Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers in 5-Year Survival After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Predominantly Male Cohort: Implications for Practice

A systematic review of the role of systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Activation of the systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is associated with inferior outcomes across a spectrum of disease. Routinely available measures of the SIR (neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet:lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammatory grade (SIG)) have been shown to provide prognostic value in patients undergoing surgical intervention. The present study aimed to review the literature describing the prognostic association of NLR, PLR, SII and SIG in patients undergoing intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

This PRISMA guidelines were followed. The MEDLINE database was interrogated for relevant studies investigating the effect of peri-operative systemic inflammation-based prognostic systems on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing OSR and EVAR for AAA. Inter-study heterogeneity precluded meaningful meta-analysis; qualitative analysis was instead performed.

RESULTS

There were 9 studies included in the final review reporting outcomes on a total of 4571 patients; 1256 (27 %) patients underwent OSR, and 3315 (73 %) patients underwent EVAR. 4356 (95 %) patients underwent a procedure for unruptured AAA, 215 (5 %) patients underwent an emergency procedure for ruptured AAA0.5 studies reported early (inpatient or 30-day) mortality; 2 of these found that elevated NLR predicted inferior survival, however PLR did not provide prognostic value. 6 studies reported long-term mortality; elevated NLR (5 studies), PLR (1 study), and SIG (1 study) predicted inferior survival.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that activation of the SIR is associated with inferior prognosis in patients undergoing intervention for AAA, however the evidence is limited by heterogenous methodology and lack of consensus regarding optimal cutoff.

PROSPERO DATABASE REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022363765.

The Preoperative Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio Predicts Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) as a potential surrogate biomarker predictive of overall mortality in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Data on patients with AAA treated by EVAR between March 2012 and December 2016 were obtained from a prospectively maintained EVAR database at Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The LMR was calculated by dividing the absolute lymphocyte count by the absolute monocyte count.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six patients were included in this study after selection based on the exclusion criteria. The subjects consisted of 148 males and 28 females with a mean age of 78.5 years (range, 51-89 years). The median follow-up period was 4.98 years (range, .03-9.28). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined the optimal cut-off value of the preoperative LMR for predicting overall mortality with 3.21 (area under the curve, .71; 95% confidence interval [CI], .62-.79; sensitivity, 57.4%; specificity, 77.0%; P < .001). On univariable and multivariable analyses, octogenarian (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95%CI, 1.10-3.22; P = .020), poor nutritional status (HR, 2.95; 95%CI, 1.73-5.03; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.79; 95%CI, 1.06-3.03; P = .031), active cancer (HR, 2.60; 95%CI, 1.53-4.41; P < .001), and low preoperative LMR (HR, 2.56; 95%CI, 1.53-4.30; P < .001) were identified as independent predictors for overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that a low preoperative LMR (<3.21) is an independent predictor of overall mortality after EVAR for AAA. The LMR may help in decision-making regarding the prediction of poor prognosis after EVAR.

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio associated with severe post-stenotic aortic dilation in a case-control study

Background

Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) represents a serious health threat to elderly patients. Post-stenotic aortic dilation, a common feature in CAVS patients, might progress into aneurysm and even dissection, potential consequences of CAVS, and predicts a poor prognosis. This study sought to investigate the association of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), an inflammatory biomarker, with severe post-stenotic aortic dilation in a case–control study in Chinese population.

Materials and methods

208 consecutive patients with CAVS were recruited retrospectively in a case–control study in Chinese population, from July 1, 2015 to June 31, 2018. LMR was statistically analyzed using the ROC curve and binary logistic regression analyses for its prognostic value in severe post-stenotic aortic dilation.

Results

LMR was significantly reduced in patients with severe post-stenotic aortic dilation (2.72 vs. 3.53, p = 0.002 < 0.05) compared to patients without severe post-stenotic aortic dilation. There was an inverse correlation observed between the maximal diameter of ascending aorta and LMR in the overall patients (r = − 0.217, p = 0.002 < 0.05). For post-stenotic aortic dilation, the prevalence of high-LMR group was statistically lower than that of low-LMR group (19.7% vs. 43.9%, p < 0.001). The maximal diameter of ascending aorta was significantly reduced in the high-LMR group (4.35 vs. 4.76, p = 0.003 < 0.05) compared to low-LMR group. Additionally, LMR was identified in the multivariate analysis independently associated with severe post-stenotic aortic dilation (AUC 0.743, 95% CI: [0.573–0.964], p = 0.025).

