Early Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Liver Transplantation: What is the Impact of the Arterial Reconstruction Type?

Transplant Hepatic Artery Complications

Hepatic artery complications can be divided into 2 different categories, nonocclusive and steno-occlusive disease. Steno-occlusive disease is a collective term that encompasses hepatic artery thrombosis, hepatic artery stenosis, and hepatic arterial kinks, while nonocclusive arterial disease encompasses less than 5% of complications and is a collective term used to describe arteriovenous fistulae, pseudoaneurysms, arterial rupture and nonocclusive hepatic artery hypoperfusion syndrome. This article details the angiographic techniques and definitions needed to accurately diagnose arterial transplant complications and describes the technical aspects and results of endoluminal management of these arterial complications. In addition, this article discusses the presentation, etiology and indications for treatment, including surgical management of these various complications.

A Single-Center's Early Surgical Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an increasingly common surgical option because the number of cadaveric donors is insufficient to fulfill the organ needs of patients facing end-stage cirrhosis. Many centers are investigating different surgical techniques to achieve lower complication rates. We aimed to examine our complication rates in light of demographic data, graft data, and perioperative findings as a single-center experience.

METHODS

The study included one hundred and three patients who underwent LDLT for end-stage liver cirrhosis. Demographic data; sex; age; blood group; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score; Child score; etiology; liver side; graft-to-recipient weight ratio; hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile anastomosis type rates; anhepatic phase; cold ischemia time; operation time; and blood product transfusion rates were analyzed. Biliary complications in patients with single or multiple biliary anastomoses, right or left liver transplants, and with or without hepatic artery thrombosis were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in biliary complications between patients who underwent single or multiple bile anastomosis (P = .231) or patients receiving right lobe and left lobe transplants (P = .315). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of portal vein thrombosis between the regular and reconstructed portal vein anastomosis groups (P = .693), the postoperative portal vein thrombosis rate was statistically higher in patients with left lobe transplants (P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular and biliary complication rates can be reduced with increasing experience.

Technique of Hepatic Artery Anastomosis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Review of Its Results in Over 1200 Adult and Pediatric Transplants

BACKGROUND

Failure to achieve a good arterial inflow to the graft in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has disastrous consequences to the graft and patient survival. Standard microvascular techniques of hepatic artery (HA) anastomosis used in deceased donor liver transplantation are not applicable in LDLT. We present the results of our unique Backwall-first technique of HA anastomosis in both adult and pediatric LDLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent LDLT from January 2010 to December 2020 was performed from our prospective database. Data with regard to early postoperative (90-day) hepatic arterial complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1276 LDLTs (876 adults, 400 children) were performed during the study period. In the 90-day postoperative period, HA anastomotic complications [thrombosis in 11 (0.9%); pseudoaneurysm in 3 (0.2%)] were observed in 14 recipients (1.1%) including 8 adults (0.9%) and 6 children (1.5%). Eight of these 14 recipients (0.6%) including 4 adults (0.5%) and 4 children (1%) had standard HA reconstruction. The remaining six (0.5%) including 4 adults and 2 children had complex arterial reconstruction with interposition graft and/or alternative arterial inflow.

CONCLUSION

The Backwall-first technique of HA reconstruction described in this study achieved a very low HA complication rate in LDLT.

Long-Term Suitability of Left Gastric Artery Inflow for Arterial Perfusion of Living Donor Right Lobe Grafts

Poorer than expected, living donor liver transplant outcomes are observed after recipient graft artery thrombosis. At grafting, the risk for later thrombosis is high if a dissected hepatic artery is used for standard reconstruction. Surgeon diagnosis of dissection requires nonstandard management with alternative technique in addition to microvascular expertise. Intimal flap repair with standard reconstruction is contingent on basis of a redo anastomosis. It is a suboptimal choice for living donor transplantation. Achieving goal graft arterial perfusion at first revascularization is crucial for superior outcomes. Managing dissection at grafting with nonstandard left gastric artery reconstruction is unreported. Our experience is limited, but this is our preferred alternative technique to standard hepatic artery reconstruction complicated by dissection. Here, we describe our two-case experience with left gastric arterialized grafts for management of dissection. Our living donor graft recipients with alternatively arterialized grafts are now 6- and 2-years posttransplant.

