Assessment of Delays in Emergency Surgical Care and Patient Postoperative Outcomes at a Referral Hospital in Northern Rwanda

Prioritising and mapping barriers to achieve equitable surgical care in South Africa: a multi-disciplinary stakeholder workshop

BACKGROUND

Surgical healthcare in South Africa is inequitable with a considerable lack of resources in the public health sector. Identifying barriers to care and creating research priorities to mitigate these barriers can contribute to strategic interventions to improve equitable access to quality surgical care.

OBJECTIVE

To use the Four Delays Framework to map barriers to surgical care and identify priorities to achieve equitable and timely access to quality surgical care in South Africa.

METHODS

A multi-disciplinary stakeholder workshop was held in Cape Town, South Africa in January 2020. A Four Delays Framework (delays in seeking care, reaching care, receiving care, and remaining in care) was used to identify barriers that occur at each delay and the top 10 priorities for intervention. Barriers were categorised into overarching themes and schematically mapped.

RESULTS

Thirty-four stakeholders including health service users, health service providers, and community members participated in this exercise. In total, 34 barriers were identified with 73 connections to various delays. Specifically, 14 barriers were related to delays in seeking care, 11 were related to delays in reaching care, 20 were related to delays in receiving care, and 28 were related to delays in remaining in care. The highest priority barriers across the delays were Lack of service provider's knowledge, training and experience, and Limited surgical outreach. The barrier Lack of decentralised services was related to all four delays. Barriers were interconnected and potentially reinforcing.

CONCLUSIONS

This workshop is the first of its kind to generate evidence on the delays to surgical care in South Africa. Mapping crucial interconnected, potentially reinforcing barriers, and priority interventions demonstrated how a multifaceted approach may be required to address delays to access. Further research focused on the identified priorities will contribute to efforts to promote equitable access to quality surgical care in South Africa.

Are Surgeons Enough? The Relationship between Increasing Surgical Demand and Access to Surgery in a Resource-Limited Environment

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between increasing surgical demand and access to operative intervention remains unclear in delivering general surgical care in resource-limited settings, where demand often exceeds capacity. We sought to characterize the association between general surgery patient volume and operative intervention at a tertiary hospital in Malawi, which has an adequate surgical workforce.

METHODS

We analyzed patients admitted to Kamuzu Central Hospital Lilongwe, Malawi, with a general surgery complaint from 2018-2020. We examined the relationship between the census at the time of admission, the use of operative intervention, and the time to operative intervention. The patient census was defined as low (≤30 patients), medium (31-49 patients), and high (≥50 patients), based on historical patterns.

RESULTS

2,701 patients were included. The mean daily census was 46 patients (SD 10). For the medium and high census, the adjusted risk ratio of undergoing surgery was 0.86 (95% CI 0.78, 0.95) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.73, 0.90), respectively, adjusted for admission diagnosis. For patients requiring urgent abdominal exploration, at a census of 25, the adjusted mean time to operation was 0.8 days (95% CI 0.1, 1.5) compared to 2.8 days (95% CI 2.1, 3.5) at a census of 65 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an adequate surgical workforce, an increasing mean daily census significantly reduced the use of operative intervention and increased time to operation for patients who needed urgent abdominal exploration. Additional improvements in the surgical ecosystem beyond surgeons are necessary to improve surgical access.