Stenting of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract: Current Status

The use of self-expanding metallic stents in the management of benign colonic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients presenting with large bowel obstruction (LBO) frequently undergo emergency surgery that is associated with significant morbidity. In malignant LBO, endoscopic approaches with placement is a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS), have been proposed to prevent emergency surgery and act as a bridge to an elective procedure-with the intention of avoiding a stoma and reducing morbidity. This systematic review aims to assess the quality and outcomes of data available on the use of SEMS in benign causes of colonic obstruction.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the protocol was registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42021239363). PUBMED, MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, APA and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies were assessed for quality utilising the MINORS criteria. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included for analysis. 300 patients were included with an average age of 68, and a male predominance of 57%. The quality of the papers included were at risk of bias. The pooled rate of technical success of procedure was 94.4% (95% CI 90.5-96.8%) The pooled rate of clinical success was 77.6% (95% CI: 66.6-85.7%). Adverse effects were low, with perforation 8.8% (4.5-16.6%), recurrence 26.5% (17.2-38.5%) and stent migration 22.5% (14.1-33.8%).

DISCUSSION

This systematic review demonstrated that SEMS for benign colonic obstruction can be a safe and successful procedure. The utilisation of SEMS in malignant disease as a bridge to surgery has been well documented. Whilst the limitations of the data interpreted are appreciated, we postulate that SEMS could be utilised to decompress patients acutely and allow pre-operative optimisation, leading to a more elective surgery with less subsequent morbidity.

Current trends and perspectives in interventional radiology for gastrointestinal cancers

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers often require a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, endoscopists, oncologists, and interventional radiologists to diagnose and treat primitive cancers, metastases, and related complications. In this context, interventional radiology (IR) represents a useful minimally-invasive tool allowing to reach lesions that are not easily approachable with other techniques. In the last years, through the development of new devices, IR has become increasingly relevant in the context of a more comprehensive management of the oncologic patient. Arterial embolization, ablative techniques, and gene therapy represent useful and innovative IR tools in GI cancer treatment. Moreover, IR can be useful for the management of GI cancer-related complications, such as bleeding, abscesses, GI obstructions, and neurological pain. The aim of this study is to show the principal IR techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of GI cancers and related complications, as well as to describe the future perspectives of IR in this oncologic field.

Efficacy and tolerability of metallic stent in patients with malignant prostatic obstruction secondary to prostatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a self-expandable covered metallic stent in patients with malignant prostatic obstruction secondary to prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

We reviewed 22 cases of insertion of self-expandable covered metallic stents with barbs. Data were collected about PC status. Uroflowmetry variables, residual urine volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), and duration from stent insertion to removal were surveyed. These clinical parameters were compared before and after stent insertion.

RESULTS

The patients with PC showed a mean age of 75.5 ± 6.5 years and mean 5.1 ± 1.9 Charlson comorbidity index. The average flow rate (2.4 ± 1.9 vs 5.9 ± 2.4 mL/s, P = .005), peak flow rate (6.9 ± 6.2 vs 14.1 ± 5.5 mL/s, P = .003), flow time (54.6 ± 29.1 vs 23.6 ± 13.7 s, P = .002), residual urine volume (178.7 ± 195.5 vs 7.0 ± 7.1 mL, P = .004), IPSS (26.2 ± 8.1 vs 8.0 ± 6.5 points, P = .001), and QOL (4.7 ± 1.3 vs 2.4 ± 2.1 points, P = .030) improved between before and after stent insertion, respectively. Pain was the most common complication, but 60% of the patients were managed without any intervention. There were hematuria, urinary retention, urinary frequency, obstruction, and urinary incontinence. However, there was no urinary tract infection due to the stent. The median time to stent removal was 5.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The stent was maintained for about 6 months with improved objective and subjective outcomes. The patients with PC, who had a poor comorbidity index and advanced PC status showed a tolerable maintenance period. Self-expandable covered metallic stents can be used for PC patients with a short life expectancy and unsuitability for general anesthesia.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with esophageal stent in the treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis: A single-center prospective study