Graft aberrant hepatic arteries in deceased donor liver transplantation: The "one liver, one artery" approach

In liver transplantation (LT), graft aberrant hepatic arteries (aHAs) frequently require complex arterial reconstructions, potentially increasing the risk of post-operative complications. However, intrahepatic hilar arterial shunts are physiologically present and may allow selective aHA ligation. Thus, we performed a retrospective study from a single-center cohort of 618 deceased donor LTs where a selective reconstruction policy of aHAs was prospectively applied. In the presence of any aHA, the vessel with the largest caliber was first reconstructed. In case of adequate bilobar arterial perfusion assessed on intraparenchymal Doppler ultrasound, the remnant vessel was ligated; otherwise, it was reconstructed. Consequently, outcomes of three patient groups were compared: the "no aHAs" group (n = 499), the "reconstructed aHA" group (n = 25), and the "ligated aHA" group (n = 94). Primary endpoint was rate of biliary complications. Only 38.4% of right aHAs and 3.1% of left aHAs were reconstructed. Rates of biliary complications in the no aHA, reconstructed aHA, and ligated aHA groups were 23.4%, 28%, and 20.2% (p = 0.667), respectively. The prevalence rates of primary non-function (p = 0.534), early allograft dysfunction (p = 0.832), and arterial complications (p = 0.271), as well as patient survival (p = 0.266) were comparable among the three groups. Retransplantation rates were 3.8%, 4%, and 5.3% (p = 0.685), respectively. In conclusion, a selective reconstruction policy of aHAs based on Doppler assessment of bilobar intraparenchymal arterial flow did not increase post-operative morbidity and avoided unnecessary and complex arterial reconstructions.

Comparison of alternative arterial anastomosis site during liver transplantation when the recipient's hepatic artery is unusable

BACKGROUND

Few studies have analyzed outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) when the recipient hepatic artery (HA) was not usable.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of LT performed using the different alternative sites to HA.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2017, 1,677 LT were performed in our institution among which 141 (8.4%) with unusable recipient HA were analyzed. Four groups were defined according to the site of anastomosis: the splenic artery (SA group, n=26), coeliac trunk (CT group, n=12), aorta using or not the donor's vessel (Ao group, n=91) and aorta using a vascular prosthesis (Ao-P group, n=12) as conduit. The median number of intraoperative red blood cell transfusions was significantly increased in the Ao and Ao-P groups (5, 5, 8.5 and 16 for SA, CT, Ao and Ao-P group respectively, P=0.002), as well as fresh frozen plasma (4.5, 2.5, 10, 17 for the SA, CT, Ao and Ao-P groups respectively, P=0.001). Hospitalization duration was also significantly increased in the Ao and Ao-P groups (15, 16, 24, 26.5 days for the SA, CT, Ao and Ao-P groups respectively, P<0.001). The occurrence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (P=0.07) or arterial complications (P=0.26) was not statistically different. Level of factor V, INR, bilirubin and creatinine during the 7th postoperative days (POD) was significantly improved in the SA group. No difference was observed regarding graft (P=0.18) and patient (P=0.16) survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of unusable HA, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes are improved when using the SA or CT compared to aorta.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up in liver transplantation

The field of liver transplantation directly or indirectly embodies all liver diseases, in addition to specific ones related to organ rejection (cellular and humoral). The recommended non-invasive methods for determining the indication for liver transplantation are the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and the alpha-foetoprotein score in case of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiological methods are the cornerstones for the diagnosis of vascular and biliary complications after liver transplantation. The possible diseases of the liver graft after transplantation are multiple and often intertwined. Non-invasive diagnostic methods have been poorly evaluated in this context, apart from the recurrence of hepatitis C. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for evaluating graft lesions in the majority of cases, especially graft rejection.

Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Orthotopic Liver Transplant: Experience in the Last 10 Years

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is the second cause of graft failure, after primary disfunction. It has a significant morbidity, with a retransplant and mortality rate in early hepatic artery thrombosis of 50%. The incidence of this event goes from 2% to 9% in the adult population.

METHODS

The objective is to assess the incidence of HAT in a third-level hospital. The study design is an observational retrospective study, collecting data of the transplant recipient from 2010 to 2020.

RESULTS

Incidence of HAT was 5.33% (39/732). A statistical difference was found with the blood intraoperative administration (P = .002) and with the presence of anatomic abnormalities in the hepatic artery between the HAT and the non-HAT group. We did not find any statistical difference with portal thrombosis (P = .73) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HAT is a fatal complication after an orthotopic liver transplant, which can lead to graft loss and even recipient death. For these reasons, we should early identify risk factors associated with this event early and try to minimize them to avoid the devastating consequences.

How to Handle Arterial Conduits in Liver Transplantation? Evidence From the First Multicenter Risk Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the present study were to identify independent risk factors for conduit occlusion, compare outcomes of different AC placement sites, and investigate whether postoperative platelet antiaggregation is protective.

