Incidence and Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism Following Hepatectomy for Colorectal Metastases: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Risk factors of venous thromboembolism for liver tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant complication in liver tumors patients, and understanding the associated risk factors is essential for effective risk assessment, prevention, and management strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify key risk factors and their clinical implications for VTE in liver tumors patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were selected, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and synthesized for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies involving 73,652 liver tumors patients and 2049 VTE cases were included. The analysis identified several significant risk factors for VTE in liver tumors patients. Age (≥65 years), male gender, high BMI, diabetes, hepatitis B and C infections, elevated D-dimer and AST levels, reduced albumin levels, and MELD score were all associated with increased VTE risk.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed several key risk factors for VTE in liver tumors patients, these findings highlight the importance of risk assessment, prevention, and management strategies in this high-risk population. Further research with larger sample sizes and standardized methods is needed to strengthen the existing evidence and validate these findings.

Venous thromboembolism and bleeding after hepatectomy: role and impact of risk adjusted prophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in 2-6% of post-hepatectomy patients and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The use of VTE risk assessment models in hepatectomy cases remains unclear. Our study aimed to determine the use and impact of Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis following hepatectomy. Hepatectomy cases performed during 2016-2021 were included. Caprini score and VTE prophylaxis were determined retroactively, and VTE prophylaxis was categorized as appropriate or inappropriate. The primary outcome was the receipt of appropriate prophylaxis, and secondary outcomes were postoperative VTE and bleeding. Statistical analyses included Fisher Exact test, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson Chi-Square test, and multivariate regression models. R Statistical software was used for analysis. A p-value < 0.05 or 95% Confidence Interval (CI) excluding 1 was considered significant. A total of 1955 hepatectomy cases were analyzed. Patient demographics were similar between study cohorts. Inpatient, 30- and 90-day VTE rates were 1.28%, 0.56%, and 1.24%, respectively. By Caprini guidelines, 59% and 4.3% received appropriate in-hospital and discharged VTE prophylaxis, respectively. Inpatient VTE (4.5-fold) and mortality (9.5-fold) were lower in patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis. All discharged VTE and mortality occurred in patients not receiving appropriate prophylaxis. Inpatient, 30- and 90-day bleeding rates were 8.4%, 0.62%, and 0.68%, respectively. Appropriate prophylaxis did not increase postoperative bleeding. Increasing Caprini score inversely correlated with receiving appropriate prophylaxis (OR 0.38, CI 0.31-0.46) at discharge, and appropriate prophylaxis did not correlate with bleeding risk (OR 0.79, CI 0.57-1.12). Caprini guideline indicated prophylaxis resulted in reduced VTE complications without increasing bleeding risk.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after open hepatectomy compared to minimally invasive liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Even though the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) after liver resection is well recognized, the association between surgical approach and VTE risk is unknown. This study aims to compare VTE rates following open liver resection (OLR) and minimally invasive liver resection (MILR).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web Of Sciences and EMBASE databases were interrogated to identify eligible studies published between February 2016 and August 2022. Studies were considered suitable if they reported a comparison between OLR and MILR (including laparoscopic liver resection [LLR] or robotic liver resection [RLR]).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 11 356 patients met the inclusion criteria. 5622 patients underwent OLR and 5734 patients underwent MILR. The VTE rate was higher among patients who underwent OLR compared to MILR (2.8% vs 1.4%, OR (95% CI) = 1.84, p=<00001). Similarly, the subgroup analysis showed a higher rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (1.4% vs 0.7%, OR (95% CI) = 1.98, p = 0.02) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (1.3% vs 0.7%, OR (95% CI) = 1.88, p = 0.002) in patients who underwent OLR compared to MILR.

DISCUSSION

Patients who undergo open hepatectomy have a higher incidence of postoperative VTE when compared to those undergoing minimally invasive liver resection. This finding was consistent for both DVT and PE.

The Efficacy of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Prognosis Nutritional Index for the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism in Gastrointestinal Cancers

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze the association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and inflammatory markers like systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and prognosis nutritional index (PNI), and to evaluate their efficacy for the diagnosis of VTE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

Patients and Methods

A total of 1326 patients with the initial diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (AHMU) were enrolled in the training cohort. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to pinpoint independent predictors of VTE, which were eventually visualized as the nomogram models. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to screen the best model. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to evaluate the models’ predictive performance in the training queue and another external sample of 250 patients at the Second Affiliated Hospital of AHMU.

Results

A total of 476 patients were complicated with VTE in the training cohort. Multifactorial analysis of clinical characteristics and inflammatory markers showed that PNI, SII, age, tumor location, and therapy were independent risk factors of VTE, visualized as model A. Another model B was constructed by adding coagulation markers to the previous analysis. Model B was the best prediction model with the minimum AIC value, followed by model A with an AUC of 0.806 (95% CI 0.782~0.830) which was similar to model B’s 0.832 (95% CI 0.810~0.855) but significantly higher than the currently widely used Khorana score’s 0.592 (95% CI 0.562~0.621) and the CATS score’s 0.682 (95% CI 0.653~0.712). The external verification yielded similar findings, with the AUC being 0.792 (95% CI 0.734~0.851), 0.834 (95% CI 0.778~0.890), 0.655 (95% CI 0.582~0.729), and 0.774 (95% CI 0.699~0.849) respectively. The DCA curves demonstrated that new models had excellent usefulness in screening patients with a high VTE risk.

Conclusion

The SII and PNI were simple and viable inflammatory markers associated with VTE, and the nomogram based on them and clinical features had a meaningful clinical utility for VTE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.