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with esophageal stent in treating malignant esophageal stenosis. Seventy patients with malignant esophageal obstruction treated in Department of Gastroenterology from April 2013 to April 2015 in China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University were enrolled. They were randomly assigned into the treatment group (radiofrequency ablation combined with esophageal stent) and control group (esophageal stent). To observe the degree of dysphagia, esophageal stenosis diameter, readmission time, adverse events and complications. There was no significant differences in dysphagia and esophageal diameter between the treatment group and the control group within 1–3 months after operation (P>0.05), and the degree of dysphagia and esophageal diameter in the treatment group at postoperative 6 months were better than those in the control group (P=0.018 and 0.038, respectively). The readmission time of the treatment group was also better than that of the control group (P=0.021). The adverse events and complications included hemorrhage, perforation and esophageal stent displacement. No significant differences in adverse events and complications between the treatment group and the control group were observed. All patients were successfully treated during hospitalization. Effect of radiofrequency ablation combined with esophageal stent implantation was better than esophageal stent implantation in the treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis, but it had no effect on the survival time.

Percutaneous Antegrade Colonic Stent Insertion Using a Proximal Trans-peritoneal Colopexy Technique

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally, colonic stents are inserted with a retrograde trans-anal approach-however, stenting of right-sided or proximal transverse colon lesions may pose a challenge due to tortuosity or long distances. We report three successful cases of percutaneous antegrade colonic stenting in patients using a proximal trans-peritoneal colopexy technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three patients underwent a proximal trans-peritoneal colopexy technique for antegrade colonic stent placement. The patients included three males, ages 89, 92 and 55, who were unsuitable for conventional methods. All patients had a colopexy with the aid of three gastropexy sutures performed under CT or fluoroscopic guidance and subsequent colonic access, followed by the crossing lesion and subsequent deployment of an uncovered colonic stent. A 10-Fr pigtail catheter was exchanged for the sheath, capped and left in place along with the colopexy suture anchors.

RESULTS

Percutaneous antegrade colonic stent placement was technically successful in all patients with no complications. Follow-up at 10 days, a tubogram confirmed stent patency. The pigtail drain and suture anchors were subsequently removed.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade colonic stenting with the use of a three point colopexy is a straightforward well-tolerated procedure and is a useful technique in a cohort of patients in whom conventional stenting has failed/is unsuitable. Additionally, we believe we have reported the first two cases involving transverse colon access for stenting.

Gastrointestinal stenting: Current status and imaging features

The use of stents in the gastrointestinal tract has been subjected to major changes. Initially, the use of stents was restricted to malignant strictures in patients with metastatic disease. But thanks to reduction of the morbidity and mortality rates, they are now used with curative intention and in patients with benign diseases after careful selection. However, for patients presenting with colon obstruction due to an advanced colon carcinoma, the mortality and morbidity are still high. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of indications, techniques and further developments of the stents in the gastrointestinal tract and to highlight the predominant role of multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) in the detection of potential complications.

Stenting for Emergency Colorectal Obstruction: An Analysis of 204 Patients in Relation to Predictors of Failure and Complications

Background and Aims:

Self-expanding metallic stents are increasingly used in the management of malignant and benign colorectal obstructions. We aimed to identify relevant predictive factors for stent failure and stent-related complications.

Material and Methods:

We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of 204 consecutive patients who underwent emergency colorectal stenting procedures because of symptomatic bowel obstructions from 1996 to 2011 at the Sisters of Charity Hospital Linz, Austria.