BACKGROUND

Arterial conduits (AC) in liver transplantation (LT) offer an effective rescue option when regular arterial graft revascularization is not feasible. However, the role of the conduit placement site and postoperative antiaggregation is insufficiently answered in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an international, multicenter cohort study of adult deceased donor LT requiring AC. The study included 14 LT centers and covered the period from January 2007 to December 2016. Primary endpoint was arterial occlusion/patency. Secondary endpoints included intra- and perioperative outcomes and graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

The cohort was composed of 565 LT. Infrarenal aortic placement was performed in 77% of ACs whereas supraceliac placement in 20%. Early occlusion (≤30 days) occurred in 8% of cases. Primary patency was equivalent for supraceliac, infrarenal, and iliac conduits. Multivariate analysis identified donor age >40 years, coronary artery bypass, and no aspirin after LT as independent risk factors for early occlusion. Postoperative antiaggregation regimen differed among centers and was given in 49% of cases. Graft survival was significantly superior for patients receiving aggregation inhibitors after LT.

CONCLUSION

When AC is required for rescue graft revascularization, the conduit placement site seems to be negligible and should follow the surgeon's preference. In this high-risk group, the study supports the concept of postoperative antiaggregation in LT requiring AC.

Risk Factors Affecting Outcomes in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Real-World Single-Center Experience

Background

Despite liver transplantation (LT) being the standard treatment for pediatric end-stage liver disease, complications often persist and can adversely affect the post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to identify the risk factors affecting the outcomes in pediatric LT patients.

Material/Methods

Data from pediatric patients who underwent primary LT from March 1988 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Chronic liver disease was defined as an explanted liver showing fibrosis regardless of grade, cirrhosis, or any other underlying disease that may cause progressive liver injury leading to fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Results

A total of 255 pediatric patients underwent LT during the study period. Their 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 90.5%, 88.4%, and 87.8%, respectively. According to multivariate analysis, while liver disease without underlying chronic liver disease (P=0.024) and a pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score ≥30 (P=0.036) were the only factors associated with worse survival, body weight <6 kg (P=0.050), whole-liver DDLT compared to LDLT (P=0.001), fulminant liver failure (P=0.008), and postoperative hepatic artery complications (P<0.001) were associated with worse graft survival. Liver disease without underlying chronic liver disease was the only factor independently associated with hepatic artery complications (P=0.003).

Conclusions

Greater caution is recommended in pediatric patients with liver disease unaccompanied by underlying chronic liver disease, high PELD score, or low body weight to improve survival after LT. Hepatic artery complication was the only surgical complication affecting the graft survival outcome, especially in patients having liver disease without underlying chronic liver disease.

Practical model to identify liver transplant recipients at low risk of postoperative haemorrhage, bile leakage and ascites

Background

This study aimed to identify a subgroup of recipients at low risk of haemorrhage, bile leakage and ascites following liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

Factors associated with significant postoperative ascites (more than 10 ml/kg on postoperative day 5), bile leakage and haemorrhage after LT were identified using three separate multivariable analyses in patients who had LT in 2010–2019. A model predicting the absence of all three outcomes was created and validated internally using bootstrap procedure.

Results

Overall, 944 recipients underwent LT. Rates of ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage were 34.9, 7.7 and 6.0 per cent respectively. The 90-day mortality rate was 7.0 per cent. Partial liver graft (relative risk (RR) 1.31; P = 0.021), intraoperative ascites (more than 10 ml/kg suctioned after laparotomy) (RR 2.05; P = 0.001), malnutrition (RR 1.27; P = 0.006), portal vein thrombosis (RR 1.56; P = 0.024) and intraoperative blood loss greater than 1000 ml (RR 1.39; P = 0.003) were independently associated with postoperative ascites and/or bile leak and/or haemorrhage, and were introduced in the model. The model was well calibrated and predicted the absence of all three outcomes with an area under the curve of 0.76 (P = 0.001). Of the 944 patients, 218 (23.1 per cent) fulfilled the five criteria of the model, and 9.6 per cent experienced postoperative ascites (RR 0.22; P = 0.001), 1.8 per cent haemorrhage (RR 0.21; P = 0.033), 4.1 per cent bile leak (RR 0.54; P = 0.048), 40.4 per cent severe complications (RR 0.70; P = 0.001) and 1.4 per cent 90-day mortality (RR 0.13; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

A practical model has been provided to identify patients at low risk of ascites, bile leakage and haemorrhage after LT; these patients could potentially qualify for inclusion in non-abdominal drainage protocols.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to evaluate risk factors for short-term and long-term outcomes after liver transplantation: A pilot prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) can identify liver donation after brain death (DBD) and cardiac death (DCD) with the risk of developing short-term primary graft dysfunction (PGD) or arterial and biliary complications within 1 year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive DBD and DCD donors who underwent DUS/CEUS examinations before surgical procurement from February 2016 to June 2018 at our institution were included. The US and CEUS images of each donor liver were analysed, and the parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean time for US examination was 32 min (range, 20-59 min), and all donors tolerated the examination well. In terms of short-term outcomes, among the 52 eligible donor livers, 20 (38.5 %) of their recipients developed PGD. The multivariable analysis showed that decreased enhancement of donor livers on CEUS (OR = 15.976, 95 % CI: 1.652-154.628, P = 0.017) and high recipient model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (OR = 1.050, 95 % CI: 1.004-1.099, P = 0.034) before liver transplantation (LT) were independent factors of PGD. In contrast, for long-term complications, among the 48 eligible donor livers, 16 (33.3 %) developed arterial or biliary complications within 1 year. The multivariable analysis did not show any independent factors of arterial or biliary complications within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in enhancement on CEUS is an independent risk factor for poor short-term outcomes of LT. CEUS may be promising for predicting post-LT outcomes of critically ill donors effectively and safely by evaluating the haemodynamic changes in DBD and DCD donor livers.

