Role of Primary Tumor Resection for Metastatic Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Diagnosis and staging of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors with CT enterography and PET with Gallium-68: preoperative risk stratification protocol

PURPOSE

Pre-operative diagnosis and staging of small intestine neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) remain sub-optimal, with open palpation during surgery still considered the gold standard. This limits a standardized implementation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to assess a tailored diagnostic work-up to identify candidates at low risk of undetected disease who may benefit from MIS.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SI-NETs between 2013 and 2022 who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography enterography (CTE) and Ga68-DOTATOC-positron emission tomography-CT (68 Ga DOTATATE PET/CT) preoperatively and subsequently underwent open surgical resection were included. Imaging studies were reassessed by two radiologists. Combined use of CTE and 68 Ga DOTATATE PET/CT in determining primary lesion disease burden (number of lesions) and LN disease stage (distal and proximal relative to superior mesenteric vessels) was assessed, using surgical reports and pathology as gold standard.

RESULTS

Overall, 56 patients were included. Sensitivity of CTE and 68 Ga DOTATATE PET/CT for at least one primary SI-NET was 100% and 94%, respectively. In the presence of concordance between studies, combined use of CTE and 68 Ga DOTATATE PET/CT for detection of single primary tumors improved specificity to 89% (n = 25/28) with a positive predictive value of 87.5% (n = 21/24). Distal LN disease was identified in 89.2% of cases (n = 33/37). The association of single lesion and distal LN disease was found pre-operatively in 32% of patients (n = 18).

CONCLUSION

Combined use of CTE and 68 Ga DOTATATE PET/CT enables identifying low-risk surgical candidates (single SI-NET lesions with distal LN disease).

Surgery as a Principle and Technical Consideration for Primary Tumor Resection of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs) are increasingly identified and have become the most frequent entity among small bowel tumors. An increasing incidence, a high prevalence, and a prolonged survival with optimal modern multidisciplinary management makes SB-NETs a unique set of tumors to consider for surgical oncologists. The major goals of surgical treatment in the setting of SB-NET include control of tumor volume, control of endocrine secretion, and prevention of locoregional complications. Key considerations include assessment of multifocality and resection of mesenteric nodal masses with the use of mesenteric-sparing approaches and acceptance of R1 margins if necessary to clear disease while avoiding short bowel syndrome. A description through eight steps for consideration is presented to allow for systematic surgical planning and execution of resection. Moreover, some controversies and evolving considerations to the surgical principles and technical procedures remain. The role of primary tumor resection in the presence of (unresectable) liver metastasis is still unclear. Reports of feasibility of minimally invasive surgery are emerging, with undetermined selection criteria for appropriateness or long-term outcomes. Resection of SB-NETs should be considered in all patients fit for surgery and should follow principles to achieve surgical oncological control that is appropriate for the stage and tumor burden, considering the age and comorbidity of the individual patient.

Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours: 10 Years' Experience at a Tertiary Referral Centre

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) arising from the small bowel are clinically challenging and are often diagnosed at advanced stages. Disease control with surgery alone can be demanding. Multimodal treatment concepts integrating surgery and non-surgical modalities could be of benefit.

METHOD

Retrospective review of consecutive adult patients with SB NET treated at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. Data regarding clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and disease trajectory were extracted and summarised. Overall and progression/recurrence-free survival were estimated at 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

154 patients were identified, with a median age of 64 years (range 33-87); 135/154 (87.7%) had stage III/IV disease at diagnosis. Surgery was used in 125 individuals (81.2%), typically with either segmental small bowel resection (60.8%) or right hemicolectomy (33.6%) and mesenteric lymphadenectomy for the primary tumour. Systemic and/or liver-directed therapies were used in 126 (81.8%); 60 (47.6%) had more than one line of non-surgical treatment. Median follow-up was 67.2 months (range 3.1-310.4); overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 91.0% (95% CI: 84.9-94.7%) and 82.5% (95% CI: 72.9-88.9%), respectively. Imaging-based median progression-free survival was 42.7 months (95% CI: 24.7 to 72.4); 5-year progression-free survival was 63.4% (95% CI: 55.0-70.6%); 10-year progression-free survival was 18.7% (95% CI: 12.4-26.1). Nineteen patients (12.3%) reached 10 years follow-up without disease recurrence and therefore were considered cured.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with SB NET present in a metastasised stage. Multimodal treatment concepts may be associated with excellent clinical outcomes. Future work should explore optimal approaches to treatment sequencing and patient selection.

Optimal surgical approach for digestive neuroendocrine neoplasia primaries: Oncological benefits versus short and long-term complications

The rising incidence and the accumulating prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) in the population makes this a common, prevalent and a clinically relevant disease group. Surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment for digestive NENs. Thus, resection should in principle be considered for all patients with NEN, although taking the patients age, relevant comorbidity, and performance status into account for operability. Patients with insulinomas, NEN of the appendix and rectal NENs are usually cured by surgery alone. However, less than a third of patients are amendable to curative surgery alone at time of diagnosis. Furthermore, recurrence is common and may occur years after primary surgery, hence the long follow-up time recommended in most NENs (>10 years). As many patients with NENs present with locoregional or metastatic disease, there is considerable debate regarding the role of debulking surgery in these settings. However, good long-term survival can be achieved in a considerable proportion of patients, with 50-70% alive up to 10 years after surgery. Location and grade are the main determinants of long-term survival. Here we present considerations to surgery for primary neuroendocrine tumors in the digestive tract.

