Should 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT be Performed Routinely in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Before Surgical Resection?

Diagnostics and Imaging for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors originate from hormone-producing islet cells and have a propensity to metastasize to the liver once they reach 2 cm in size. Their diagnosis relies upon a combination of computed tomography, MRI, DOTATATE PET, and endoscopic ultrasound with or without tissue biopsy. Biochemical work-up is driven by patient symptoms of hormone excess.

Larger Tumor Size and Elevated Serum Chromogranin A Levels Predict Metastatic Disease on DOTATATE Imaging in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE

DOTATATE PET/CT (DOTATATE) is superior to conventional imaging in detecting metastasis for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). However, limited availability, high-cost, and additive radiation exposure necessitate guidelines for its use. This study seeks to investigate the relationship between clinical characteristics and metastasis on DOTATATE.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 815 patients who underwent DOTATATE at UCLA from 2014 to 2022. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study cohort consisted of 163 patients with pathologically diagnosed GEP-NETs, who either underwent primary tumor resection within 1-year prior, or had not undergone resection at the time of DOTATATE imaging. The presence of metastasis was determined using DOTATATE. Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test, and Mann-Whitney test were conducted to compare intergroup difference. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify clinical characteristics associated with metastasis on DOTATATE.

RESULTS

Of patients with GEP-NETs, 40.5% (n = 66) were diagnosed with metastases by using DOTATATE. Those with metastatic disease were more likely to exhibit a larger primary tumor size (median 3.4 vs. 1.2, cm, P < 0.001), elevated serum chromogranin A level (CgA, median 208 vs. 97, mg/ml, P = 0.005), and higher tumor grade (P < 0.001). Primary tumor size ≥2 cm and serum CgA level ≥150 ng/mL for metastatic disease had a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 89%, and 72% and 59%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that primary tumor size (≥2/<2, cm, odds ratio [OR] 47.90, P < 0.001), tumor functionality (functional/nonfunctional, adjusted OR 10.17 P = 0.008), serum CgA level (≥150/<150, ng/ml, OR 6.25, P = 0.005), and tumor grade G2 (G2/G1, OR 9.6, P < 0.001) were independently associated with metastases on DOTATATE.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with GEP-NETs, primary tumor size ≥2 cm, serum CgA level ≥150 ng/mL, and tumor grade G2 are associated with an increased risk of metastases on DOTATATE, and these predictors may be helpful to identify patients where DOTATATE is indicated for complete staging.

Light It Up! The Use of DOTATATE in Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are increasingly used in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnostic imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has demonstrated the improved sensitivity in detecting primary and metastatic neuroendocrine lesions compared with conventional imaging and prior generation somatostatin receptor imaging. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE is now frequently included in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with prospective randomized control studies demonstrating its beneficial impact on survival and quality of life. Nonetheless, peptide rector radionuclide therapy is still considered palliative rather than curative and may be accompanied by adverse effects.

The Role of 68 Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT in the Management and Prediction of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Response for Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate the role of 68 Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT in guiding treatment for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) based on published literature, with specific focus on the ability of PET/CT to impact clinical management and predict peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search of articles up to December 2021 was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Eligible studies included ≥10 patients with confirmed or suspected NETs who had undergone pretreatment staging 68 Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT. A meta-analysis using the random-effects model was conducted to determine the overall change in management after PET/CT, whereas PET/CT-derived parameters that correlated with PRRT outcome were summarized from studies that assessed its predictive capabilities.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were included in this systemic review, of which 2266 patients from 24 studies were included for meta-analysis. We showed that PET/CT resulted in a change in clinical management in 36% (95% confidence interval, 31%-41%; range, 3%-66%) of patients. Fifteen studies consisting of 618 patients examined the prognostic ability of 68 Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT for PRRT. Of those, 8 studies identified a higher pretreatment SUV to favor PRRT, and 4 identified PET-based radiomic features for somatostatin receptor heterogeneity to be predictive of PRRT response.

CONCLUSIONS

Along with its diagnostic abilities, 68 Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT can impact treatment decision-making and may predict PRRT response in patients with NETs. More robust studies should be conducted to better elucidate the prognostic role of somatostatin receptor PET/CT in optimizing treatment for clinical outcome.

Optimization of timing of hepatocellular phase imaging after gadoxetate disodium injection for evaluation of patients with neuroendocrine tumor

PURPOSE

Metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (mGEP-NEN) are indolent malignancies which undergo frequent imaging follow-up. Hepatocellular phase (HCP) MR with hepatocellular-specific contrast agent is widely used to evaluate mGEP-NEN liver metastases but is commonly performed after a 20-min delay which prolongs scan time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if HCP MR at 15 min offers comparable performance to 20-min delay for patients with mGEP-NEN undergoing routine imaging surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved retrospective study, we evaluated 52 patients with mGEP-NEN who were imaged for routine surveillance with gadoxetate disodium (Eovist^®)-enhanced MR including 15- and 20-min delayed HCP. Two readers (R1, R2), blinded to HCP timing, independently reviewed each set of images in random order at least 1 month apart. Readers assessed presence and conspicuity of metastases, and subjective image quality using 5-point scales. Readers quantified the number of metastases and diameter of the largest lesion. Statistical analysis was performed to determine individual-reader and inter-reader differences for qualitative and quantitative data.

RESULTS

No differences were observed for subjective image quality (R1 p = 0.86, R2 p = 0.17) or lesion conspicuity (R1 p = 0.56, R2 p = 0.74) at 15 min and 20 min for either reader. Individual-reader concordance correlation coefficient between 15 and 20 min was high for number of metastases detected (R1 = 0.9842, R2 = 0.9579) and diameter of largest metastasis (R1 = 0.9629, R2 = 0.8859).

CONCLUSION

HCP imaging at 15 min provides similar diagnostic yield to standard 20-min delay, which may help reduce the scan time and costs, and improve throughput and patient satisfaction.

Cancers Metastatic to the Liver

The liver is a common site of metastatic cancer spread, and metastatic lesions are the most common malignant liver tumors. Diagnosis of liver metastases often is established based on clinical assessment, laboratory tests, and appropriate imaging. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for resectable colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases. Long-term survival outcome data after treatment of hepatic metastases of noncolorectal non-neuroendocrine tumors are less robust. The treatment strategy for patients with liver metastases should be determined case by case in a multidisciplinary setting.