Definitions for Loss of Domain: An International Delphi Consensus of Expert Surgeons

Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum and Botulinum Toxin A in a High-Risk Patient With Loss of Domain Inguinoscrotal Hernia

We present a challenging case of a loss of domain (LOD) inguinoscrotal hernia in a 77-year-old high-risk patient, successfully managed with the complementary preoperative use of progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) and botulinum toxin A (BTA) without complications. Giant inguinoscrotal and LOD hernias, particularly in multimorbid patients, are highly complex and require meticulous preoperative preparation. In this case, PPP was performed with ambient air and a gradual increase in insufflation volume, while BTA was injected at three points on each side, with a total dose of 300 IU. This approach facilitated a complication-free increase in abdominal cavity volume and the repositioning of chronically eventrated abdominal contents. The technique proved safe, feasible, and effective, contributing to atraumatic adhesiolysis, reduced operative time, and avoidance of more invasive surgical methods. A Shouldice pure tissue repair was performed, successfully avoiding the need for prosthetic materials.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal management of giant inguinoscrotal hernia with loss of domain

ABSTRACT

A giant inguinoscrotal hernia extends below the level of the midpoint of the thigh, in an upright position. They are usually due to the neglect of the patient and fear of surgical intervention. Patients typically present with lower urinary tract symptoms, ulcers over the scrotum caused due to dribbling of urine and rarely with obstruction or strangulation. Here, we present a similar case of an uncomplicated giant inguinoscrotal hernia with a Tanaka index of 74% who was preoperatively optimised with BOTOX (BOtulinum TOXin-A) and pre-operative progressive pneumoperitoneum and was managed laparoscopically with enhanced totally extraperitoneal repair. This signifies the importance of optimisation of the patients, especially with loss of domain help in managing such cases without any resection of bowel or omentum. Moreover, this proper pre-operative optimisation also helped us in managing such a case laparoscopically.

Eureka: objective assessment of the empty pelvis syndrome to measure volumetric changes in pelvic dead space following pelvic exenteration

BACKGROUND

Large tissue defects following pelvic exenteration (PE) fill with fluid and small bowel, leading to the empty pelvis syndrome (EPS). EPS causes a constellation of complications including pelvic sepsis and reduced quality of life. EPS remains poorly defined and cannot be objectively measured. Pathophysiology of EPS is multifactorial, with increased pelvic dead space potentially important. This study aims to describe methodology to objectively measure volumetric changes relating to EPS.

METHODS

The true pelvis is defined by the pelvic inlet and outlet. Within the true pelvis there is physiological pelvic dead space (PDS) between the peritoneal reflection and the inlet. This dead space is increased following PE and is defined as the exenteration pelvic dead space (EPD). EPD may be reduced with pelvic filling and the volume of filling is defined as the pelvic filling volume (PFV). PDS, EPD, and PFV were measured intraoperatively using a bladder syringe, and Archimedes' water displacement principle.

RESULTS

A patient undergoing total infralevator PE had a PDS of 50 ml. A rectus flap rendered the pelvic outlet watertight. EPD was then measured as 540 ml. Therefore there was a 10.8-fold increase in true pelvis dead space. An omentoplasty was placed into the EPD, displacing 130 ml; therefore, PFV as a percentage of EPD was 24.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first reported quantitative assessment of pathophysiological volumetric changes of pelvic dead space; these measurements may correlate to severity of EPS. PDS, EPD, and PFV should be amendable to assessment based on perioperative cross-sectional imaging, allowing for potential prediction of EPS-related outcomes.

Delphi consensus statement for understanding and managing the subcostal hernia: subcostal hernias collaborative report (scholar study)

INTRODUCTION

Subcostal hernias are categorized as L1 based on the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification and frequently involve M1, M2, and L2 sites. These are common after hepatopancreatic and biliary surgeries. The literature on subcostal hernias mostly comprises of retrospective reviews of small heterogenous cohorts, unsurprisingly leading to no consensus or guidelines. Given the limited literature and lack of consensus or guidelines for dealing with these hernias, we planned for a Delphi consensus to aid in decision making to repair subcostal hernias.