The Evolving Landscape of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors, with variable presentation based on the location of origin and degree of metastatic spread. There are no randomized control trials to guide surgical management; however, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for most gastroenteropancreatic NETs based on retrospective studies. Metastatic disease is common at the time of presentation, particularly in the liver. There is a role for cytoreduction for improvement of both symptoms and survival. Robust prospective randomized data exists to support the use of medical therapies to improve progression-free and overall survival in patients with advanced, metastatic, and unresectable NETs.

177Lu-DOTATATE Efficacy and Safety in Functioning Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Joint Analysis of Phase II Prospective Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies with different prognoses. At least 25% of metastatic patients have functioning neuroendocrine tumors (F-NETs) that secrete bioactive peptides, causing specific debilitating and occasionally life-threatening symptoms such as diarrhea and flushing. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are usually effective but beyond them few treatment options are available. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of 177 Lu-DOTATATE in patients with progressive metastatic F-NETs and SSA-refractory syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A non-pre-planned joint analysis was conducted in patients enrolled in phase II clinical trials on metastatic NETs. We extrapolated data from F-NET patients with ≥1 refractory sign/symptom to octreotide, and ≥1 measurable lesion. Syndrome response (SR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance and disease response were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, the majority (88.1%) with a SR. According to RECIST criteria, 1 (1.5%) patient showed a CR, 21 (32.3%) had a PR and 40 (61.5%) SD. At a median follow-up of 28.9 months (range 2.2-63.2) median PFS was 33.0 months (95%CI: 27.1-48.2). Median OS (mOS) had not been reached at the time of the analysis; the 2-year OS was 87.8% (95%CI: 76.1-94.1). Syndromic responders showed better survival than non-responders, with a 2-year OS of 93.9% (95%CI: 92.2-98.0) vs. 40.0% (95%CI: 6.6-73.4), respectively. A total of 233 adverse events were recorded. Grade 1-2 hematological toxicity was the most frequent.

CONCLUSION

The 177 Lu-DOTATATE improved symptoms and disease control in patients with F-NETs. Treatment was well tolerated. The syndrome had an impact on both quality of life and OS.

Association of lymph node metastases, grade and extent of mesenteric lymph node dissection in locoregional small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors with recurrence-free survival

We aimed to assess the prognostic impact of tumor- and patient-related parameters in patients with stage I-III small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs), who underwent locoregional resective surgery (LRS) with curative intent. We included 229 patients with stage I-III SI-NETs diagnosed from June 15, 1993, through March 8, 2021, identified using the SI-NET databases from five European referral centers. Mean ± SD age at baseline was 62.5 ± 13.6 years; 111/229 patients were women (49.3%). All tumors were well-differentiated; 160 were grade 1 (G1) tumors, 51 were G2, two were G3 and 18 tumors were of unspecified grade (median Ki-67: 2%, range 1%-50%). One-hundred and sixty-three patients (71.2%) had lymph node (LN) involvement. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 10 (0-63), whereas the median number of positive LNs was 2 (0-43). After a mean ± SD follow-up of 54.1 ± 64.1 months, 60 patients experienced disease recurrence at a median (range) of 36.2 (2.5-285.1) months. The 5- and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 66.6% and 49.3% respectively. In univariable analysis, there was no difference in RFS and overall survival (OS) between LN-positive and LN-negative patients (log-rank, p = .380 and .198, respectively). However, in stage IIIb patients who underwent mesenteric lymph node dissection (MLND) with a minimum of five retrieved LN (n = 125), five or more LN metastases were associated with shorter RFS (median RFS [95% CI] = 107.4 [0-229.6] vs. 73.7 [35.3-112.1] months; log-rank, p = .048). In addition, patients with G2 tumors exhibited shorter RFS compared to patients with G1 tumors (median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 46.9 [36.4-57.3] vs. 120.7 [82.7-158.8] months; log-rank, p = .001). In multivariable Cox-regression RFS analysis in stage IIIb patients, the Ki-67 proliferation index (hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.035-1.131; p < .0001) and the number of LN metastases (hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.001-1.125; p = .047) were independent prognostic factors for RFS. In conclusion, LRS with a meticulous MLND and a minimum number of five harvested LNs appears to be critical in the surgical management of SI-NET patients with locoregional disease. In patients who underwent LRS and MLND, the Ki-67 proliferation index and the LN metastases count were independent predictors of RFS.

