Uncomplicated Acute Diverticulitis: Identifying Risk Factors for Severe Outcomes

Colonic diverticular disease: clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention Clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine, the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia, and the North- West Society of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists

   Clinical guidelines are intended for gastroenterologists, internists, and general practitioners and focus primarily on the management of patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, as well as on the primary and secondary prevention of acute diverticulitis and other complications of diverticular disease. Clinical guidelines were developed by the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine, the Gastroenterological Scientifi c Society of Russia, and the North-West Society of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists. One of the reasons for creating new clinical guidelines is that the current guidelines on diverticular disease (2021) pay much more attention to complications of diverticular disease and surgical treatment of acute and chronic complications of the disease.

Colonic diverticular disease: clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention Clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine, the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia, and the North- West Society of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists

   Clinical guidelines are intended for gastroenterologists, internists, and general practitioners and focus primarily on the management of patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, as well as on the primary and secondary prevention of acute diverticulitis and other complications of diverticular disease. Clinical guidelines were developed by the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine, the Gastroenterological Scientifi c Society of Russia, and the North-West Society of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists. One of the reasons for creating new clinical guidelines is that the current guidelines on diverticular disease (2021) pay much more attention to complications of diverticular disease and surgical treatment of acute and chronic complications of the disease.

Diverticular Disease and Rifaximin: An Evidence-Based Review

There have been considerable advances in the treatment of diverticular disease in recent years. Antibiotics are frequently used to treat symptoms and prevent complications. Rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic, is a common therapeutic choice for symptomatic diverticular disease in various countries, including Italy. Because of its low systemic absorption and high concentration in stools, it is an excellent medicine for targeting the gastrointestinal tract, where it has a beneficial effect in addition to its antibacterial properties. Current evidence shows that cyclical rifaximin usage in conjunction with a high-fiber diet is safe and effective for treating symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, while the cost-effectiveness of long-term treatment is unknown. The use of rifaximin to prevent recurrent diverticulitis is promising, but further studies are needed to confirm its therapeutic benefit. Unfortunately, there is no available evidence on the efficacy of rifaximin treatment for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

Impact of rurality and ethnicity on complexity of acute diverticulitis in Northland, New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Acute diverticulitis is a common general surgical condition associated with significant costs and healthcare burden. It is unknown if rurality represents a barrier to healthcare and whether ethnic disparities exist in Northland, New Zealand. This study, therefore, aims to assess the impact of rurality and ethnicity on complexity, management, and outcomes in patients with acute diverticulitis.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of all adults aged >18 years admitted with acute diverticulitis to any Northland District Health Board hospital between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 was performed. Diverticulitis complexity was assessed using the modified Hinchey classification. The primary outcome was the effect of rurality and ethnicity on complexity of diverticulitis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 397 patients (mean age 60.3 years (standard deviation (SD) 13.8); 48.7% female) were included. Overall, 134 patients had complicated diverticulitis. Rurality nor distance from the hospital were not associated with complexity of diverticulitis or clinical outcomes (p > 0.05). Maori patients presented younger than non-Maori (mean 51 vs. 63 years, p < 0.001) but there was no difference in complications, management, or clinical outcomes (p > 0.05). On multivariable analysis, rurality status and Maori ethnicity were not associated with more complicated diverticulitis.

CONCLUSION

This study found that rurality and ethnicity were not significant predictors of the complexity of diverticulitis.

Development of a prediction model for clinically important outcomes of acute diverticulitis

OBJECTIVE

Acute diverticulitis (AD) is a common disease with various outcomes. When AD is diagnosed in the emergency department (ED), the ED clinician must determine the patient's treatment strategy whether the patient can be discharged, needs to be admitted to the general ward, ICU, or needs surgical consultation. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for clinically important outcomes (CIOs) and to develop a prediction model for CIOs in AD to aid clinical decision making in the ED.

METHODS

Retrospective data from between 2013 and 2017 in an ED in an urban setting were reviewed for adult AD. Potential risk factors were age, sex, past medical history, symptoms, physical exams, laboratory results, and imaging results. A CIO was defined as a case with one of the following outcomes: hospital death, ICU admission, surgery or invasive intervention, and admission for 7 or more days. The prediction model for CIOs was developed using potential risk factors. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, respectively. Model validation was conducted using 500 random bootstrap samples.