METHODS

We adopted a modified Delphi technique to establish consensus regarding the definition, characteristics, and surgical aspects of managing subcostal hernias (SCH). It was a four-phase Delphi study reflecting the widely accepted model, consisting of: 1. Creating a query. 2. Building an expert panel. 3. Executing the Delphi rounds. 4. Analysing, presenting, and reporting the Delphi results. More than 70% of agreement was defined as a consensus statement.

RESULTS

The 22 experts who agreed to participate in this Delphi process for Subcostal Hernias (SCH) comprised 7 UK surgeons, 6 mainland European surgeons, 4 Indians, 3 from the USA, and 2 from Southeast Asia. This Delphi study on subcostal hernias achieved consensus on the following areas-use of mesh in elective cases; the retromuscular position with strong discouragement for onlay mesh; use of macroporous medium-weight polypropylene mesh; use of the subcostal incision over midline incision if there is no previous midline incision; TAR over ACST; defect closure where MAS is used; transverse suturing over vertical suturing for closure of circular defects; and use of peritoneal flap when necessary.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi consensus defines subcostal hernias and gives insight into the consensus for incision, dissection plane, mesh placement, mesh type, and mesh fixation for these hernias.

A Ventral Hernia Management Pathway; A "Getting It Right First Time" approach to Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is an emerging specialty, involving complex multi-stage operations in patients with high medical and surgical risk. At our hospital, we have developed a growing interest in AWR, with a commitment to improving outcomes through a regular complex hernia MDT. An MDT approach to these patients is increasingly recognized as the path forward in management to optimize patients and improve outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review and combined this with our experiential knowledge of managing these cases to create a pathway for the management of our abdominal wall patients. This was done under the auspices of GIRFT (Getting It Right First Time) as a quality improvement project at our hospital.

RESULTS

We describe, in detail, our current AWR pathway, including the checklists and information documents we use with a stepwise evidence and experience-based approach to identifying the multiple factors associated with good outcomes. We explore the current literature and discuss our best practice pathway.

CONCLUSION

In this emerging specialty, there is limited guidance on the management of these patients. Our pathway, the "Complex Hernia Bundle," currently provides guidance for our abdominal wall team and may well be one that could be adopted/adapted by other centers where challenging hernia cases are undertaken.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and compartment syndrome after complex hernia repair

PURPOSE

Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a well-known concept after trauma surgery or after major abdominal surgery in critically ill patients. However, ACS as a complication after complex hernia repair is considered rare and supporting literature is scarce. As complexity in abdominal wall repair increases, with the introduction of new tools and advanced techniques, ACS incidence might rise and should be carefully considered when dealing with complex abdominal wall hernias. In this narrative review, a summary of the current literature will highlight several key features in the diagnosis and management of ACS in complex abdominal wall repair and discuss several treatment options during the different steps of complex AWR.

METHODS

We performed a literature search across PubMed using the search terms: "Abdominal Compartment syndrome," "Intra-abdominal pressure," "Complex abdominal hernia," and "Ventral hernia." Articles corresponding to these search terms were individually reviewed by primary author and selected on relevance.

CONCLUSION

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and ACS require imperative attention and should be carefully considered when dealing with complex abdominal wall hernias, even without significant loss of domain. Development of a true abdominal compartment syndrome is relatively rare, but is a devastating complication and should be prevented at all cost. Current evidence on surgical treatment of ACS after hernia repair is scarce, but conservative management might be an option in the early phase and low grades of IAH. However, life-saving treatment by relaparotomy and open abdomen management should be initiated when ACS starts setting in.

The empty pelvis syndrome: a core data set from the PelvEx collaborative

BACKGROUND

Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of radicality of PE are inconsistent; therefore, the best approaches for prevention are unknown. To facilitate future research into EPS, the aim of this study is to define a measurable core outcome set, core descriptor set and written definition for EPS. Consensus on strategies to mitigate EPS was also explored.

METHOD

Three-stage consensus methodology was used: longlisting with systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient engagement, and Delphi-piloting; shortlisting with two rounds of modified Delphi; and a confirmatory stage using a modified nominal group technique. This included a selection of measurement instruments, and iterative generation of a written EPS definition.