Results:

A total of 204 patients (median age 74 years) with 36 (17.7%) benign and 168 (82.3%) malignant obstructions were included in the study. Technical success was achieved in 92.5% and clinical success in 86.8% of the cases. Major complications occurred in 2.9% and minor ones in 19.6%. Overall mortality during a median follow-up period of 4.3 years was 73% (149 patients). Relevant predictors of increased risk of complications were extracolonic obstruction (p = 0.001), complete obstruction (p = 0.066), and inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.05). Stent localization at the splenic flexure, a stenosis of >8 cm in length, and the need for endoscopic guidance were associated with higher rates of technical and/or clinical stenting failure.

Conclusion:

Colorectal stenting is less invasive than other means of emergency treatment for large bowel obstruction; it is generally safe and effective in different types of colorectal obstruction. However, relevant rates of failure and complications were recorded and predictors could be determined.

Covered self-expandable metal stents are more associated with complications in the management of malignant colorectal obstruction

BACKGROUND

The use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction is increasing. However, results of risk factors for its complications are inconsistent. This study aimed to examine the clinical effectiveness of the procedure as well as the complications and risk factors associated with the complications.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with malignant colorectal obstruction who underwent endoscopic placement of covered or uncovered SEMS were reviewed retrospectively. The procedure was performed by two endoscopists with experience in pancreatobiliary endoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included (102 men; mean age, 70 ± 12.5 years). The procedure was performed for palliative management in 83 patients and performed as a bridge to surgery in 69 patients. There were 111 uncovered stents and 41 covered stents. The technical success rate was 100% and the clinical success rate 94.1%. Overall complications were observed in 49 patients (32.2%) during the follow-up period (median, 98 days; interquartile range, 19-302 days). Obstruction (17.1%), migration (7.9%), perforation (5.2%), bleeding (1.3%), and tenesmus (0.7%) were the causes of the complications. Stage IV disease, carcinomatosis peritonei, complete obstruction of the colon, palliative intention, and covered stents increased the complications based on the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that complete obstruction of the colon and covered stents were significantly independent risk factors for complications. In the palliative group, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly shorter median duration to the onset of complications in the covered stent group than in the uncovered stent group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SEMS in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction is effective both as palliative therapy and as a bridge to surgery, one-third of patients experienced complications. Severity of obstruction and stent type can influence outcomes.

A novel over-the-scope deployment method for enteral stent placement

BACKGROUND

Over the last two decades, self-expanding enteral stents have gained popularity and shown therapeutic potential for strictures, obstructions, fistulae, and perforations of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Currently available stent delivery systems make deployment in many locations in the GI tract difficult due to the inability to traverse curves or impossible due to the size requirements of the deployment systems.

METHODS

A 67-year-old male presented to our hospital with severe gallstone pancreatitis, requiring a prolonged intensive care unit course. Two days after discharge to a rehabilitation facility he developed acute abdominal pain and pneumoperitoneum. Operative exploration failed to identify a perforation. Subsequently, a left-upper-quadrant abscess developed that was drained percutaneously, yielding coliform bacteria. The drain produced several hundred milliliters of stool a day. A barium enema demonstrated a perforation in the descending colon from an old colo-colic anastomosis site. We proposed a novel over-the-scope (OTS) stent deployment method. Utilizing a heat-activated polymer sheath, the stent was affixed to the endoscope. A modified speed-banding attachment was created to permit release of the polymer sheath once endoscopic and fluoroscopic confirmation of the correct position was obtained.

RESULTS

Utilizing this method of OTS stent deployment, a fully covered 23 × 155 mm self-expanding metal stent (WallFlex, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was placed in the colon. Endoscopic and fluoroscopic evaluation following stent placement confirmed stent coverage of the perforation with no ongoing evidence of leak. The patient was discharged to his home state 2 weeks after stent placement in stable condition.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a novel method of OTS stent placement that permits deployment of a variety of enteral stents on any available endoscope. This method permits placement of fully covered stents in locations in the GI tract not reachable with currently available delivery systems.

