Knowledge of the Culture of Safety in Cholecystectomy (COSIC) Among Surgical Residents: Do We Train Them Well For Future Practice?

[The clinical importance of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

BACKGROUND

Injury of the bile duct during cholecystectomy (CHE) is a severe complication. The critical view of safety (CVS) can help to reduce the frequency of this complication during laparoscopic CHE. So far, no scoring of CVS images with a grading system is available.

METHOD

The CVS images of 534 patients with laparoscopic CHE could be structurally analyzed and assessed with marks from 1 (very good) to 5 (insufficient). The CVS mark was correlated with the perioperative course. Additionally, the perioperative course of patients after laparoscopic CHE with and without a CVS image was investigated.

RESULTS

In 534 patients 1 or more CVS images could be analyzed. The average CVS mark was 1.9, whereby 280 patients (52.4%) had a 1, 126 patients (23.6%) a 2, 114 (21.3%) a 3 and 14 patients (2.6%) a 4 or 5. Younger patients with elective laparoscopic CHE had CVS images significantly more frequently (p ≤ 0.04). The statistical examination with Pearson's χ²-test and the F‑test (ANOVA) showed a significant correlation between improving CVS marks and reduction of surgery time (p < 0.01) and the hospitalization time (p < 0.01). For senior physicians the quota of CVS images ranged from 71% to 92% and the average marks from 1.5 to 2.2. The marks for the CVS images were significantly better for female than male patients (1.8 vs. 2.1, p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

There was a relatively broad distribution of marks for CVS images. Injuries of the bile duct can be avoided with a high degree of certainty with marks 1‑2 for the CVS image. The CVS is not always adequately visualized in laparoscopic CHE.

Evaluation of the knowledge of the critical view of safety and recognition of the transoperative complexity during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Since the establishment of the Critical view of safety (CVS), different strategies have been created such as bailout procedures (SC, subtotal cholecystectomy), classifications for preoperative and intraoperative complexity (The Parkland grading scale, PGS) and objective evaluation of the CVS (doublet score, DS) to establish a "Culture of Safety in Cholecystectomy, COSIC"; to avoid complications.

METHODS

A multiple choice questionnaire was applied to residents and graduated surgeons from different Hospitals in Mexico during different national meetings; evaluating the knowledge of this different concepts (CVS, SC, PGS, DS), univariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of the knowledge with adverse events (AE) like the Bile duct injury.

RESULTS

A total of 744 questionnaires were evaluated; 284 (38.17%) women and 460 (61.83%) men; 436 (58.6%) were residents and 308 (41.4%) graduated surgeons. 708 (95.16%) reported knowing the CVS; however, only (51.98%, p ≤ 0.001) defined the concept correctly, while 136 (18.28%) reported knowing the DS, but only 44 (5.91%) defined it correctly. Regarding the PGS, 398 (53.49%) mentioned knowing it, but only 262 defined it correctly. The concept of SC 642 (86.29%) reported knowing it; however, only (56.7%, p ≤ 0.001) correctly defined the techniques, being the reconstituting technique the preferred one (42.37% vs 34.89%). In this survey, the correct knowledge of the CVS (OR 0.47, p < 0.001), the subtotal techniques (OR 0.71 p = 0.07), the DS (OR 0.48 p < 0.001) and of the PGS (OR 0.28, p < 0.001) decreased the risk of presenting BDI.

CONCLUSION

Despite the COSIC and the timing of publication of the CVS; the percentage of people who can correctly define basic safety concepts is low among residents and licensed surgeons. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the dissemination of these concepts to obtain safe LC and thus reduce the incidence of complications.

Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective investigation from both cognitive and executive aspects

Background

The achievement rate of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is much lower than expected. This original study aims to investigate and analyze factors associated with a low critical view of safety achievement.

Materials and Methods

We prospectively collected laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos performed from September 2, 2021, to September 19, 2021, in Sichuan Province, China. The artificial intelligence system, SurgSmart, analyzed videos under the necessary corrections undergone by expert surgeons. Also, we distributed questionnaires to surgeons and analyzed them along with surgical videos simultaneously.

Results

We collected 169 laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgical videos undergone by 124 surgeons, among which 105 participants gave valid answers to the questionnaire. Excluding those who conducted the bail-out process directly, the overall critical view of safety achievement rates for non-inflammatory and inflammatory groups were 18.18% (18/99) and 9.84% (6/61), respectively. Although 80.95% (85/105) of the surgeons understood the basic concept of the critical view of safety, only 4.76% (5/105) of the respondents commanded all three criteria in an error-free way. Multivariate logistic regression results showed that an unconventional surgical workflow (OR:12.372, P &lt; 0.001), a misunderstanding of the 2nd (OR: 8.917, P &lt; 0.05) and 3rd (OR:8.206, P &lt; 0.05) criterion of the critical view of safety, and the don't mistake “fundus-first technique” as one criterion of the critical view of safety (OR:0.123, P &lt; 0.01) were associated with lower and higher achievements of the critical view of safety, respectively.

Conclusions

The execution and cognition of the critical view of safety are deficient, especially the latter one. Thus, increasing the critical view of safety surgical awareness may effectively improve its achievement rate.

The Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: User Trends Among Residents and Consultants

BACKGROUND

The Critical View of Safety (CVS) aims at preventing bile duct injuries (BDIs) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC). This study investigated CVS utilization among surgeons.

METHODS

Photos from LCCs were scored for satisfactory CVS. Rates of satisfactory CVS, BDIs, and postoperative complications among residents and consultants were compared. A lecture on CVS was given halfway through the study.

RESULTS

The study comprised 1532 patients. Residents had higher rates of satisfactory CVS in elective LCCs compared with consultants (34.9% vs. 23.0%, P<0.001), but not in emergency LCCs (18.4% vs. 15.0%, P=0.252). No significant differences in BDIs or postoperative complications emerged between residents and consultants. After the lecture, elective LCCs were photographed more frequently (80.3% vs. 74.0%, P=0.032), but rates of satisfactory CVS, BDIs, and postoperative complications remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of CVS can be affected by a single lecture but affecting rates of satisfactory CVS may require stronger interventions.

[Modern principles of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy]

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has many advantages over open surgery. Nevertheless, incidence of intraoperative bile duct injury is consistently higher for laparoscopic technique. This review is devoted to modern principles of identifying the anatomical elements in hepatoduodenal ligament and rules for safe tissue dissection in this area. The last ones mainly consist in formation of «critical view of safety» before clipping and transection of tubular structures. The key for «critical view of safety» is mobilization of fatty and fibrous tissues of hepatocystic triangle starting from the lower third of the gallbladder.