RESULTS

One hundred and three and 119 participants took part in the modified Delphi and consensus meetings, respectively. This encompassed international patient and healthcare professional representation with multidisciplinary input. Seventy statements were longlisted, seven core outcomes (bowel obstruction, enteroperineal fistula, chronic perineal sinus, infected pelvic collection, bowel obstruction, morbidity from reconstruction, re-intervention, and quality of life), and four core descriptors (magnitude of surgery, radiotherapy-induced damage, methods of reconstruction, and changes in volume of pelvic dead space) reached consensus-where applicable, measurement of these outcomes and descriptors was defined. A written definition for EPS was agreed.

CONCLUSIONS

EPS is an area of unmet research and clinical need. This study provides an agreed definition and core data set for EPS to facilitate further research.

[Loss of domain and reduction in median suture tension]

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall reconstruction in large incisional hernia/laparostoma poses a particular challenge. A loss of domain is the extreme form of intestinal volume displacement. The challenge lies in overcoming retraction of the lateral abdominal muscles.

OBJECTIVE

Experienced surgeons have access to a variety of techniques aimed at gaining lateral length along the abdominal wall or reducing suture tension at the midline. These techniques are intended to facilitate reconstruction even in complex cases and are outlined in this article from a practical perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The application of botulinum toxin A (BTA) and progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) are described as preoperative methods to gain abdominal wall length. Peritoneal flaps, intraoperative fascial traction (IFT) and component separation including transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) are available for the surgical reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Bridging and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh approach are fallback techniques. All these techniques were integrated into a practical algorithm for complex abdominal wall reconstruction including preoperative and postoperative care and assessed by the authors with respect to effort, effectiveness and complexity.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In the opinion of the authors, the status of complex abdominal wall reconstruction is currently best described by a combination of the most effective and proven techniques in terms of a "categorical algorithm". The combination of BTA, IFT and TAR presently appears to be the most effective method; however, experience and expertise are a prerequisite.

Preoperative Optimization for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Patients requiring abdominal wall reconstruction may have medical comorbidities and/or complex defects. Comorbidities such as smoking, diabetes, obesity, cirrhosis, and frailty have been associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Prehabilitation strategies are variably associated with improved outcomes. Large hernia defects and loss of domain may present challenges in achieving fascial closure, an important part of restoring abdominal wall function. Prehabilitation of the abdominal wall can be achieved with the use of botulinum toxin A, and preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum.

Comparison of two-dimensional measurement with three-dimensional volume rendering for the assessment of loss of domain in incisional hernia patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare simple two-dimensional (2D) measurement with comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering to determine loss of domain (LOD), a clinically important decision-making feature for incisional hernia repair.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed the CT scans of a consecutive cohort of adult patients with a midline incisional hernia. The hernia sac- and abdominal cavity volumes were obtained by two different methods. The 2D method estimated the volumes using the corresponding height, width, and depth. The 3D method comprised of a volume rendering tool. For both methods, LOD was calculated according to the Sabbagh ratio (hernia sac volume / (hernia sac volume + abdominal cavity volume)). Taking the 3D method as the reference standard, the performance of the 2D method was expressed as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for LOD of more than- and less than 20%. The agreement between both methods was expressed as Cohen's kappa coefficient (kappa).

RESULTS

We analyzed 92 CT scans. Agreement between both methods was high (kappa = 0.854, p = 0.0001); all 67 measurements for which the 2D method assessed LOD to be less than 20% were correctly classified (NPV = 100%), and 20 of 25 measurements for which the 2D method assessed LOD to be more than 20% were correctly classified (PPV = 80%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2D method can exclude patients from perioperative actions needed for a more complex hernia. Since this method is easy to use and less time-consuming, it seems useful for the routine radiological assessment of LOD in clinical practice.

EVOLUTION OF COMPONENT SEPARATION TECHNIQUE (REVIEW)

The problem of treatment of incisional ventral hernias is currently very relevant. The appearance of a hernial defect in the area of a previous operation is one of the most frequent long-term complications of any surgical treatment. Component separation techniques are the most modern and promising methods for the treatment of large ventral hernias. The review focuses on the main stages in the development of separation technique, as well as the results of treating patients with incisional ventral hernias using various options for posterior separation repair, which are currently frequently used. It has been established that posterior component separation is an effective and safe method of treatment, however, there is currently insufficient data on the long-term postoperative period and patients quality of life.

