design may have increased the risk of selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node metastasis and advanced T stage were associated with anastomotic recurrence. The prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence was similar to that with resected nonanastomotic local recurrence. Thus, surveillance should be carefully continued while considering the poor prognosis of patients with anastomotic recurrence. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 .

CARACTERSTICAS CLINICOPATOLGICAS DE LA RECURRENCIA ANASTOMTICA DESPUS DE LA RESECCIN CURATIVA DEL CNCER COLORRECTAL COMPARACIN CON LAS RECURRENCIAS LOCALES NO ANASTOMTICAS

ANTECEDENTES:Se cree que la recurrencia anastomótica es causada por la implantación de células tumorales en la línea anastomótica; sin embargo, los factores de riesgo asociados y el significado en cuanto a pronóstico siguen sin estar claros.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo aclarar los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica en el cáncer colorrectal y evaluar el pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.DISEÑO:Un estudio observacional retrospectivo de un solo centro.ESCENARIO:Los registros médicos de los participantes del estudio se recopilaron retrospectivamente de la base de datos del Departamento de Cirugía Oncológica del Hospital de la Universidad de Tokio.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluyó a 1584 pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica entre enero de 2005 y diciembre de 2017. Nos enfocamos en 15 pacientes que tuvieron recurrencia anastomótica.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron los factores de riesgo de recurrencia anastomótica en la resección primaria y los datos de pronóstico en comparación con la recurrencia local no anastomótica.RESULTADOS:Hubo 15 pacientes (0.95%) con recurrencia anastomótica y 35 (2.21%) con recurrencia local no anastomótica. El análisis univariable reveló que la metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado son los factores de riesgo para la recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de aquellos con recidiva local no anastomótica sometidos a resección.LIMITACIONES:El pequeño número de pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica es una limitación importante de este estudio. Además, el diseño retrospectivo del estudio puede haber aumentado el riesgo de sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:La metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos y el estadio T avanzado se asociaron con recurrencia anastomótica. El pronóstico de los pacientes con recidiva anastomótica fue similar al de la recidiva local no anastomótica resecada. Por lo tanto, la vigilancia debe continuarse cuidadosamente considerando el mal pronóstico de los pacientes con recurrencia anastomótica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C92 . (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).

Endoscopic surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and its global incidence is rapidly increasing among adults younger than 50 years, especially in the 20-39 age group. Once a curative resection is achieved, surveillance is mandatory. Colonoscopy has a pivotal role aimed at resecting premalignant neoplasms and detecting cancer at a curable stage. In the current review, an update on the role of surveillance colonoscopy after CRC is provided, considered the most recent international guidelines and evidence published on this issue. In particular, several questions have been answered, why, how and how often colonoscopy should be performed, whether intensive surveillance is more effective than standard surveillance, how endoscopically resected T1 cancer should be followed, the different management existing between colon and rectal cancer, and, finally, how to improve the endoscopic surveillance. In a period of resource constraints, appropriateness will be mandatory, thus understanding how to optimize the role of colonoscopy in the surveillance of patients with a history of CRC is of crucial importance. Improving the quality of colonoscopy and identifying risk factors for recurrent and new-onset CRC, will allow us to individualize the surveillance program while sparing health care cost.

Novel temperature-responsive hydrogel injected to the incision site for postoperative pain relief in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a single-blind, randomized, pivotal clinical trial

