1
|
Siemssen B, Hentschel F, Ibach MJ. Long-term results after laparoscopic revision fundoplication: a retrospective, single-center analysis in 194 patients with recurrent hiatal hernia. Esophagus 2024; 21:390-396. [PMID: 38709415 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-024-01060-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After laparoscopic fundoplication, 10-20% of patients experience symptom recurrence-often due to resurgence of the hiatal hernia. The standard surgical treatment for such cases remains laparoscopic revision fundoplication. However, there is little data on the time frame and anatomic patterns of failed fundoplications. Additionally, few large studies exist on the long-term efficacy and safety of laparoscopic revision fundoplication. METHODS In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 194 consecutive revision fundoplications for recurrent reflux disease due to hiatal hernia, we collected data on time to failure and patterns of failure of the primary operation, as well as on the efficacy and safety of the revision. RESULTS The median time to failure of the primary fundoplication was 3 years. Most hiatal defects were smaller than 5 cm and located anteriorly or concentric around the esophagus. Laparoscopic redo fundoplication was technically successful in all cases. The short-term complication rate was 9%, mainly dysphagia requiring endoscopic intervention. At a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 77% of patients were symptom-free, 14% required daily PPI, and 9% underwent secondary revision. Cumulative failure rates were 9%, 23%, and 31% at 1, 5, and 10 years. CONCLUSION The majority of failed fundoplications occur within 3 years of primary surgery, with most patients exhibiting anterior or concentric defects. For these patients, laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure with a low rate of short-term complications and satisfactory long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Siemssen
- Department of Surgery, MIC Klinik, Kurstr. 11, 14129, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Florian Hentschel
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Zentrum für Innere Medizin Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Depypere L, Van Veer H, Nafteux P, Coosemans W. Current practice in antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery: exploration of the Belgian field. Acta Chir Belg 2023; 123:647-653. [PMID: 36227741 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2136048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Belgium, no publicly available information exists on the spread, quality, results nor follow-up of antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery, in contrast to the recently centralized esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to create a snap shot of the current practice in Belgium. METHODS An online questionnaire was distributed among all members of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery in autumn 2021. A total of 33 questions spread over four sections were asked, covering demographics, current practice (case load, case mix, indications, preoperative workup, patient information, average length of stay, follow up, quality of life (QOL)), operative techniques and future thoughts. RESULTS Twenty-four surgeons completed the questionnaire. Surgical indications are discussed multidisciplinary and based on guidelines in 67%. Workup includes endoscopy, pH-monitoring and manometry in 100%. Barium swallow, impedance and gastric emptying tests were added in respectively 83%, 42% and 13%. Symptom or QOL scores were used in 17%. About 81% are performed as primary surgery, 18% redo surgery and 1% resections. Laparoscopic procedures are reported in 99%: Nissen(-Rosetti) 79%, Toupet/Lind 15%, partial gastrectomy 5% and Collis gastroplasty 1%. Discharge is planned on POD1 in 42% and on POD2 in 54%. 50% performs follow-up < 1 year. Interest in further clinical research collaboration was expressed in 92%. CONCLUSION Antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery is not standardized in Belgium. There is an evident variety in clinical practice, but this questionnaire shows similarity amongst respondents regarding workup and surgical approach. There is a willingness for future research collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Depypere
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Van Veer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Coosemans
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Postoperative Timing of Chemoprophylaxis and Its Impact on Thromboembolism and Bleeding Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study. World J Surg 2023; 47:1174-1183. [PMID: 36806555 PMCID: PMC10070293 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06899-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major abdominal surgery is associated with bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks. Chemoprophylaxis prevents VTE but increases bleeding risk. When compared with pre- and intra-operative chemoprophylaxis, recent evidence suggests that starting chemoprophylaxis postoperatively lowers the risk of bleeding without compromising VTE protection. This study investigates whether an optimal window exists in the postoperative period for initiating chemoprophylaxis in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS Analysis of pooled data from four multicenter PROTECTinG studies, which investigated the timing of perioperative chemoprophylaxis on bleeding and VTE outcomes following major abdominal surgery. Patients that commenced chemoprophylaxis postoperatively were separated into quartiles based on timing of administration within the first 24 h post-surgery. RESULTS Overall, 4729 (Abdominal visceral resection N = 668, cholecystectomies N = 573, major ventral hernia repair N = 1701, antireflux surgery N = 1787) consecutive patients had chemoprophylaxis commenced within 24 h following elective surgery. Baseline characteristics were comparable between quartiles. Across quartiles and within each procedural type, the timing of starting chemoprophylaxis was not associated with bleeding (2.6, 1.7, 2.7 and 3.2%, p = 0.130) or clinical VTE (0.8, 0.2, 0.8 and 0.5%, p = 0.131), and did not predict their occurrences on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Chemoprophylaxis can be safely started at any time within 24 h post-skin closure in major abdominal surgery, without affecting bleeding or VTE risks. This finding encourages the standardization of chemoprophylaxis timing in the postoperative period to pre-defined times during the day to improve workflow efficiency and chemoprophylaxis compliance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Analatos A, Lindblad M, Ansorge C, Lundell L, Thorell A, Håkanson BS. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6576516. [PMID: 35511051 PMCID: PMC9070466 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fundoplication is an essential step in para-oesophageal hernia (POH) repair, but which type minimizes postoperative mechanical complications is controversial. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted between May 2009 and October 2018. Patients with symptomatic POH were allocated to either a total (Nissen) or a posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair. The primary outcome was dysphagia (Ogilvie dysphagia scores) at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were peri- and postoperative complications, swallowing difficulties assessed by the Dakkak dysphagia score, gastro-oesophageal reflux, quality of life (QoL), and radiologically confirmed hernia recurrence. Results A total of 70 patients were randomized to a Nissen (n = 32) or a Toupet (n = 38) fundoplication. Compared with baseline, Ogilvie dysphagia scores were stable at the 3- and 6-month follow-up in the Nissen group (P = 0.075 and 0.084 respectively) but significantly improved in the Toupet group (from baseline mean (s.d.): 1.4 (1.1) to 0.5 ( 0.8) at 3 months, and 0.5 (0.6) at 6 months; P = 0.003 and P = 0.001 respectively). At 6 months, Dakkak dysphagia scores were significantly higher in the Nissen group than in the Toupet group (mean (s.d.): 10.4 (7.9) versus 5.1 (7.2); P = 0.003). QoL scores improved throughout the follow-up. However, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the absolute median improvement (⍙) from preoperative values in the mental component scores of the Short Form-36 QoL questionnaire was significantly higher in the Toupet group (median (i.q.r.): 7.1 (−0.6 to 15.2) versus 1.0 (−5.4 to 3.3) at 3 months, and 11.2 (1.4 to 18.3) versus 0.4 (−9.4 to 7.5) at 6 months; (P = 0.010 and 0.003 respectively)). At 6 months, radiologically confirmed POH recurrence occurred in 11 of 24 patients (46 per cent) of the Nissen group and in 15 of 32 patients (47 per cent) of the Toupet group (P = 1.001). Conclusions A partial posterior wrap (Toupet fundoplication) showed reduced obstructive complications and improved QoL compared with a total (Nissen) fundoplication following POH repair. Registration number: NCT04436159 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolos Analatos
- Correspondence to: Apostolos Analatos, Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Olrogs väg 1, 61139, Nyköping, Sweden (e-mail: )
| | - Mats Lindblad
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christoph Ansorge
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Nyköping Hospital, Nyköping, Sweden
| | - Lars Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Thorell
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital and Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Ersta Hospital Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt S. Håkanson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital and Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Ersta Hospital Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maini A, Sun J, Buniak B, Jantsch S, Czajak R, Frey T, Kumar BS, Chawla A. Heartburn Center Set-Up in a Community Setting: Engineering and Execution. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:662007. [PMID: 34858998 PMCID: PMC8631278 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.662007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Optimal management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) requires a concerted team of physicians rather than an individual approach. While an integrated approach to GERD has previously been proposed, the practical execution of such a "center of excellence" (COE) has not been described, particularly in a community setting. Ranging from initial consultation and diagnosis to surgical intervention for complex disease, such an approach is likely to provide optimal care and provide surveillance for patients with a complex disease process of GERD. Methods: We report our approach to implement an integrated heartburn center (HBC) and our experience with the first cohort of patients. Patients treated in the HBC were followed for 2 years from initial consultation to completion of their appropriate treatment plan, including anti-reflux surgery. The performance prior to the HBC set-up was compared to that post-HBC. Performance was measured in terms of volume of patients referred, referral patterns, length of stay (LOS), and patient health-related quality of life (HRQL) pre- and post-surgery. Results: Setting up the HBC resulted in referrals from multiple avenues, including primary care physicians (PCPs), emergency departments (EDs), and gastroenterologists (GIs). There was a 75% increase in referrals compared to pre-center patient volumes. Among the initial cohort of 832 patients presenting to the HBC, <10% had GERD for <1 year, ~60% had GERD for 1-11 years, and ~30% had GERD for ≥12 years. More than one-quarter had atypical GERD symptoms (27.6%). Only 6.4% had been on PPIs for <1 year and >20% had been on PPIs for ≥12 years. Thirty-eight patients were found to have Barrett's esophagus (4.6%) (up to 10 times the general population