Slowly absorbable mesh versus standard care in the management of contaminated midline incisional hernia (COMpACT-BIO): a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial including a health economic evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernia (IH) is the most frequent mid-term and long-term complication after midline laparotomy. The current standard treatment includes repair using a mesh. In a contaminated field, the use of a non-absorbable mesh increases the risk of surgical site infection and the costs. Slowly absorbable meshes are safe in contaminated fields, but no data have been reported regarding their long-term recurrence rate. COMpACT-BIO is a multicentre prospective randomised controlled phase III trial designed to compare the 3-year recurrence rate in patients undergoing contaminated IH repair with either a slowly absorbable mesh or standard care.

METHODS

In patients undergoing midline IH repair in a contaminated surgical field (grade III of the modified Ventral Hernia Working Group classification), the COMpACT-BIO study compares the use of a slowly absorbable mesh with that of conventional care according to standardised surgical procedures (primary closure, non-absorbable synthetic mesh or biologic mesh, at the discretion of the surgeon). Randomisation is done during surgery before closure the fascia with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The choice of the slowly absorbable mesh is left to the criteria of each centre. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with scan-confirmed IH recurrence within 3 years after repair.

ETHICS/DISSEMINATION

This trial is conducted in compliance with international standards for research practice and reporting. Written informed consent will be obtained from patients prior to inclusion. All data were identified and anonymised prior to analysis. The protocol has been approved by an Institutional Review Board (2020-A0823-36/SI:20.07.03.66831), and will be conducted in compliance with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals and presented to patients and healthcare professionals.

PROTOCOL VERSION

Version 2-13 October 2020.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04597840.

Midterm Results of the Open and Minimally Invasive Transversus Abdominis Release Technique for the Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias in an Academic Center

Introduction: Large hernia defects are a challenge for general and specialized hernia surgeons. The transversus abdominis release (TAR) technique has revolutionized the treatment of complex hernias since it allows the closure of large midline hernias, as well as hernias in different locations. This study aims to report the experience with the TAR technique and mid-term results in the first 101 patients. Methods: Non-concurrent cohort review of our prospectively collected electronic database. All patients submitted to a TAR (open or minimally invasive eTEP-TAR) from 2017 to 2020 were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, hernia characteristics, preoperative optimization, intraoperative variables, and clinical outcomes were gathered. The main outcomes of this study are hernia recurrences and surgical morbidity. Results: A total of 101 patients were identified. The median follow-up was 26 months. Mean age and body mass index was 63 years and 31.4 Kg/m2, respectively. Diabetes was present in 22% of patients and 43% had at least one previous hernia repair. Nineteen patients had significant loss of domain. Mean hernia size and area were 13 cm and 247 cm2, respectively. Ninety-six percent of cases were clean or clean-contaminated. The mean operative time was 164 min and all patients received a synthetic mesh. We diagnosed two hernia recurrences and the overall (medical and surgical) complication rate was 32%. The hernia-specific complication rate was 17%, with seven surgical site infections and seven surgical site occurrences requiring procedural interventions. Notably, weight loss was associated with a lower risk of SSOPI and reoperations. Conclusion: We show an encouraging 2% of recurrences in the mid-term follow-up in the setting of clinically complex hernia repair. However, we observed a high frequency of overall and hernia-specific complications pointing to the complexity of the type of surgery itself and the patients we operated on.

Assessing Textbook Outcome After Implementation of Transversus Abdominis Release in a Regional Hospital