Conclusions

This study provided the evidence of an inverse correlation between severe post-stenotic aortic dilation and LMR. LMR is potentially independently associated with severe post-stenotic aortic dilation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02636-3.

Association of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio to overall mortality after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive ability of neutrophilia, lymphocytopenia, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for overall mortality after EVAR for AAA.

METHODS

Data on patients with AAA treated by EVAR between March 2012 and December 2016 were obtained from a prospectively maintained EVAR database at Tokyo Medical University Hospital. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. A cut-off value of total WBC count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and NLR was determined according to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard analyses to account for the time at risk.

RESULTS

178 patients were included in this study after selection based on the exclusion criteria. The subjects consisted of 150 men and 28 women with a mean age of 77.5 years (range, 51-89 years). A ROC curve analysis determined the optimal cut-off values of preoperative total WBC, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and NLR for predicting overall mortality with 7,050 /μL, 4,012 /μL, 1,312 /μL, and 3.19, respectively. On univariate analysis and multivariate analyses, octogenarian, obesity, COPD, active cancer, and lymphocytopenia or NLR were detected as independent predictors for overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific leukocyte populations, such as lymphocyte count and NLR, are useful biomarkers to predict overall mortality in patients undergoing EVAR for AAA, suggesting that WBC count and its subsets, which are easy to perform a test, may be used to stratify patients at risk for poor prognosis following EVAR.

Biomarkers in EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications

Circulating biomarkers have been recently investigated among patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Considering the plethora of small descriptive studies reporting potential associations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes, this review aims to summarize the current literature considering both the treated disease (post EVAR) and the untreated disease (AAA before EVAR). All studies describing outcomes of tissue biomarkers in patients undergoing EVAR and in patients with AAA were included, and references were checked for additional sources. In the EVAR scenario, circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a marker of inflammatory reaction which might predict postoperative morbidity; cystatin C is a promising early marker of post-procedural acute kidney injury; plasma matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) concentration after 3 months from EVAR might help in detecting post-procedural endoleak. This review also summarizes the current gaps in knowledge and future direction of this field of research. Among markers used in patients with AAA, galectin and granzyme appear to be promising and should be carefully investigated even in the EVAR setting. Larger prospective trials are required to establish and evaluate prognostic models with highest values with these markers.

Mediators of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in the relationship between ondansetron pre-treatment and the mortality of ICU patients on mechanical ventilation: causal mediation analysis from the MIMIC-IV database

AIMS

The mortality of critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) is high and few strategies are available. We explored the relationship between ondansetron pre-treatment, the neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet:lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mortality of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

We developed a retrospective cohort study that involved patients undergoing MV in the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Causal mediation analysis was conducted to assess the relationship of ondansetron use and mortality and explore the potential causal pathway mediated by the NLR or PLR. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 17,927 eligible patients was obtained (5665 had taken ondansetron before MV initiation and 12,262 patients had not). The OR for 28-day mortality for ondansetron use uncorrelated with the mediator (NLR, PLR) was 0.72 (95%CI=0.64-0.81, P <0.001). Ondansetron was also associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality after controlling for the mediator of NLR (OR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.97-0.99, P < 0.01). For the indirect effect, the NLR could explain 13.47% (95%CI = 8.59-20.54%, P < 0.01) of the impact of ondansetron use on 28-day mortality. The proportion mediated increased to 21.50% (95%CI = 12.36-47.44%, P < 0.01) for 90-day mortality. Adjusted mediation analysis revealed no suggestion of a causal mediation pathway for this effect by the PLR (P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

NLR may play substantial roles in the relationship between ondansetron pre-treatment before initiation of mechanical ventilation and the reduction of death risk in ventilated patients.