prevalence). Two patients had dysplasia. Seven patients (0.8%) received radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for Barrett's esophagus and two patients received endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for Barrett's esophagus-related dysplasia. The most common comorbidities were chronic pulmonary disease (16.8%) and diabetes without complications (10.6%). Patients received treatment for newly identified comorbid conditions, including early maladaptive schemas (EMS) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (n = 7; 0.8%). Fifty cases required consultation with various specialists (6.0%) and 34 of those (4.1%) resulted in changes in care. Despite the significant increase in patient referrals, conversion rates from diagnosis to anti-reflux surgery remained consistent at ~25%. Overall HRQL improved year-over-year, and LOS was significantly reduced with potential cost savings for the larger institution. Conclusions: While centralization of GERD care is known to improve outcomes, in this case study we demonstrated the clinical success and commercial viability of centralizing GERD care in a community setting. The integrated GERD service line center offered a comprehensive, multi-specialty, and coordinated patient-centered approach. The approach is reproducible and may allow hospitals to set up their own heartburn COEs, strengthening patient-community relationships and establishing scientific and clinical GERD leadership.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atul Maini
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | - John Sun
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | - Borys Buniak
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | - Stacey Jantsch
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | - Rachel Czajak
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | - Tara Frey
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | - B Siva Kumar
- The Heartburn Center at St. Joseph's Health, Liverpool, NY, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lugaresi M, Nafteux P, Nilsson M, Reynolds JV, Rosati R, Schoppmann SF, Targarona EM, Mattioli S. Exploring the concept of centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases: a Delphi based consensus from the European Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6148804. [PMID: 33621318 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Surgery for benign esophageal diseases may be complex, requiring specialist training, but currently, unlike oncologic surgery, it is not centralized. The aim of the study was to explore the opinion of European surgeons on the centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases. A web-based questionnaire, developed through a modified Delphi process, was administered to general and thoracic surgeons of 33 European surgical societies. There were 791 complete responses (98.5%), in 59.2% of respondents, the age ranged between 41 and 60 years, 60.3% of respondents worked in tertiary centers. In 2017, the number of major surgical procedures performed for any esophageal disease by respondents was <10 for 56.5% and >100 for 4.5%; in responder's hospitals procedures number was <10 in 27% and >100 in 15%. Centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases was advocated by 83.4%, in centers located according to geographic/population criteria (69.3%), in tertiary hospitals (74.5%), with availability of advanced diagnostic and interventional technologies (88.4%), in at least 10 beds units (70.5%). For national and international centers accreditation/certification, criteria approved included in-hospital mortality and morbidity (95%), quality of life oriented follow-up after surgery (88.9%), quality audits (82.6%), academic research (58.2%), and collaboration with national and international centers (76.6%); indications on surgical procedures volumes were variable. The present study strongly supports the centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases, in large part modeled on the principles that have underpinned the centralization of cancer surgery internationally, with emphasis on structure, process, volumes, quality audit, and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marialuisa Lugaresi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC) and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna Maria Cecilia Hospital Cotignola (RA), Bologna, Italy
| | - Philippe Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - John V Reynolds
- National Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Center, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastian F Schoppmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Upper GI Tumors Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Eduardo M Targarona
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandro Mattioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC) and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna Maria Cecilia Hospital Cotignola (RA), Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Redo Fundoplication in Patients With Failed Antireflux Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2021; 274:78-85. [PMID: 33214483 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the current available evidence regarding the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic redo fundoplication (LRF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although antireflux surgery is highly effective, a minority of patients will require a LRF due to recurrent symptoms, mechanical failure, or intolerable side-effects of the primary repair. METHODS A systematic electronic search on LRF was conducted in the Medline database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Conversion and postoperative morbidity were used as primary endpoints to determine feasibility and safety. Symptom improvement, QoL improvement, and recurrence rates were used as secondary endpoints to assess efficacy. Heterogeneity across studies was tested with the Chi-square and the proportion of total