Background: The posterior component separation technique with transversus abdominis release (TAR) was introduced in 2012 as an alternative to the classic anterior component separation technique (Ramirez). This study describes outcome and learning curve of TAR, five years after implementation of this new technique in a regional hospital in the Netherlands. Methods: A standardized work up protocol, based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, was used to implement the TAR. The TAR technique as described by Novitsky was performed. After each 20 procedures, outcome parameters were evaluated and new quality measurements implemented. Primary outcome measure was Textbook Outcome, the rate of patients with an uneventful clinical postoperative course after TAR. Textbook Outcome is defined by a maximum of 7 days hospitalization without any complication (wound or systemic), reoperation or readmittance, within the first 90 postoperative days, and without a recurrence during follow up. The number of patients with a Textbook Outcome compared to the total number of consecutively performed TARs is depicted as the institutional learning curve. Secondary outcome measures were the details and incidences of the surgical site and systemic complications within 90 days, as well as long-term recurrences. Results: From 2016, sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent a TAR. Textbook Outcome was 35% and the institutional learning curve did not flatten after 69 procedures. Systemic complications occurred in 48%, wound complications in 41%, and recurrences in 4%. Separate analyses of three successive cohorts of each 20 TARs demonstrated that both Textbook Outcome (10%, 30% and 55%, respectively) and the rate of surgical site events (45%, 15%, and 10%) significantly (p < 0.05) improved with more experience. Conclusion: Implementation of the open transversus abdominis release demonstrated that outcome was positively correlated to an increasing number of TARs performed. TAR has a long learning curve, only partially determined by the technical aspects of the operation. Implementation of the TAR requires a solid plan. Building, and maintaining, an adequate setting for patients with complex ventral hernias is the real challenge and driving force to improve outcome.

A simplified method to evaluate the loss of domain

PURPOSE

The treatment of giant incisional hernia (IH) with loss of domain (LOD, IHLD) is considerably challenging due to technical difficulties and subsequent post-operative complications. These post-operative risks may be anticipated by calculating the abdominal cavity (AC) volume (ACV) and the IH volume (IHV) on the preoperative CT-scans, using the AC and IH dimensions (Tanaka's method) or using tridimensional volumetry (Sabbagh's method). These techniques are often time-consuming and require specific softwares. The aim of the present study was to develop a simple method to rapidly obtain the LOD-ratio on the preoperative CT-Scan.

METHODS

The CT-scans (n = 89) of patients with IHLD were retrospectively studied. Several ratios were calculated using different parameters of the AC and the IH, including width, height and depth, the areas (axial and sagittal ellipse, as well as freehand sagittal surface areas) and these were compared with the reference methods of Sabbagh et al. and Tanaka et al. RESULTS: The LOD ratios calculated from the two reference methods gave similar results (ICC = 0.82, p < 0.0001). The new "R-ratios" (Reims-ratios) obtained from the IH and AC surface areas measured using the "freehand ROI" tool on sagittal view or roughly evaluated by an ellipse on axial view showed excellent correlation with both reference ratios (all ICC ≥ 0.71, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The LOD ratio may be quickly obtained by drawing two circles on the pre-operative CT scan ("R ratios") and available on the webpage https://romeo.univ-reims.fr/Rratio/ . This will certainly help surgeons to routinely anticipate the post-operative complications before IHLD repair.

A modified Delphi process to establish research priorities in hernia surgery

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet despite this, there remains a lack of high-quality evidence to support best management. The aim of the study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine future research priorities in this field.

METHODS

Stakeholders were invited by email, using British Hernia Society membership details or Twitter, to submit individual research questions via an online survey. In addition, questions obtained from a patient focus group (PFG) were collated to form Phase I. Two rounds of prioritization by stakeholders (phases II and III) were then completed to determine a final list of research questions. All questions were analyzed on an anonymized basis.

RESULTS

A total of 266 questions, 19 from the PFG, were submitted by 113 stakeholders in Phase I. Of these, 64 questions were taken forward for prioritization in Phase II, which was completed by 107 stakeholders. Following Phase II analysis, 97 stakeholders prioritized 36 questions in Phase III. This resulted in a final list of 14 research questions, 3 of which were from the PFG. Stakeholders included patients and healthcare professionals (consultant surgeons, trainee surgeons and other multidisciplinary members) from over 27 countries during the 3 phases.

CONCLUSION

The study has identified 14 key research priorities pertaining to abdominal wall hernia surgery. Uniquely, these priorities have been determined from participation by both healthcare professionals and patients. These priorities should now be addressed by well-designed, high-quality international collaborative research.

Preoperative botulinum A toxin as an adjunct for abdominal wall reconstruction: a single-center early experience at an Academic Center in New York

INTRODUCTION

the botulinum toxin A (BTA) has been used to achieve a chemical component separation, and it has been used with favorable outcomes for the repair of complex ventral hernia (CVH) with and without loss of domain (LD). The aim of this study is to describe our early experience with the chemical component separation in the United Sates.