RESULTS

Of the final 337 AD patients, 63 patients had CIOs. Six potential factors (age, abdominal pain (≥ 3 days), anorexia, rebound tenderness, white blood cell count (> 15,000/μl), C-reactive protein (> 10 mg/dL), and CT findings of a complication) were used for the final model. The AUC (95% CI) for CIOs was 0.875 (0.826-0.923), and χ² was 2.969 (p-value = 0.936) with the HL test. Validation using bootstrap samples resulted in an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.858 (0.856-0.861).

CONCLUSION

A prediction model for clinically important outcomes of AD visiting a single ED showed good discrimination and calibration power with an acceptable range.

Antibiotics Do Not Reduce Length of Hospital Stay for Uncomplicated Diverticulitis in a Pragmatic Double-Blind Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Antibiotic treatment is the standard care for patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. However, this practice is based on low-level evidence and has been challenged by findings from 2 randomized trials, which did not include a placebo group. We investigated the non-inferiority of placebo vs antibiotic treatment for the management of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.

METHODS

In the selective treatment with antibiotics for non-complicated diverticulitis study, 180 patients hospitalized for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis (determined by computed tomography, Hinchey 1a grade) from New Zealand and Australia were randomly assigned to groups given antibiotics (n = 85) or placebo (n = 95) for 7 days. We collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory data and answers to questionnaires completed every 12 hrs for the first 48 hrs and then daily until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was length of hospital stay; secondary endpoints included occurrence of adverse events, readmission to the hospital, procedural intervention, change in serum markers of inflammation, and patient-reported pain scores at 12 and 24 hrs.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in median time of hospital stay between the antibiotic group (40.0 hrs; 95% CI, 24.4-57.6 hrs) and the placebo group (45.8 hrs; 95% CI, 26.5-60.2 hrs) (P = .2). There were no significant differences between groups in adverse events (12% for both groups; P = 1.0), readmission to the hospital within 1 week (1% for the placebo group vs 6% for the antibiotic group; P = .1), and readmission to the hospital within 30 days (11% for the placebo group vs 6% for the antibiotic group; P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Foregoing antibiotic treatment did not prolong length of hospital admission. This result provides strong evidence for omission of antibiotics for selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis.

ACTRN

12615000249550.

C-reactive protein trajectory in the first 48 hours predicts the need for intervention in conservative management of acute diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful marker for monitoring response to treatment in sepsis. The aim of this study was to examine the use of CRP trajectory in predicting the need for intervention in conservatively managed patients with acute diverticulitis (AD).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with AD who were managed conservatively was performed. They were divided into four groups based on CRP relative to the median at day 0 and 2: 'Low rise' (levels below median at day 0 and 2), 'High rise' (levels above median at day 0 and 2), 'Rapid rise' (levels below median at day 0 but above median at day 2) and 'Decline' (levels above median at day 0 but below median at day 2).

RESULTS

Intervention was required in 64 of 456 (14%) with 30 (48%) of these performed after day 2 of admission. There were 150 patients (54%) in the 'Low rise', 76 (27%) in the 'Decline', 26 patients (9%) in the 'Rapid rise' and 25 patients (9%) in the 'High rise' groups. Within these groups 5%, 8%, 19% and 32% of patients required intervention (P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients with a pelvic abscess were more likely to need intervention (odds ratio 19.1 (confidence interval 6.2-59.4), P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The CRP trajectory during the initial 48 h of admission can predict the need for intervention in AD patients being managed conservatively. Patients with a 'Rapid rise' or 'High rise' in CRP from day 0 to 2 are more likely to need intervention.

Colonic diverticular disease

Diverticula are outpouchings of the intestinal wall and are common anatomical alterations detected in the human colon. Colonic diverticulosis (the presence of diverticula in the colon; referred to as diverticulosis) remains asymptomatic in most individuals but ~25% of individuals will develop symptomatic diverticulosis, termed colonic diverticular disease (also known as diverticular disease). Diverticular disease can range in severity from symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) to symptomatic disease with complications such as acute diverticulitis or diverticular haemorrhage. Since the early 2000s, a greater understanding of the pathophysiology of diverticulosis and diverticular disease, which encompasses genetic alterations, chronic low-grade inflammation and gut dysbiosis, has led to improvements in diagnosis and management. Diagnosis of diverticular disease relies on imaging approaches, such as ultrasonography, CT and MRI, as biomarkers alone are insufficient to establish a diagnosis despite their role in determining disease severity and progression as well as in differential diagnosis. Treatments for diverticular disease include dietary fibre, pharmacological treatments such as antibiotics (rifaximin), anti-inflammatory drugs (mesalazine) and probiotics, alone or in combination, and eventually surgery. Despite being effective in treating primary disease, their effectiveness in primary and secondary prevention of complications is still uncertain.