variation attributable to heterogeneity was estimated by the inconsistency (I2) statistic. A random-effect model was used to generate a pooled proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) across all studies. RESULTS A total of 30 studies and 2,095 LRF were included. The mean age at reoperation was 53.3 years. The weighted pooled proportion of conversion was 6.02% (95% CI, 4.16%-8.91%) and the meta-analytic prevalence of major morbidity was 4.98% (95% CI, 3.31%-6.95%). The mean follow-up period was 25 (6-58) months. The weighted pooled proportion of symptom and QoL improvement was 78.50% (95% CI, 74.71%-82.03%) and 80.65% (95% CI, 75.80%-85.08%), respectively. The meta-analytic prevalence estimate of recurrence across the studies was 10.71% (95% CI, 7.74%-14.10%). CONCLUSIONS LRF is a feasible and safe procedure that provides symptom relief and improved QoL to the vast majority of patients. Although heterogeneously assessed, recurrence rates seem to be low. LRF should be considered a valuable treatment modality for patients with failed antireflux surgery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bonavina L, Boyle N, Schoppmann SF. The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2021; 37:384-389. [PMID: 33883422 PMCID: PMC9904435 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been designed as a less disruptive and more standardized laparoscopic surgical procedure than fundoplication for patients with early stage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We analyzed the more recent literature in search of updates regarding indications, technique, perioperative management, and long-term outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Over the years, the procedure of MSA has evolved to including full hiatus repair rather than relying on the preservation of the phreno-esophageal ligament. Restoring the mechanical synergy between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm has the potential to further enhance the antireflux barrier. The adoption of this approach has led to expand the indications from early stage disease to different scenarios including patients with high esophageal acid exposure, atypical symptoms, large hiatal hernias, Barrett's esophagus, postbariatric surgery, and previously failed fundoplication. SUMMARY MSA has a favorable side-effect profile and is highly effective in reducing typical reflux symptoms, medication dependency, and esophageal acid exposure. Excellent outcomes have been confirmed over a 12-year follow-up, indicating that the operation has the potential to prevent GERD progression. Further studies are needed to confirm the cost-effectiveness of this procedure in patients with more advanced disease-stage and prior gastric surgery. A randomized control trial comparing MSA with fundoplication could raise the level of evidence and the strength of recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Bonavina
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Nick Boyle
- King Edward VII Hospital, Medical Director RefluxUK, London, UK
| | - Sebastian F. Schoppmann
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of General Surgery, Upper-GI-Service, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Trends of anti-reflux surgery in Denmark 2000-2017: a nationwide registry-based cohort study. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3662-3669. [PMID: 32748262 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07845-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilisation of laparoscopic fundoplication peaked internationally around 2000. Perioperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay initially declined as the use of laparoscopic technique increased. Studies indicate that complication rates have increased over time, probably as a consequence of rising age and level of comorbidity. None of these previous studies is nationwide. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate trends in the utilisation of anti-reflux surgery in the entire Danish population from 2000 to 2017. METHODS Nationwide Danish health registries were utilised to include all Danish patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery 2000-2017. The utilisation of anti-reflux surgery in procedures per 100.000 inhabitants was compared to the utilisation of proton-pump inhibitors for each year. Postoperative complications, mortality, and length of stay per year, including yearly changes, were also calculated. RESULTS The use of anti-reflux surgery peaked in 2001 with 5.9 procedures per 100,000 inhabitants and reached its lowest point in 2008 with 2.8 procedures per 100,000 inhabitants. The use of proton-pump inhibitors increased from 3,370 users per 100,000 inhabitants in 2000 to 10,284 users per 100,000 inhabitants in 2017. The 30-day and 90-day mortality ranged from 0 to 1.2%. The 30-day hospital-registered complications were 1.3-6.1%, and the 90-day hospital-registered complications were 2.4-8.3%. Length of stay was consistently low, with a median of 2 days in 2000 reduced to a median of 1 day by 2017. CONCLUSION The utilisation of anti-reflux surgery in Denmark from 2000 to 2017 declined, and the use of PPI increased dramatically. Age, comorbidity, and postoperative complications increased, while the use of laparoscopic technique remained high, and mortality was consistently low.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ljungdalh JS, Rubin KH, Durup J, Houlind KC. Reoperation after antireflux surgery: a population-based cohort study. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1633-1639. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Antireflux surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and/or hiatal hernia is effective. Between 10 and 20 per cent of patients undergo reoperation for recurrent symptoms. Most studies are undertaken in a single centre and possibly underestimate the rate of reoperation. The aim of this nationwide population-based cohort study was to investigate long-term reoperation rates after antireflux surgery.