METHODS

a retrospective observational study of all patients who underwent ventral hernia repair for CVH with or without LD between July 2018 and June 2020. Preoperative BTA was injected in all patients via sonographic guidance bilaterally, between the lateral muscles to achieve chemical denervation before the operation. Patient demographics, anatomical location of the hernia, perioperative data and postoperative data are described.

RESULTS

36 patients underwent this technique before their hernia repair between July 2018 to June 2020. Median age was 62 years (range 30-87). Median preoperative defect size was 12cm (range 6-25) and median intraoperative defect size was 13cm (range 5-27). Median preoperative hernia sac volume (HSV) was 1338cc (128-14040), median preoperative abdominal cavity volume (ACV) was 8784cc (5197-18289) and median volume ration (HSV/ACV) was 14%. The median OR time for BTA administration was 45 minutes (range 28-495). Seroma was the most common postoperative complication in 8 of the patients (22%). Median follow up was 43 days (range 0-580).

CONCLUSION

preoperative chemical component separation with BTA is a safe and effective adjunct to hernia repair in CVH repairs where a challenging midline fascial approximation is anticipated.

Scapula revisited: new features identified and denoted by terms using consensus method of Delphi and taxonomy panel to be implemented in radiologic and surgical practice

BACKGROUND

The scapular structures that have not yet been assigned anatomic terms generate a challenge in clinical diagnostics and surgical application, as well as in scientific observation. The aim of this study was to solve the lack in terminology concerning the scapula and the scapular region.

METHODS

Observation and description of 29 structures were carried out on both dry scapulae and radiographs of the shoulder joint. In addition, several terms commonly encountered throughout the literature concerning the scapula were revised. A degree of consensus was reached by using the Delphi method surveying the opinions of 21 invited experts in the field. Taxonomy panels and etymology of anatomic terminology were considered in the generation of the proposed terms.

RESULTS

The scapula was redefined as a lamina with projecting processes, and several landmarks demarcating certain newly defined topographic spaces were highlighted via 2 rounds of Delphi systematic voting and discussion. The overall level of the peer nominees' consensus was high. Few terms received a neutral opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study communicates a proposal of 16 new terms defining grossly visible structures on the scapula that have not yet been described by officially recognized terms, including a call to unify 13 previously contributed terms that have not been codified and are often used interchangeably within different surgical and scientific fields. Incorporating these terms into the anatomic nomenclature would facilitate communication accuracy and eliminate ambiguity among clinicians, surgeons, and anatomists.

Reading a preoperative CT scan to guide complex abdominal wall reconstructive surgery

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is the imaging modality of choice when planning the overall management and operative approach to complex abdominal wall hernias. Despite its availability and well-recognised benefits there are no guidelines or recommendations regarding how best to read or report such scans for this application. In this paper we aim to outline an approach to interpreting preoperative CT scans in abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). This approach breaks up the interpretive process into 4 steps-concentrating on the hernia or hernias, any complicating features of the hernia(s), the surrounding soft tissues and the abdominopelvic cavity as a whole-and was developed as a distillation of the authors' collective experience. We describe the key features that should be looked for at each of the four steps and the rationale for their inclusion.

Reporting guideline for interventional trials of primary and incisional ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Primary and incisional ventral hernia trials collect unstandardized inconsistent data, limiting data interpretation and comparison. This study aimed to create two minimum data sets for primary and incisional ventral hernia interventional trials to standardize data collection and improve trial comparison. To support these data sets, standardized patient-reported outcome measures and trial methodology criteria were created.

METHODS

To construct these data sets, nominal group technique methodology was employed, involving 15 internationally recognized abdominal wall surgeons and two patient representatives. Initially a maximum data set was created from previous systematic and panellist reviews. Thereafter, three stages of voting took place: stage 1, selection of the number of variables for data set inclusion; stage 2, selection of variables to be included; and stage 3, selection of variable definitions and detection methods. A steering committee interpreted and analysed the data.

RESULTS

The maximum data set contained 245 variables. The three stages of voting commenced in October 2019 and had been completed by July 2020. The final primary ventral hernia data set included 32 variables, the incisional ventral hernia data set included 40 variables, the patient-reported outcome measures tool contained 25 questions, and 40 methodological criteria were chosen. The best known variable definitions were selected for accurate variable description. CT was selected as the optimal preoperative descriptor of hernia morphology. Standardized follow-up at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years was selected.