Safety and efficacy of an integrated endovascular treatment strategy for early hepatic artery occlusion after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery occlusion (HAO) after liver transplantation (LT) is typically comprised of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and stenosis (HAS), both of which are severe complications that coexist and interdependent. This study aimed to evaluate an integrated endovascular treatment (EVT) strategy for the resolution of early HAO and identify the risk factors associated with early HAO as well as the procedural challenge encountered in the treatment strategy.

METHODS

Consecutive orthotopic LT recipients (n = 366) who underwent transplantation between June 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively investigated. EVT was performed using an integrated strategy that involved thrombolytic therapy, shunt artery embolization plus vasodilator therapy, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and/or stent placement. Simple EVT was defined as the clinical resolution of HAO by one round of EVT with thrombolytic therapy and/or shunt artery embolization plus vasodilator therapy. Otherwise, it was defined as complex EVT.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (median age 52 years) underwent EVT for early HAO that occurred within 30 days post-LT. The median interval from LT to EVT was 7 (6-16) days. Revascularization time (OR = 1.027; 95% CI: 1.005-1.050; P = 0.018) and the need for conduit (OR = 3.558; 95% CI: 1.241-10.203, P = 0.018) were independent predictors for early HAO. HAT was diagnosed in eight patients, and four out of those presented with concomitant HAS. We achieved 100% technical success and recanalization by performing simple EVT in 19 patients (3 HAT+/HAS- and 16 HAT-/HAS+) and by performing complex EVT in seven patients (1 HAT+/HAS-, 4 HAT+/HAS+, and 2 HAT-/HAS+), without major complications. The primary assisted patency rates at 1, 6, and 12 months were all 100%. The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 6, and 12 months were 88.5%, 88.5%, and 80.8%, respectively. Autologous transfusion < 600 mL (94.74% vs. 42.86%, P = 0.010) and interrupted suture for hepatic artery anastomosis (78.95% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.005) were more prevalent in simple EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrated EVT strategy was a feasible approach providing effective resolution with excellent safety for early HAO after LT. Appropriate autologous transfusion and interrupted suture technique helped simplify EVT.

The learning curve for piggyback liver transplantation: identifying factors challenging surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to quantify the learning curve of piggyback liver transplantation and to identify factors that impact the operative time and blood transfusion during the learning curve.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on consecutive cases of patients' first piggyback liver transplantations that were performed by a single surgeon. The learning curve for the operative time was evaluated using the cumulative sum method.

RESULTS

There were 181, consecutive, first-time piggyback liver transplantations. The median operative time was 345 minutes (range: 180-745 minutes) with a median transfusion rate of 4 packed red blood cell units (range: 0-23 units). The cumulative sum learning curve identified 3 phases: an initial phase (1-70 piggyback liver transplantations), a plateau phase (71-101 piggyback liver transplantations), and a stable phase (102-181 piggyback liver transplantations). Over the 3 phases, there were significant decreases in the median duration of the surgery (388.8 vs 344.8 vs 326.9 minutes; P = .004, P = .0004, P ≤ .0001) and the number of red blood cell units transfused (6.00 vs 3.90 vs 3.71; P = .02, P = .79, P = .0006). Multivariable analysis identified that the following factors impacted the operative time: surgeon experience (P = .00006), previous upper abdominal surgery (P = .01), portocaval shunt fashioning (P = .0003), early portal section (P = .00001), multiple arterial graft reconstruction (P = .03), and the length of the retrohepatic inferior vena covered by segment 1 (P = .0006). Independent risk factors for increased blood loss were surgeon experience (P = .0001), previous upper abdominal surgery (P = .002), the retrohepatic inferior vena cava encirclement by segment 1 (P = .0001), severe portal hypertension (P = .01), early portal section (P = .001), and low prothrombin time (P = .00001).

CONCLUSION

Easily identifiable factors related to recipients (segment 1 morphology, previous upper abdominal surgery, severe portal hypertension) and to surgeon (operative experience, portocaval shunt fashioning, early portal section, and multiple arterial reconstructions) impact operative time and blood loss during the learning curve of piggyback liver transplantation. These factors can be used for grading the difficulties of liver transplantation to tailor the surgical strategy.