Complicated Disease Course in Initially Computed Tomography-Proven Uncomplicated Acute Diverticulitis

Background: Although uncomplicated acute diverticulitis has a benign disease course, some patients are at increased risk for complications. Identification of these patients may aid the selection of treatment strategies such as outpatient treatment. This study aimed to assess the rate and timing of a complicated disease course in initially computed tomography (CT)-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis, and to identify risk factors for the development of these diverticular complications. Patients and Methods: Computed tomography-proven, left-sided uncomplicated diverticulitis patients from two cohorts were included. Main outcome measure was complicated diverticulitis (perforation, abscess, obstruction, or fistula) within three months after presentation. Risk factors for diverticular complications were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 1,087 patients with initially CT-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis, 4.9% (53/1,087) developed complicated diverticulitis. Most perforations and abscesses (16/21) occurred during the first 10 days, whereas colonic obstruction and fistula occurred during three months of follow-up. Independent risk factors for the transition from uncomplicated to complicated diverticulitis were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 3/4 (odds ratio [OR] 4.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-12.48), duration of symptoms before presentation longer than five days (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.72-6.13), vomiting (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.96-7.92), and C-reactive protein (CRP) above 140 mg/L (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.51-5.43). Conclusion: Approximately one in 20 patients with CT-proven uncomplicated diverticulitis develops a complicated disease course within three months; perforation and abscess occur predominantly within 10 days after presentation. Patients with systemic comorbidity, symptoms for more than five days, those who vomit, or have high CRP levels at presentation are at risk for diverticular complications after an uncomplicated initial presentation and may warrant closer observation.

Is the outpatient management of acute diverticulitis safe and effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In Western countries, the incidence of acute diverticulitis (AD) is increasing. Patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis can undergo a standard antibiotic treatment in an outpatient setting. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of the management of acute diverticulitis in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Central and Web of Science up to September 2018. Studies including patients who had outpatient management of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis were considered. We manually checked the reference lists of all included studies to identify any additional studies. Primary outcome was the overall failure rates in the outpatient setting. The failure of outpatient setting was defined as any emergency hospital admission in patients who had outpatient treatment for AD in the previous 60 days. A subgroup analysis of failure was performed in patients with AD of the left colon, with or without comorbidities, with previous episodes of AD, in patients with diabetes, with different severity of AD (pericolic air and abdominal abscess), with or without antibiotic treatment, with ambulatory versus home care unit follow-up, with or without protocol and where outpatient management is a common practice. The secondary outcome was the rate of emergency surgical treatment or percutaneous drainage in patients who failed outpatient treatment.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 21 studies including 1781 patients who had outpatient management of AD  including 11 prospective, 9 retrospective and only 1 randomized trial. The meta-analysis showed that outpatient management is safe, and the overall failure rate in an outpatient setting was 4.3% (95% CI 2.6%-6.3%). Localization of diverticulitis is not a selection criterion for an outpatient strategy (p 0.512). The other subgroup analyses did not report any factors that influence the rate of failure: previous episodes of acute diverticulitis (p = 0.163), comorbidities (p = 0.187), pericolic air (p = 0.653), intra-abdominal abscess (p = 0.326), treatment according to a registered protocol (p = 0.078), type of follow-up (p = 0.700), type of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.647) or diabetes (p = 0.610). In patients who failed outpatient treatment, the majority had prolonged antibiotic therapy and only few had percutaneous drainage for an abscess (0.13%) or surgical intervention for perforation (0.06%). These results should be interpreted with some caution because of the low quality of available data.

CONCLUSIONS

The outpatient management of AD can reduce the rate of emergency hospitalizations. This setting is already part of the common clinical practice of many emergency departments, in which a standardized protocol is followed. The data reported suggest that this management is safe if associated with an accurate selection of patients (40%); but no subgroup analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups (such as comorbidities, previous episode, diabetes). The main limitations of the findings of the present review concern their applicability in common clinical practice as it was impossible to identify strict criteria of failure.