Colorectal stenting as a bridge to surgery reduces morbidity and mortality in left-sided malignant obstruction: a predictive risk score-based comparative study

BACKGROUND

The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity model, and its Portsmouth and colorectal modifications are used to predict postoperative mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery.

AIMS

To compare stent placement as a bridge to surgery vs. emergency surgical resection in patients with acute left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction using P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM.

METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2009, the physiological and operative scores, morbidity and mortality predicted by the P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores were collected in all consecutive patients with LCCO who underwent surgical resection directly (Group A) or after stent placement (Group B).

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were enrolled (Group A-41 and Group B-45). The observed 30-day mortality rate was 9.8% (4/41) in Group A and 2.4% (1/45) in Group B. The 30-day morbidity rate was 61% (25/41) in Group A and 29% (13/45) in Group B. The mean values of P-POSSUM morbidity (A=70.5% vs. B=34.3%; p=0.001), P-POSSUM mortality (A=13.6% vs. B=2.4%; p=0.001) and CR-POSSUM mortality (A=15.1% vs. B=4.9%; p=0.001) were significantly lower in the Group B patients than in the Group A patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bridge to surgery strategy reduces the surgical risks in LCCO, and P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores represent a good tool for comparing the two strategies.

Gemcitabine-releasing polymeric films for covered self-expandable metallic stent in treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

Non-vascular drug-eluting stents have been studied for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and cancer-related stenosis. In this study, we designed and evaluated a gemcitabine (GEM)-eluting covered nonvascular stent. Polyurethane (PU)/polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) film was selected for the drug loading and eluting membrane. The membrane was fabricated by dip-coating on a Teflon bar (∅; 10mm), air-dried, peeled off and applied to a self-expanding Nitinol stent. Various amounts of poloxamer 407 (PL, Lutrol F127, BASF) (8%, 10%, or 12% of PU by weight) were added to control the release of GEM from membranes. The membrane containing 12% PL (GEM-PU-PL12%) showed the most favourable release properties; 70% of the loaded GEM released within 35 days, including the 35% released during the initial burst. The biological activities of GEM-PU-PL12% were evaluated using human cholangiocarcinoma cells (SK-ChA-1). GEM-PU-PL12% most efficiently inhibited the proliferation of cholangiocarcinoma cells and most highly induced pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-12) and p38 MAPKs in the cells. Subtumoural insertion of the GEM-PU-PL12% membrane more efficiently inhibited the growth of CT-26 colon cancer than other membranes. In this study, the GEM-eluting metal stents covered with PU-PL12% showed considerable feasibility for the treatment of malignant gastrointestinal cancer as well as cancer-related stenosis.

Metallic stent placement in the palliative treatment of malignant colonic obstructions: primary colonic versus extracolonic malignancies

PURPOSE

To compare retrospectively clinical outcomes in patients who underwent metallic stent placement for colonic obstruction caused by colonic or extracolonic malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Palliative stent placement was performed for inoperable malignant colonic obstruction in 108 patients, including 58 for primary colorectal cancer and 50 for extracolonic malignancies including gastric (n = 31), pancreatic (n = 8), ovarian (n = 4), bladder (n = 2), bile duct (n = 1), gallbladder (n = 1), breast (n = 1), esophageal (n = 1), and renal (n = 1) cancers.

RESULTS

Technical (84% vs 94%, P = .137) and clinical (98% vs 96%, P = .533) success rates of stent placement were similar in patients with primary colorectal cancer and patients with extracolonic malignancies. Rates of perforation, stent migration, tumor overgrowth, bleeding, and pain did not differ significantly between groups of patients with primary colorectal cancer and extracolonic malignancies. The median symptom-free survival periods were 4 months in patients with primary colorectal cancer and 3 months in patients with extracolonic malignancies (P = .072).

CONCLUSIONS

Metallic stent placement was clinically effective in the palliative treatment of colonic obstructions in patients with primary colorectal cancer and patients with extracolonic malignancies.