Reconstruction of the hepatic artery using the superior mesenteric artery for liver transplantation

Background

To investigate the application of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) for the in vitro reconstruction of the hepatic artery for liver transplantation, and to improve the success rate and safety of donor liver transplantation.

Methods

The donor liver and the pancreas were obtained, and the SMA and its branches were used to reconstruct the hepatic artery. Liver transplantation was performed after reconstruction to understand the intraoperative situation after donor liver opening, as well as postoperative liver function. Color Doppler ultrasound of the transplanted liver was also performed.

Results

During the period from September 2016 to March 2020, a total of 98 pancreases were obtained. The common hepatic artery and gastroduodenal artery loop (CHA-GDA) were preserved to the donor pancreas, and only the proper hepatic artery (PHA) or left/right hepatic artery (LHA/RHA) were preserved to the donor liver. If the PHA of the donor liver was short or absent, the SMA was used for lengthening the PHA or in vitro reconstruction of the LHA/RHA, followed by implantation of the donor liver after reconstruction. A total of 17 cases of this type of donor liver required mesenteric artery lengthening or reconstruction. After opening, the donor liver was well-filled, bile secretion was normal, and liver function recovered as scheduled after surgery. Color Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography (CTA) of the transplanted liver revealed that hepatic arteries were normal without complications such as hepatic artery embolism.

Conclusions

In vitro reconstruction of the hepatic artery with the SMA is an effective new method of vascular reconstruction, which ensures the blood flow of the hepatic artery, reduces the anastomosis difficulty of the arteries of the donor liver, and reduces the occurrence of vascular complications.

Usefulness of microsurgical back-table angioplasty for multiple hepatic arteries in living donor liver transplantation

The graft hepatic artery orifice is tiny in living donor liver transplantation, and therefore, it is more difficult to reconstruct the hepatic artery than in deceased donor liver transplantation. In situ, multi-vessel hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation is time-consuming, and reconstructions are often complicated if the hepatic graft has several stumps. We describe two living donor liver transplants using back-table microsurgical angioplasty to combine two hepatic artery stumps to create a single orifice, and sequential single-vessel hepatic artery reconstruction in the recipient. Briefly, we used double-needle interrupted sutures for the two hepatic artery stumps with a biangular stay-suture method in back-table microsurgical angioplasty. Each suture was placed from the inner side of the arterial wall to the outer side, which allowed for safe and reliable suturing. After placing the interrupted sutures in the anterior wall, we turned over the vessels in the cold storage on the back table and placed interrupted sutures in the posterior wall. In the recipient, the single stump of the graft was anastomosed to the recipient's hepatic artery using an interrupted pattern and a surgical microscope. The postoperative courses of the donors and recipients were uneventful. Back-table hepatic artery angioplasty is a feasible option to overcome the complexities of multi-vessel arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. We recommend performing secure multi-vessel hepatic arterial reconstruction adapted to the clinical scenario. Using simple appropriate anastomosis, back-table microsurgical angiography may provide good results in living donor liver transplantation.

Impact of Microsurgical Anastomosis of Hepatic Artery on Arterial Complications and Survival Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

Hepatic artery (HA) complications after liver transplant (LT) can lead to biliary complications, graft failure, and mortality. Although microsurgery has been established to improve anastomotic outcomes, it prolongs surgical time and has not reached widespread adoption at all transplant centers. We investigated the incidences of arterial, biliary complications and outcomes after using microsurgery to anastomose HA during LT. Retrospective cohort of consecutive LT performed from 2006 to 2018 was reviewed for operative details and postoperative outcomes. Cox-regression models were used to investigate the relationship between variables and outcomes. Eighty (62.5%) LTs (Group 1) were performed without and compared with 48 (Group 2) with microsurgical anastomosis of HA. Both groups were comparable in terms of arterial and biliary anastomoses performed. Incidence of early HA thrombosis was similar (6.2% vs 2.1%, P = .28). Group 2 had lower incidence of short- and long-term arterial complications, especially amongst living donor liver transplantations (LDLT) (5.3% vs 35.0%, P = .022). On multivariate analysis, microsurgery was associated with lower risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.71) of, and LDLT had higher risk (HR 4.23, 95% CI 1.46-12.27) of arterial complications. Biliary complications were associated with LDLT (HR 3.91, 95% CI 1.30-11.71) and dual biliary anastomoses (HR 5.26, 95% CI 1.15-24.08) but not with occurrence of HA complications. Worse patient survival was associated with the occurrence of any HA complication (HR 4.11, 95% CI 1.78-9.48). Hepatic arterial complications can be reduced using microsurgical techniques for the anastomosis, resulting in improved patient survival outcomes after liver transplantation.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in pediatric liver transplantation: Experience from a single group

BACKGROUND

The reconstruction of hepatic artery is a challenging part of the pediatric liver transplantation procedure. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and stenosis are complications which may result in ischemic biliary injury, causing early graft lost and even death.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-nine patients underwent liver transplantation in 2017 in a single liver transplantation group. Among them, 225 patients were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and 34 deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).