CONCLUSION

These minimum data sets, patient-reported outcome measures, and methodological criteria have allowed creation of a manual for investigators aiming to undertake primary ventral hernia or incisional ventral hernia interventional trials. Adopting these data sets will improve trial methods and comparisons.

Adjunct botox to preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for incisional hernia with loss of domain: no additional effect but may improve outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernia with loss of domain (IHLD) remains a surgical challenge. Its management requires complex approaches including specific preoperative and intra-operative techniques. This study focuses on the interest of adding preoperative botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection to preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP), compared to PPP alone.

MATERIAL

Patients between January 2015 and March 2020 with IHLD who underwent pre-operative preparation were included. Their baseline characteristics were retrospectively analyzed, along with the characteristics of their incisional hernia before and after preparation including CT-scan volumetry. Intra-operative data, early post-operative outcomes, surgical site occurrences (SSOs) including surgical site infection (SSI) were recorded.

RESULTS

Four hundred and fifty (450) patients with incisional hernia were operated, including 41 patients (9.1%) with IHLD, 13 of which had both BTA and PPP, while 28 had PPP only. Both groups were comparable in term of patients and IHLD characteristics. Median increase in the volume of the abdominal cavity (VAbC) was + 55% for the entire population (+ 58.3% for the BTA-PPP group, p < 0.0001 and + 52.8% for the PPP-alone group, p < 0.0001) although the increase in volume was not different between the two groups (p = 0.99). Complete fascial closure was achieved in all patients. SSOs were more frequent in the PPP-alone group than in the BTA-PPP group (17 (60.7%) versus 3 (23.1%) patients, respectively, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

BTA and PPP are both useful in pre-operative preparation for IHLD. Combining both significantly increases the volume of abdominal cavity but associating BTA to PPP does not add any volumetric benefit but may decrease the post-operative SSO rate.

[Laparostoma-Avoidance and treatment of complications]

The open abdomen (OA) is an established concept for treating severe abdominal diseases. The most frequent reasons for placement of an open abdomen are abdominal sepsis (e.g. from intestinal perforation or anastomotic leakage), severe abdominal organ injury and abdominal compartment syndrome. The pathophysiology is much more complex than the surgeon's eye can see in an OA. The temporary closure of the abdominal wall ensures sufficient drainage of infected ascites, protection of the intestinal loops and conditioning of the abdominal wall in order to be able carry out definitive closure of the abdominal wall at the end of the surgical treatment. Negative peritoneal pressure therapy combined with fascia traction (with or without mesh) is well-established in the management of an open abdomen.

Beyond the Hernia Repair: A Review of the Insurance Coverage of Critical Adjuncts in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

The prevalence of complex abdominal wall defects continues to rise, which necessitates increasingly sophisticated medical and surgical management. Insurance coverage for reconstructive surgery varies due to differing interpretations of medical necessity. The authors sought to characterize the current insurance landscape for a subset of key adjunctive procedures in abdominal wall reconstruction, including component separation and simultaneous ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy (SVHR-P) or abdominoplasty (SVHR-A), and synthesize a set of reporting recommendations based on insurer criteria.

Methods

Insurance companies were selected based on their national and state market share. Preauthorization criteria, preauthorization lists, and medical/clinical policies by each company for component separation, SVRH-P, and SVRH-A were examined. Coverage criteria were abstracted and analyzed.

Results

Fifty insurance companies were included in the study. Only 1 company had clear approval criteria for component separation, while 38 cover it on a case-by-case basis. Four companies had clear approval policies for SVHR-P, 4 cover them on an individual case basis, and 28 flatly do not cover SVHR-P. Similarly, 3 companies had clear approval policies for SVHR-A, 6 cover them case by case, and 33 do not cover SVHR-A.

Conclusions

Component separation and soft tissue contouring are important adjunctive AWR procedures with efficacy supported by peer-reviewed literature. The variability in SVHR-P and SVHR-A coverage likely decreases access to these procedures even when there are established medical indications. The authors recommend standardization of coverage criteria for component separation, given that differing interpretations of medical necessity increase the likelihood of insurance denials.