Specific Factors Predict the Risk for Urgent and Emergent Colectomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Diverticulitis

The aim of this study was to identify preoperative characteristics that may determine the need for emergency surgery for diverticulitis and assess postoperative outcomes for these patients when compared with elective surgery. All patients included in the ACS-NSQIP–targeted colectomy database from 2012 to 2013 who underwent colectomy with an underlying diagnosis of diverticulitis were included. Preoperative characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes were evaluated for patients who underwent elective versus emergent/urgent surgery using univariable and multivariable analyses. Of 8708 patients with diverticular disease, 28.1 per cent underwent emergent/urgent colectomy. Patients who underwent emergent/urgent colectomy had greater preoperative steroid use, diabetes mellitus, disseminated cancer, chronic renal failure, hypertension, chronic heart failure, chronic liver disease, COPD, and dependent functional health status ( P < 0001). There were more patients with age >65 years ( P < 0001), smoking history ( P < 0.05), and BMI < 18.5 kg/m2( P < 0001) in the emergent/urgent colectomy group. After performing multivariable analysis, preoperative steroid use, weight loss >10 per cent, BMI < 18 kg/m2, smoking, age > 65, and comorbid conditions were associated with a higher rate of emergent/urgent surgery. Mortality (5.2% vs 0.2%) and infectious and noninfectious complications were higher after nonelective colectomy. Emergent/urgent colectomy was also associated with longer hospital stay and reoperation. Emergency and urgent colectomy for diverticulitis is associated with significantly worse outcomes than after elective surgery, and patients with comorbid conditions who develop attacks of diverticulitis may in fact be the population that might best benefit from a lower threshold for an elective colectomy.

Recent advances in understanding and managing diverticulitis

In the past few decades, the increasing socioeconomic burden of acute diverticulitis (AD) has become evident, and with the growth of the population age, this significant economic impact will likely continue to rise. Furthermore, recent evidence showed an increased rate of hospital admissions especially evident among women and younger individuals. The natural history and pathophysiology of this clinical condition is still to be fully defined, and efforts continue to be made in the identification of risk factors and the establishment of relative preventive strategies. The actual therapeutic strategies aimed to modulate gut microbiota, such as rifaximin or probiotics, or to reduce mucosal inflammation, such as mesalazine, present a relatively poor efficacy for both the prevention of the first AD episode (primary prevention) and its recurrence (secondary prevention). In the last few years, the main goal achieved has been in the management of AD in that uncomplicated AD can, to a larger extent, be managed in an outpatient setting with no or little supportive therapy, a strategy that will certainly impact on the health costs of this disease. The problem of AD recurrence remains a topic of debate. The aim of this review is to present updated evidence on AD epidemiology and relative open clinical questions and to analyze in detail predisposing and protective factors with an attempt to integrate their possible modes of action into the several pathogenic mechanisms that have been suggested to contribute to this multifactorial disease. A unifying hypothesis dealing with the colonic luminal and extra-luminal microenvironments separately is provided. Finally, evidence-based changes in therapeutic management will be summarized. Because of an ascertained multifactorial pathogenesis of uncomplicated and complicated AD, it is probable that a single 'causa prima' will not be identifiable, and a better stratification of patients could allow one to pursue tailored therapeutic algorithm strategies.

Low risk of complications in patients with first-time acute uncomplicated diverticulitis

PURPOSE

First-time acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (AUD) has been considered to have an increased risk of complication, but the level of evidence is low. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk of complications in patients with first-time AUD and in patients with a history of diverticulitis.

METHODS

This paper is a population-based retrospective study at Västmanland's Hospital, Västerås, Sweden, where all patients were identified with a diagnosis of colonic diverticular disease ICD-10 K57.0-9 from January 2010 to December 2014. The records of all patients were surveyed and patients with a computed tomography (CT)-verified AUD were included. Complications defined as CT-verified abscess, perforation, colonic obstruction, fistula, or sepsis within 1 month from the diagnosis of AUD were registered.

RESULTS

Of 809 patients with AUD, 642 (79%) had first-time AUD and 167 (21%) had a previous history of AUD with no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics. In total, 16 (2%) patients developed a complication within 1 month irrespective of whether they had a previous history of diverticulitis (P = 0.345). In the binary logistic regression analysis, first-time diverticulitis was not associated with increased risk of complications (OR 1.58; CI 0.52-4.81). The rate of antibiotic therapy was about 7-10% during the time period and outpatient management increased from 7% in 2010 to 61% in 2014.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for development of complications is low in AUD with no difference between patients with first-time or recurrent diverticulitis. This result strengthens existing evidence on the benign disease course of AUD.