RESULTS

In LDLT all reconstructions of hepatic artery were microsurgical, while in DDLT either microsurgical reconstruction or traditional continuous suture technique was done depending on different conditions. There were five (1.9%) HATs: four (4/34, 11.8%) in DDLT (all whole liver grafts) and one (1/225, 0.4%) in LDLT (P = 0.001). Four HATs were managed conservatively using anticoagulation, and 1 accepted salvage surgery with re-anastomosis. Until now, 3 HAT patients remain in good condition, whereas two developed biliary complications. One of them needed to be re-transplanted, and the other patient died due to biliary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical technique significantly improves the reconstruction of hepatic artery in pediatric liver transplantation. The risk for arterial complications is higher in DDLT. Conservative therapy can achieve good outcome in selected HAT cases.

The devil is in the detail: current management of perioperative surgical complications after liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in the field, perioperative morbidity is common after liver transplantation. This review examines the current literature to provide up-to-date management of common surgical complications associated with liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research focuses on problems with anastomoses of the vena cava, portal vein, hepatic artery, and bile ducts. Interventional endoscopic and radiological techniques are used more frequently to avoid reoperation.

SUMMARY

Advances in the management of perioperative surgical complications have focused on minimally invasive measures that successfully treat technical problems with implantation of liver allografts from both living and deceased donors.

Impact of Hepatic Artery Variations and Reconstructions on the Outcome of Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor variational arteries often require complex reconstruction.

METHODS

We analysed the incidence of different variations, types of arterial reconstructions and their impact on post-operative results from 409 patients undergoing liver transplantation at Karolinska Institute between 2007 and 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 292 (71.4%) liver grafts had a standard hepatic artery (SHA), and 117 (28.6%) showed hepatic artery variants (HAV). 58% of HAV needed reconstruction. The main variations were variant left hepatic artery (45.3%) from the gastric artery; variant right hepatic artery (38.5%); and a triple combination of variant right and left hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery from the common hepatic artery (12.8%); other 3.4%. Patients/graft survival and arterial complications were not different between SHA and HAV. Incidence of biliary stricture was numerically higher in left hepatic artery variants (p = 0.058) and in variants where no arterial reconstruction was performed (p = 0.001). Operation and arterial warm ischaemia time were longer in the HAV group. The need for intraoperative re-reconstruction was higher in the HAV group (p = 0.04). Intraoperative bleeding was larger after back-table reconstruction than with intraoperative reconstruction (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

No overall differences were found between the HAV and the SHA groups. Occurrence of a variant left hepatic artery and HAV with no reconstruction seems to increase the risk of biliary strictures.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic treatment

End-stage liver disease is characterized by multiple and complex alterations of hemostasis that are associated with an increased risk of both bleeding and thrombosis. Liver transplantation further challenges the feeble hemostatic balance of patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and the management of antithrombotic treatment during and after transplant surgery, which is particularly difficult. Bleeding was traditionally considered the major concern during and early after surgery, but it is increasingly recognized that transplant recipients may also develop thrombotic complications. Pathophysiology of hemostatic complications during and after transplantation is multifactorial and includes pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factors. Risk stratification is important, as it helps the identification of high-risk recipients in whom antithrombotic prophylaxis should be considered. In recipients who develop thrombosis during or after surgery, prompt treatment is indicated to prevent graft failure, retransplantation, and death.

Impact of ABO-incompatibility on hepatic artery thrombosis in living donor liver transplantation

Background

The current era of rituximab-based regimens brought improved survival in ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Nevertheless, the actual risk for hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) still remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ABO-incompatibility on HAT in adult LDLT patients.

Methods

Patients who received ABO-I LDLT were compared to those who received ABO-compatible (ABO-C) LDLT with a special focus on HAT.

Results

A total of 378 patients underwent LDLT from January 2012 to February 2018. Of those, ABO-I LDLT was performed in 78 consecutive patients. The other 300 patients with ABO-C LDLT constituted the comparator group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in baseline and perioperative characteristics. HAT occurred in 11 (2.9%) patients, 2 and 9 patients in ABO-I and ABO-C LDLT groups, respectively, which didn't show any significant difference between the two groups (P=0.84). All were categorized into early HAT. Immediate revascularization by intraarterial thrombolysis was successfully employed in 8 patients. Surgical revision of anastomosis and retransplantation were performed in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. No one-year mortality was related to HAT in the two groups. The overall outcomes including biliary complications made no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions

ABO-incompatibility has no adverse impact on the incidence and treatment outcome of HAT in the current rituximab-based desensitization.