Methods
This study included patients who underwent antireflux surgery between 2000 and 2017 in Denmark, and were registered in the Danish nationwide health registries. Reoperation rates were calculated for 1, 5, 10 and 15 years after the primary antireflux operation for GORD and/or hiatal hernia. Duration of hospital stay, 30- and 90-day mortality and morbidity, and use of endoscopic pneumatic dilatation were assessed.
Results
This study included a total of 4258 antireflux procedures performed in 3717 patients. Some 3252 patients had only primary antireflux surgery and 465 patients underwent reoperation. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year rates of repeat antireflux surgery were 3·1, 9·3, 11·7 and 12·8 per cent respectively. Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates were similar for primary surgery (0·4 and 0·6 per cent respectively) and reoperations. The complication rate was higher for repeat antireflux surgery (7·0 and 8·3 per cent at 30 and 90 days respectively) than primary operation (3·4 and 4·8 per cent). A total of 391 patients (10·5 per cent of all patients) underwent endoscopic dilatation after primary antireflux surgery, of whom 95 (24·3 per cent) had repeat antireflux surgery.
Conclusion
In this population-based study in Denmark, the reoperation rate 15 years after antireflux surgery was 12·8 per cent. Reoperations were associated with more complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Ljungdalh
- Department of Surgery, Kolding Hospital, part of Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - K H Rubin
- Department of Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Durup
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - K C Houlind
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Kolding Hospital, part of Hospital Lillebaelt, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schlottmann F, Nurczyk K, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: How I Do It? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:639-641. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kamil Nurczyk
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- 2nd Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, and Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Marco G. Patti
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Antireflux Surgery in a Cohort Study From the 5 Nordic Countries. Ann Surg 2019; 274:e535-e540. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Maret-Ouda J, Wahlin K, Artama M, Brusselaers N, Färkkilä M, Lynge E, Mattsson F, Pukkala E, Romundstad P, Tryggvadóttir L, von Euler-Chelpin M, Lagergren J. Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Antireflux Surgery in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the Nordic Countries. JAMA Oncol 2019; 4:1576-1582. [PMID: 30422249 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with a strong and severity-dependent increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Whether antireflux surgery prevents esophageal adenocarcinoma is a matter of uncertainty. Objectives To examine whether antireflux surgery is associated with reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and whether the risk is different between surgically and medically treated patients. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multinational, population-based retrospective cohort study from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, patients undergoing surgery were followed up for a median of 12.7 years, and a comparison group of patients receiving medication only were followed up for a median of 4.8 years. All patients with a registered diagnosis of GERD (or an associated disorder), including 48 414 individuals undergoing surgery and 894 492 receiving medication only, were included in the study. The study periods varied in the different countries depending on the year of initiation of registration and the date of data retrieval, from January 1, 1964, to December 21, 2014. Exposures Antireflux surgery for GERD. Main Outcomes and Measures The risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma over time after surgery was compared with that in a corresponding background population using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% CIs and with patients with GERD who received medication using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, providing hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs adjusted for confounders. Results In this study of 942 906 patients with GERD, 48 414 underwent antireflux surgery (median [interquartile range] age, 66.0 [58.0-73.0] years; 27 161 male [56.1%]) and 894 492 received medication only (median [interquartile range] age, 71.0 [62.0-78.0] years; 434 035 male [48.6%]). Among patients undergoing surgery, 177 developed esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophageal adenocarcinoma risk decreased in a time-dependent manner after surgery compared with the background population (5 to <10 years after surgery: SIR, 7.63; 95% CI, 5.42-10.43; ≥15 years after surgery: SIR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.98-1.80). Among patients with more severe and objectively determined GERD, the SIRs were 10.08 (95% CI, 6.98-14.09) at 5 to less than 10 years after surgery and 1.67 (95% CI, 1.15-2.35) at 15 years or more after surgery. The risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma did not change over time in surgical patients compared with patients who received medication only (5 to <10 years after surgery: HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.44-2.84; ≥15 years: HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.28-2.54). The risk remained stable over time in analyses restricted to severe reflux disease (5 to <10 years after surgery: HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.24-2.63; ≥15 years after surgery: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.14-2.51). Conclusions and Relevance Medical and surgical treatment of GERD were associated with a similar reduced esophageal adenocarcinoma risk, with the risk decreasing to the same level as that in the background population over time, supporting the hypothesis that effective treatment of GERD might prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Maret-Ouda