Survival According to Therapy Regimen for Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Introduction: Scarce data exist for therapy regimens other than somatostatin analogues (SSA) and peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) for siNET. We analyzed real world data for differences in survival according to therapy. Patients and methods: Analysis of 145 patients, diagnosed between 1993 and 2018 at a single institution, divided in treatment groups. Group (gr.) 0: no treatment (n = 10), gr 1: TACE and/or PRRT (n = 26), gr. 2: SSA (n = 32), gr. 3: SSA/PRRT (n = 8), gr. 4: chemotherapy (n = 8), gr. 5: not metastasized (at diagnosis), surgery only (n = 53), gr. 6 = metastasized (at diagnosis), surgery only (n = 10). Results: 45.5% female, median age 60 years (range, 27–84). A total of 125/145 patients with a resection of the primary tumor. For all patients, 1-year OS (%) was 93.8 (95%-CI: 90–98), 3-year OS = 84.3 (CI: 78–90) and 5-year OS = 77.5 (CI: 70–85). For analysis of survival according to therapy, only stage IV patients (baseline) that received treatment were included. Compared with reference gr. 2 (SSA only), HR for OS was 1.49 (p = 0.47) for gr. 1, 0.72 (p = 0.69) for gr. 3, 2.34 (p = 0.19) for gr. 4. The 5 y OS rate of patients whose primary tumor was resected (n = 125) was 73.1%, and without PTR was 33.3% (HR: 4.31; p = 0.003). Individual patients are represented in swimmer plots. Conclusions: For stage IV patients in this analysis (limited by low patient numbers in co. 3/4), multimodal treatment did not significantly improve survival over SSA treatment alone. A resection of primary tumor significantly improves survival.

Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: Factors Associated with the Development of Local Tumor-Related Symptoms

INTRODUCTION

Clinical presentations of small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SiNENs) can range from asymptomatic to life-threatening complications. Other than primary tumor(s), mesenteric mass (MM) can provide local tumor-related (LTR) symptoms. Although some expert centers propose routine primary resection to avoid complications in stage IV patients, some guidelines suggest avoiding primary tumor resection unless in the presence of symptoms. This study was aimed to identify factors associated with the presence or development of LTR symptoms.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2019, SiNEN patients with appropriate initial morphological imaging were included. All initial imaging was reviewed. Associations between factors and LTR symptoms were assessed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 144 SiNEN patients, 66 met the inclusion criteria. Multivariate analysis identified on initial morphological imaging (i) any visible primary tumor (p < 0.01) and (ii) MM contact ≥180° with the superior mesenteric vessels (p ≤ 0.02), as independent factors associated with LTR symptoms in the whole study population as well as in the subgroup of primary resected patients. Among the 14 (21%) patients with both factors on initial cross-sectional conventional imaging, 12 (18%) were straightaway symptomatic at diagnosis and the remaining became symptomatic during the follow-up. All asymptomatic patients, without upfront surgery and without any predictive factor 16/18 (89%), stayed asymptomatic during the 2.7-year median follow-up. The absence of association between these 2 factors yielded a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 62%, and a negative predictive value of 100% for the occurrence of LTR symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The presence of any visible primary tumor and/or MM superior mesenteric vessels contact ≥180° at initial cross-sectional imaging are 2 easily identifiable factors, which can help physicians for the decision-making regarding timing and type of surgery for SiNENs. Larger multicenter studies should endorse these results.

Effect of primary tumour resection without curative intent in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours of the small intestine and right colon: meta-analysis

Background

Patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (siNETs) usually present with advanced disease. Primary tumour resection without curative intent is controversial in patients with metastatic siNETs. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate survival after primary tumour resection without curative intent compared with no resection in patients with metastatic siNETs.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed, using MEDLINE® (PubMed), Embase®, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to 25 February 2021. Studies were included if survival after primary tumour resection versus no resection in patients with metastatic siNETs was reported. Results were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis, and are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to enable comment on the impact of important confounders.

Results

After screening 3659 abstracts, 16 studies, published between 1992 and 2021, met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 9428 patients. Thirteen studies reported HRs adjusted for important confounders and were included in the meta-analysis. Median overall survival was 112 (i.q.r. 82–134) months in the primary tumour resection group compared with 60 (74–88) months in the group without resection. Five-year overall survival rates were 74 (i.q.r. 67–77) and 44 (34–45) per cent respectively. Primary tumour resection was associated with improved survival compared with no resection (HR 0.55, 95 per cent c.i. 0.47 to 0.66). This effect remained in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Primary tumour resection is associated with increased survival in patients with advanced, metastatic siNETs, even after adjusting for important confounders.

How to Manage Small Intestine (Jejunal and Ileal) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Presenting with Liver Metastases?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (siNENs) are slowly growing tumours with a low malignant potential. However, more than half of the patients present with distant metastases (stage IV) and nearly all with locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases at the time of surgery. The value of locoregional treatment is discussed controversially.

RECENT FINDINGS

In stage I to III disease, locoregional surgery was currently shown to be curative prolonging survival. In stage IV disease, surgery may prolong survival in selected patients with the chance to cure locoregional disease besides radical/debulking liver surgery. It may improve the quality of life and may prevent severe local complications resulting in a state of chronic malnutrition and severe intestinal ischaemia or bowel obstruction. Locoregional tumour resection offers the opportunity to be curative or to focus therapeutically on liver metastasis, facilitating various other therapeutic modalities. Risks and benefits of the surgical intervention need to be balanced individually.