Liver Transplantation

The field of liver transplantation has changed since the MELD scoring system became the most widely used donor allocation tool. Due to the MELD-based allocation system, sicker patients with higher MELD scores are being transplanted. Persistent organ donor shortages remain a challenging issue, and as a result, the wait-list mortality is a persistent problem for most of the regions. This chapter focuses on deceased donor and live donor liver transplantation in patients with complications of portal hypertension. Special attention will also be placed on donor-recipient matching, perioperative management of transplant patients, and the impact of hepatic hemodynamics on transplantation.

Severe atherosclerosis of donor hepatic arteries is a salvageable condition in liver transplantation to optimise the graft utilisation: A case series and review of the literature

•

We showed how to manage sever atherosclerosis in liver transplant with special technique.

•

This case report will help not to discard donated liver graft.

•

Management of sever artherosclerosis, liver transplantation.

Introduction

The presence of atherosclerosis of the common hepatic artery (CHA) in donor livers potentially contributes to vascular complications after liver transplantation, thereby most of those organs are traditionally discarded. Herein, we describe the successful outcome of three patients transplanted with grafts that had severe atherosclerosis of the donor CHA up to the level of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA).

Presentation of case

In all three cases, endarterectomies were performed by dissection between the atheromatous core and the artery intima using a dissecting spatula, allowing to secure the lumen of the vessel. The native CHA/GDA patch was aligned with the corresponding CHA/GDA patch from the graft for the arterial reconstruction. No vascular complications were seen post-operatively.

Discussion

Endarterectomy and anatomical reconstitution of the arterial tree, without any redundancy or kinking, allowed for the successful transplantation of organs that would be otherwise discarded. Further, the straight alignment of the arteries may enhance flow dynamics, preventing thrombosis.

Conclusion

This report might guide future studies targeting means to increase the utility of donor livers discarded due to arterial atherosclerosis.

Median Arcuate Ligament Compression in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Results from a Single-Center Analysis and a European Survey Study

Median arcuate ligament compression (MALC) potentially causes arterial complications in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Here we aimed to investigate the incidence of MALC and its impact on clinical outcome after OLT. In addition, we performed an international survey among 52 European liver transplant centers to explore local protocols on the management of these patients. Data of 286 consecutive OLT recipients from a prospective database were analyzed retrospectively (05/2010-07/2017). Preoperative computed-tomography images were evaluated. Celiac axis stenosis due to MALC was found in 34 patients (12%). Intrinsic stenosis was present in 16 (6%) patients. Twenty-six patients (77%) with MALC underwent standard arterial revascularization with median arcuate ligament (MAL)-division. Patients treated for MALC had comparable baseline data and no difference was found in early- and long-term outcome compared to the rest of our cohort. Our survey found heterogeneous strategies regarding diagnosis and treatment of MALC. Only 29% of the centers reported the division of MAL in these patients as routine procedure. Even though there is no consensus on diagnosis and management of MALC among European centers, a surgical division of MAL is feasible and safe and should be considered in OLT recipients with MALC.

Hepatic Artery Anatomic Variations and Reconstruction in Liver Grafts Procured in Greece: The Effect on Hepatic Artery Thrombosis

AIMS

Variations of the anatomy of donor hepatic arteries increase the number of arterial anastomoses during liver transplantation and, possibly, the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). In this study, we describe the arterial anatomic variations in liver grafts procured and transplanted by a single center in Greece, the techniques of arterial anastomosis, and their effect on the incidence of early HAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2017, the arterial anatomy of 116 grafts procured for liver transplantation were recorded, as well as the technique of arterial anastomosis and the incidence of early hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT <30 days).

RESULTS

A single hepatic artery was recorded in 72.41% of the procured grafts, an aberrant left hepatic artery (accessory or replaced) in 18 grafts (15.52%), and an aberrant right hepatic artery (accessory or replaced) in 17 grafts (14.66%), while other variations were observed in less than 1% of the procured livers. Of the 116 primary liver transplantations, 6 patients (5.17%) developed early HAT <30 days. Two of these patients (1.72%) had 1 anastomosis of the hepatic artery and 4 (3.45%) had 2 anastomoses due to anatomic variations.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic variations of the hepatic artery in liver grafts is a common finding and increase the incidence of early HAT but not to a degree to make these grafts unusable.

Aggressive prevention and preemptive management of vascular complications after pediatric liver transplantation: A major impact on graft survival and long-term outcome

Vascular complications are a major cause of patient and graft loss after LTs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multimodal perioperative strategy aimed at reducing the incidence of vascular complications. A total of 126 first isolated LTs-performed between November 2008 and December 2015-were retrospectively analyzed. A minimum follow-up period of 24 months was analyzable for 124/126 patients (98.4%). The aggressive preemptive strategy consisted of identifying and immediately managing any problem and any abnormality in the vascular flow, in any of the hepatic vessels, and at any time after the liver graft revascularization. As a result, with a median follow-up of 57 months (3-112 months), not a single graft has been lost from vascular or biliary problems. The actuarial 8-year graft survival is 96.5%. These results have shown that a combination of technical attention, medical prevention, an early diagnosis, and rapid interventions reduced the negative impact of vascular problems on the outcome of both grafts and patients.