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karl Wahlin
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miia Artama
- Impact Assessment Unit, Department of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Tampere, Finland
| | - Nele Brusselaers
- Centre for Translational Microbiome Research, Department of Microbiology, Tumor, and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Science For Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martti Färkkilä
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fredrik Mattsson
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eero Pukkala
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland.,Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pål Romundstad
- Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Laufey Tryggvadóttir
- Icelandic Cancer Registry, Icelandic Cancer Society, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Jesper Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Panda N, Rattner DW, Morse CR. Third-time ("redo-redo") anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:3092-3101. [PMID: 31388809 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07059-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 3-6% of patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery require "redo" surgery for persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Further surgery for patients with two failed prior anti-reflux operations is controversial due to the morbidity of reoperation and poor outcomes. We examined our experience with surgical revision of patients with at least two failed anti-reflux operations. METHODS Adults undergoing at least a second-time revision anti-reflux surgery between 1999 and 2017 were eligible. The primary outcomes were general and disease-specific quality-of-life (QoL) scores determined by Short-Form-36 (SF36) and GERD-Health-Related QoL (GERD-HRQL) instruments, respectively. Secondary outcomes included perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS Eighteen patients undergoing redo-redo surgery (13 with 2 prior operations, 5 with 3 prior operations) were followed for a median of 6 years [IQR 3, 12]. Sixteen patients (89%) underwent open revisions (14 thoracoabdominal, 2 laparotomy) and two patients had laparoscopic revisions. Indications for surgery included reflux (10 patients), regurgitation (5 patients), and dysphagia (3 patients). Intraoperative findings were mediastinal wrap herniation (9 patients), misplaced wrap (2 patients), mesh erosion (1 patient), or scarring/stricture (6 patients). Procedures performed included Collis gastroplasty + fundoplication (6 patients), redo fundoplication (5 patients), esophagogastrectomy (4 patients), and primary hiatal closure (3 patients). There were no deaths and 13/18 patients (72%) had no postoperative complications. Ten patients completed QoL surveys; 8 reported resolution of reflux, 6 reported resolution of regurgitation, while 4 remained on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Mean SF36 scores (± standard deviation) in the study cohort in the eight QoL domains were as follows: physical functioning (79.5 [± 19.9]), physical role limitations (52.5 [± 46.3]), emotional role limitations (83.3 [± 36.1]), vitality (60.0 [± 22.7]), emotional well-being (88.4 [± 8.7]), social functioning (75.2 [± 31.0]), pain (66.2 [± 30.9]), and general health (55.0 [± 39.0]). CONCLUSION An open thoracoabdominal approach in appropriately selected patients needing third-time anti-reflux surgery carries low morbidity and provides excellent results as reflected in QoL scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Panda
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRB-425, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - David W Rattner
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Christopher R Morse
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Patti MG. Surgery for benign esophageal disorders in the US: risk factors for complications and trends of morbidity. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:3675-3682. [PMID: 29435748 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6102-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), paraesophageal hernia (PEH), and achalasia are the most frequent benign esophageal disorders that may need surgical treatment. We aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and to characterize trends of morbidity for surgery for benign esophageal disorders in a national cohort. METHODS A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2000-2013. Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed with GERD, PEH, and achalasia, and who underwent fundoplication, PEH repair, and esophagomyotomy were included. The yearly incidence of complications, stratified by procedure, was calculated using Poisson regression, and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for complications. RESULTS A total of 79,622 patients were included; 38,695 (48.6%) underwent PEH repair, 38,719 (48.6%) fundoplication, and 2208 (2.8%) esophagomyotomy. While the rate of postoperative complications dropped from 26.5 to 10.0% and from 16.1 to 12.2% for PEH repair and esophagomyotomy, respectively, the complication rate after fundoplication increased from 5.7 to 12.7% during the same period (p < 0.0001). Age, black race, diabetes, renal insufficiency, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and open surgery were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The rate of laparoscopic procedures for PEH repair increased from 4.9 to 91.4%, while for fundoplication it increased from 24.2 to 78.3% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Opposite to PEH repair and esophagomyotomy, antireflux surgery has shown an increase in the morbidity rate in the last decade. Patient selection and embracement of laparoscopic techniques are critical to improve the perioperative outcome in surgery for benign esophageal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery and Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Paula D Strassle
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marco G Patti
- Department of Surgery and Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|