BACKGROUND

A temperature-responsive hydrogel (PF-72; TGel Bio, Inc., Ltd, Seoul, Korea), developed as a sustained drug delivery device, can be mixed with ropivacaine to reduce pain in the incision area. The hydrogel is soluble at low temperatures (2-8 °C) and is converted into a gel at high temperatures (> 30 °C). We aimed to evaluate whether the administration of ropivacaine using PF-72 at incision sites reduces pain until 72 h postoperatively in patients undergoing laparoscopic stomach or colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to the control group (0.75% ropivacaine) or PF-72 group (PF-72 mixed with 0.75% ropivacaine). Before surgical incision closure, 0.75% ropivacaine or PF-72 mixed with 0.75% ropivacaine was injected into the subcutaneous fat and muscle of all incisions. Postoperative pain was evaluated by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = most severe pain) for wound pain at 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after the end of surgery.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients (control, n = 51; PF-72, n = 48) were included in the analysis. The areas under the curve of NRS for wound pain until 72 h in the control group and the PF-72 group were 188.7 ± 46.1 and 135.3 ± 49.9 h, respectively (P < 0.001). The frequency of the administration of rescue analgesics in the general ward was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PF-72 mixed with 0.75% ropivacaine reduced postoperative pain until 72 h in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Although the study population was not large enough for safety evaluation, no adverse events associated with PF-72 were observed.

Intraoperative adverse events as a risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer after resection surgery

AIM

Failure to achieve a radical resection as well as intraoperative rectal perforation are important risk factors for local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery, but the importance of other intraoperative adverse events for the prognosis is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of intraoperative adverse events during rectal cancer surgery, and to determine whether these were associated with an increased risk of local recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was undertaken, including all patients in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, who had undergone primary resection surgery for rectal cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2014, registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Data were retrieved from the registry and through review of the medical records.

RESULTS

In total, 1208 patients were included in the study of whom 78 (6%) developed local recurrence during the follow-up period of at least 5 years. Intraoperative adverse events were common and occurred in 62/78 (79%) of patients with local recurrence compared to 604/1130 (53%) of patients without local recurrence. In multivariate analysis intraoperative adverse events were found to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer, as were nonradical resection, a high pathological T stage, the presence of lymph node metastases, type of surgery and refraining from rectal washout during anterior resection and Hartmann's procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative adverse events were found to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence of rectal cancer and could possibly be used together with other known risk factors to select patients for intensified postoperative surveillance.

Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for metachronous early cancer or precancerous lesions emerging at the anastomotic site after curative surgical resection of colorectal cancer

Background

The incidence of metachronous early cancer or precancerous lesions (MECPL) emerging at the anastomotic site (AS) after curative surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is so low that few study have been conducted to explore the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of these lesions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult for these lesions because of the presence of severe fibrosis and AS. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of ESD for MECPL emerging at the AS after curative surgical resection of CRC.

Methods

The data used in the analysis were retrospectively collected from CICAMS in Beijing China between January 2013 and May 2019 and from all the patients who underwent ESD for MECPL emerging at the AS after curative surgical resection of CRC. The rates of en bloc resection (ER), complete resection (CR), curative resection (CuR) and incidence of complications were analyzed by SPSS software.

Results

A total of 11 patients were included. The rates of ER, CR and CuR were 63.6%, 54.5% and 54.5%, respectively. No additional surgery was performed, and no recurrences were found. Bleeding occurred in only one case and there was no perforation after the operation.

Conclusions

Overall, ESD is safe and effective in the treatment of MECPL emerging at the AS after curative surgical resection of CRC. Especially for patients with anastomotic recurrence close to anal margin, this method can avoid the risks of reoperation and improve the rate of anal preservation.

Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer: the Optimal Interval for Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Patients who have undergone curative surgery for colorectal cancer are at risk of developing a metachronous colorectal tumour or anastomotic recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of recurrent colorectal cancer in a cohort of patients who participated in a colonoscopy surveillance programme.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study included patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2015. All reports of postoperative colonoscopies were retrieved to calculate the incidence rates of recurrence and metachronous colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Of 2420 patients, 1644 (67.9%) underwent at least one postoperative colonoscopy and 776 (32.1%) did not. In 1087 patients, colonoscopy was performed in the first 18 months after surgery, which detected 34 (3.1%) instances of metachronous colorectal tumours or anastomotic recurrence. Thirty-three additional patients were also diagnosed with recurrent colorectal cancer, but the tumours were detected by other diagnostic modalities or detected perioperatively, rather than by colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of colorectal cancer have an increased risk for a second colorectal tumour. Therefore, we recommend a colonoscopic surveillance programme with the first colonoscopy performed 1 year after curative surgery, which is in accordance with national guidelines.