Hepatic artery occlusion in liver transplantation: What counts more, the type of reconstruction or the severity of the recipient's disease?

Although the type of hepatic artery revascularization technique is known to have an impact on patency rates, independent perioperative risk factors on patient outcomes are poorly defined. All consecutive adult patients undergoing cadaveric liver transplantation (n = 361) from July 2007 to June 2016 in a single institution were analyzed. Primary outcomes were early (<30 days) hepatic artery occlusion and primary hepatic artery patency rate. A multivariate model was used to identify independent risk factors for occlusion and the need of arterial conduit, as well as their impact on graft and patient survival. Arterial revascularization without additional reconstruction (end-to-end arterial anastomosis [AA]) was performed in 77% (n = 279), arterial reconstruction (AR) in 15% (n = 53), and aortohepatic conduit (AHC) in 8% (n = 29) of patients. AHC had the highest mean intraoperative flow (275 mL/minute; P = 0.02) compared with AA (250 mL/minute) and AR (200 mL/minute; P = 0.02). There were 43 recipients (12%) who had an occlusive event with successful revascularization in 20 (47%) recipients. One-year primary patency rates of AA, AR, and AHC were 97%, 88%, and 74%, respectively. Aortic calcification had an impact on early occlusion. AR (odds ratio [OR], 3.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-10.75; P = 0.02) and AHC (OR, 6.21; 95% CI, 2.02-18.87; P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for early occlusion. Dyslipidemia additionally independently contributed to early occlusion (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 0.96-7.87; P = 0.06). The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 83% and 70% for AA, 75% and 69% for AR, and 59% and 50% for AHC (P = 0.004), respectively. In conclusion, arterial patency is primarily determined by the type of vascular reconstruction rather than patient or disease characteristics. The preoperative lipid status is an independent risk factor for early occlusion, whereas overall occlusion is only based on the performed vascular reconstruction, which is also associated with reduced graft and patient survival. Liver Transplantation 24 790-802 2018 AASLD.

Placement of an Aortohepatic Conduit as an Alternative to Standard Arterial Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of placement of an aortohepatic conduit on graft and patient survival after liver transplantation (LT) in selected patients with an inadequate recipient hepatic artery (HA) for a standard arterial anastomosis.

Material/Methods

Of 331 patients who underwent deceased donor LT, 25 (7.6%) who received placement of an aortohepatic conduit at the time of transplantation were included. Clinical characteristics and outcomes, including postoperative complications, conduit patency, and graft and patient survival rates, were analyzed.

Results

All 25 patients included in this study presented a high preoperative Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (25.4±8.6; range, 6–42) and high rates of retransplantation (n=11, 44%) or previous abdominal – pelvic surgery (n=5, 20%). The observed postoperative vascular complications were portal vein thrombosis in 3 cases (12%) and anastomosis-site bleeding of the aortohepatic conduit in 1 case (4%); there was no HA thrombosis or stenosis in our analysis. With a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 0–69 months), all aortohepatic conduits were patent, and the graft and patient survival rates were 84% and 68%, respectively. The causes of death were graft failure (n=4), pneumonia (n=3), and cerebrovascular accidents (n=1).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that placement of an aortohepatic conduit is a feasible alternative to a standard arterial anastomosis in selected patients whose HA and surrounding potential inflow arteries are not suitable for standard arterial anastomosis.

Transplant artery thrombosis and outcomes

Post-transplantation allograft arterial thrombosis is a well-recognized complication associated with solid organ transplantation. Much of the literature is centered on liver and kidney transplantation, which will therefore serve as the principle basis for this review, with a brief discussion on pancreas transplantation and associated arterial complications. The number of solid organ transplants has been steadily increasing over the past decade in parallel with growing demand for organs and expansion of the transplantation criteria for both donors and recipients. This increase has been accompanied by a number of innovative medical advances and surgical techniques, as well as improved imaging that has allowed for thoughtful exploration of vascular anatomic variants and the possibilities for transplant with which they are associated. It has also been accompanied by a growing field of behavioral research, as potential recipients must weigh the risk of accepting certain organs based on perceived outcomes that may differ according to the quality of the underlying organ. Improvements in imaging technology have brought greater sensitivity to detecting arterial complications in post-operative surveillance examinations and have allowed for further development of tailored endovascular and surgical interventions for transplant-associated vascular complications. This review will focus on post-transplantation solid organ allograft artery thrombosis, including discussion of risk factors, diagnostic imaging, natural history, and therapeutic options.